05:08:579 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25) - the movement and direction is this stream makes no sense. In the two previous death-streams you represent the music with short and small streams with minimal movement (as the song called for it), yet here despite the vocals being lower-pitched then the two previous death-streams you represented the music with higher-spacing and more intense movement. I would just represent this part of the music with a death-stream of similar movement and spacing to 05:06:179 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13) - or 05:07:379 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13) -
it fits much better pookies :3

05:04:979 (2) - up the spacing and movement? I understand this is 200BPM 1/6 ... yet it still feels quite easy to hit that finisher note

04:02:579 (1,2) - is represented with a kickslider leading to a circle whilst 04:03:779 (1,2,3) - is represented with a 3-note burst, yet the music is very similar in both parts of the song. I believe you should just stick to a 3-note burst to represent this part of the music.

03:54:779 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - as there are very distinct 1/2 sounds here, I believe it's better fit to represent this section with either kicksliders OR more harsh and angular spacing between each 1/2 note. in simpler terms either (like I said use kicksliders) or put 2 1/4 circles close together then a large space in between and so forth and so on. You could also use 4 1/4 circles close together, then high-spacing or snappy movement (or both) to represent the other 4 1/4 circles.

03:39:629 (7,8,9,10,11,12,13,1,2,3,4,5,6) - you represented the vocals with kicksliders here YET here 03:40:979 (6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,1,2,3,4,5,6) - it seems like you gave up LOWKEY. As tedious as it is to remap this section, the inconsistencies between musical representation is problematic. I would (as you previously did) represent all the changes in vocals with kicksliders (of course using streams for long-lasting vocals)

03:11:579 (3) - i feel as if a more rigid and abstract slider similar to 03:10:829 (1) - would fit better. the distinction and difference in slider design feels off for such similar sounding parts of the music

02:49:779 (1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2) - for such a musically distinctive and intense part of the song, the representation of objects you used feels lackluster in intensity. I would up the spacing between the 1-2 combo sliders and up the difference in slider speed between the two objects

02:38:679 (1) - maybe move the grey anchors of this slider up a decent amount higher then the previous slider here 02:38:379 (3) - ... creates more distinction between the synth and more snappy movement. overall i like the way you represented the synth though :33

00:40:979 (1,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,1,2,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,1,2,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,1) - you have some inconsistencies when differentiating between whether to use kicksliders or circles to represent the vocals/drums in this lil deathstream section. i would do something like this: (( https://pasteboard.co/yex35yZXwB2x.png )) for 00:40:979 (1,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,1,2) - ... there are two distinct vocals that sound like he is moaning ... on the part of the song he is moaning more higher pitched, use a kickslider ... on the part where he is moaning deeper, use a stream. i understand it makes the map substantially harder, but as far as music representation, it fits much better.