Sorry gw jadi lama ...
rip magang[General]
itu metadata dah konfirmasi lagi?
jgn lupa apus diff HS nya klo udh dicek smuanya sblm dibub
[5K and 4K EZ]
00:08:159 - i think instead of capturing 1/1 thingy, you can make use 1/2 LN instead started at 00:07:997 - (it has 2 instrument, the 1/2 long synth and vocal) , and i don't really think beginner will be surprised with transition towards those instrument, because you also do 1/2 transition at 01:24:375 - too..
00:13:510 - in 5K EZ i suggest to have the similar pattern concept as 01:28:754 - here, don't really see the reason why 1 pattern is stair and the other is not.
00:25:024 - until 00:33:456 - actually i really expect you to map this part as 1/1 trill like 1-4-1-4 or something like that.. (it's not hard even for beginner, trust me
), i get that this is really an easy diff for beginner player, but if i'm at their side, i also want to experience different kind of pattern that not just focused on 1/1 spreaded pattern.. it's already too many even for easy diff (reff beginning, part after this one, kiai 1 kiai 2, closing part and also this one)
00:51:618 - this one in 5K EZ is one note, but in 4K EZ it's double note?
01:19:510 - i notice both in keymodes version , the outro section has almost all the notes going into the left direction (yeah, like 95% all the notes going into the left direction) , is it intentional you made it like that? i just do not really see the merit of having particular pattern design having specific direction until the end from this point when in the beginning reff you mixed the pattern direction movement here.. my suggestion is for 01:24:700 - to have the notes going into the right direction to counterbalance that, it also acts as its own pattern specification section itself that acts as final touch towards the end.
[5K NM]
00:03:943 - is it intentional making this 2 LN while in 4K NM it's full stream? it's pretty awkward if your intention is for variation when both keymodes seem want to maintain how the structure being made.. and stream for drum seems more intuitive too imo..
00:07:835 (7835|0,8159|2) - switch column them? i mean.. you make 4-2-4-2 trill at 00:08:645 - , and you didn't do the same at 00:07:997 - even though the song literally reflects it to give pseudo-mirror is kinda ... urgh.. (but now it seems you intentionally do it to avoid making it too hard? i don't think so tbh..)
00:13:672 (13672|1,13997|0) - i'm outright say that switch column them gives much better flow overall with the note at col 2 doesn't being on the same column as 00:13:186 - , and you will get stair towards the ln at 00:14:159 - and 00:14:645 - which literally double benefit tbh.. the structure you want to do doesn't change too tbh..
00:19:510 (19510|4) - just wondering what is this LN for.. if it's for burst sound , then you should have one at 00:16:429 - ,etc..
00:24:375 (24375|2,25348|3) - i truly believe you will got much splendid results if you make 4-3 here.. the space button have more lenient space between each button and you also get 5-3-1 pattern at 00:25:024 - which is pseudoing mirror with 00:26:321 - ..
00:40:591 - since this is a change of pace of music here (you can also proof that indication from the tick white line), i suppose you can give pattern rotation by switch column between 00:40:591 (40591|2,40916|0) - instead of doing linear stair.
00:42:051 (42051|4,42213|1) - try col 2 and col 5? double at left hand seems to defeat the purpose of neutralize the left hand biases pattern at 00:35:402 -
01:20:970 (80970|2,81294|2) - I wonder if there's a chance that this can get moved to col 4?
DD well, col 4 seem and felt empty here..
01:27:943 (87943|3) - this note is kinda hard actually when combined with LN here.. i believe you can moved to col 1 or have a bit rearrange to avoid it..
[4K NM]
00:07:024 (7024|2) - I suggest to move this to col 2 to neutralizes the biases you have at 00:07:510 (7510|2,7672|3,7997|3,8159|2) -
00:19:348 (19348|2,19510|0,19672|1) - the pattern around here will be much neater if you try make it 1-3-1 here..
00:52:429 - i expect the double to have different pattern compared with 00:51:618 - , something like mixed of 1-3 /2-4 or 1-4 / 2-3 of double will work here..
00:54:213 (54213|2,54375|1) - you can switch column here perhaps? i find the full stair until 00:55:024 - kinda boring when you can utilize it in much more different ways.. furthermore the kiai part is when it's get expected for other more kind of pattern to showed up..
01:04:591 - this is even more linear and not many different compared with before orz... my suggestion is to switch column between 01:04:591 (64591|2,64754|3) - and also switch column the one at 01:05:564 (65564|0,65727|1) - .. you got symmetrical pattern that still provide quite distinct differences..
01:23:727 (83727|2,83889|1,84051|3) - make this 2-4-3? i find the pattern quite bit similar with 01:23:078 - is kinda awkward when the instrument here is quite hectic that it can warrants much more intristic choices of pattern instead of repeating it..
[5K and 4K HD]
00:14:483 - 00:14:564 - in 5K HD, i wonder if the drum stream sound are good enough to warrants double .. because it feels like it's not loud for it..
00:25:024 - now now... since in MX diff you going to such trouble of making wall LN, i wonder why not make 1/2 LN sequence for this part every piano sound? people that play this will be taken by a huge surprise when it's 2-1-2-1 pattern in HD then suddenly in 4K and 5K MX it's a huge sea wall LN that literally thrown players out (yeah it can be said as huge diff gap by itself)... and this can also serve as purpose for adding other gimmick within the diffs itself
00:50:645 - this is also for both diff, since the double have its own emphasis that leads towards the next section, i expect this one to be at different column with the double before here..
01:18:051 - kinda wonder why is this double +LN while finish sound at 01:18:700 - only single + LN
I guess the thing with this diff is that i think this can be added more gimmick because the pattern i see is kinda the same for many parts.. NM has even more variation imo.. it's a solid structured diff though..
[5K and 4K MX]
00:17:889 - 00:23:078 - i expect these two to be added another note for a really big exploding sound here.. i mean, it's really awkward it got only 1 LN + 1 note then i see 00:23:889 - get all the benefit of big notes, it caused jealousy for big sound you know :<
00:40:267 - how come these LN in 5K MX doesn't exist on 4K MX D: ..
00:53:889 - 01:04:267 - you can turn these one of the notes into another LN to give emphasis towards the long low cymbal sound here.. it also serves as differentiation towards ordinary triple like 01:05:564 -
01:03:294 - i expect this part to be filled with 1/4 stream all the way down following drum for a bit diff increase.. I know you want to stay consistent with the LN sound, but seriously.. it's way too empty when considering this is highest difficulty.. it's kinda a let down you didn't do it..
01:07:997 - this LN in 4K MX somehow dissapear in 5K MX orz
01:14:078 - kinda wondering you did full jumptrill in 5K MX, but in 4K MX you make it single notes here.. kinda wondering since in 00:14:483 - , you make them consistent in note amount..
------
Okay, that's it.
Feel free to call me back when you already sure the consistency already correct across the map.