Maakkeli wrote:

hi!!!!!
didn't really find anything interesting in my que (except fcl's vektor thing) so you're first !!!!!!!!! i consider myself a lucky bastard then :^)
ich habe sauerkraut in meine lederhosen !!!!!!!! same tbh

gänstä

1. 00:04:014 (1) - you might wanna be consistent when spacing these sliders. Like at 00:06:414 (1) - you have a bigger more noticeable spacing for this aaa isnt this like about the same distance lel
2. 00:48:714 (2,3,1,2) - this was hella unreadable for some reason. Also your overlapconsistency is kinda foked with 00:48:114 (3,1,2) - i think i made it better now.
3. 01:04:014 (1) - the spacing thing pls
4. 01:11:214 (1) - here especially made it more continously i think, but the first part was fine to me idk
5. 01:17:064 (1,1) - i don't really think you need these nc's here. Since it's still just the same gun loading whatever sound asd im hipster so im doing this for no reason. w/e deleted.
6. 01:21:414 (3) - i think i should've mentioned this way before but having this super big spacing for this clap whatever sound is kinda awkward when most people would pay more attention to the sound on that blue tick before wat, this is good cuz my dick says so.
7. 01:22:914 (2) - slider pls for that sound aaaaaaaa would like kill the whole spacing here and single notes follow vocal better imo.

rest seems fine nicenice

insaneaf

1. 00:24:114 (1,5,2) - overlapconsistency thingy moved 5 somewhere else.
2. 01:01:314 (5) - tbh imo you could've made a few of these as streams like yes and no, but im to lazy to change back, since i don't think it makes mch difference rip
3. 01:17:064 (1,1) - same as gänstä ppp ooooooooooooooo
4. 01:21:414 (3) - same as gänstä pppp fdsfasdfd nah

im gay me2

haardääää

1. 00:08:514 (5) - holy shit big spacing mediocore spacing brah
2. 00:13:314 (5) - aäioehyf
3. 01:56:214 (1,1) - pls lol no 200k rank is able to read this yeah did slider instead

i'm good at modding hards

normal

1. 00:38:214 (5,6) - this overlap look kinda derp to me. I would ctrl+h that slider and then fix spacings lel
2. 01:34:914 (6,1,2) - idk how creative you can be in normals with patterns and stuff but now the pattern kinda indicates that (6), (1) and (2) are the same thing decided to delete 01:34:914 (6) - and on the other pattern too, since i want to seperate the sounds on downbeat and this one, so yeah, but i think the pattern itself is fine since newbs look at the sliderball and not the song itself - these creeps.
3. 01:54:114 (7,1,2) - same here asd yessfdasdf

i'm fabulousyfäasdhjfs

easy

1. nothing much but hoyl your normal is so much more dense than this

yesfsdaf
i'm good

aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
black
also have some stars

Come[Back]Home wrote:

Easy

00:06:414 (1,2) - Mach mal diese beiden Slider kurvig, irgendwie ist das ziemlich einseitig und langweilig wenn man die ganze Zeit die gleiche Sliderart verwendet. agree
00:41:814 (2,3) - Das sieht ziemlich random aus, wegen (3). Mach (3) doch kurvig und blanke es mit (2). Würde besser aussehen. ich hasse blankets rip. ich versuch sie so oft zu vermeiden wie es geht.
00:47:214 (3,4) - Sieht komisch aus wenn die so dicht beieinander sind :/ hab 4 bissl weggeschoben.
01:19:614 (2,3) - Ja, der Overlap sieht blöd aus. Total random, und solche Overlaps werden neue Spieler einfach nur verwirren. kp mögliich, aber ich will was neues in ne easy bringen und das einzige was mich da vllt bissl stört ist, dass das anti flow is ansonsten wär das k in meinen augen.
01:30:414 (4,5) - Für neue Spieler ist das hier auch ziemlich hart zu readen, mach es bitte etwas erkennbarer ohne diesen starken Overlap. ^wie oben denke da ist eher der anti flow bissl hart zu readen, aber auf der anderen Seite ists schön, wenn man auch mal ne anspruchsvollere easy hat wo es auch overlaps und antiflow gibt.
01:35:214 (4,5) - ^ ^same
01:47:214 - 01:56:814 - Ich fand eigentlich schon vorher dass es ziemlich viele 1/2 Objekte waren für eine Easy, aber in dem Part ist das einfach zu viel. Es soll eine Easy sein und keine Normal, der Part ist nämlich doch schon zu schwer für eine Easy, neue Spieler werden dort garnicht durchsehen können. naja man muss dazu sagen, dass obj wie 01:55:614 - als 1/1 gerechnet werden könne, da es ja in 1/8 gemappt ist und so betrachtet ist das ganze eig gar nicht so schwer. Die density hab ich mit einer höheren Ar ausgegleicht.

Normal

00:22:614 (3,4) - Nur ne Kleinigkeit aber ich finde dass solch ganz leichte Overlaps irgendwie blöd aussehen :/ hab da ma was gedreht.
00:32:214 (3,4) - Der Flow hier ist nicht gerade gut, ich würde ja (3) nach 488/272 ziehen, und die Kurve andersrum machen (Hoffe du verstehst was ich meine), denn ist der Flow auch schon viel besser. der antiflow ist eig gewollt . Behalt ich mal.
00:38:214 (5,6) - Der Overlap sieht nun aber wirklich blöd aus imo. hab den ma gerade gezogen. da sieht der overalp auch schöner aus.
01:35:514 (2,3,4) - Ich bin mir hier echt umsicher, der Flow ist nicht gerade gut hier, da die Circles überhaupt nicht im geringsten mit den Flow des Sliders davor mitgehen. 01:34:914 - ich glaube bei deiner mod war das noch ein slider mittlerweilen nicht mehr und macht jetzt auch mehr sinn .
01:41:814 (5) - Der ist ganz schön weit unten. Move den mal etwas hoch.der is on-screen sollte klar gehn.
01:46:014 (3,4,5) - Ich bin kein Fan von diesen liniearen Circleplacements, sind langweilig imo. Wie wäre es wenn du z.b. (4) etwas nach unten oder oben bewegst für ein bisschen Bewegung? Versuche ja das bissl abwechselnd zu machen, dass das nicht so monoton aussieht und spielt. 01:47:214 - In der sektion hab ich ja kein lineares movement.
01:53:214 (4,5,6) - ^ ^
01:54:714 (2,3,4) - Ja, hier ist auch wieder dieses Problem mit dem Flow wie bei 01:35:514 (2,3,4) - der flow war aber k, nur der slider ist halt kein circle mehr :^D

Hard

00:17:814 (1,2) - Warum hier ein NC? Das ist doch eigentlich nicht notwendig, da ist kein Downbeat oder irgendwas besonders im Lied, ziemlich sinnloser NC.
Ok, ich weiß nicht wirklich was ich zu dieser Hard sagen soll. Sie ist ja echt gut, aber ich mag es einfach nicht dass die SV so verdammt low ist, dadurch wirkt die gesamt Diff einfach "leblos". Slider spielen sich hier fast wie normale Circles da man ja kaum den Slidern follown muss, irgendwie schade meiner Meinung nach. Also zum NC - Der NC ist dafür da was man in der Hard schlecht erkennt, aber dennoch vllt sieht und zwar in insane & extra ist das Spacing bei weitem erhöht und normalerweise kommt ja hier ein stack wie zuvor ständig das soll ebend nur den spieler "alarmieren", dass das jetzt anders ist und das spacing sicht erhöht. In der Hard nicht wirklich bemerkbar, aber dachte ich bleib hier diffübergreifend konsistent.

Jetzt zu meinem Lieblingspart! Die langsame Slidervelocity passt zum einen zum Lied, denn das Lied ist nicht wirklich schnell was man auch an der bpm erkennen kann wodurch auch easy / normal so viel 1/2 rhyhtmus haben. Außerdem ist das spielen ab Insane sehr snappy. Man merkt es nicht so ganz in der Hard, aber ich wollte für jede diff die langsame sv behalten. Dadurch, dass man snappy spielt ist es schwerer den slider richtig zu hitten, bei größeren jumps. Kann man natürlich in der Hard nicht wirklich nachverfolgen, aber das war so die hauptidee die ich fürs gesamte set verfolgt hab.
01:44:214 (3) - Den würde ich etwas nach oben moven, der ist ziemlich tief. did
01:56:214 (1,1) - Das sollte ein Slider sein, in einer Hard würde niemand mit sowas rechnen, oder ist 01:56:514 (1) - irgendwie falsch getimed (Der scheint unsnapped zu sein). Ich blicke da gerade nicht wirklich durch, aber ich würde auf alle Fälle hier nen Slider platzieren anstatt den beiden Circles. 01:56:214 - hab hier nen slider jetzt und die ncs in der hard entfernt, ist aber richtig gesnappt und zwar auf 1/12. sieht zwar doof aus aber meh.

Insane

00:17:814 (1) - Gleiche wie in Hard, ich verstehe den Grund für den NC nicht. same reason.
00:28:614 (1) - Warum ein NC? Ist das nicht inconsistent, und im Lied ist auch nicht wirklich etwas was ein NC empfehlen würde. also einerseits wegen, dem sound der sich wiederholt von der vorherigen combo und der vorher nicht kam und andererseits um klarheit zu verschaffen, dass sich die beiden unterscheiden.
00:38:214 (1) - ^ und sollte 00:38:514 (3) - der nicht einen NC haben wie 00:28:914 (1) - ? Und hier sollte laut den NC-Pattern davor auch ein NC sein yep hab den mal genauso nct.00:39:114 (1) - und außerdem sollte der hier den auch keinen haben 00:39:714 (1) - sowie du es davor auch getan hast. korrekt
00:49:014 (1) - Warum NC? entfernt!
01:15:414 (1) - ^ bei mkls mod entfernt.

Wollte diese ncs die du für die 1/8 notes gehl hast eig nur für gangsta ncen damnit. weil die da recht schwer zu readen sind imo.

Gangsta

00:17:814 (1) - Jop y erklärung von vorhin.
00:25:164 (1,2) - Ich würde hier die Distanz vergrößern, zwar nicht viel aber etwas, damit es mit den Hitsounds gut zusammenpasst nurn bisschen
00:30:114 (1,2) - Die Distanz hier kann verwirrend sein, da 00:29:514 (1,2) - fast die gleiche Distanz haben und somit 00:30:114 (1,2) - als das gleiche Snapping missreaded werden kann das ende vom slider ist ziemlich weit weg vom head vom nächsten slider und selbst wenn es die ziemliche gleiche distanz hätte fände ich es noch als reading element oder ähnliches.
01:15:414 (1) - Jop same wie vorhin.


Jo, das wars. Sorry wenn ich nicht viel fand später, aber es fällt mir echt schwer Sachen zu finden wenn die SV die ganze Zeit so low ist. Das ist denn nicht gerade viel Bewegung oder so drinnen, und wirklich was mit Slidern anfangen kann man denn ja auch nicht direkt. An sich aber ein gutes Mapset, viel Glück damit :3 Hab versucht dies slow SV so gut wie möglich zu erklären bei der Hard :^D

Garden wrote:

[Easy]

• since there's quite dense rhythm in normal, the diff gap can be a bit too high imo, maybe u can consult other ppl for this n tend to be more dense imo anyway.

1. 01:11:214 (2,1) - can somewhat improve blanket did

[Normal]

1. HP4 for diffspread o ye actually good point.
2. 01:41:814 (5) - maybe not friendly enough for normal players to read hmm i think only edgy stuff is kinda hard to read dunno about this cuz the slidertrack is actually visible and so on. i think i wait for more ppl on this.

[Hard]

1. 01:35:064 (5,6,1) - 01:54:264 (5,6,1) - might be abrupt cuz imo low sv maps are more about cursor tracing, ppl may focus more on their movement instead of the changing rhythm patterns, especially when they played most of the map and no triplets exist elsewhere. these are the hardest parts in the map therefore it should be fine emphasizing these parts with triplets.
2. 01:53:514 (2,5,6,1) - also if u would like to keep the previous rhythm pattern, it's kinda untidy here with the auto-stack, might wanna rearrange a bit yep moved the triplet+slider thing a bit down .
3. some inherited points unused where u use extended sliders in insane/extra they have no affect on the diff so meh

[Insane]

1. 01:19:539 (6) - 01:20:739 (6) - 01:36:339 (4) - keep ds can be neat owell didn't notice the first one.
2. some inherited points unused as well

[Gangsta]

1. 01:01:314 (5,6,7,8) - 01:10:914 (5,6,7,8) - curve iss too much imo, even having the edge of 5 overlapped with 8. 01:13:314 (5,6,7,8,1) - this one is fine for me based on ur design of the pattern i think both are mandatory thinks which don't affect the gameplay to much.

nice sv design and solid overall quality for me, good luck on this!

Down wrote:

M4M from your queue

[Easy]
■ 00:58:614 (4,1) - Check the spacing. It's 1.24x fixed
■ 01:15:414 (2) - Not recommended to use the 1/4 slider in Easy diff. it is very confusing to new player. as last note its fine.

[Normal]
■ 01:41:214 (3,4) - Check the spacing. It kinda close. all +-0.1? dunno what you mean tho.
■ 01:49:314 (7,1) - It's 1.57x its 1.30 for me tho.
Nice, This diff is style that I like.

[Hard]
■ 01:56:814 (4) - NC, In your other diff, this place has a NC. y

[Insane]
■ 01:22:614 (1) - Ctrl+G here. It is disturbed flow of stream and you did it like this 01:31:914 (2,3,4,5,1). its the exact same pattern? dunno what you mean.
■ 01:27:714 (5) - Make one more reverse like this 01:37:314 (1) they differenciate.
■ 01:45:564 (2) - I think that clap was a bit abused. Please remove this clap. whoops forgot to copypaste hitsounds from e xtra

[Gangsta]
■ 00:37:014 (4) - Ctrl+G flow is better IMO. have double anti-flow here should be fine i guess.
■ 00:42:864 (3,4) - I don't agree with that antijump is fit the song. Please give more distance. same distance as 00:43:464 (6,1) - now.
■ 00:49:464 (2) - Replace this circle with 1/4 slider. This is same sound with 00:49:464 not quite the same the first one has more prominent sound on 1/8 tick.
■ 00:58:914 (1,2) - Also replace it if you accept front my suggestion. ^
■ 01:31:914 (2,3,4,5,1) - Why is this spacing big? You didn't use big spacing stream on whole map. cuz the kiai should be harder then the intro lol
■ 01:56:564 (2) - NC? You added a NC in this place on your Insane diff. made it for reading purpose on insane and cuz of the antistack + weird 1/12 snapping here. so yeah i suppose that extra players can read this with not much problem.

Wow, I haven't seen anything like this style before, but this is nice!
I'm really sorry my modding skills really sucks btw I hope this mod's kinda useful..lol
Good luck!

Qapitol wrote:

Hi! Modding because DJ Snake. yay

Easy
00:20:814 (1) - This hitsound is incredibly loud and annoying for my tastes. I'd switch it entirely with something a bit cleaner, but at the very least I'd lower the volume of the sample itself. This applies for all difficulties.
There's really nothing to edit for this difficulty, but that hitsound man... do you mean the clap or finish lel. the bass is a must imo

Normal
01:19:314 (2) - angle upwards instead of downwards the flow is fine on these
01:35:514 (2) - ctrl+g? uh they are supposed to be like this.
01:39:714 (6) - angle this downwards instead of upwards
01:54:714 (2) - ctrl+g?

Hard
00:13:164 (4,5) - any reason these are spaced more so than the same sequences of objects before and after? idk just looked odd to me
Not really a lot to talk about with this difficulty. lowered the spacing a bit.


Gangsta
I'd lower the CS to 4. Just because reading this with HDHR is already very difficult I don't think the higher CS would really help with playability. cs4.2 is pretty much meta for highest diffs. lower cs make sthe map usually easier to read. so uhhhh
00:48:414 (1,2,3,1,2,1,2) - This entire jump section just plays very awkwardly and is difficult to read, I would at the very least ctrl+g at 00:49:014 (1,2) - . changed it up abit.
00:58:614 (3,4,1,2) - I would switch the combos around like... this is the exact same jump pattern i did, just the other way around lel.
01:17:214 (3) - this should be an 8th note slider a what?
01:25:464 (5,6) - move these more to the left of the slider? hope i understood that correct.

Other than that, I can't seem to find any errors with the map. Nothing too serious to change. Hope it gets ranked, good luck! thanks for random modding :>

Lanturn wrote:

Turn down for what

soft-hitfinish7.wav has just over 5ms of delay before the main part of the sound starts. You need to cut it. (I can do this if you need me to. but offline atm)
fixed this one. Knew that it had delay but i was lazy :>

Your Insane has the same density of your Gangsta diff. I think you mean variety, because density has to do with object placement in my understanding. Insane for example is much more dense than the Extra diff. The spacings are very different. I agree on variety wise, however i wanted it be like the extra in the first place. So i suppose its fine. I agree i could have done more, but i have focused more on extra lel Also, 95% of the whole diff is also the exact same rhythm with circles and sliders.... The only variety is some reverses are now streams. If we go even further back to your hard, it's close to the upper diffs density wise. i know. Normal is a huge step down afterwards. It just feels a bit unbalanced when the three diffs feel similar in this sense, with just bigger jumps or a couple more streams. You probably need to nerf Hard a little for density as well.

[Gangsta]
SV is definitely way too low, but let's work with what you got. song would look very cringy imo if you use higher SV. The low SV fits the music genre extremly good. I also don't really understand some of your comboing for this and Insane. 00:25:164 (1,2,3) - why is this a new combo? can't remember prolly cuz off the pattern, but its not needed there.There is nothing in the song that would even consider using an NC for. 00:28:614 (1,2) - 00:38:214 (1,2) - 00:47:814 (1,2,3) - 00:49:014 (1,2) - 00:57:414 (1,2,3) - and so on. No real reason to have NCs here as they still match up with the previous combo and have nothing really to emphasize from. thes rest are because of the stronger beats they posses unlike the rest of this part. Its consistent too, so i'll keep em.

1. 00:16:014 (1) - move it just a little bit closer to the stream. (like at most 2.5) sure
2. 00:25:014 (5,1,2) - Emphasis should be from (1,2) and not (5,1) changed this up a bit.
3. 00:29:964 (4) - A bit far. Try stacking it on 00:28:914 (1) - 's head. part is strong here tho.
4. 00:34:314 (2,3,4) - Pretty positive these are in 1/6 eh? i hear the ticks on 1/8 tho, vocals maybe but that other one? uhh gonna check with someone.,,
5. 00:49:464 (2) - Should probably be a 1/8 slider as well since it has the same scratch noise as 00:49:314 (1) - (although quieter) I forgot to mention 00:30:264 (2) - which would be a good one to 1/8 slider on too. did those, don't kno wwhy i didn't earier.
6. 00:58:914 (1,2) - no 1/8? i thought jump pattern would be better to finish of the first part
7. 01:01:614 (1) - Move a little bit closer to the stream?
8. 01:16:764 (1,2,3) - I don't really think you need this. It's more awkward to play than cool or anything. kept cuz i like to troll
9. 01:17:214 (3) - Would be cool if the bounce was closer to 1/12 after the head. where the part of the reloading sound happens. (if you don't take the above) oh y
10. 01:19:464 (5,6) - If you're going to do something like this, then I at least recommend that they have the same DS between them for cleanliness. 01:19:464 (5,6) - is 0.43 01:20:664 (5,6) - is 0.57, 01:21:864 (5,6) - is 0.45, and 01:24:264 (5,6) - is 0.67 as examples. Try like 0.5 and then 1.5 or 1.8 to the last note. This applies literally throughout the rest of the song. If you want to change the DS a little for different sections, that's perfectly fine, but at least make them consistent! tried to adjust some visually they all have looked about the same but y made them in last kiai bit harder.
11. 01:26:514 (5) - I'd move this down a bit so the distance from (5,6) isn't so much. You're basically going from 4ish DS straight to a 8, so a little buildup wouldn't hurt.abit
12. 01:27:714 (1,2) - 1/8 slider for both would work better here to capture the sounds. hhnn y
13. 01:54:264 (5,6,1) - Swap (5,1)? Normally you don't have that big of jump for the triplet part. and this flows a little better anyways. if id map linear flow y
14. 01:56:214 (1) - Almost feels like it ends at 01:56:476 - dunno abut that but sounds cool too

[Insane]
Combo thing again here.

1. Same suggestions as insane, add an extra reverse on sliders like 00:30:114 (5) - to capture the scratches. There's a bunch more in the song, though they can all be found in the same spots as I mentioned in Gangsta.
2. 00:25:014 (5,1) - Nothing to emphasize here, no sounds or anything on (1). Maybe this would even be better as a 1/4 slider or something. same as gansta changed
3. 00:26:064 (3) - x312 y128 for better flow? i changed this jpattern just now, looks a bit weird with your coordinates now, so i guess i changed it lol
4. 00:34:314 (2,3,4) - Pretty positive these are in 1/6 as in gangsta.
5. 00:57:264 (3,2) - Work nicely just stacked imo. why would i stack the srongest beats me, wud maybe fit for the first one but not the second i guess?
6. 00:58:914 (1,2) - no 1/8? same reasoning as in insane
7. 01:16:764 (1,2,3) - Same as gangsta, not really needed. Might as well let the player rest a bit more. i think i stay with that until insane. hard i didn't use it.
8. 01:22:914 (2,3) - control+G? Flows better if the (2) is below since you're holding 01:22:614 (1) - like a 1/2 note. and how does that affect the flow here?

[Hard]
I really do think this diff needs a lot of work. First off it's very very uncomfortable to play at a "hard" level. The movement of the cursor varies way too much and will easily cause people to let off the sliders too early. The SV should be at least as much as Normal, or even more to help balance this.

Let's also talk density. Compared to normal, this is a huge jump up in which it's all 1/4 with lots of 1/8 thrown in. You need some more 1/2 gaps in this diff throughout the difficulty. Especially when you're already draining them with all the stop and go movements. Note that it isn't just density causing the problems. The uneven DS and maybe too many "jumps" also doesn't help here. It needs to be a little more consistent imo. Every single note feels like you have to jump to it because of the SV, which really isn't something you want in a Hard diff.

1. 00:17:814 (1,2) - was expecting a bit more a jump from these. keeping all clean and easy in the intro
2. 00:21:414 (3) - Could flow better from (2).. a curved flow instead maybe? but im using antiflow in all of my diffs lel.
3. 00:22:914 (5) - 00:27:714 (5) - 00:32:514 (5) - 00:34:914 (4) - 00:37:314 (5) - 00:42:114 (4) - 00:44:514 (4) - 00:46:914 (4) - 00:48:114 (5) - 00:51:714 (4) - 00:54:114 (4) - 00:56:514 (4) - 00:57:714 (5) - Consider changing even half of these to just a circle to help lower the density of this difficulty. did a few, makes me cringe that i didn't even consider it at that time.
4. 00:25:014 (3,4) - This (4) shouldn't be clicked. It avoids all instruments, and even the vocals, so it has nothing to click from. Try swapping these two at least. y
5. 00:30:414 (1) - Reverse doesn't hit anything here either. A 1/2 slider would work the best here. y
6. 00:45:714 (4) - These would make more sense as two circles. y
7. 00:46:014 (1) - Move it a bit closer to the 00:45:714 (4,2) - ? There's all that open space there and it doesn't need to jump as far as it currently is. agree the jump is very far.
8. 00:50:514 (4) - 00:55:314 (4) - ^ tats k imo
9. 00:58:614 (3,1) - The SV changes on these sliders make them look the exact same. Probably going to catch some players off guard since they've only been playing 1/4s up to this point. dont underrate hard players. they aren't brainded.
10. 01:06:114 (5,1) - Too cramped. The (1) should be more visible imo. its perfectly visible in the gameplay its just at the bottom of the playfield.
11. 01:15:414 (1,2) - Jump? maek it ez
12. 01:46:614 (3) - Just a straight slider? or even just a slight curve. uh ok.

[Normal]
AR would be fine at just 5. SV could also use a little boost as well here if you wanted.

1. 01:08:814 (1) - Send this tail downwards instead? why
2. 01:32:214 (5,6,1) - A bit clumped in my opinion. The tail stack is also a bit forced and really not needed imo. ofc its forced, but that doesn't make it bad.
3. 01:41:814 (5) - you can loosen the curve off this quite a bit and it'll still be fine. Try the head at 59,314 | middle node at 72,344 | tail at x108 y358 for example. well changed cuz of the low amount of lsiderbody u see there.

[Easy]
Well, with the slow SV, the overlaps near the end can be fairly difficult to read for newer players, and also overwhelming. What should be done, is the overall SV raised and the AR turned down to 3. Overlaps in general for Easy aren't a problem, but they're overlapping too much for this diff. Plus having all these sliders cover your other ones is something that should be avoided in Easy. A straight clear path is what you should be aiming for.

1. 00:58:614 (4,1) - All this cluttered overlap can actually be difficult for new players since they won't have any idea what to click. Please avoid doing this! i don't change until someone can actually prove that stuff like this can't be read by those ppl. We say these things as guidelines, but we don't know if its true. kinda funny if you ask me.
2. 01:15:414 (2) - As others have already mentioned, Just a single circle would be more than sufficient. but im a dick
3. 01:30:414 (4,5) - Same as 58. This can be confusing for new players. "can" :>
4. 01:35:214 (4,5) - Less cluttered please. You can move the Slider up to around x240 y120 and shoot the tail end up some. Adjust the next circle as well. hows this cluttered when there are basically 1 1/2 beats not mapped lol.
5. 01:38:214 (1,2) - 01:41:814 (5,1) - Same idea as the others. same answer i suppose
6. 01:40:914 (4,2,5) - Try moving these 1/2 forward. You wan't to be clicking the dominant beat at 01:41:214 - and 01:41:514 - is equally important as 01:40:914 - So it's better to have the dominant note the main priority. wut the bass is like the must have to be covered imo. uhh
7. 01:49:014 (3,6) - 01:53:814 (3,6) - These can all just be circles. No need to pump up the density here. You need a few 1/1 gaps here. agree changed it a up quite a bit.

Hmm. I'm not really a fan of the low SV (it hurts in Hard mostly) but hopefully you can find a BN that doesn't mind it. Good luck o/ well yeah the sv is basically the idea behind the map so im not goin to change it in I/E... but hard is debateable.

2017-02-10 23:07 My Angel Azusa: well i just have a few things to say,i think we can irc but stil let sonnyc qualify?
2017-02-10 23:07 My Angel Azusa: just a few minor things
2017-02-10 23:08 Feb: sure
2017-02-10 23:08 My Angel Azusa: ACTION is editing [https://osu.ppy.sh/b/956369 DJ Snake & Lil Jon - Turn Down For What [Easy]]
2017-02-10 23:08 My Angel Azusa: 00:18:414 - can drag break here
2017-02-10 23:09 My Angel Azusa: 00:32:814 (3,4,1) - flow is kinda weird here,also with the overlapping...i think you can change to another pattern?
2017-02-10 23:09 Feb: its dragged there on my end :o
2017-02-10 23:09 My Angel Azusa: o really
2017-02-10 23:09 My Angel Azusa: not on mine
2017-02-10 23:09 Feb: nvm lol
2017-02-10 23:09 Feb: wrong diff
2017-02-10 23:09 Feb: :s
2017-02-10 23:09 My Angel Azusa: o lol
2017-02-10 23:11 My Angel Azusa: hmm you did same thing 00:54:414 (1,2,3) - 
2017-02-10 23:11 My Angel Azusa: idk what newbie players will respond tbh
2017-02-10 23:11 Feb: sonnyc pointed them out as well.
2017-02-10 23:12 My Angel Azusa: yeah they're kinda tricky
2017-02-10 23:12 Feb: i honestly see them struggle mostly when there's no real connection between circles and not with reading.
2017-02-10 23:12 Feb: ya but in oko's words: we underestimate haha
2017-02-10 23:12 My Angel Azusa: hhhhh
2017-02-10 23:12 My Angel Azusa: maybe its fine
2017-02-10 23:12 My Angel Azusa: 00:58:614 (4,1) - probably avoid 1/2 gap like this in easy?
2017-02-10 23:13 My Angel Azusa: the only place you used an overlap with 1/2 spacing so far
2017-02-10 23:13 Feb: thats also why i did the antiflow on some patterns
2017-02-10 23:13 Feb: i just wanted to hl them haha
2017-02-10 23:14 My Angel Azusa: ok then
2017-02-10 23:14 My Angel Azusa: 01:19:614 (2,3) - avoid overlap?
2017-02-10 23:14 My Angel Azusa: its honestly better to do a parallel pattern
2017-02-10 23:14 My Angel Azusa: http://puu.sh/tWXqm/4e128e7352.jpg
2017-02-10 23:15 My Angel Azusa: 01:47:214 (1,2,3) - kinda hard pattern,you sure wanna use in easy?
2017-02-10 23:15 Feb: oh isn#t the spacing unstable here anyway
2017-02-10 23:16 My Angel Azusa: which one
2017-02-10 23:17 Feb: 01:20:814 (3) -
2017-02-10 23:17 Feb: made them parallel
2017-02-10 23:17 Feb: but still did that edgy slider
2017-02-10 23:17 Feb: so upperbody is parallel
2017-02-10 23:18 My Angel Azusa: kkk
2017-02-10 23:19 Feb: well i concentrated on those having the clap sound in the song
2017-02-10 23:19 Feb: so they are clickable
2017-02-10 23:19 My Angel Azusa: yeah i see
2017-02-10 23:19 My Angel Azusa: it's kinda easy+ normal-
2017-02-10 23:19 Feb: since its actual 200 bpm its a bit wanky to have reasonable spread
2017-02-10 23:20 My Angel Azusa: true
2017-02-10 23:22 My Angel Azusa: i think rest seems fine
2017-02-10 23:22 My Angel Azusa: also in insane i feel you can use higher cs tbh
2017-02-10 23:22 My Angel Azusa: should be fine now anyways
2017-02-10 23:23 Feb: ehh wud require a bit of remapping tho
2017-02-10 23:23 Feb: and think spread is okay with 4 to 4.2
2017-02-10 23:23 My Angel Azusa: nvm then
2017-02-10 23:23 My Angel Azusa: pretty solid now
2017-02-10 23:23 Feb: k ^^
2017-02-10 23:23 My Angel Azusa: what about od in top diff, try 8.5?
2017-02-10 23:24 My Angel Azusa: 8.7 is kinda weird lol
2017-02-10 23:24 Feb: not a bad idea actually
2017-02-10 23:25 Feb: 1 to .5
2017-02-10 23:25 My Angel Azusa: 8 to 8.5 seems more reasonable qwq
2017-02-10 23:25 Feb: ya
2017-02-10 23:25 Feb: changed it