1. Hard (2.44 stars, 396 notes)
2. Normal (1.59 stars, 221 notes)
3. Remember (3.25 stars, 607 notes)

luislima wrote:

Can you please add more hit circles and sliders?

10nya wrote:

ganbatte

1. Check your .mp3 bit rate

1. 00:37:346 (2,3,4) - They may looks too monotonous here . How about change those circles into single 1/2 slider? It might be fine since you didn't use NC on 00:38:346 (4) - . It creates more room to improve the selected rhythm tho . You emphasize the downbeat with slider tail too at the part which has the same rhythm with those circles { 00:29:846 (4,2) - }
2. 01:08:346 (3,4,5) - Same here
3. 01:21:346 (2) - Movement from this slider to the next slider 01:22:346 (3) - looks a little rigid here . Try to curve this slider 01:21:346 (2) - and make it blanket with 01:20:346 (1) - . It looks the way better than the current one
   
   SPOILER

   
4. 01:36:096 (6) - Bend this slider to the left side? it may improve the transition to 01:36:846 (1) -
5. 01:42:096 (3,4,5) - Looks rigid here . How about this kind of flow? May improve the transition too beside the visual and movement
   
   SPOILER

   
6. 02:10:346 (3,4,5) - Same as top
7. 02:13:346 (2,3,4) - They plays very rigid too . Try this? The flow will run smoothly from 02:12:346 (1) - and better than the current one
   
   SPOILER

   
8. 03:17:846 (2,3,4) - Same as top
9. 03:36:346 (1,2) - Nazi, fix blanket?
10. 03:42:096 (3,4) - Looks a little bit rigid here? Make it like this? I guess it has the similar reason like what I mentioned above
    
    SPOILER

    
    
    They're all structured well, but you could improve some placement so it won't looks so rigid . The best way to map lower diffs is keep the flow runs smoothly imo

1. 00:44:846 (2) - Rearrange this slider into 2 circles? The sound on 00:45:096 - seems particularly need to be emphasized more
2. 01:03:721 - The vocal on this section mustn't be ignored if you following the vocal on this rhythm 01:03:346 (2,3) - , or it'll plays awkwardly throughout the current vocal . Also, you can keep this drum sound to be emphasized . Delete the slider and make the pattern like this . I hope you can turn out all of them in another similar part like this . Try to find out an idea to make the isn't really hard to be clicked ( Keep the current pattern is fine tho, but I suggest you to try my suggestion )
   
   SPOILER

   
3. 01:04:346 - Why you ignore this strong and important beat here? I strongly recommend you to map this out . Rearrange the current slider that covered up this beat
4. 01:52:096 (1) - ^
5. 02:00:096 (1) - ^

Ipas wrote:

Hello! | From #modreqs

[General]

1. Check your .mp3 bit rate

[Normal]

1. 01:08:346 (3,4,5) - Same here vocal on 5 so I prefer circle.
2. 01:21:346 (2) - Movement from this slider to the next slider 01:22:346 (3) - looks a little rigid here . Try to curve this slider 01:21:346 (2) - and make it blanket with 01:20:346 (1) - . It looks the way better than the current one kinda agree that it looks better but imo, it doesn't fit with next straight slider. If curve this, also need to curve the next one so.. if someone mention this again, I will try to change.
   
   SPOILER

   
3. 01:36:096 (6) - Bend this slider to the left side? it may improve the transition to 01:36:846 (1) - I think straight looks better, two curve slider and bend in same way is kinda look weird imo. curve or not still play the same though so I prefer straight for this.
4. 01:42:096 (3,4,5) - Looks rigid here . How about this kind of flow? May improve the transition too beside the visual and movement that's interesting but for me, put note straight to the straight slider is more flow.
   
   SPOILER

   
5. 02:10:346 (3,4,5) - Same as top same
6. 02:13:346 (2,3,4) - They plays very rigid too . Try this? The flow will run smoothly from 02:12:346 (1) - and better than the current one this is nice but I fix in other way, as I said, two curve slider that bend in same way look weird (for me) so I prefer straight afterward. I fixed 02:15:346 (5,1) to curve like you said though.
   
   SPOILER

   
7. 03:17:846 (2,3,4) - Same as top same
8. 03:36:346 (1,2) - Nazi, fix blanket? hmm didn't plan to blanket there, if I made it perfect blanket, 2 will be too close with 03:35:346 (5) and look forced.
9. 03:42:096 (3,4) - Looks a little bit rigid here? Make it like this? I guess it has the similar reason like what I mentioned above same reason
   
   SPOILER

   
   
   They're all structured well, but you could improve some placement so it won't looks so rigid . The best way to map lower diffs is keep the flow runs smoothly imo

[Hard]

1. 01:03:721 - The vocal on this section mustn't be ignored if you following the vocal on this rhythm 01:03:346 (2,3) - , or it'll plays awkwardly throughout the current vocal . Also, you can keep this drum sound to be emphasized . Delete the slider and make the pattern like this . I hope you can turn out all of them in another similar part like this . Try to find out an idea to make the isn't really hard to be clicked ( Keep the current pattern is fine tho, but I suggest you to try my suggestion ) yes, you are right but I don't want it to be harder.
   
   SPOILER

   
2. 01:04:346 - Why you ignore this strong and important beat here? I strongly recommend you to map this out . Rearrange the current slider that covered up this beat because I don't want to spamming just 1/2, this is like light hard diff so I want to use 1/1 a lot as well.
3. 01:52:096 (1) - ^ ^
4. 02:00:096 (1) - ^ ^

[]
Ahh I can't mod higher diff ><
The higher the difficulty the better you make it ><
Good Luck~

Lasse wrote:

m4m from your queue

Remember

00:42:721 (2,4) - i don't like the flow here, consider rotating the kicksliders a little it's fine :3
01:43:096 (5) - nc here would make nc usage more consistent, but not having nc kinda fits the music, your choice I prefer no NC here.
01:57:596 (1) - eitehr make this straigh or slightly curve the others in that combo, looks better I prefer straight
02:11:346 (1,2,3) - make it more like thismaybe? this is interesting but less zig-zag than mine and i prefer zia-zag so yea.
02:18:346 (1) - see * yes i changed the first you mention but I want to use it various shape so I prefer mine in this case.
03:26:096 (1,2,3) - looks weird no, I think :3
03:38:096 (1,2) - blanketing? no no
03:44:596 (2) - i don't really like how this slider look with that red point ... ahaha I will think about it, keep it like this for now.

Hard

00:45:846 (5) - how about putting this somewhere around 280|350 and curving 4 to blanket 1? 280|350.. that's weird.
00:56:096 (1) - "smoother" slider like this? * this looks interesting but I prefer mine.
01:12:096 (1) - ^ change to other shape.
01:15:846 (4) - make this blanket 3? nope
01:18:346 (1) - doesn't look that great try various shape.
01:19:346 (2) - strg+g no
01:22:596 (2) - curve this like 01:23:346 (4) - I want it to has some straight line on that section.
01:34:096 (1) - looks very bland, how about a little curving or sth? mhmm no
02:06:096 (1) - very bland long slider again sometime I want to use basic shape
02:16:096 (1) - curve like 02:16:846 (3) - same reason
02:19:346 (2) - strg+g exactly what is this mean? if ctrl+g, no it will be too hard.
02:21:346 (4) - ^ ^
02:23:346 (4,5) - blanket is a little bit off it's so a bit so I can't find any mistake >_>
02:36:096 (1) - very bland long slider again yea want some basic shape
03:26:846 (2) - strg+g
03:32:346 (1) - very bland long slider again yea want some basic shape
03:34:096 (1) - ^ it fit with above slider.

Normal

00:32:846 (1) - move the end a bot more to the left nono, intentional
01:09:346 (5) - nc here I add NC every 2 stanza.
01:10:346 (1) - remove nc ^
01:10:596 feels like sth should be here, but that might be hard on a normal diff, nc shouldstart around here too yes, it would be too hard for easiest diff.
==> these nc changes would make it more consistent over all the diffs
01:51:346 (5) - move end a very little bit to the right hmmm no
02:20:846 (1) - make this like 02:19:346 (1) - but half the size noo I prefer this.
02:33:346 (5) - move nd point a bit left nono, intentional
02:39:346 (2,3) - round those two to blanket each other I want to use some straight slider.
03:36:346 (1,2) - blanket? nope
03:43:346 (1,2) - change one of those (or both), they shoulldn't look the same as 2 is mapped purely to the vocals and 1 to the instrumental this is really interesting but I still don't have any idea to change and I'm not sure if you mean the shape are the same or what.

Yes, I put lots of emphasis on the sliders, escpecially on the harder diffs, but that is mostly because it was hard to find other stuff that bothered me. Map seems fine pretty much

thanks for your slider mod it make my map more lively.

• Normal
  01:26:346 - maybe circle on downbit?
  01:51:346 (5) - This slider is not parallel 01:50:346 (4) . The correct coordinates
  03:17:846 (2) - Repeated slider would have been better
  03:44:596 (2) - to add another repeat (suggestion)

• Hard
  01:26:096 (1) - Next can be put on 1.18
  03:10:346 (1) - The spinner can be extended to downbit

• Remember
  01:14:346 (1) - fix this slider, if u wanted to do sliderwawe course
  01:18:221 (9) - the circle seemed to me unnecessary
  01:40:846 (1) - ^ (overmapping)
  01:41:846 (1) - ^ etc

Backstep wrote:

Quick check~ (ขอม๊อดเป็นภาษาอังกฤษละกันนะ)

Overall

- Add "エーピンク" and "A Cube Entertainment" in tags.
- Mp3 clear.
- BG clear.
- All wav files clear.
- HS clear.

Normal
02:02:346 (4,5,6,7,1) - These notes you can make more symmetry pentagon shape?

Hard
00:49:096 (2) - Move to 420:16 will more blanket
02:05:471 (6) - Move this note down a bit around 345:296 to make more straight line slider.
02:09:346 (3) - Stack this note?
02:35:346 (3) - Same above.


Remember
01:20:096 (7) - Move to 0:96 look be better (triangle shape.)
03:32:346 (1) - This note you can move to 296:328 to make pentagon shape, then use rotate section centre anti-clockwise 13 degree for blanket.

That's all good luck!

Where LUV song o.o?

1. 00:36:846 (2,3,4) - I honestly have no idea why you suddenly decided to stack these 1/4s instead of spreading them out like you did on previous patterns. It caused quite an abrupt flow stop for me when I was playing this trying to see whether I could farm this with DT later lelel
2. 00:42:846 (3,4) - I would either make these go like
   
   this

   
   or find a way to spread them out, since imho they are a bit too close together despite being a 1/4 slider jump and it plays awkwardly when they are at ambiguous distance like this (like when you are jumping to next note, you might "overshoot" and go past the actual circle position and hit on wrong spot) maybe cause I suck at this game
3. 00:47:846 (4) - maybe have this one at like 1.75x since this is a drum hit and vocal emphasis point after all and is easy to do so without breaking any other pattern that would possibly refer back to this pattern when positioning
4. 00:59:346 (5) - ^^ except that you will need to think harder if you actually want to make a different DS here since you are doing a nice stack on previous note
5. 01:56:846 (3) - consistency with 00:47:846 (4) -
6. 02:00:846 (3,4,6,7) - I think it makes more interesting flow when you ctrl+g 02:00:846 (3,4) - and 02:01:596 (6,7) - but consider whether you want to put in extra difficulty spike in here just throwing out suggestions to avoid making this diff a bit repetitive due to song length
7. 02:09:596 (4,5) - like ctrl+g here also makes nice jump flow
   
8. General comment:
   well I looked over the whole diff I have to say you did a bloody good job at keeping your patterns/rhythms consistent throughout the song, but only gripe I have is that there are quite a handful places where you can easily give more musical emphasis by simple re-positioning and ctrl+g at some parts (like those circle note chains like 02:00:596 (2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - ). I mean, this is the hardest diff, it could be harder than currently is right now =w=
   
   its totally fine if you want to keep the diff as it is though

• it's not like I can really mod any of your maps anyways ;_;
  
  Normal

1. 01:01:346 (6) - 02:03:346 (6) - shouldn't these two be consistent in how they're hitsounded?
2. 01:56:096 (6) - very strong piano sound being skipped here. Not sure if this is worth adding a circle for you, but I do think that it's worth considering
3. 02:17:096 (2) - circle here goes along really really well with the vocals without making the rythm too dense
4. 02:44:096 (3) - would honestly rather follow vocals than background music here, I think following the 'remember' is way more intuitive here since that is what feels strong in the song, thus feeling a lot easier and more natural to follow. Sam obviously applies to the other kiais if you feel like this needs change
5. 03:15:596 (4) - idk about skipping the white tick here, doesn't make a lot of sense to me. Both the high pitched drum and the little 'swoosh' in the song land on this, while I don't think that would feel stronger is currently landing on the red tick. (atleast nothing that would justify skipping the white tick) Not sure if you did this to implement some variety in the rythm, but I really don't think it works all to well right here
   
   Hard
   
6. 00:55:346 (3,4) - would move 4 to the left a bit (or pretty much as far to the left as you can as it's already this close haha) since that'd make it easier to follow when coming from 3
7. 00:58:096 (5) - would probably turn this into a circle and then have a 1/2 start on the downbeat, playing feels a lot better than skipping because of how audible the sound is
8. 02:00:346 (1) - ^ same idea for this one. I don't really think vocals call for something that requires holding here (they don't feel particularly powerful) so I feel like just making the slider a circle and then starting a 1/2 on the downbeat is alot nicer
9. 03:18:096 (6) - a bit weird to have this peak in the drums (I think this is drums?) land on the repeat here
   
   Remeber
   
10. 01:11:471 (5,6) - 0.7 spacing between these too?
11. 01:11:096 (3,5) - oh and was kinda surprised that these weren't a blanket, thought that would've matched your style really well
12. 02:00:096 (1,2,3) - could even out the spacing a bit one these, pretty picky but it really does benefit the symmetry I think ><
13. 02:22:346 (1,1) - aaah a blanket that is not perfecttt
14. 02:41:096 (4,5) - could space these out to 0.7 if you feel like it, though I guess the spacing being off by 0,5 doesn't matter as much
15. 03:28:346 (1,2) - would rotate anti-clockwise a bit like https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/3448545 to make it easier to catch this properly

guineaQ wrote:

##derusting

much pink in this map

[Remember me pls]

1. 00:36:846 (2,3,4) - I honestly have no idea why you suddenly decided to stack these 1/4s instead of spreading them out like you did on previous patterns. It caused quite an abrupt flow stop for me when I was playing this trying to see whether I could farm this with DT later lelel because it's not looks clean when unstack them XD but yea, I did some.
2. 00:42:846 (3,4) - I would either make these go like mine is more flow imo. and it's kinda... far enough ahaha, I don't want to make this too hard.
   
   this

   
   or find a way to spread them out, since imho they are a bit too close together despite being a 1/4 slider jump and it plays awkwardly when they are at ambiguous distance like this (like when you are jumping to next note, you might "overshoot" and go past the actual circle position and hit on wrong spot) maybe cause I suck at this game
3. 00:47:846 (4) - maybe have this one at like 1.75x since this is a drum hit and vocal emphasis point after all and is easy to do so without breaking any other pattern that would possibly refer back to this pattern when positioning I want to make them consistent though, also if I fix this, I need to fix the whole map lol, let's see for more opinion.
4. 00:59:346 (5) - ^^ except that you will need to think harder if you actually want to make a different DS here since you are doing a nice stack on previous note yep
5. 01:56:846 (3) - consistency with 00:47:846 (4) - nope nope
6. 02:00:846 (3,4,6,7) - I think it makes more interesting flow when you ctrl+g 02:00:846 (3,4) - and 02:01:596 (6,7) - but consider whether you want to put in extra difficulty spike in here just throwing out suggestions to avoid making this diff a bit repetitive due to song length
7. 02:09:596 (4,5) - like ctrl+g here also makes nice jump flow hm no ctrl+g is more flow here x3
   
8. General comment:
   well I looked over the whole diff I have to say you did a bloody good job at keeping your patterns/rhythms consistent throughout the song, but only gripe I have is that there are quite a handful places where you can easily give more musical emphasis by simple re-positioning and ctrl+g at some parts (like those circle note chains like 02:00:596 (2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - ). I mean, this is the hardest diff, it could be harder than currently is right now =w= to be honest I tried to make other part consistent spacing, flow and make it peak at... the yellow+orange part.
   
   its totally fine if you want to keep the diff as it is though

I got bad at modding

Peachtrees wrote:

• it's not like I can really mod any of your maps anyways ;_;
  
  Normal

1. 01:56:096 (6) - very strong piano sound being skipped here. Not sure if this is worth adding a circle for you, but I do think that it's worth considering I didn't plan to follow piano there, and note would be too dense.
   
   Hard
   
2. 00:55:346 (3,4) - would move 4 to the left a bit (or pretty much as far to the left as you can as it's already this close haha) since that'd make it easier to follow when coming from 3 currenr one is completely fine imo XD
3. 00:58:096 (5) - would probably turn this into a circle and then have a 1/2 start on the downbeat, playing feels a lot better than skipping because of how audible the sound is will look for more opinion here, I want to follow vocal with 1/1 slider here.
4. 02:00:346 (1) - ^ same idea for this one. I don't really think vocals call for something that requires holding here (they don't feel particularly powerful) so I feel like just making the slider a circle and then starting a 1/2 on the downbeat is alot nicer same, well I want to use variety rhythm. I mean I want to use some 1/1 to emphasis vocal.
5. 03:18:096 (6) - a bit weird to have this peak in the drums (I think this is drums?) land on the repeat here hmm I think no and that beat is not that strong so I prefer reverse there, it somehow fit. I add NC on this slider though
   
   Remeber
   
6. 01:11:471 (5,6) - 0.7 spacing between these too? it's already 0.68 so let it be.
7. 01:11:096 (3,5) - oh and was kinda surprised that these weren't a blanket, thought that would've matched your style really well for star and square sake, I denied my deer blanket there.
8. 02:22:346 (1,1) - aaah a blanket that is not perfecttt hm... let me try my best to fix.
9. 03:28:346 (1,2) - would rotate anti-clockwise a bit like https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/3448545 to make it easier to catch this properly hm nope, that's not my taste.

Good Luck and have fun with this shitmod ;_;

thanks!!

Euny wrote:

just fast check for metadata♥

• General

1. for metadata : + add tags : 박초롱 윤보미 정은지 손나은 김남주 오하영 A-cube Entertainment
   
   and i think ' エーピンク' i know this is japanese team name. but i think dont need to tag. remove it.
   also remove that source too.
   
   
   
   here is artist official site >> http://www.a-cube.co.kr/apink

sorry for late and no kds please

1. 03:10:346 (1) - Since this is your easiest difficulty, I think ending this at 03:12:346 will be much more natural. You'll know what to do next for recovery time.

1. 01:06:096 - I'd like to recommend adding a note to fit the lyrics.
2. 03:12:346 - Mind ending at 03:12:346? It suits better than the current ending point.

1. 01:00:596 (2) - Consider placing this at where 01:00:096 (7) is. I think a long note using a zigzag will fit the song better than a static stack.
2. 01:20:846 - I guess a Finish here too would sound nice along with 01:20:346. If you concern with finish spams, I'd like to say 01:19:846 wasn't a nice spot for it. Same opinion for 02:22:846.
3. 02:02:596 (2,3) - Consider ctrl+G. Similar suggestion to construct a zigzag.

Sonnyc wrote:

[Hard]

1. 03:12:346 - Mind ending at 03:12:346? It suits better than the current ending point. tbh, I plan to end there but I'm afraid it will cause an early appearance issue of next circle. but let's try this out though.

[Remember]

1. 01:00:596 (2) - Consider placing this at where 01:00:096 (7) is. I think a long note using a zigzag will fit the song better than a static stack. I understand about this but (2)'s spacing will be further than (3) to (4) and it will make flow a little weird so I prefer mine first.
2. 01:20:846 - I guess a Finish here too would sound nice along with 01:20:346. If you concern with finish spams, I'd like to say 01:19:846 wasn't a nice spot for it. Same opinion for 02:22:846. I think I can hear cymbal sound on 01:19:846 (6) and I tried to add finish on the spot you suggest, I think clap is more fit there.
3. 02:02:596 (2,3) - Consider ctrl+G. Similar suggestion to construct a zigzag. since I didn't fix the first one so I want to keep it consistent.

Yuii- wrote:

I will take a quick mod by tomorrow!

HabiHolic wrote:

[Normal]

01:00:346 (4) - NC. he emphasis in preparation for the music so strong I add NC every 2 stanza so I want to keep it consistent.

Call me.

Aerous wrote:

HOLY SHIT PAN HOPE I CAN SPEED RANK MY AOA SONG DDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDD