as spec request about a decade ago ~
oh hey look at those greenlines x.x
[Spec]
00:20:390 (4) - move this a bit right to make the less movement so the upcoming Hyper would become smoother
00:28:851 (2) - x:268 or around? just matching most of your pattern before like 00:24:428 (4,5,1)
01:18:082 (2) - expecting this a Hyper. it looks more suitable as it would be a nice pair with the upcoming stream
01:34:044 (6) - no Hyper here?
01:38:467 (3,4,5) - better to make it a 1/2 slider with reverse as it easier to read
01:40:582 (1) - how about ctrl +g this and place it to x:68? this will result a directional change on the prev Hyper which i think is nice to apply
02:18:851 (3) - this could be a nice Hyper. how about x:120?
02:37:313 (8,9) - maybe change it to a slider with a higher SV like you did on 01:18:851 (8)?
03:02:313 (6) - just my personal opinion. maybe it is just me or don't you think a side to side Hyper make it look cooler?
03:31:351 (5,6,1,2) - try this pattern?
http://osu.ppy.sh/ss/290961103:36:736 (3,4,5) - almost the same case as Xinely. make this triplet more horizontal pls
04:38:467 (5,6) - omg lol you did map exactly just like xinely. it's probably the same as 03:21:544 (5,6) on xinely's
[Xinely]
00:43:851 (1,2,3) - naaah this could be spaced more to show the current timeline better. idk why you put the spacing here lower than 00:43:467 (4,1). i'd say move (2) to x:268 would be nice one
00:47:698 (3,4) - imo putting the same spacing as the object before would make the Hyper smoother
00:53:851 (3,4) - nazi but dont you think they're better as a 1/2 slider with reverse since they're in a same x spot?
02:09:236 (2,3,4,5) - misplaced Hyper or intentionally? those double Hypers looks like forced and really uncomfortable imo. how about swap the position of (4) and (5)? :p
02:38:659 (4) - quite dislike the Hyper here. i prefer on 02:38:467 (3) instead
02:49:429 (5,6) - a 1.60x spacing just like you made on first kiai?
03:18:659 (5,6,7) - eew make this triplet more horizontal pls. it truly break the flow at this part x.x
03:20:005 (4,5) - reduce the spacing here. i feel a little jump doesn't fit at this part
03:20:967 (2,3,4) - move all of them together to the left until (2) on x:302 to balance the spacing between before and the next object
03:21:544 (5,6) - mmmmh im not really sure about this. there's nothing in the music to enhance your current timeline. i prefer a 1/2 timeline here instead of skipping 03:21:736
03:23:851 (1) - rotate it to a more horizontal pls. at least make it similar like 03:24:236 (3)
03:24:140 (2,3) - in case you apply the suggestion above, you could make this a bit more spacing
[is this my part?]
00:06:159 (3) - idk how to word it, but the timeline on 00:06:351 is really deserve an object
04:51:928 (2) - move this a bit to left. the spacing tho the next note is a bit too much
/me poofs away