Hmm, ok. So it was a one-way thing meaning abraker was the only lover?
forum
Great Idea Mafia Game Over
posted
Total Posts
410
maybe lover role doesnt have to have another to exist, its just a random chance for someone else to get it
Westonini wrote:
Hmm, ok. So it was a one-way thing meaning abraker was the only lover?
yes and yescravenfiner wrote:
maybe lover role doesnt have to have another to exist, its just a random chance for someone else to get it
Penguin wrote:
I think I'm wrong about the cross party lovers, but still, GIF's role would have said that he was a lover.
Yeah, "However, sometimes, one lover is otherwise a vanilla townie, while the other is a mafia goon."
And I do agree that GIF's role most likely would have said lover. But it would seem odd for there to be only one lover in a game. Maybe that's just because of my lack of experience though.
If you look at the list, there are only 7 Lover roles, so having two of them is highly unlikely when there are 146 roles.Westonini wrote:
Yeah, "However, sometimes, one lover is otherwise a vanilla townie, while the other is a mafia goon."Penguin wrote:
I think I'm wrong about the cross party lovers, but still, GIF's role would have said that he was a lover.
And I do agree that GIF's role most likely would have said lover. But it would seem odd for there to be only one lover in a game. Maybe that's just because of my lack of experience though.
It's just that most sources I'm seeing seem to mention it being a two-way thing, with them being a connected pair.
But I guess the only way it would make sense here is if there was only one lover.
I don't know how else to explain it. It's only a two-way thing if there are two lovers.Penguin wrote:
"If there are other Lovers in the game, you will form a Lover bond with them. All Lovers will die at the same time."
Keyword is "IF"
Yeah, I guess we'll just go with that since it makes the most sense here.
So GIF's Psychomagnet ability allows him to direct all actions at a single person. But seeing as he died, he probably didn't use the ability and just regularly killed abraker, then the mafia killed GIF.
So GIF's Psychomagnet ability allows him to direct all actions at a single person. But seeing as he died, he probably didn't use the ability and just regularly killed abraker, then the mafia killed GIF.
makes sense
So if it was originally 5vs1vs2, it's now 4vs2. Or at least that's what seems most likely. But I suppose it's also still possible for there to be another neutral or mafia.
Topic Starter
If only a single Lover exists, they are essentially a "Named Towie" work as a VT with a different role name. This only happens in idea games where it's possible less than 2 ppl pick or get lovers as a role. Additionally Lovers works as the Mason version for Werewolves, Lovers cannot be Werewolves
Vote Count 2.1
Vote Count 2.1
Not Voting (6) - Penguin, Husa, cravenfiner, Westonini, Keremal, Death
With 6 alive it takes 4 to lynch
Deadline: Feb 16th 2019, 6:40 PM ESTWith 6 alive it takes 4 to lynch
Yeah, that was my theory as well. The only way that this could be incorrect is if there is another neutral killing. I still think that abraker's theory of 5 town, 2 maf, and 1 neutral makes the most sense. It could also have been 4 town, 2 maf, and 2 aliens though. In that case it would be 3v2v1 right now.Westonini wrote:
So GIF's Psychomagnet ability allows him to direct all actions at a single person. But seeing as he died, he probably didn't use the ability and just regularly killed abraker, then the mafia killed GIF.
so pretty much, it's either 4v2 or 3v2v1.
I highly doubt there is 3 mafia. That would just be unfair.Westonini wrote:
So if it was originally 5vs1vs2, it's now 4vs2. Or at least that's what seems most likely. But I suppose it's also still possible for there to be another neutral or mafia.
Death seemed to really jump-the-gun there with his accusation at Penguin.
That's not to say Penguin couldn't have killed abraker and just planned to tell everyone "That would be stupid of me to do that if I was mafia." But in this case it seems most likely that GIF was the one that killed abraker, not a mafia member.
That's not to say Penguin couldn't have killed abraker and just planned to tell everyone "That would be stupid of me to do that if I was mafia." But in this case it seems most likely that GIF was the one that killed abraker, not a mafia member.
I'm pretty sure that it was GIF's plan to kill abraker then frame me, but I can't tell if Death just fell for it or if he was trying to frame me as well.Westonini wrote:
Death seemed to really jump-the-gun there with his accusation at Penguin.
That's not to say Penguin couldn't have killed abraker and just planned to tell everyone "That would be stupid of me to do that if I was mafia." But in this case it seems most likely that GIF was the one that killed abraker, not a mafia member.
That's exactly what a guilty person would say.
Now that I think about it, I'm pretty sure Death wasn't being serious. At the beginning of Day 1 he said
Which was almost certainly a joke. So
Was probably just a follow-up to that joke.
Death wrote:
Clearly it's Penguin's intention to eliminate everyone as fast as possible.
Vote: Penguin
Which was almost certainly a joke. So
Death wrote:
Should have voted for Penguin.
Was probably just a follow-up to that joke.
now it just sounds like you're talking out of your butt.Death wrote:
That's exactly what a guilty person would say.
yeah, but he's still accusing meWestonini wrote:
Was probably just a follow-up to that joke.
Husa wrote:
poor abraker
I think abraker was the most hyped about this too
Topic Starter
Vote Count 2.2
Not Voting (6) - Penguin, Husa, cravenfiner, Westonini, Keremal, Death
With 6 alive it takes 4 to lynch
Deadline: Feb 16th 2019, 6:40 PM ESTWith 6 alive it takes 4 to lynch
okay, well if there's 4 town, then we can vote someone today or tomorrow, assuming that only one of us dies tonight. If there's only three of us, we're kinda screwed.
we gotta be proactive and vote someone or else we're just gonna be sitting here twiddling our thumbs and doing nothing while mafia runs the game.
we gotta be proactive and vote someone or else we're just gonna be sitting here twiddling our thumbs and doing nothing while mafia runs the game.
I don't really have a read on anyone since no one is talking this game, that's the problem. I'm slightly sus of Death, but nothing substantial. Husa has posted like 2 times.
we have 6 more days to think of someone logical to vote, so at least we have that
Westonini wrote:
So like, vote someone to get the ball rolling?
Vote: Husa
They've barely said anything this entire game. Perfect strategy for mafia.
I'm fine with thisDeath wrote:
Vote: HusaWestonini wrote:
So like, vote someone to get the ball rolling?
They've barely said anything this entire game. Perfect strategy for mafia.
Vote: Husa
although, this could be Death just trying to get a bandwagon on someone besides himself since he knows I'm sus of him. Either way, it's a 50/50 and we have nothing else to go off of. Unless someone got info last night.
Penguin wrote:
I don't really have a read on anyone since no one is talking this game, that's the problem. I'm slightly sus of Death, but nothing substantial. Husa has posted like 2 times.
Death is fairly sus, since he's only been pointing fingers and not really providing much support in trying to figure out who's what, so he might be Godfather, however contradictory that statement is. Simply voting for someone doesn't make you innocent. However, Husa might be a mafioso, seeing as he rarely talks in this game, which would provide a real nuisance to Death, in the event that he's actually planning something. Again, contradictive of me, I know- But it's pretty plausible for someone who doesn't like the fact that a fellow mafioso isn't helping them keep their cover up do a friendly-fire vote. Then again, Death and Husa might be exceptions/townies that're unintentionally trying to mislead people, and Death is actually a Normal Townie.
Westonini appears to be legitimate, maybe an Investigator ploy even. But his eagerness to vote someone off to get the show started raises a small, but still distinct, red flag immediately. Probably a Vigilante, to be real.
However, I have to consider the fact that I'm going out on a limb, if not slanted towards one particular outcome, and so I won't define my vote as anything until damn well sufficient evidence is provided or theorized. If anything, I'll help push the boot to Husa in the event that nobody could figure something out.
are you serious???? 
i dont quite get the game tbh. what happens if the lynched is a townie?
i dont quite get the game tbh. what happens if the lynched is a townie?
thats risky, wouldnt day 1 repeat over and over again?cravenfiner wrote:
we have 6 more days to think of someone logical to vote, so at least we have that
Vote: cravenfiner
Husa wrote:
are you serious????
i dont quite get the game tbh. what happens if the lynched is a townie?
Exactly what you'd expect. They're eliminated, regardless of if they were innocent or not. Goes without saying that it would be disadvantageous for the townies as a result of an incorrect accusation.
If you claim you don't understand some aspects of the game, it's obviously pretty important that you should ask about it or search it up. Otherwise you really only have yourself to blame. In my eyes this is just a bit suspicious. I got the feeling as if you're acting confused and harmless to make people think you're less of a threat. But at the same time you may genuinely just be confused so who knows.
Things seem to be moving along so I'll save my vote for a couple more days perhaps.
would at least hoped that the first one who voted for me get lynched aswell if i were innocent. =/Westonini wrote:
Exactly what you'd expect. They're eliminated, regardless of if they were innocent or not. Goes without saying that it would be disadvantageous for the townies as a result of an incorrect accusation.
as well as the 2nd lyncher :eyes:
Husa wrote:
cravenfiner wrote:
we have 6 more days to think of someone logical to vote, so at least we have that
thats risky, wouldnt day 1 repeat over and over again?
no, since we have less people now because abraker and guy in freezer is dead there’s less people to contemplate about
Vote: Husa
kinda sus to vote me just for giving a reminder..
who thje hell isnt suspicious at this point? i dont know,
i find it a scheme of yours, going no lynch on day and then kill people off 1 by 1 at nightcravenfiner wrote:
kinda sus to vote me just for giving a reminder..
Topic Starter
Vote Count 2.3
[L-1] Husa (3) - Death, Penguin, cravenfiner
cravenfiner (1) - Husa
Not Voting (2) - Westonini, Keremal
With 6 alive it takes 4 to lynch
Deadline: Feb 16th 2019, 6:40 PM ESTcravenfiner (1) - Husa
Not Voting (2) - Westonini, Keremal
With 6 alive it takes 4 to lynch
It's possible that they're both mafia, but at the same time, Death hasn't really talked much either, so I don't see the "nuisance" aspect being likely.keremal wrote:
Death is fairly sus, since he's only been pointing fingers and not really providing much support in trying to figure out who's what, so he might be Godfather, however contradictory that statement is. Simply voting for someone doesn't make you innocent. However, Husa might be a mafioso, seeing as he rarely talks in this game, which would provide a real nuisance to Death, in the event that he's actually planning something.
To be 100% fair, I'm the one who brought up the fact that town needs to lynch someone today. Westo is a solid town read in my eyes though.keremal wrote:
Westonini appears to be legitimate, maybe an Investigator ploy even. But his eagerness to vote someone off to get the show started raises a small, but still distinct, red flag immediately. Probably a Vigilante, to be real.
craven meant 6 days as in real life days, not game days. He didn't mean that we shouldn't lynch someone.Husa wrote:
thats risky, wouldnt day 1 repeat over and over again?cravenfiner wrote:
we have 6 more days to think of someone logical to vote, so at least we have that
Vote: cravenfiner
So far by looking at the vote count and reading peoples reactions, I can boil down the teams to this.
If husa IS mafia, then either keremal or Westo are his mafia buddy since they aren't voting for him. Kere did put a little bit of suspicion on Death, so it would be most likely that kere is his buddy, especially since Westo is a solid town read.
If husa ISN'T mafia, then Death and craven are most likely mafia. So I can almost GUARANTEE that either Husa and keremal are mafia OR Death and craven are mafia.
to be honest, I'm kind of leaning towards the Death/craven theory, since Death already seems suspicious in my opinion and kere seems to be thinking logically about everything.
change vote: Death