I highly doubt there is 3 mafia. That would just be unfair.Westonini wrote:
So if it was originally 5vs1vs2, it's now 4vs2. Or at least that's what seems most likely. But I suppose it's also still possible for there to be another neutral or mafia.
I highly doubt there is 3 mafia. That would just be unfair.Westonini wrote:
So if it was originally 5vs1vs2, it's now 4vs2. Or at least that's what seems most likely. But I suppose it's also still possible for there to be another neutral or mafia.
I'm pretty sure that it was GIF's plan to kill abraker then frame me, but I can't tell if Death just fell for it or if he was trying to frame me as well.Westonini wrote:
Death seemed to really jump-the-gun there with his accusation at Penguin.
That's not to say Penguin couldn't have killed abraker and just planned to tell everyone "That would be stupid of me to do that if I was mafia." But in this case it seems most likely that GIF was the one that killed abraker, not a mafia member.
Death wrote:
Clearly it's Penguin's intention to eliminate everyone as fast as possible.
Vote: Penguin
Death wrote:
Should have voted for Penguin.
now it just sounds like you're talking out of your butt.Death wrote:
That's exactly what a guilty person would say.
yeah, but he's still accusing meWestonini wrote:
Was probably just a follow-up to that joke.
Husa wrote:
poor abraker
Westonini wrote:
So like, vote someone to get the ball rolling?
I'm fine with thisDeath wrote:
Vote: HusaWestonini wrote:
So like, vote someone to get the ball rolling?
They've barely said anything this entire game. Perfect strategy for mafia.
Penguin wrote:
I don't really have a read on anyone since no one is talking this game, that's the problem. I'm slightly sus of Death, but nothing substantial. Husa has posted like 2 times.
thats risky, wouldnt day 1 repeat over and over again?cravenfiner wrote:
we have 6 more days to think of someone logical to vote, so at least we have that
Husa wrote:
are you serious????
i dont quite get the game tbh. what happens if the lynched is a townie?
would at least hoped that the first one who voted for me get lynched aswell if i were innocent. =/Westonini wrote:
Exactly what you'd expect. They're eliminated, regardless of if they were innocent or not. Goes without saying that it would be disadvantageous for the townies as a result of an incorrect accusation.
Husa wrote:
cravenfiner wrote:
we have 6 more days to think of someone logical to vote, so at least we have that
thats risky, wouldnt day 1 repeat over and over again?
i find it a scheme of yours, going no lynch on day and then kill people off 1 by 1 at nightcravenfiner wrote:
kinda sus to vote me just for giving a reminder..
It's possible that they're both mafia, but at the same time, Death hasn't really talked much either, so I don't see the "nuisance" aspect being likely.keremal wrote:
Death is fairly sus, since he's only been pointing fingers and not really providing much support in trying to figure out who's what, so he might be Godfather, however contradictory that statement is. Simply voting for someone doesn't make you innocent. However, Husa might be a mafioso, seeing as he rarely talks in this game, which would provide a real nuisance to Death, in the event that he's actually planning something.
To be 100% fair, I'm the one who brought up the fact that town needs to lynch someone today. Westo is a solid town read in my eyes though.keremal wrote:
Westonini appears to be legitimate, maybe an Investigator ploy even. But his eagerness to vote someone off to get the show started raises a small, but still distinct, red flag immediately. Probably a Vigilante, to be real.
craven meant 6 days as in real life days, not game days. He didn't mean that we shouldn't lynch someone.Husa wrote:
thats risky, wouldnt day 1 repeat over and over again?cravenfiner wrote:
we have 6 more days to think of someone logical to vote, so at least we have that
Vote: cravenfiner
This is correctPenguin wrote:
also, just a reminder "Last edited by cravenfiner on about 2 hours ago, edited 1 time in total."
editing isn't allowed, even if it's to fix small things like typos
because he knows I'm a normal townie and he just wants to lob Husa in with me in order to save his fellow mafia.keremal wrote:
Then again, Death and Husa might be exceptions/townies that're unintentionally trying to mislead people, and Death is actually a Normal Townie.
I'm confused, are you saying that husa and kere are mafia or aren't mafia?Death wrote:
It's hardly logical if both Husa and keremal are mafia. Conveniently throwing in this part:because he knows I'm a normal townie and he just wants to lob Husa in with me in order to save his fellow mafia.keremal wrote:
Then again, Death and Husa might be exceptions/townies that're unintentionally trying to mislead people, and Death is actually a Normal Townie.
Yeah, but I know for a fact that I'm not mafia. I understand that you guys don't know that I'm 100% town unless you have some sort of info, but my opinions are from my perspective with all of the information that I have.cravenfiner wrote:
you forgot to put yourself in your reasoning though, but you seem to be going with a logical approach like what keremal did and everything can be taken the wrong way in this so i dont want to assume anything right now unless something stands out enough
I mean, I'm not part of the support team so I can't really say much on that topic, but I doubt it takes up 100% of his time.cravenfiner wrote:
lets not forget Death is part of the support team so he's probably busy so he cant say much, but as keremal said, he doesnt provide much backing to votes
That does make sense, which is why I mentioned the husa/keremal theory in the first place. I don't know, I feel like I'm a little apprehensive with lynching husa cause I'd feel really bad if he were innocent and is really just confused after all. But at the same time, I'd feel very stupid if he's just taking advantage of that. It's almost a 50/50 chance in my opinion since we don't have much info.Death wrote:
It's hardly logical if both Husa and keremal are mafia. Conveniently throwing in this part:because he knows I'm a normal townie and he just wants to lob Husa in with me in order to save his fellow mafia.keremal wrote:
Then again, Death and Husa might be exceptions/townies that're unintentionally trying to mislead people, and Death is actually a Normal Townie.
I don't think that it's 3v2v1 anymore due to the voting patternsWestonini wrote:
Also yeah I just realized that that win requirement confirms it's not possible for there to be 3 mafia members because then they'd already have won. So to restate what Penguin said, its most likely 4vs2 but it's technically possible to be 3vs1vs2 I suppose.
how does keremal know that im a mafia? i was just not talkative enough to be voted for that lynch to get the game ongoingDeath wrote:
It's hardly logical if both Husa and keremal are mafia. Conveniently throwing in this part:because he knows I'm a normal townie and he just wants to lob Husa in with me in order to save his fellow mafia.keremal wrote:
Then again, Death and Husa might be exceptions/townies that're unintentionally trying to mislead people, and Death is actually a Normal Townie.
In Death's theory, both you and Kere are mafia, so that's why he would know. The reason why you got voted was because you WEREN'T talking. A lot of the times new players who are mafia tend to be quiet so that's why we initially voted you.Husa wrote:
how does keremal know that im a mafia? i was just not talkative enough to be voted for that lynch to get the game ongoingDeath wrote:
It's hardly logical if both Husa and keremal are mafia. Conveniently throwing in this part:because he knows I'm a normal townie and he just wants to lob Husa in with me in order to save his fellow mafia.keremal wrote:
Then again, Death and Husa might be exceptions/townies that're unintentionally trying to mislead people, and Death is actually a Normal Townie.