Congratulations!!
No he's not. The map is rankable already so why not?T o u c h e wrote:
Ranked!? Are you kidding
86. Offset: 94,000ms BPM: 135.00Card N'FoRcE wrote:
Fun fact:
[quote="Ranking Criteria":8f7c6]All uninherited sections must be on the downbeat of the measure. A downbeat is the first beat of a measure, and while this may not affect gameplay, it will affect the main menu pulsing. Therefore, any and all uninherited sections (including metronome changes such as 2/4 and 3/4 measures) must be correct. Please see this thread for more information on downbeats.
Apply common sense and you'll agree that current ranking criteria are stupid. Which is funny because the current ranking criteria were made because "people don't seem to have common sense" (cit.).Garven wrote:
Apply common sense and we don't have to care so much.
Functionality trumps already because some people make rules then decide to follow them only when it's convenient. That goes against the very concept of "rule" (which i remind you, is described as "may NOT be broken under ANY circumstance" in the wiki), so why would you make a rule if you know there will be some cases in which it's not possible to follow it?Garven wrote:
then functionality trumps.
Pluto isn't hard, it's only memory :3Nazo wrote:
I could have sworn I made a taiko map of this before. (but like, it's >REALLY< hard. harder than the submitted one!)
of course I never knew this was on the BSS so yeah
akira_silverberg wrote:
nice map