1. 01:37:554 (1,2,3) - This is a hard diff. So please follow the consistent distance spacing here.

1. 01:21:008 (4,5) - Since it's too hard for beginner to read the timing, change these notes to a slider.

Suzully wrote:

From my modding queue. Sorry for taking long time :< <<Never mind~

[Difficult]

1. 01:37:554 (1,2,3) - This is a hard diff. So please follow the consistent distance spacing here.<<Ok~

[Basic]

1. 01:21:008 (4,5) - Since it's too hard for beginner to read the timing, change these notes to a slider.<<I can't change it to slider,because the slider is too slow.

Please tell me your thought.

About red timing sections. I'll ask other members about this and I'll write a result here. Please wait a bit.<<Okay,I think It is fine because it is from the official timing~

7odoa wrote:

Suzully wrote:

About red timing sections. I'll ask other members about this and I'll write a result here. Please wait a bit.<<Okay,I think It is fine because it is from the official timing~

104,300,4,2,1,95,1,0
9704,272.727272727273,4,1,2,60,1,0
18431,260.869565217391,4,1,1,70,1,1
22539,-100,4,2,1,95,0,1
22800,-100,4,1,1,70,0,0
22995,-100,4,1,1,70,0,1
26778,250,6,1,1,70,1,0
32778,260.869565217391,6,1,1,70,1,1
41438,300,4,1,2,60,1,0
48638,272.727272727273,4,1,1,70,1,0
58456,300,4,1,1,70,1,0
59056,-100,4,1,1,63,0,0
59656,-100,4,1,1,56,0,0
60256,-100,4,1,1,49,0,0
63106,-100,4,2,2,95,0,0
68056,272.727272727273,4,1,1,80,1,0
80260,-100,4,1,1,85,0,0
80806,-100,4,1,1,90,0,0
81351,-100,4,1,1,95,0,0
81624,-100,4,2,1,90,0,0
82237,250,4,1,2,65,1,0
90077,230.769230769231,4,1,1,75,1,1
93711,-100,4,2,1,95,0,1
94111,-100,4,1,1,80,0,1
94666,222.222222222222,4,1,1,80,1,1
95499,-100,4,1,1,85,0,1
96443,222.222222222222,5,1,1,85,1,1
96831,-66.6666666666667,5,1,1,85,0,1
97220,-100,5,1,1,85,0,0
97331,-100,5,1,1,70,0,0

1. I want to keep BPM:50~270,not BPM:200~270(as I said before,it is from the official timing)
2. If I use this timing,then I must Re-map those slow part.
3. I think using BPM:50x4=200 for slow part is not fit.

Twilight Sparkle wrote:

This feels entirely rankable.
Great job on the map :3

No BAT going to rank this? orz...

Rules wrote:

DarknessAngel wrote:

Rules wrote:

我在mod這張圖的時候就該說的...orz
沒辦法，要是你不改的話就不能ranked ;_;

7odoa wrote:

我不想改了,改了只會令圖的質量變差...
rank不了便算吧,而且我不只是想這張圖rank~
(新圖求MOD XD)

I tired to get it ranked...

DarknessAngel wrote:

我個人很想看到這圖上架的說T.T<-我都是.
慢滑條的確很有梗，可是不用紅線就沒辦法達成...(綠線最少0.5倍速度還是快了些..)<-只是用的原作的timing而已,不是我想出來的梗.
還是說改成像Expert那樣1/1重疊？<2個難度用同一種寫法太沒有新意了
雖說捨棄變慢的梗讓人不爽但是至少能ranked ;w;<-以圖的質量為先,改了會令我對圖的質量不滿意,我不想rank了一些陣mapper自己都不滿意的圖

話說在這裡求MOD是哪招xD
sry我最近不接req =3=<不要緊,只是宣傳一下而已~

7odoa wrote:

我不想改了,改了只會令圖的質量變差...

Suzully wrote:

About red timing sections. I'll ask other members about this and I'll write a result here. Please wait a bit.

those wrote:

From .:Let those mod those maps:.

[General]
If you would like, you can delete all your bookmarks to decrease the size of your .osz file by a little since you won't be needing them by the time this gets put on the server.
You do not need the timing points at:
00:13:385
00:13:931
00:14:067
00:17:749
00:22:604
00:51:365
00:54:773
00:58:045
01:10:783
01:11:056
01:11:737
01:12:419
01:13:100
01:13:372
01:14:327
01:14:599
01:15:145
01:15:554
01:16:235
01:16:507
01:17:053
01:17:325
01:17:871
01:18:143
01:18:415
01:18:552
01:18:961
01:19:915
01:20:327
01:20:872
01:21:008
01:21:690
01:25:612
01:29:477
01:33:769
01:34:666
01:36:443

That's a lot of timing points you used there: at first I thought you were trying to stay on rhythm and to try to start each downbeat at the right place, but then I looked at your Challenge difficulty and realized that you were using the Timing points to manipulate your slider velocity, which is unfortunately UNRANKABLE. Let's delete these and fix your sliders before I come back to this. Feel free to PM me when that's fixed.

In addition, you also have inconsistent Kiai Times. You may want to fix those as well.

Good luck :3

7odoa wrote:

Twilight Sparkle wrote:

This feels entirely rankable.
Great job on the map :3

Thank You!~

No BAT going to rank this? orz...

nold_1702 wrote:

把sv轉做1.35 1.0part轉2.0 bpm 慢part轉0.5試試?

Baka Tenshi wrote:

01:09:146 (1) to 01:22:237 (1) - This part...I gotta be serious. Needs an experience from who can apply my idea, who knows? May work and may not, or w/e

Shiro wrote:

Hi.

I can confirm that the timing has been changed.
However, watch out for broken sliders. For example, in the Expert difficulty, 00:22:995 (1) -
while I'm at it, 01:21:556 (1,1) - (expert diff) this is quite a huge jump, and very surprising, given that the objects are a whole screen away from each other.

I'm happy to unnuke this - good luck on getting this ranked !

1. 01:17:465 (3,1) - Incorrect spacing.
2. 01:30:077 (1,3) - Oh...

Suzully wrote:

Thank you for understanding.
I'm glad that I can get a bubble back now. But there is still a few issues.

[Beginner]

1. 01:17:465 (3,1) - Incorrect spacing.<-Fixed
2. 01:30:077 (1,3) - Oh...<-Fixed......

7odoa wrote:

Baka Tenshi wrote:

01:09:146 (1) to 01:22:237 (1) - This part...I gotta be serious. Needs an experience from who can apply my idea, who knows? May work and may not, or w/e

It's fine,just like Expert.

BPM:50~270 Changed to 100~135

It's no problem for now?

rrtyui wrote:

Please Rank it !

Garven wrote:

Yo

[General]
Tick rate 4 to all difficulties since you have the BPM halved. I'd recommend you silence key ticks during the beginning and other quieter parts of the song.
Ok~

[Easy]
01:15:556 (1,2,3) - This part is pretty trick for an easy. You might want to simplify with it longer sliders like you've used before.
I have re-map this part,it is hard to map...

[Basic]
This is hardly what I would call a Basic. Call it Standard or Normal.
It is DDRSN2's Diff Name,Basic=Normal

[Difficult]
00:15:704 (4) - I'm not sure what this note is mapped to, but it is weird to play.
Fixed
00:32:778 (1) - Something that's really bugging me about this section is that you chose to do a slider -> circle -? slider -> circle progression when the music is grouped in fours. You're essentially grouping things in threes with this type of pattern and it's really really difficult to play it naturally. I recommend you rethink this part.
[Expert]No changed because it's not very hard in this diff...
01:27:917 (2,1) - This jump is egg a big pain too due to the direction change.
Changed some.

[Challenge]
01:26:237 (1) - I didn't like how this was the sole stacked note after a slow slider.
Fixed

Good stuff. Mainly worried about the simplification of the Easy.

1. 01:37:220 - unsnapped KIAI section.

1. 01:34:000 (2) - for consistence, new combo this instead of the note next.

Colin Hou wrote:

[General]

1. 01:37:220 - unsnapped KIAI section.

[Challenge]

1. 01:34:000 (2) - for consistence, new combo this instead of the note next.

~

1. make sure all white combo color is used properly after 01:35:111

Colin Hou wrote:

[Challenge]

1. make sure all white combo color is used properly after 01:35:111

T o u c h e wrote:

Ranked!? Are you kidding

congrats for the rank!

Card N'FoRcE wrote:

Fun fact:

[quote="Ranking Criteria":8f7c6]All uninherited sections must be on the downbeat of the measure. A downbeat is the first beat of a measure, and while this may not affect gameplay, it will affect the main menu pulsing. Therefore, any and all uninherited sections (including metronome changes such as 2/4 and 3/4 measures) must be correct. Please see this thread for more information on downbeats.

Garven wrote:

Apply common sense and we don't have to care so much.

Garven wrote:

then functionality trumps.

Nazo wrote:

I could have sworn I made a taiko map of this before. (but like, it's >REALLY< hard. harder than the submitted one!)

of course I never knew this was on the BSS so yeah

Alduric wrote:

what is this crap? o_o

akira_silverberg wrote:

nice map