1. osu! forums
  2. osu!
  3. Feature Requests
This is a feature request. Feature requests can be voted up by supporters.
Current Priority: +1,066
show more
posted
first! this sounds amazing, but what would be an appropriate name for the leaderboard?
posted
god tier idea, 10/10

camellirite wrote:

first! this sounds amazing, but what would be an appropriate name for the leaderboard?
posted

Enkidu wrote:

god tier idea, 10/10

camellirite wrote:

first! this sounds amazing, but what would be an appropriate name for the leaderboard?
Performance Ranking sounds good.

Only other names that came to mind were "Competitive Ranking", "Peer Ranking" and "Rising Star Ranking".

For the most part I think it should be called either "Performance Ranking" or "Peer Ranking".

Remind me to dump my 62 stars here when the 24hrs are over.
posted
niceu idea
posted
This sounds great, but if we go by the idea of 0pp --> Your pp + E, then it could be a large server load since it would load it individually for each user.

Granted it would be supporter only, but still.
posted
mayb make it for rank ranges? everyone in 1500-2000 sees same lb, 2000-2500, etc..
posted

Narrator wrote:

This sounds great, but if we go by the idea of 0pp --> Your pp + E, then it could be a large server load since it would load it individually for each user.

Granted it would be supporter only, but still.
Since friend ranking is basically the same in the sense that it is loaded individually, I don't think it will be a large server load.
posted

Youmu Chan wrote:

Narrator wrote:

This sounds great, but if we go by the idea of 0pp --> Your pp + E, then it could be a large server load since it would load it individually for each user.

Granted it would be supporter only, but still.
Since friend ranking is basically the same in the sense that it is loaded individually, I don't think it will be a large server load.
I would counter that with the fact that there is a friend limit, but maybe. I dunno, I'd just imagine it would be demanding since instead of a range of 0 - 200 possible people to load from it loads from thousands it might be more.

Then again I don't code so ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
posted
Why not just ignore the scoreboard if you really don't like it?
posted
posted

Narrator wrote:

I would counter that with the fact that there is a friend limit, but maybe. I dunno, I'd just imagine it would be demanding since instead of a range of 0 - 200 possible people to load from it loads from thousands it might be more.

Then again I don't code so ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Number of friends doesn't affect much though if the database is relational and is appropriately indexed.
I would imagine the friend ranking is done by a 3-way JOIN of play, player and friend relationship, or by retrieving and caching friend list first and then do a 2-way JOIN of play and player against the list. Either way to extend it to this new proximity ranking I would call, it is just a matter of changing filtering predicate. Given that total score is properly indexed (which I presume it is), I don't think the performance will be significantly worse than friend ranking.
posted
Pretty sure it's a duplicate but it's a fantastic idea.
posted
how about 'Global Ranking (Balanced)' or 'Balanced Ranking'
posted
good idea!
posted
Yes, performance ranking is nice!

Kaine wrote:

mayb make it for rank ranges? everyone in 1500-2000 sees same lb, 2000-2500, etc..
what about low rank players? You have to determine the difference betwen your pp(or rank) and pp(or rank) you see at the scoreboard
In your example the Difference is 500, but you cant use this difference for players like 1kk rank where the players in interval like ~50k++ could have the same sklll
the main idea that scoreboard will show scores untill ~your pp(+-) So then we have a scoreboard where each guy has a possibility to get #1 rank

Sandy Hoey wrote:

Duplicate?: https://osu.ppy.sh/community/forums/topics/27123
nope. This guy wants scoreboard like
1 guy from #1000
1 guy from #2000
~~~here goes your score~~~
1 guy friom #3000
etc
If i get his right ofc
posted

Sandy Hoey wrote:

Duplicate?: https://osu.ppy.sh/community/forums/topics/27123
not only is this not a duplicate (as the idea proposed in that thread suggested having scores from thousands of ranks apart as opposed to from players within your rank range), that thread is eight years old at this point.

Denil25 wrote:

Yes, performance ranking is nice!

Kaine wrote:

mayb make it for rank ranges? everyone in 1500-2000 sees same lb, 2000-2500, etc..
what about low rank players? You have to determine the difference betwen your pp(or rank) and pp(or rank) you see at the scoreboard
In your example the Difference is 500, but you cant use this difference for players like 1kk rank where the players in interval like ~50k++ could have the same sklll
the main idea that scoreboard will show scores untill ~your pp(+-) So then we have a scoreboard where each guy has a possibility to get #1 rank

Sandy Hoey wrote:

Duplicate?: https://osu.ppy.sh/community/forums/topics/27123
nope. This guy wants scoreboard like
1 guy from #1000
1 guy from #2000
~~~here goes your score~~~
1 guy friom #3000
etc
If i get his right ofc


yeah i think it would be a bit skewed if it were to just take a flat rank differential, especially at lower ranks where scores could fluctuate wildly. as an example, some six digit players are capable of passing maps like airman without issues, and grouping them with players that differentiate wildly in rank at that level would produce some very weird leaderboards.

WEIRD FACE wrote:

Remind me to dump my 62 stars here when the 24hrs are over.
gotchu fam :^)
posted
Seems like a good idea would love for this to be implemented
posted
Peppy Please 🙏😌
I Thought The Scoreboard Would Be Great! Like We Seeing People Same Like Us & Able to Beaat Him/Her, So That Would Be A Motivation For The Player To Play Better! 👍
posted
Make it happen
posted
#peppyAddThisPlease
show more
Please sign in to reply.