thing wrote:
Do not edit the .osu file to modify difficulty settings, slider tick rate, or insert break times in ways that are unintended for each respective game mode.
There's really no reason to ban tickrate from .osu editing. It doesn't cause any bugs, and has multiple uses, such as putting tick on 3/4 or 2/3 beats for specific songs, or dropping down to .5 for highbpm maps or maps with lots of 5/4 or 3/2 heavy rhythming. Multiple maps in recent memory have been qualified with edited tickrate to show support for the concept, and the only disqualification reasons provided were very superficial things or just the fact that it was listed as unrankable. Obviously most maps shouldn't do it, but it really, really should be rankable for the maps that need it.
thing wrote:
Kiai must start on an important sound in the music. Doing so on an unimportant sound causes the kiai flash to feel unrelated to the song.
This is a really weird rework of the previous "kiai should be snapped to the timeline" rule. It makes sense to require kiai be snapped to the timeline because of fountain mechanics, but "important sound" is very subjective and can lead to a lot of unneeded debates, namely how many mappers nowadays are using fountain flashes. Best to just revert back to requiring kiai be snapped to the timeline and nothing more.
thing wrote:
There must not be any obscene imagery in the background/storyboard/video content. This includes nudity, near-nudity, sexual references, violence, drug abuse, etc. Keep things PG, suitable for ages 12+. Images should be on a level that can be displayed on all-audience TV, on public signage, and of nature that does not require censoring in any country.
I understand the desire to keep this vague, but atm there is a ton of confusion in the community about what is/isn't an appropriate bg. It's reached the point that some bn's are just bubbling incredibly questionable things to see what they can get away with, while others actively refuse to bubble anything not appropriate for toddlers at the fear of getting punished by a prudish qat member. The case-by-case method being used atm has been very inconsistent. I really think this should be expanded upon further, or at least if the current rule is kept, there should be something like the metadata team set up to formally determine inappropriate content.
(also maybe formalize the "no penis sliders allowed" ruling in some way)