1. osu! forums
  2. Beatmaps
  3. Ranked/Approved Beatmaps
show more
posted
commenting on usage of 1/6 I guess.

There are some that are acceptable for me, some that aren't:

◾ 03:41:636 - This is aight, the noise stands out pretty far.
◽ 03:45:636 - These consecutive 1/6th hits are okay to be there, but shouldn't be the same. The second should be kkkd since it's descending and the first is ascending.
◾ 03:45:351 - This hit before the 1/6ths I just highlighted should be mapped as 1/6 if you're gonna map 03:49:922 - as 1/6.
◽ 03:55:065 - I would say map this 1/6 to stay consistent, but you do it in the pattern after so nah.

It's ok.
posted
Funny, you commented on the ones he said to remove or change, so basically, you think I should change it back to how it was.

But I did some things, I made the 1/6 consistent across 3:45 and 3:49, and also made the first dddk into a kkkd
posted
loved std map bg is better ;wwwwwwwwwwwwwww;
posted

Astolfo wrote:

loved std map bg is better ;wwwwwwwwwwwwwww;
i can change bg tbh
posted
smh wrong one -_ -
posted
2nd part (no kd)

basically about 1/6 usage, my main concern as far as i can see

01:25:494 - why not using 1/6 on here like 01:29:922 - considering you're following that wub sound? it seems like you just forgot D: (01:32:779 - etc)

01:33:494 - same on here

i think you could make this 01:33:922 - stream more complex, feels so empty overall

oki so you get my point now, just try to take a review in this section 00:58:494 - 02:11:636 - and try to be more consistent in the 1/6 usage, some seems like randomized D:

02:37:208 (21) - :arrow: 02:38:351 -

it feels a little strange to see 02:41:065 (40,41,42,43,44) - ddddk on here and 02:43:351 - d ddk on these, i don't feel any difference between them that needs a different pattern 02:45:636 - also

02:56:779 (3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10) - mmm these are so overmapped imo D:, by deleting i just hear voice not even drum or sth

03:45:636 (110,111,112,113,114,115,116,117,118,119,120,121) - i agree with nifty on this, but 03:45:636 (110,111,112,113) - i don't feel like it's actually a real 1/6, it should be on 03:45:779 -

basically in kiai my main concern is what you're exactly following with the 1/6 usage, sometimes i get confused cause you map 1/6's before the wub sound that i thought you were suppose to follow :c

03:50:208 - for example this one looks better
03:54:779 - also

the rest looks nice

EDIT: what about adding Kiai in 04:57:494 - 05:15:636 - ? would be nice for that deathstream >:D
posted
I'm using the 1/6 in the beginning only on the "fuzzy" sound. It's pretty consistent, if you listen to the sound I use it.

The stream is ok for me, since it's only pitch based for now.

It's ddddk because there is extra sound there, with the others, it's x xxx for some reason, blame the artist lol

At 2:56 I am clearly mapping to the wubs lel

For 3:45, I think it's ok to start the 1/6 early and carry the sound because it does the same here 03:46:208 -

I think if you look, I specifically tried to make sure the 1/6 was consistent with each other.

If I didn't mention it, I applied it.
posted
well i can agree with your point about that fuzzy sound, some aren't as intense as others so it's good for me

just little stuff i want to point, i already agree with structure but melody

03:01:208 (53,54,55,56,57,58,59,60,61) - kddkkkddk fills really better according to the build up on 02:56:779 (3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10) -

03:41:565 (65) - k then 03:41:636 (66,67,68,69) - 03:41:636 (66,67,68,69) - fits better as dddk considering ascendant wubsound

about 03:45:636 (110,111,112,113) - it was my mistake; i wanted to say i agree about 1/6 usage, but should be dddk and 03:46:208 (118,119,120,121) - kkkd according to melody as he stated

personal: what about making something different on 03:54:494 (212,213,214,215) - like dkkd?

highly suggest to 03:59:636 (273,274,275,276) - make something like 03:50:494 - , doesn't make any sense for me to have a 03:59:636 (273,274,275,276) - considering you're following the wub

04:04:494 (327,328,329,330) - 04:09:065 (376,377,378,379) - also ascendant, dddk?

call me back
posted
Agree with everything except the last point, those to me are kkkd
posted
o/
2017-12-02 06:10 xfraczynho: you up for a last irc?
2017-12-02 06:11 xfraczynho: ACTION is editing [http://osu.ppy.sh/b/1445955 Team Grimoire - C18H27NO3(extend) [Taikocalypse]]
2017-12-02 06:12 Backfire: ok
2017-12-02 06:14 xfraczynho: 02:09:351 (90,91,92,93,94,95,96,97,98,99) - making them ddk then 02:10:351 - kkkd 1/6 makes sense
2017-12-02 06:16 Backfire: what
2017-12-02 06:16 xfraczynho: (suggest) 04:38:779 - 1/6 kkkk would be nice
2017-12-02 06:16 Backfire: ???
2017-12-02 06:17 xfraczynho: 02:09:351 - this and 02:09:922 - doesn't make sense
2017-12-02 06:17 xfraczynho: ddk on them would be better
2017-12-02 06:18 xfraczynho: and [https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/9670198 here] would be nicer
2017-12-02 06:18 Backfire: why doesnt it
2017-12-02 06:18 Backfire: ?
2017-12-02 06:18 Backfire: they sound like the fuzzy noise to me
2017-12-02 06:19 xfraczynho: just compare to 02:11:351 (12,13,14,15) -
2017-12-02 06:19 02:11:351 (13,14,15,16) - *
2017-12-02 06:20 xfraczynho: 02:10:351 - the wub starts from here 02:10:351 -
2017-12-02 06:20 xfraczynho: after that i can get what you're following
2017-12-02 06:21 Backfire: Can I do
2017-12-02 06:21 Backfire: ddk d d kkd k
2017-12-02 06:21 Backfire: 02:09:351 -
2017-12-02 06:22 Backfire: ?
2017-12-02 06:24 xfraczynho: that look nice
2017-12-02 06:24 xfraczynho: just 02:10:208 (96,97) - d k instead imo
2017-12-02 06:24 Backfire: alright
2017-12-02 06:24 Backfire: 02:10:494 -
2017-12-02 06:24 Backfire: change to dddk?
2017-12-02 06:24 xfraczynho: yup
2017-12-02 06:25 Backfire: ok
2017-12-02 06:25 xfraczynho: thats more important than other stuff
2017-12-02 06:25 xfraczynho: 02:10:636 (4,5) - cuz comparing them
2017-12-02 06:25 xfraczynho: and about 04:38:779 -
2017-12-02 06:26 xfraczynho: its totally up to you
2017-12-02 06:26 xfraczynho: 1/6 could be overmapped but still fluent
2017-12-02 06:26 Backfire: I hate it with 1/6
2017-12-02 06:26 Backfire: lol
2017-12-02 06:26 xfraczynho: it's fine
2017-12-02 06:27 xfraczynho: from here just starts a little thrill
2017-12-02 06:27 xfraczynho: other than that looks fine
2017-12-02 06:27 xfraczynho: let me know when you update it
2017-12-02 06:28 Backfire: ok im gonna update
2017-12-02 06:30 Backfire: submitted
posted
hi
Please sign in to reply.