Hello, just here to take a quick look at the rain before whoever is checking comes.
[Rain]
00:03:389 (1) - Really strange to have such a strong sound as a sliderend here, considering it was a dash at least in most other cases of that sound.
00:07:139 (1) - This piano note is stronger than the earlier ones, yet you have a normal dash to this one, whereas a HDash to the other ones. Try a HDash to this to follow the music better.
00:08:021 (1) - Very weak sound here, having a HDash to it sounds really weird musically, at least reduce it to a dash if nothing else.
00:10:447 (1) - Similar case to 00:03:389 (1) - , but also having a HDash to this makes no sense as it's quite inconsistent with previous section, and the sound isn't strong really.
00:13:094 (3) - Would maybe be better to have a normal dash to this, it would match the buildup nicer to have a dash to the first one, and then a HDash to the second.
00:14:197 (1) - Having a HDash to this really doesn't fit your current rhythm structure at all, for the rest of these triplets, you've done a normal movement to the third part, and this one isn't stronger in any way, so using a HDash sounds very strange.
00:14:418 (2) - On the other hand, this one is a stronger version of the other triples you've been using, however there is no notable movement to this, which sounds super awkward with the music.
00:14:859 (4) - No strong sound on this at all, not really hearing any reason for the HDash if I'm honest.
00:15:962 (1,2,3) - Really strong HDash to this, would really highly recommend reducing the HDash strength a little by moving this section to x:108.
00:21:256 (1,2) - Feels really weird to play this due to the strong sound being on the 3/4 which is currently a slider end, whereas the HDash is just to a weak vocal instead. Would restructure this part a little bit.
00:23:021 (1) - Pretty strong HDash to this considering the direction change, try x:140 instead.
00:23:903 (3) - Not really strong enough of a sound to imply a HDash, quite weak overall, would recommend just reducing it to a normal dash.
00:26:550 (1) - Feels kinda forced against the wall right now due to the HDash strength, would probably be best to keep to the guideline and go with x:496.
00:28:315 (1) - This sound really isn't stronger than the other sounds at all, would maybe understand a dash to it for the downbeat, but doing a HDash sounds really bad with the music here.
00:29:639 (4) - Small change to make the dash slightly more managable after the HDash would feel good, maybe try x:236.
00:32:506 (3) - This vocal is slightly stronger than the surrounding ones, but just doing a normal dash to it would be a lot more fitting, as it doesn't particularly stand out as a strong note.
00:35:374 (1,2) - Similar situation to 00:21:256 (1,2) - .
00:38:021 (3) - Really not a strong enough note to imply a HDash here, normal dash would be much more fitting with the music here.
00:39:565 (2,3) - Would actually be a lot nicer to have the HDash to 2, as that's a strong piano note, and then just have a normal dash to 3, as that note doesn't really have any outstanding sounds.
00:41:440 (3) - Hmm, not really hearing any strong sound on this sound at all, much less any reason to have a HDash to it. Try just doing a normal movement in it.
00:43:315 (2) - Again not really any sort of strong sound here to indicate using a HDash, would recommend a normal movement on there.
00:43:756 (6) - HDash to that one would be a lot more fitting.
00:44:197 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7) - Very strong HDash to this is really strange to play considering the speed in it, could really throw a rain player off. Try reducing it by moving this section to x:320.
00:45:521 (8) - Considering the vocal here and the piano on the next note, would be nice to have a dash both to and from it. Maybe try x:396.
00:46:624 (4,5,6,7,8) - Pretty strong vocal on this one, try x:304 on here to add a dash to it.
00:49:050 (8) - Dashing here for this vocals would feel pretty good to play, try x:160 on that one.
00:52:139 (3) - This slider sounds really weird to play because it's a 3/4 slider surrounded by 1/2, with no clear vocal on the 3/4 whereas the rest of the 1/2 sliders have had very clear vocals on ends.
00:54:786 (1,2) - Would be better to weaken this HDash a little bit considering it's a direction change right after. Try x:88.
00:56:771 (2) - Considering the strength of the sound on the sliderend here, would be a lot nicer to have at least a dash to the sliderend, if not reducing 00:56:330 (1) - to 1/2 and doing a double HDash.
01:00:962 (4) - I think this would be nicer as a 1/2 slider considering there is a clear drum on it.
01:03:168 (5) - Not really a strong enough sound to imply a HDash on it, try a normal dash for consistency with the rest of this kiai time so far.
01:04:050 (3) - Might as well make this one a normal dash too, feels really weird to have a HDash to this drum considering you had dashes for most of the previous part, just try a dash to this one too.
01:04:933 (5) - The strength of the vocal on this sliderend feels highly ignored right now. I would highly recommend at least adding a dash if not a HDash to it.
01:08:021 (4) - Similar to 01:00:962 (4) - .
01:10:227 (5) - Split it into 2 circles with a higher distancing, would feel nicer with the vocal strength of the sliderend currently.
01:11:771 (8) - Current HDash pattern feels kinda difficult for a rain, and also I can't really hear the reason behind having a HDash to this. Try reducing this one to a normal dash by making it at x:228.
01:15:521 (6) - Again, would be better to have a normal dash to it for consistency with the previous sections.
Alright, done <3
Easy
Normal
Hard
Insane
Rain
I have to be afk until Feb.25 because of real life so I try to finish by March.
