Asuka_- wrote:

thanks m4m

im not good at english sorry.
ive been pcactice modding, so im sorry if my mod isnt good xd
ofc, all sugestion lol
(these png image is lowering ar to explain.)

general
tags: repcace the fullwidth space between side.紅 and 天統姫 with half-width space. fixed

Hymn
00:58:913 (4) - change to 1/1 slider? because long vocal and symbal sound start at here. like this?? https://i.gyazo.com/5c2dbea2fa32c94bbe6 ... 787ba5.png
01:04:560 (4) - ^ same here.
think current fits better to with the drums here and overall low intensity of the part = less dense rhythm
01:28:737 (2,3,4,7) - it's good stacing. however, here is a place where music is exciting, I think that it is fun to expand the distance imo.
like this? https://i.gyazo.com/0250cc5c47a49babe77 ... 3518cd.png , https://i.gyazo.com/bc88a5bcf2a8c2e5318 ... 61e7b2.png
to me it seems the music only builds up a bit starting from 01:30:678 (4,5,6,7,8,9,10) - when I spam triples
03:23:531 - you dont follow this big guitar sound? i think 03:23:090 - ~ 03:23:619 - and 03:21:678 - ~ 03:22:207 - are identical. guitar snapping is weird but blue tick sounds way too late so I go with snapping to the kick before
04:36:854 (2,3,1) - stackmiss? yes, fixed
04:51:678 (1) - missing whistle plobably. fixed
05:42:325 (4) - change to 2 circles? because i think here sound is smiler to 05:40:913 (4,5) - and 05:41:619 (1,2) - , so 2 circles is more fun imo. takes away too much from held strings
05:59:442 (5) - move to bit left? because You aligned sliders' heads in a straight line in other pattern (05:53:090 (3,4,5) - 05:55:913 (3,4,5) - ) it's actually a rotated symmetrical pattern https://i.imgur.com/ihonxnp.jpg and think it fits well
06:18:832 - 06:18:854 - same green lines

great map~!!!

kwk wrote:

~
[Hymn]
00:18:325 - 02:50:795 - i think it would be better if you map this and the subsequent guitar beats, sounds a bit off atm undermapping guitars to keep a more varied rhythm is fine since it still follow the string it prioritised and fits this part well
00:22:737 (3,4) - feels a bit lacking in emphasis, i think a similar distance to 00:25:031 (5,1) - would be nice, maybe can ctrl+g 00:22:913 (4) - seems fine to me actually :/
00:51:325 (4,5) - curve these with a red anchor to follow the guitar in the background? 01:25:207 (4,5) - 04:08:972 (4,5) - same here would kill the same slider copy paste concept as guitars aren't the main focus here (violins + vocals are). only parts besides the weird shape 1/1 sliders that follow guitar are 01:13:384 (2,3,4) - etc
01:07:119 - maybe fill this with a circle for vocals? cause atm it sounds a bit off is that the right timestamp? there is only a held vocal from before and 1/1 drums o:
01:32:972 (1) - shortening this to 1/1 and adding another 1/1 slider at 01:33:678 fits vocals better? not sure if your doing it to emphasise the drums here think current works well to start this calm part01:34:031 (2) - but you end it on a slider tail anyway at 01:35:795 (2) -
02:02:619 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7) - did you run out of space lol, seems a bit cramped there is still some space left so I spaced it more now
03:54:060 (3) - is this note necessary? fits the guitar and I map it all the time in this part 00:36:413 (6) - 01:10:295 (6) -
04:04:031 (1,2,3,4) - i think its a bit of a shame that you stick to your standard patterning here, when this drum pattern is different to the rest of the song. 04:04:472 - beat here too I get you point, but I really want to keep the visual concept the same since the part is the same in general, the higher intensity due to cymbal spam gets reflected by higher sv. skipping the sound there is fine since drums on 04:04:295 (2,3) - are different
05:52:913 (2,3) - 05:55:737 (2,3) -05:58:560 (2,3) - swap the rhythm around here? follows guitar better current has all sliders start on the same guitar sound which makes more sense to and seems to fit guitars better
~

Lami wrote:

hello

tag big spacing :thinking: pp tags

00:08:884 - add note? looks like there is same sound with 00:08:795 (2) - part is mainly mapped a rhythm buildup with a more improvised rhythm
00:14:442 (4,6) - blanket off-ed if u care fix
00:18:854 (5,6) - how about follow melody instead of drum, like 00:18:148 (3) - .
btw, since this melody isn't clear, i cant sure my idea for that tbh. current also fits the background vocal on 00:19:207 - well, also melody is still clickable
01:13:031 (1,2,3,4) - i think 01:24:325 (1,2,3,4,5) - this rhythm is better for expressing lyric than previous 01:13:384 (2,3,4) - has much more outstanding distorted guitars, so I map to guitar
01:44:090 - circle for lyric? seems like to follow lyric in this section can't here vocals here o:
01:57:854 (3,4) - seems like 1/8 rhythm already end at 01:57:854 - . yes, but it's only sliderends and I think the two overmapped ends fit well here, hitsounding makes it not really noticeable ingame anyways
02:43:207 (13) - rly personally taste, since 02:42:148 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12) - is kiai's end(peek) part,
circle can be express intense feeling. not sure, I had a stream there before but didn't like how it transitioned into the next part. might consider this again later
03:02:442 (4,5) - buff DS? i thought u put jump at every melody.changed
05:42:325 (4,5) - not big deal maybe, if it was compared with 00:13:384 (4,5) - 02:45:854 (4,5) - , kinda different rhythm usage.
usually, you seems like to use consistent rhythm usage @@ yea but here melody seems slightly different

ok ccya

pishifat wrote:

soft sliderwhistle33 unused

Mir wrote:

Hi hi

Hymn
- 00:05:090 (4) - Pls why is this a different angle (this is a minor point) just looks nicer that way to me with how things are arranged, made it less diagonal though
- 02:33:237 (6,1,2) - Seems a lot weaker emphasis-wise than most of your other bends. Not being part of 02:31:207 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - makes it quite noticeable and seemingly inconsistent when compared to 05:18:413 (6,1,2) - in the last kiai. made it stand out a bit more, can't really do muchj more without making it either play like ass and/or make it look unfitting
- 02:59:090 (1,2,1,2,1,2) - Seems more spaced than 03:04:737 (1,2,1,2,1,2) - and the others, maybe lower it a tad? only looks like that cause of the slider angles/placement, spacing on heads (~1.7 on last 1-2), which matters here, is actually even less than some other 1-2s like 02:54:148 (1,2) - (~1.8). they all play quite similar
- 05:51:678 - There's a lot of 1/3 similar to 05:52:384 (2) - going on in this break you left that could be brought out further with hitsounds, but it's up to you if you want to map it. I find leaving a break here somewhat awkward as the song is still going. Similarly applied to sections like 05:54:501 - yea but it's really quiet and the song has calmed down a lot, which is why I mainly focus on snares (05:51:678 - 05:52:384 - etc. ). more clicking seems unfitting to me, only reason the second 1/3 thing is mapped is that I put a click on the snares anyway and 1/2 or 2/3 slider would be ??

Good. More EXA_PICO hymns are always welcome.