Pulse wrote:

hi!
from my queue

[Normal]

1. Check some distance snapping on AiMod I kniow this problem, but it should be so

[Advanced]

1. 01:08:592 - Isn't a note supposed to be here? no
2. 01:36:021 - ^ Ye, here is good
   You could do something lile this. That void on those parts are awkward while playing.

[Hard]

1. 01:20:164 (2) - Could you space it a litte more from 1? Only 1 or 2 pixels to right and top, so it looks cleaner. I tested 2 skins and it just doesn't looks great. sure, fixed

[Light Insane]

1. 00:20:164 (4) - What about curve this slider since it overlaps with a curved slider? Random example. Fixed
2. 01:06:664 (3) - Move a little to right and fix curvature? This is bad.Fixed
3. 01:20:378 (3) - I think that you have enough space to avoid overlap with (4). Not a huge thing, but at least consider. Yes, it looks bad, fixed
4. 01:24:664 (1) - Such huge SV change can negatively impact gameplay. this part allows me to do such huge sv
5. 01:34:092 (1) - It looks better Ctrl+G'd. but flow will be bad

[Insane]

1. 00:01:949 (2) - It could be lined up with next slider. fixed
2. 00:32:056 (2) - It could be more spaced. nah
3. 00:33:878 (4,5,6) - Fix stack and check 00:34:949 (1) - overlap to match. Fixed
4. 00:55:521 (1,2) - Move (1) a little bit up and incresase (2) spacing a bit. Fixed
5. 01:12:664 (1) - Tail should be fixed since it overlaps with 01:11:806 (5). Try to fix

[Fade Away]

1. 00:55:413 (6,1) - This spacing is fucked up even if that's a last diff. Remove last stream note or change spacing.
2. 01:09:128 (4,1) - ^
   I don't think that it's too huge)))

Good luck!

PeterEU wrote:

Normal

00:04:949 (2) - make it less sharp nah
00:08:378 (2,3) - http://osu.ppy.sh/ss/9096767 I use ds, so i can't do that
00:16:521 (4) - place it somewhere else maybe here http://osu.ppy.sh/ss/9096782? nah? (2,3,4) in one line
00:22:949 (4,5) - that jump isnt good do something like that http://osu.ppy.sh/ss/9096793 there did you find jumps??? It's normal! Here can't be jumps
00:36:664 (4) - looks bad move 00:36:664 (4,5) to https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/9096802= Fixed it

advanced

00:08:378 (2) - bad one do something like that https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/9096819 and move 00:10:092 (3) maybe like this http://osu.ppy.sh/ss/9096827 Fixed
00:27:664 (5) - to http://osu.ppy.sh/ss/9096836 Fixed

Hard

00:13:735 (2) - this circle isnt placed on blue tick its on red one so its too close do something like that http://osu.ppy.sh/ss/9096852 But it's understandable
01:07:735 (2,3) - place them here http://osu.ppy.sh/ss/9096871 I think now it's good

Light insane

01:10:735 (4) - kinda off why? i don't think so
01:18:449 (2,3) - https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/9096906 I like my pattern more sry

4 stars is my max GL

Taoshi wrote:

Great map , here are just a few things that i've noticed.
[Insane]
01:04:949 (3) - This could potentially go off-screen on a 4:3 aspect ratio
[Faded away]
01:33:235 (1) - This dosen't flow
01:34:092 (1) - ^ Idk if it is on purpose or your intentions is to make them not use curcular flow. Anyways up to you

- Frontier - wrote:

q
what's the idea of this map? i don't understand it xp Oh, it's my fault( I don't think about it. I just try to create it how i feel it. I don't read lyrics Just know, that everybody don't know why, and don't know much
[General]

1. The audio's file bitrate is 255kbps which is higher than 192kbps. Due to the Ranking Criteria, it is considered to be unrankable. Fixed
2. The difficulty spread between Advanced and Hard is the biggest gap in the mapset. Current difficulty spread is 1.92*>2.42*>3.46*>3.86*>4.11*>4.58*. Maybe add a diff between the gap or nerf them. maybe...But is it a big problem???
3. I think the image background doesn't quite fit with the song's lyrics. The song's lyrics tells about depression in singing or something lol. Having cherry blossom tree with children's background doesn't quite fit with the song. Maybe you could try searching some other bg that can express the song's lyrics better. Fixed, this picture is depressed enough???

[Metadata]

1. Artist: REOL (All capitalized as it said on her webpage)
2. Title: 404 not found
3. Tags:
   1. Σ sigma (album name)
   2. ギガ giga お菊 okiku れをる (members of REOL)
   3. RΞOL (stylized artist name. okay to skip this cuz i haven't seen this name appeared in ranked maps)
4. References:
   1. http://www.toysfactory.co.jp/artist/reol/official/news/20160915-2/
      
   2. http://www.reol.jp/
   3. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reol_(band)

Going to stop here. (might mod later if have time) I don't like how you overemphasized the rhythm in higher diffs. GL~

Milar001 wrote:

Hi, from my queue

[Timing]
From my perspective red line offset should be 660 or alike I don't think so
Generally I would put some effort to make more green lines and to complicate the vol. level at beginning Why??? I use green line, if it needs. I don't know what i should add(

[Insane]
OD 4 is too low, I know it's hard for 4* but don't set it lower than 6
00:16:306 - Here's a sound worth noticing
00:18:021 - ^
00:24:878 - ^
00:31:735 - ^
00:48:017 (7,8,9) - That's same sounds but movement is different, I would ctrl g 7 and 9
00:58:735 (6,7,1) - That's not for insane level
01:05:592 (4,5,1) - ^
01:12:449 (6,7,1) - ^, like 01:13:199 (2) - is even stronger tan 6 and 7 and it's less spaced This part i didn't fixed, cuz it looks cool
01:21:449 - Fill No
01:21:664 - ^No
01:21:878 - ^ plus blue and white ticksNo
01:30:878 - It's same sound as 01:31:306 (4) - so it should be filled (I would move both to blue ticks) No, it's another sound, so now it's following the music

[Fade Away]
For this level OD should be not less than 7
00:11:806 - Fill Red point in the slider highlights the sound
00:13:521 - ^ Why i should fill it?? It's not important sound
00:16:306 - As in insane, worth noticing
00:18:021 - ^
01:09:771 - Here's pretty strong sound, so instead of 01:09:878 (2) - make a reversed 1/8 slider here
01:21:449 and so on - as in insane No
01:26:378 (1) - This slider is too straight for this kind of sounds
01:30:664 (1,2) - As in insane No
01:31:521 (1) - Make it much faster

Hope will be helpful. Good luck

Ryuusei Aika wrote:

quite sad that sigma will be dissolved ;w; Yes T_T

General

current bg name in your file isn't the same with whose in your codes I checked it, and it's okey...

Advanced

is the sv change from 0.9x to 1.9x is a popular trend in mapping 2.5* map for now? Hahaah, don't know, but i don't see this in RC)))
00:19:521 (1,2) - if you're intentional, then the ds here would cause read problem in a generally equal-ds map. same for some following similar patterns It's international, because 2,43* - hard (RC) So it's not problem!

Hard

00:54:449 (3,4,5,6,7,8,1,2,3,4) - 11 notes stream is quite hard for this diff, You can at least change 00:55:091 (1,2,3,4) - into 2 1/4 sliders
00:54:449 (3,4,5,6,7,8,1,2,3,4) - ^
3,5* - it's okey to use 11 notes streams and bpm 140 is too low, so stream is good

Light Insane

00:20:592 (5,6,7,8,9,10,1) - this part is also too hard for a ~4* map. maybe it's better to not split up the stream as it may not only cause read problems but also give an extremely high level of moving skills for players (may easily cause 100). also same for some following similar patterns Fixed

have fun future technical mapper xD

Forzaken4K wrote:

Hello from my queue!

Fade Away

00:00:664 (1) - You can put the gray notch on x:170 y:154 for a better blanket.
00:04:092 (1) - Place the red notch on the slider tick. (It looks nice) fixed
00:13:735 (1) - Stack this better with the slider end. fixed
00:16:092 (1) - Don't curve the sliders too much for the start of the song. And what?
00:21:127 (6,1) - Think they're too far apart. No, it's last diff
00:38:271 (6,1) - ^^
00:40:735 (1,2) - Try to space these like the rest of the stream.
00:55:413 (6,1) - Again, too far apart.
01:21:235 - Why is it blank here? The beat and the vocals continue on. why not?Is it bad?
01:25:521 (1,2,3) - Try to map it like this. I like my version
01:26:378 (1) - This could be choppier with more red notches, example fixed. Wow, too cool)))
01:26:914 - There's a beat here. Where?

Insane

00:02:378 (1) - Remove NC. nah
00:05:806 (1) - ^^
00:09:235 (1) - ^^
00:12:664 (1) - ^^
00:15:664 (4) - Can be copypasted from 00:15:235 (3) fixed
00:19:735 (2,3) - Unstack these, doesn't really fit. I don't think so
00:33:449 (2,3) - ^^
00:40:306 (2,3) - ^^
00:47:164 (2,3) - ^^
00:55:413 (4,1) - Too far apart. fixed
00:58:092 (5) - Ctrl + H? For better flow. fixed
01:09:128 (4,1) - Too far apart. fixed
01:21:235 - You could map here, there's still vocals and beats. fixed

Light Insane

00:02:378 (1) - Remove NC nah
00:05:806 (1) - ^^
00:09:235 (1) - ^^
00:41:806 (1,2,3) - Goes off-screen. You are wrong
00:42:664 (4,5) - Unstack.

• general

1. seems good
   
   fade away
   
2. 00:13:949 (2) - imo a slider here would be better as there's not really a strong sound on 00:14:164 (3) - that should be clickable
3. 00:14:914 (2,3) - could be replaced by 1/8 repeat slider to follow song better, as it is top diff
4. 00:16:735 (3) - remove hs
5. 00:19:521 (1,2,3,4,1) - this spacing seems random, could switch 00:19:949 (3,4) - around to have more reasonable spacing
6. 00:21:127 (6,1) - extremely unnecessary jump here
7. 00:22:949 (1,2,3) - it sounds to me as 00:23:164 (2) - is louder than 00:23:378 (3) -, so why is the spacing the complete opposite?
8. 00:24:664 (1,2) - too close, could easily be misread, move triplet here for better spacing
9. 00:27:021 (3) - remove repeat arrow and put a circle at 00:27:235 -
10. 00:27:984 (4,1) - this jumpstream doesnt fit here
11. 00:30:664 (3,4,5,1) - this pattern is extremely confusing, i'd stack 00:31:306 (4,5) - on 00:31:521 (1) -
12. 00:33:235 (1,2) - very big spacing for a quiet sound, 00:33:235 (1) - is louder than 00:33:449 (2) -, too
13. 00:34:841 (6,1) - extremely unnecessary jump again
14. 00:38:164 (5,6,1) - ^
15. 00:40:735 (1) - remove repeat arrow and put a circle at 00:40:949 -
16. 00:41:698 (4,1) - extremely unecessary spacing again...
17. 00:43:735 (2,3) - there's no sound here that calls for this big spacing
18. 00:46:949 (1,2) - ^
19. 00:46:949 (1,1) - stack
20. 00:48:556 (6,1) - unecessary spacing again...
21. 00:54:770 (6,1) - ^, if you wanna make this stream into a cutstream 00:55:091 (3) - would probably be the best place to do so
22. 00:55:413 (6,1) - 10 distance snapping speaks for itself
23. 00:58:735 (5,6,1) - stack 5,6 ontop of 1 so its more playable
24. 01:03:664 (5) - too big jump
25. 01:05:592 (5,6,1) - stack 1 on 5,6 for a more playable pattern
26. 01:06:235 (2,3,4,5) - this is just confusing, stack 01:06:235 (2,3,4) -, preferably on 2
27. 01:05:806 (1,5) - stack slidertails
28. 01:07:199 (6) - move closer to tail of 01:06:664 (5) -
29. 01:07:949 (2,3) - unnecessary spacing again
30. 01:09:128 (4,1) - ^
31. 01:12:449 (6,7,1) - just stack them...
32. 01:14:378 (1,2) - unnecessarily big spacing
33. 01:15:984 (5,1) - ^
34. 01:19:521 (1,2,3) - ^
35. 01:24:556 (8,1) - ^
36. 01:25:521 (1,2,3) - even though they're sliders you could nc all to show its 1/3
37. 01:27:235 (1,2) - big spacing
38. 01:35:164 (2,3) - very small spacing

UnNVus wrote:

hi i mod from my q

Fade Away

00:04:092 (1) - this is just my opinion but this slider is kinda ugly Fixed
00:24:235 (7,8) - as far as I can tell theres no reason 8 should be so close to 7 while the rest of the notes in this combo are spaced like 2x this. from what i hear the song is the same intensity through this part so i think 8 should use the same spacing as all the other notes There is a difference in the vocal+it's aesthetically
00:25:092 (2,3,4) - I don't think a triple reflects this very well cause youre applying the same emphasis to a filler rhythm as you are to actual rhythm (i'll say right now that I'm not a huge fan of filler rhythm tho so this may just be a me thing) It needs
00:29:806 (1) - Stuff like this feels like youre ignoring the sound at the tail of the slider. maybe add a click there? I don't think so
01:00:878 (2,3) - why is 2 emphasized more than 3 despite being the same sound? Because of the same sound))) 2 is stronger than 1, so the ds is huge, but 2 is not so different with 3
01:13:199 - I feel like there should be a click here Fixed

Overall I don't really like the rhythms you mapped, it feels like you ignore a lot of unique sounds by using slider tails as well as creating a lot of needless filler but that's probably just me. Also only one diff modded cause thats what I said I'd do in my q rules.
Gl with the set, sorry if this didn't help much.

Xoul wrote:

From my mod queue.

Mod

Advanced

00:31:949 (2,3,5,1) - Hard to read for players around this range most likely Fixed
01:20:164 (2,3) - Overlap And???

Hard

00:30:235 (2,4,5,1) - Stack/Blanket this better Fixed
00:57:021 (4,1,2,3,4) - Way too spaced. Really big spike in difficulty. Reduce it I don't think so

Light Insane

00:57:449 (2,4) - Overlap. Stack or repattern. I like it now
01:06:235 (2,3,5) - ^ Fixed

Insane

Overall a ton of object overlap. Can be easily avoided but yea And what??? Overlaps are not bad

Fade Away

I'd maybe suggest a different name for the top diff to go along withe either the song title or some lyrics in the song
01:05:806 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - Doesn't look clean. Could be patterned better Fixed
01:26:092 (3,1) - Put 3 elsewhere. I think the flow here is good
Overall lots of overlapping objects, some stacking as well as blanketed objects aren't fully complete

Good luck on your set!

bite you death wrote:

hello, from queue

• general

1. seems good Good, good ^^
   
   fade away
   
2. 00:13:949 (2) - imo a slider here would be better as there's not really a strong sound on 00:14:164 (3) - that should be clickable But, i don't think so, no matter slider or circles. But even tho i like circles here more
3. 00:14:914 (2,3) - could be replaced by 1/8 repeat slider to follow song better, as it is top diff No, firstly because 2 circled are more hardly to click than slider, secondaly because there is no sound 1/8
4. 00:16:735 (3) - remove hs
5. 00:19:521 (1,2,3,4,1) - this spacing seems random, could switch 00:19:949 (3,4) - around to have more reasonable spacing
6. 00:21:127 (6,1) - extremely unnecessary jump here
7. 00:22:949 (1,2,3) - it sounds to me as 00:23:164 (2) - is louder than 00:23:378 (3) -, so why is the spacing the complete opposite?
8. 00:24:664 (1,2) - too close, could easily be misread, move triplet here for better spacing
9. 00:27:021 (3) - remove repeat arrow and put a circle at 00:27:235 -
10. 00:27:984 (4,1) - this jumpstream doesnt fit here
11. 00:30:664 (3,4,5,1) - this pattern is extremely confusing, i'd stack 00:31:306 (4,5) - on 00:31:521 (1) - I don't think so, it;s understandable
12. 00:33:235 (1,2) - very big spacing for a quiet sound, 00:33:235 (1) - is louder than 00:33:449 (2) -, too I think you are wrong, this sound is really strong...
13. 00:34:841 (6,1) - extremely unnecessary jump again
14. 00:38:164 (5,6,1) - ^
15. 00:40:735 (1) - remove repeat arrow and put a circle at 00:40:949 -
16. 00:41:698 (4,1) - extremely unecessary spacing again...
17. 00:43:735 (2,3) - there's no sound here that calls for this big spacing
18. 00:46:949 (1,2) - ^
19. 00:46:949 (1,1) - stack
20. 00:48:556 (6,1) - unecessary spacing again...
21. 00:54:770 (6,1) - ^, if you wanna make this stream into a cutstream 00:55:091 (3) - would probably be the best place to do so
22. 00:55:413 (6,1) - 10 distance snapping speaks for itself no
23. 00:58:735 (5,6,1) - stack 5,6 ontop of 1 so its more playable no
24. 01:03:664 (5) - too big jump
25. 01:05:592 (5,6,1) - stack 1 on 5,6 for a more playable pattern no
26. 01:06:235 (2,3,4,5) - this is just confusing, stack 01:06:235 (2,3,4) -, preferably on 2 no
27. 01:05:806 (1,5) - stack slidertails
28. 01:07:199 (6) - move closer to tail of 01:06:664 (5) - no
29. 01:07:949 (2,3) - unnecessary spacing again
30. 01:09:128 (4,1) - ^
31. 01:12:449 (6,7,1) - just stack them... no
32. 01:14:378 (1,2) - unnecessarily big spacing
33. 01:15:984 (5,1) - ^
34. 01:19:521 (1,2,3) - ^
35. 01:24:556 (8,1) - ^
36. 01:25:521 (1,2,3) - even though they're sliders you could nc all to show its 1/3
37. 01:27:235 (1,2) - big spacing
38. 01:35:164 (2,3) - very small spacing

you need to work a LOT on spacing, dont have time for other diffs rn, might be able to check tomorrow.

gl

p.s. @xoul : diffname comes from lyrics at 00:01:521 -

Example) Normal

324,243,23806,2,0,P|349:275|356:315,1,75,8|0,0:0|0:0,0:0:0:0:

Luel Roseline wrote:

Hi from my queue

[General]
BPM : 140 → 70 (Don't forget to increase slider speed) I think it's not so, because of clap sound. In every 4/4, 3/4 it is clap.

Example) Normal

Remove this tag - RΞOL Fixed

[Normal]
00:23:806 (5) - http://puu.sh/y9Pwf/5703d714d6.jpg

324,243,23806,2,0,P|349:275|356:315,1,75,8|0,0:0|0:0,0:0:0:0:

Fixed
01:32:378 (3,4) - (Compare other diffs) Add hitsound. Fixed

I can't found anymore. Good works.