hi, m4m from #modreqs
final diff:
final diff:
- 00:11:505 (1,2,3,4) - perhaps make some kind of progression here? cause intensity of the song is raising, having similar space between these objects feels pretty underwhelming
- 00:14:953 (5,1) - 02:38:401 (3,1) - would be better imo if this thing was symmetrical (like this i guess)
- 00:27:884 (2,3,4,1,2,3) - this flow is a bit unexpected cause 4-1-2 has wide angle, try ctrl+g on 00:28:401 (1,2) -
- 00:33:573 (1,1) - nazi but you could make it neater (second slider's tail lower)
- 00:36:332 (3,1) - this transition may be a bit confusing and cause sliderbreaks. i personally didn't have trouble testplaying (probably because i alternate such stuff), but still consider it (in this 02:48:746 (1,2) - place you care about that)
- 00:37:367 (1) - more emphasize (spacing) to downbeat?
- 00:53:918 (1,2,3,4,5,6,1,2,3,4,5,6) - 03:06:332 (1,2,3,4,5,6,1,2,3,4,5,6) - the only reason i hear for this thing to be a jumpstream is a vocal. but considering this logic, 00:54:436 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - 5-6 should be separeted and nced
- 00:56:332 (1) - nazi again, but would be neater if node in the middle would be a bit lower
- 01:21:505 (1) - does this thing really need to be bezier? i mean its too similar to regular circular slider visually. kind of same 01:39:263 (1) - but there it looks like it should be more curved
- 01:42:022 (1,2,3) - i think with this rhythm vocal would be emphasized better (better than emphasizing boring snare imo, vocal here is a bit chaotic and distorted, affecting rhythm as well, i think it should be represented)
- 01:43:229 (3) - how about making this 1/2 and placing a note on blue tick? cause vocal
- 01:47:453 (4) - make this 1/12 reverse lmao
- 01:50:125 (3,4,5,1,2,1) - not sure about this rhythm, perhaps make it closer to the vocal
- 02:31:677 (6,1) - parallel?
- 02:45:470 (1) - hm? you made 1/6 for previous similar instance (same for insane diff)
- 02:56:677 (1) - make tail curved, not straight?
- 02:56:677 (1,1) - transition between this objects may be unexpected, perhaps treat slider as extended one and place circle very close to its tail
- 03:01:849 (1) - perhaps make this thing reverse, cause its same note as 03:00:815 (1) -, fits well imo
- 00:31:332 (4,5) - align? or some other kind of connection, cause now they look kinda random imo
- 00:39:780 (1,1) - i personally think that such things look better when you do it like this, but its up to you i guess
- 00:44:263 (1) - this node a but upper to make curve look better
- 00:51:849 (1) - 03:04:263 (1) - i don't think this nc much needed
- 00:54:263 (5,1,2,1) - 03:06:677 (5,1,2,1) - for some reason thins thing was quite difficult to read, perhaps try toying with nc, or object placement, for example try put nc on 5 and 2 and delete 2 others
- 01:32:022 (4,5) - align?
- 01:39:780 (2,3,4) - use sharp flow?
- 02:10:815 (4,1) - point 4 towards 1