opinion : coolest aki ever
owoLeft wrote:
opinion : coolest aki ever
no reply = fixedMinorsonek wrote:
M4M
I've heard this song before.... rrtyui mapped it on jp mapping contest, yes i rly liked the kanau and kotori's entry wTop diff00:19:263 (6,3) - stack it properly
00:19:263 (6,5) - blanket they arent even visible each other on animation
00:18:573 (3) - i think you can move it up a bit, to form a blanket with sliderend + 00:18:918 (4) - and sliderhead with 00:19:091 (5) -
00:21:332 (3) - if you ctrl+g, triangle isnt perfect https://i.imgur.com/reZjzok.png maybe
00:28:746 (3) - you dont need to re-do this slidershape, just copy 00:13:056 (5) - and rotate for visual consistent they r far enuf and actually different part of the song lol
00:30:298 (1,3) - you can rearrange this sliders to form something like 00:24:780 (1,3) -, would look better
00:35:298 (3) - this sound is way weaker than 00:35:125 (1,2) - but also different than 00:35:470 (4,5,6) - so maybe 1/4 slider 00:35:211 (2) - and make it as sliderend? uh its still audible enough to keep it as circle
00:37:711 (2) - there is weird sound, but i think normal 1/4 rhythm will be better than 1/3 just like you did almost same sound here 00:38:229 (4,5,6) - did something different, i listened carefully with 25% playback rate and ye
01:11:505 (1,2) - blanket isnt perfect here not perfect but close enuf lul
01:32:194 (3,1) - ^ a
02:08:056 (3,1) - ^ b
02:12:539 (2,4) - stack
02:18:401 (4,3) - stack (4) at the slider body
02:14:953 (3) - 02:20:470 (3) - again, copy 00:13:056 (5) handmade ftw
02:31:677 (6) - ctrl+g for better flow (02:30:470 (1,2,3,4,5,6,1) - every slider here goes up) 02:31:677 (6) - is kind of weak and i like my current trick for confusing ppl :^(
03:40:815 (1) - not a big fan of this shape source : dimension WInsane00:05:987 (2,3,4,5,6) - flow is meh here, especially if compared to next section
00:55:729 - 00:56:246 - two sounds skipped, i suggest 00:55:643 (5,5) - 1/4 sliders here therefore change pattern a bit those 2 is really weak compared to others so i can safely skip it to not overdone as lower diff. I changed the flow anyways
01:04:263 (3) - 01:09:780 (3) - here you've mapped this sound by red anchor slider, but here 01:15:298 (3) - this exact sound is noticeably longer, and you didnt change anything didn't extend as it's awkward to see 2 extended in a row and looks lame lol, but I moved the anchor for more noticeable changes
01:26:160 (3,3) - maybe blanket? they arent visible each other lul
01:45:125 (2,3,4) - no reason to triple here vocals are worth here enuf to triple it
01:51:505 (4) - NC (as you did 00:34:263 (1) - , or remove NC there)
02:46:677 (2) - NC (as you did 00:34:263 (1) - , or remove NC there)
03:07:711 (1,2,3,4,5,1,2,3,4,5) - same as before same
Pretty good map, really well made, adding to favs, good luck!
thanks <3Pachiru wrote:
i really like the concept of the kiai, it makes it more creative, and not boring so good luck, and good job!
NeilPerry wrote:
Yoyo!
General: add in tags something. about genre and some additional things about source. ye
Conviction:
01:37:022 (3) - move it on x:29 y:229 for more neat. If i catch ur idea right ye
01:50:815 (3) - i guess moments like this should be emphazed with nc lol. rly hard sv gap forgot w
02:56:160 (2,1) - avoid this micro overlap xd fixed xd
lol sorry for nazi. it looks like ready. owo
Insane:
03:01:332 (2) - ok nazi blanket suqad right here. put it on x:247 y:363 will be more even at better overlap with this 03:01:849 (1) - lol i think its fine ;3
00:54:953 (1) - 03:07:367 (1) - dont rly understand of NC using here stream note count getting decreased, 00:51:160 (1,2,1,2,1,2,3,4,5,1,2,3,4,5) - is 8, 00:53:918 (1,2,3,4,5,1,2) - is 6 and finally that single 00:54:953 (1) - is 4, same applies to other related parts
03:19:780 (5,4) - should be stacked? oh my god
03:34:780 (4,5,6) - dont rly looks neat to overlap this with sldierend of 03:35:298 (1) - . just wanna suggest try this https://puu.sh/xQDtr/b88c3d77ee.jpg sure
ya same looks like ready
Hard:
perfect
Normal:
02:23:918 (5) - place nc? for be consistence with this 02:57:022 (1) - ? i prefer keeping measurement consistency in regardless of intensity change, also that's different idea lol
03:08:746 - useless greenline uwu
03:30:125 (5) - same about nc ^
Easy:
00:44:608 - useless greenline uwu
01:26:332 (4) - this slider starts from nothing. I dunno how to resolve this problem cuz previously you did rythm variation maybe fixed
02:43:573 (4) - ya same ye
02:45:470 (1) - is this spinner lenght rankable for easy? yes iirc
Okay im done. Set looks really ready. Best of luck with it. Sorry for nazi stuff mostly.
thank you boisScaltinof wrote:
[Conviction]
00:22:022 (1,2,1,2,1,1) - ここスライダーが裏拍取ってて少し変則的な音取りに感じたから00:21:677 (4,5) - を普通に単発置いただけだとなんか違和感が感じる こんな感じにして00:21:332 (3) - の終点に00:21:849 (4) - の単発置くのどう?NC間違えてたから見にくくなってたのかも、でもパターンに対しては個人的にリバースは避けたいっすね...
00:43:229 (1) - こ↑こ↓こっちの方が良いぞきっと これわざとです、 こーゆー仕組みになっとるゾ
01:40:470 (1,2,1,2,1) - これは鬼畜 (褒め言葉) オォン
02:22:711 (1) - これ02:21:505 (1) - の反転だけで良いと思う お、おう
03:14:263 (3) - ちょっと遠すぎ・・・?03:13:229 (2) - にスタックでも良いと思う もしくはスライダーの向き逆にするとかがいいかな
全体的通してなんだけどキックスライダーの向きが鬼畜すぎるなぁってstackまではしてないけど少し近付けました
一番キツいって感じたのが03:13:573 (4,1,2,3) - 100出させたいなら問題はない(?)って思うけどne
03:13:918 (1) - を反転するだけでも大分やりやすさが変わってきそう pp激マズ譜面作るの難しいよお( ´•̥̥̥ω•̥̥̥`)
なんか硬い文になってすみません許してください!なんでもしますから!ん?今なんでもするって
no reply = fixed, thanks!h4d0uk3n1 wrote:
hi, m4m from #modreqs
final diff:insane:
- 00:11:505 (1,2,3,4) - perhaps make some kind of progression here? cause intensity of the song is raising, having similar space between these objects feels pretty underwhelming note density is enough for this part imo
- 00:14:953 (5,1) - 02:38:401 (3,1) - would be better imo if this thing was symmetrical (like this i guess)
- 00:27:884 (2,3,4,1,2,3) - this flow is a bit unexpected cause 4-1-2 has wide angle, try ctrl+g on 00:28:401 (1,2) - it was like that before but that's actually harder to play
- 00:33:573 (1,1) - nazi but you could make it neater (second slider's tail lower)
- 00:36:332 (3,1) - this transition may be a bit confusing and cause sliderbreaks. i personally didn't have trouble testplaying (probably because i alternate such stuff), but still consider it (in this 02:48:746 (1,2) - place you care about that) did something
- 00:37:367 (1) - more emphasize (spacing) to downbeat? ds based so maybe not
- 00:53:918 (1,2,3,4,5,6,1,2,3,4,5,6) - 03:06:332 (1,2,3,4,5,6,1,2,3,4,5,6) - the only reason i hear for this thing to be a jumpstream is a vocal. but considering this logic, 00:54:436 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - 5-6 should be separeted and nced i don't need to nitpick that much as it will plays like wtf
- 00:56:332 (1) - nazi again, but would be neater if node in the middle would be a bit lower
- 01:21:505 (1) - does this thing really need to be bezier? i mean its too similar to regular circular slider visually. kind of same 01:39:263 (1) - but there it looks like it should be more curved i have weird taste right
- 01:42:022 (1,2,3) - i think with this rhythm vocal would be emphasized better (better than emphasizing boring snare imo, vocal here is a bit chaotic and distorted, affecting rhythm as well, i think it should be represented) i prefer mine ;;
- 01:43:229 (3) - how about making this 1/2 and placing a note on blue tick? cause vocal
- 01:47:453 (4) - make this 1/12 reverse lmao brO that's brutal
- 01:50:125 (3,4,5,1,2,1) - not sure about this rhythm, perhaps make it closer to the vocal it is tho ?
- 02:31:677 (6,1) - parallel?
- 02:45:470 (1) - hm? you made 1/6 for previous similar instance (same for insane diff) uhH it happens only once on the song tho
- 02:56:677 (1) - make tail curved, not straight?
- 02:56:677 (1,1) - transition between this objects may be unexpected, perhaps treat slider as extended one and place circle very close to its tail i don't think they misread with this flow lmao
- 03:01:849 (1) - perhaps make this thing reverse, cause its same note as 03:00:815 (1) -, fits well imo
Cool song and map. Hope i helped somehow, good luck!
- 00:31:332 (4,5) - align? or some other kind of connection, cause now they look kinda random imo it's fine as is, clap emphasis looks good enuf here
- 00:39:780 (1,1) - i personally think that such things look better when you do it like this, but its up to you i guess i have weird taste
- 00:44:263 (1) - this node a but upper to make curve look better
- 00:51:849 (1) - 03:04:263 (1) - i don't think this nc much needed nah too much combos if i remove that
- 00:54:263 (5,1,2,1) - 03:06:677 (5,1,2,1) - for some reason thins thing was quite difficult to read, perhaps try toying with nc, or object placement, for example try put nc on 5 and 2 and delete 2 others vocals for those kicks
- 01:32:022 (4,5) - align? im stacking with 01:30:987 (1) -
- 01:39:780 (2,3,4) - use sharp flow? similar with ^
- 02:10:815 (4,1) - point 4 towards 1
ive been cucked by a BNAkitoshi wrote:
omG thanks so much Sinnoh marry me tbh
Thank you daddySinnoh wrote:
can i bubble lol yes daddy
01:40:815 (1) - In this section you can probably spam red slider points for the glitchy effect on insane/expert tried, not that much tho w
Can you clean up your green lines so it's easier for me to check https://puu.sh/y7FT3/f7f5fa43ab.png ye cleaned on low diff
Conviction
01:04:263 (1) - 01:15:298 (1) - these can probably be 2.0x sv to be more noticeable did only 1.9 on first 2 choruses cuz last chorus has slight boost
Insane
01:21:160 (4) - Can move this right to emphasise next slider better ok
01:57:367 (1) - 02:52:539 (1) - This slider could be much more interesting added random curves w
03:32:884 (2,3,4,5,6,7) - Make this stream look cleaner i have bad eyes lol tried to fix tho
Hard
01:12:539 (1,2,3) - Make an equal triangle? oh no
02:41:505 (1) - Looks a bit too generic, either add red anchor or something added
Normal
02:57:022 (1) - is this nc correct asdasfsdfqweqweqwewqeqw
aridesuDelis wrote:
placeholder
top diff
00:14:953 (5,1) - 多分00:20:470 (5,1) - ぐらいmovementあった方が良いと思う、00:14:953 (5) - が3/4なら良い感じに合うけど、とても微妙なoverlapはリズムが分かりづらい http://osu.ppy.sh/ss/9476160 ただ2番ではこれがメインだから (01:21:160 (5,1) - ) CONSISTENCYが死ぬかも fixed,
consistencyもできるだけ守りました
00:58:746 (1) - 01:04:263 (1) - この辺何かhitsoundあるとかっこいいな~って思って自分ならnormal whistleとか付けるかも もし音付けするのであれば他のkiaiの部分も!(SV変わってるとこだけ付ければOK) c00l nice catch i added normal whis on sliderbodies
01:25:298 (5) - と01:25:815 (2) - の形だけをctrl+gしたらかっこいいと思うんだけどどう? http://osu.ppy.sh/ss/9476185 ん~流れは今のままが好きですね
01:28:229 - missing whistle?? あ
02:01:505 (1) - this deserves an edgy slider edge'd
02:30:729 - ここにサークルあったらかっこよくない? https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/9476846 こんな感じ 確かに鳴ってたわ・・・added
02:44:780 (2,3,1) - would whistle spam here :joy:
02:58:056 (1) - finish? will fit on lower diffs especially because there's a break afterwards oko
03:00:815 (1) - 03:01:849 (1) - 02:58:056 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - みたいにサークルにしたほうが良いかも?doing a slider spam from spamming squares is making the intensity here super weird because the song doesn't really do much different around did circles
03:30:815 (1) - whistle fits on body as well added, with 01:18:401 (1) - too
insane
00:42:884 (1) - こんな感じのspacingじゃないと、どういう理由でここのSVを変えてるのか分かりづらいかも。元々のSVがあまり高くないのもあるから、spacingでもここの音を表現すると良いと思います 了解
00:54:263 (5,1,2) - https://delisha.s-ul.eu/hlqA4B7u みたいなリズムが良いと思う、ここの連打の音の強弱がeditorで、25% playrateで聞かないとわからないぐらいだからシンプルなリズムじゃないと難しいかも。キックではなく単発にしてみました (こっちの方が個人的にシンプルだと思いました)
01:04:263 (3) - 3/4が合うと思うけど、しないのであればslider tailにwhistleかな? for the bass drum 01:09:953 - 01:15:470 - and find the rest urself its ez unko hs copier lolz ez mid
02:00:125 (1) - 1個目のsuggestionと同じ理由で、もう少し02:00:470 (1) - に近づけた方がSV changeに合うと思います fixd
02:46:677 (1) - top diff was 1/2 smh fixd
03:06:677 (5,1,2) - 00:54:263 (5,1,2) - と同じ 上と同じ方法で直しました
Hard
01:11:505 (4,6) - would have them less curve since 01:12:194 (6) - is forced for a blanket this flows kinda bad lol remapped the flow w
02:41:505 (1) - 3/4スライダーより 1/1 pauseの方が個人的に好き、SV changeしないんだったら3/4よりリズムが分かり易くてプレイしやすいかな?なる、fixed
Normal
02:01:849 (4) - missing whistle on the body oh noes
02:34:953 (4) - hardとかinsaneみたいに、red tickを使ったスライダーが合うかも
03:17:367 (1) - I somehow expected more curved slider to support the flow on 03:18:401 (2) - https://delisha.s-ul.eu/rbjyyHQc i agre
Easy
01:25:470 (3,4) - the 2/1 blank might be surprise for newbies as the song is quite consistent but the rhythm is. 01:50:815 (2) - is what you generally did great with the blank it represented the music in a good way. 01:26:332 - would add a circle at here or a 1/1 slider over here. i had doubt on this too thanks
02:43:918 (4) - the reason would be the same as above but this especially shouldn't have been grouped as one with 02:44:263 (1,2) - cause this makes it lame that it doesn't stand out due to 02:43:918 (4) - being together with im lame too mommy uwu
couldn't mod it in japanese because im trash at it c00l set dude c00l
im mapping beziers on non-wubDelis wrote:
tfw people started mapping beziers only on wubs
ありがとナァァァァス!_kotachi_ wrote:
おめでとナァァァァス!
Thanks fam !JourneyPlayzYT wrote:
Great Map!