my lord
Agree, you should kill yourself.iSlodinx wrote:
Kill
Thats why i said killKupcaH wrote:
Agree, you should kill yourself.iSlodinx wrote:
Kill
How is 3 months into the futurekai99 wrote:
poff is it november im seeing things
Abraker ate a piabraker wrote:
How is 3 months into the futurekai99 wrote:
poff is it november im seeing things
We get to a point where there's more lurkers than posters. People get scared of the massive amount of repeated threads that pollute OT and only those who stayed here long enough have what it takes to keep posting.johnmedina999 wrote:
Hmm. So we don't get any new users between now and then? Interesting.
Below.Ryoid wrote:
But where am i?
uh.. did you just change all the names of the threads with html?Serraionga wrote:
We get to a point where there's more lurkers than posters. People get scared of the massive amount of repeated threads that pollute OT and only those who stayed here long enough have what it takes to keep posting.johnmedina999 wrote:
Hmm. So we don't get any new users between now and then? Interesting.Below.Ryoid wrote:
But where am i?
Why, of course not! That's supposed to be a representation of the future, which means I used more direct and powerful means. I won't reveal them though._SkyFall wrote:
uh.. did you just change all the names of the threads with html?
How much time I have to wait until that future becomes reality?Serraionga wrote:
Why, of course not! That's supposed to be a representation of the future, which means I used more direct and powerful means. I won't reveal them though._SkyFall wrote:
uh.. did you just change all the names of the threads with html?
6 month is enough i guess_SkyFall wrote:
How much time I have to wait until that future becomes reality?
I meant the member count on the top-right.Serraionga wrote:
We get to a point where there's more lurkers than posters. People get scared of the massive amount of repeated threads that pollute OT and only those who stayed here long enough have what it takes to keep posting.johnmedina999 wrote:
Hmm. So we don't get any new users between now and then? Interesting.Below.Ryoid wrote:
But where am i?
It's a feature. Whatever you were told is false.Serraionga wrote:
The time travel mechanic gets glitchy from time to time. The member count would obviously be higher than now.