What makes you think there are 5 mafia?Swift wrote:
Faceman: If I do my calculations correctly, there's a 2 in 3 chance that I'm still town.
He might be suspecting some anti-town but not mafia, like SK. Or more likely, he's just failing at math. It's not as if voting is a complete crapshoot, either, so don't worry about it too much.0_o wrote:
hmmWhat makes you think there are 5 mafia?Swift wrote:
Faceman: If I do my calculations correctly, there's a 2 in 3 chance that I'm still town.
I agreeRolled wrote:
Usually when you're unable to roleclaim, you are also unable to say you are unable to claim.
That statement is full of WIFOM. You're basically saying that anyone arguing with someone else is scum.Wojjan wrote:
well Hitter assume you're both mafs for a second. pieguy knows you're maf and votes you as a "gut feeling" which wow chigga wow boom bang he's a maf! pieguy definitely looks town now, lynching a maf D1!
Are you suggesting someone to actively lurk?animask wrote:
@VashWolf SwiftTail Anything you post can be used against you. You have the right to remain silent (for a while). I don't think roleclaiming will save you at this point. Stop trying to poorly defend yourself and make some logical deductions on your own. Also don't OMGUS FoS people... please.
This is something I strongly agree with, but I can't shake the feeling that he's town. I think my thinking goes along the lines of; if he was really anti-town, why constantly put himself into the spotlight?NoHItter wrote:
Some people are saying that Swift feels sort of like animask, but that's not a valid excuse to not vote for him. (Then again, I don't believe in meta)
Actually, unvote: DxS because his claim sounds a lot more reasonable now that other people have said the same thing. One of them could still be mafia who want a convenient excuse not to roleclaim, but this is WIFOM.10. don't try to exploit things plsjust a friendly reminder
Ill keep it to myself, sorry bro.Two wrote:
10. don't try to exploit things plsjust a friendly reminder
>suspects person for bandwagoningpieguy1372 wrote:
I find it somewhat suspicious how Lybydose blatantly bandwagoned.[/b]
explain your thoughts or I will eat youChris wrote:
are you slowfoulcoon wrote:
vote: Chris
nope, I see you playing like an aggressive tard whilst contributing next to nothing. Also you agreeing with rolled on the ability to roleclaim struck me as odd because of what others have said about their restrictions.Chris wrote:
are you slowfoulcoon wrote:
vote: Chris
sounds like you're upset friendfoulcoon wrote:
nope, I see you playing like an aggressive tard whilst contributing next to nothing. Also you agreeing with rolled on the ability to roleclaim struck me as odd because of what others have said about their restrictions.
voting for me is a joke ^_^Wojjan wrote:
explain your thoughts or I will eat you
metaChris wrote:
voting for me is a joke ^_^Wojjan wrote:
explain your thoughts or I will eat you
foulcoons just upset I hammered him
Perhaps, but he had 4 votes on him and if his role is as important as he claims it is it's understandable that he wants to stay alive. Might seem like I'm buddying up with him here but honestly I think from what he's said lynching him is far too big of a risk to take.Lybydose wrote:
He's had "unable to claim" roles before as town, and he never actually said that. Seems a bit odd that he suddenly does now.
what I gathered from his post was "I did this same thing in the game before and was town, so obviously if I do it again I must be town"Mashley wrote:
Ordinarily DxS' roleclaim would seem odd, but if other people have the same restriction it's much more believable imo.Perhaps, but he had 4 votes on him and if his role is as important as he claims it is it's understandable that he wants to stay alive. Might seem like I'm buddying up with him here but honestly I think from what he's said lynching him is far too big of a risk to take.Lybydose wrote:
He's had "unable to claim" roles before as town, and he never actually said that. Seems a bit odd that he suddenly does now.
explain your reasoning or I will eat youLybydose wrote:
Vote: Mashley
He's mafia.
Some of you may be able to pick up on why.
are you roleclaiming werewolfWojjan wrote:
explain your reasoning or I will eat youLybydose wrote:
Vote: Mashley
He's mafia.
Some of you may be able to pick up on why.
no cause you can't play off your nk if you say thatWojjan wrote:
naw chris I just like saying eat you want me to switch to END YOU?
I don't know but I am curious if there is a SKWojjan wrote:
sure I can I won't say it tomorrow at any point in time and you won't have any more kills at all
(by the way do you really think there's a role that says "you're a serial killer but you can only kill when you say eat you"?)
Yet I don't believe his claim.Mashley wrote:
Ordinarily DxS' roleclaim would seem odd, but if other people have the same restriction it's much more believable imo.
I'm not 100% sure, but I think it's because of sheer inactivity. To be honest, I'd like to hear more about this claim, myself.Wojjan wrote:
explain your reasoning or I will eat youLybydose wrote:
Vote: Mashley
He's mafia.
Some of you may be able to pick up on why.
Can't say. Is Still fun thoughChris wrote:
you usually make long posts suburu why so closeted this game
I agree with youLybydose wrote:
@above: can't really see exactly 30-characters being a mafia post restriction but hey could be making the whole thing up
that wasn't so hard see now I don't have to eet just for you chirs youLybydose wrote:
@above: can't really see exactly 30-characters being a mafia post restriction but hey could be making the whole thing up
opinions, logic, maybe a FOS if you're so kind.Rolled wrote:
Okay I'm done with sandwich wojjan what do you want.
I feel like this was pointed at akro, animask, and maybe even DxS. They had obvious claim restrictions in their role PM, and posting what they did was borderline loopholing. Inability to claim a role is a pro-town trait, so the only thing left to consider is whether or not they're lying. Leaning town for all three, really.Two wrote:
10. don't try to exploit things plsjust a friendly reminder
No fibbing, I haven't said anything I don't believe is true. I did have an intent with any post I made, and any votes have actual reasoning behind them that I can't explain.Rolled wrote:
That said, unless LS has some amazing aux ability and will eventually supply us with information, I think there's some kind of fibbing going on.
LS fakes a typing quirk, Act 1. Or: Oh no, he broke it, what do?LadySuburu wrote:
No fibbing, I haven't said anything I don't believe is true. I did have an intent with any post I made, and any votes have actual reasoning behind them that I can't explain.Rolled wrote:
That said, unless LS has some amazing aux ability and will eventually supply us with information, I think there's some kind of fibbing going on.
That being said, I'm fairly sure Wojjan and Lyby are town, and Mashley and DxS are scum. However, at this point Mashley would be a better choice.
Unvote
Vote: Mashley
Still, Swift seems to be above on the list. due to Chris's interesting choice of voting method. Kinda suspicious, if you ask me.
I did have an intent with any post I made, and any votes have actual reasoning behind them that I can't explain.Unless that is addressing the tiny posts in some way I'm not understanding.
I can't come up with useful aux information if I don't have an aux role.Rolled wrote:
Correct me if/where I'm wrong pls
Feel free to lynch me if you'd likejesterjesterjesterjesterjester
If that's what you want to believe.Chris wrote:
Feel free to lynch me if you'd likejesterjesterjesterjesterjester
jesterjesterjesterjesterjesterLadySuburu wrote:
If that's what you want to believe.
what a noobChris wrote:
aw foulcoon has no input apparently since they lurked and didn't post
All you've done this game is some aggressive day 1 "scumhunting" . You say you've contributed most to this game but you're really done nothing. My input has already been given sir.Chris wrote:
aw foulcoon has no input apparently since they lurked and didn't post
more than you ^_^foulcoon wrote:
All you've done this game is some aggressive day 1 "scumhunting" . You say you've contributed most to this game but you're really done nothing. My input has already been given sir.Chris wrote:
aw foulcoon has no input apparently since they lurked and didn't post
Was this really just an earnest question? I doubt it.Mashley wrote:
Wait, who's exploiting?
Seems to me like he's trying to get away with defending DxS by lampshading the fact.Mashley wrote:
Might seem like I'm buddying up with him here but honestly I think from what he's said lynching him is far too big of a risk to take.
he knows he's off the hookakrolsmir wrote:
Way to lurk without posting anything, DxS.
reading0_o wrote:
I will be gone all day Sunday
god forbid someone makes sure they stay aliveNoHItter wrote:
Also just so you guys know just in case,
Second on my list is Chris for his bad logic on insisting a self-preservation vote.
And perhaps we can tone down the fluff posts?
I actually don't understand this. Yes, he did accuse 2 people but he said he didn't want to vote because he didn't believe a gut vote was appropriate (which I agree with). So how did not wanting to vote due make him any more suspicious?pieguy1372 wrote:
Regarding Mashley, I saw a few posts from him, and while some were neutral, he did accuse a few people in one of them. However, he didn't actually vote anyone. IMO, this does seem somewhat suspicious. unvote: NoHItter, vote: Mashley
Which doesn't explain how he's more suspicious (outside the whole, there are less people so there is a higher chance he's anti-town argument)DeathxShinigami wrote:
@pieguy
Two town members died within the last day. Swift's logic still doesn't make much sense and he already was on a bunch of other player's suspicions.