1. Hard (3.02 stars, 452 notes)
2. Insane (4.47 stars, 715 notes)
3. Normal (1.65 stars, 218 notes)

Umm...

Jayel wrote:

Hey, I've downloaded your map, but osu! does not add the map to the library and says there are some problems in the osz file. Perhaps you should check out your map and submit it again so that I may be able to redownload and mod it.

Jayel wrote:

Alright, modding time!

These are all suggestions. You don't need to follow everything I say below.

[General]
The combo colors in gray are somehow indistinguishable. Try changing the other combo color to a darker one. Yeah, sounds like a good idea

[Normal]
I guess you didn't separate combos in this diff on purpose, so no comment about the combos here. Welp, It's WIP so theres no combo colours yet.
Other than that, it's quite well made difficulty. I have nothing to say about it. Well done! I didn't actually expect you to say that it's a well made map. Thank you so much

[Hard]
01:22:690 ~ 01:31:290 - Did you just set the combo colors here not to have any 'colors' in purpose? If not, I recommend you to add some colors to the notes so that the notes here does not look odd with the rest of the notes in the kiai time. V
02:31:490 ~ 02:38:290 - This time, no colors. Do you have the video on you?
02:57:090 ~ 03:04:890 - OK, add colors this time. ^
03:14:490 - Try adding a circle here. Sorry, but if I put a circle here, it would mean hitting a note with no music behind it.

[Insane]
Up AR to 9. eeeeeehhhhhhh, well... I'll take note of this one. If there are more ppl who say the same then I'll change it.

00:41:090 ~ 00:44:090 - Colors Do you have the video on you?
01:22:690 ~ 01:31:290 - ^ ^
01:40:290 ~ 01:48:090 - ^ ^
01:54:490 (5) - Try replacing the slider with a circle. If more people say the same, I'll change it.
01:59:290 (9) - ^ ^
02:03:890 (7) - Try replacing the slider with 2 circles. I would've, but note that this sound, although I can tell has two syllables is better represented as a short slider than a triple.
02:31:490 ~ 02:38:290 - No colors Do you have the video on you?
02:57:090 ~ 03:04:890 - Colors ^

Overall, it's very well-designed map. I love the song itself, the overall ambience, the colors and placements of each note. Thank you so much.
In short, very nice work. Alright, good luck!

-Harpuia- wrote:

I had an issue with downloading the .osz file earlier lol I knew how you felt...

M4M~

[General]

1. BG size is at 1294x730, consider resizing it to a common scale such as 1366 by 768. Doing that.

[Insane]

1. Isn't a volume of 30% too low? Now that I think about it: yes.
2. 00:18:490 (3,1,2) - imo in this state, it feels like 00:19:090 (2) - has a stronger sound, where it really doesn't. Try having larger distance between 00:18:490 (3,1) - than 00:18:690 (1,2) - . I reckon this wouldn't matter. You are right about the fact that 00:19:090 (2) has a stronger sound, but it strangely feels better if the slider stayed where it is.
3. 00:22:690 (4) - 00:23:090 (5) - Really optional, but ctrl+g'ing these may work too. But if you're trying to have emphasis in the vocals, then no need to change. Sorry, but this change would make the map more uncomfortable than it should be.
4. 00:41:490 (2,3) - Spacing between these two are too large. Also compared to the previous parts, this contains the highest spacing even though the song doesn't have any drastic changes... I think. Then how would you explain this part: 00:28:290 (1,2,3,4)? it's almost 100% identical (it's just rotated 90 degrees (or pi/2 radians lel)) meaning that this bit of content becomes a repeated pattern for the player.
5. 00:47:890 (2,3,4) - From what I can hear, the vocals hit more on the 1/6 snapping (evident on 00:47:990 (3,4) - if they were to be snapped on to 1/6 ticks). Well unfortunately in these kinds of songs (slow rap) you are commonly forced to undermap to usually make it more readable for the players. How would you like it if I were to give you a steady 1/8 rhythm then slap you in the face with some irregular rhythm? (1/3, 1/6 note that the denominators of these fractions cannot evenly divide into 8) Surely you would have missed before you were even able to recognise the rhythm change.
6. 00:46:490 - This part kinda feels awkward, considering the vocal right before 00:46:690 (3) - . Same as above, I am forced to underlap due to readability factors.
7. 01:02:290 (3,4) - Would be nice to change this into a slider. Plus it would be consistent with 00:55:890 (3) - (semi-jump section then circle-circle-slider kind of pattern). Mostly because of song structure. Well, imo it is better represented as a bunch of circles. It would be a waste to replace these notes with a slider because the beats are just as strong as each other.
8. 01:11:890 (3,4) - This is pretty much just a suggestion. Maybe change these into a single slider. I don't know, I think it works better. ^
9. 01:46:290 (5) - Basing from how 01:45:090 (1,3) - are placed, distance on 01:46:090 (4,5) - , where sounds are similar to (1,3), should be increased. That's agreeable.
10. 02:02:690 (1) - Better to emphasize this object through DS. imo, it would seemingly separate the sounds on 02:02:090 (5,6,2) - from (1). Or like making the sound at (1) more apparent. Something xd Not sure what you mean here...
11. 02:15:490 (1,2,3) - Vocals hit at 1/6 snapping. Actually, this point is not too bad to have 1/6 snapping...
12. 02:27:090 (2,4) - This overlap is kinda jarring D: Is it less jarring now?
13. 02:25:890 (5) - Why not extend objects like this last until the blue tick right next to it? It would kinda fix each odd pauses in those patterns. (like 02:27:490 (4) - & 02:32:290 (2) - ) I wouldn't call the pauses "odd", but it does allow more necessary part of the song to be clickable!
14. 02:28:890 (3,4,5) - Flow here is too linear imo. Well, I did a bit of thinking through this one and I ended up moving the notes around here.
15. 02:36:890 (3,4,5,6) - I'd say spacings here are too large. Best to have less objects that require large movement on calmer parts. Might as well...
16. Overall, it's pretty nice. Good job! Thank you so much!

[Hard]I can't see anything much really that need to be called out. The difficulty already looks good to me. Only thing I have noticed are the consistency things you might have overlooked. But if the difference in pattern structure is because of variation, feel free to disregard this part:
I'm disregarding this part as the idea of large-scale repetition is imo a sign of laziness (but when it comes to others I just let it slide). Too much repetition in notes just makes it more boring for players.

1. 00:35:090 (2,3) - 00:31:890 (2) -
2. 00:18:690 (1,2) - 00:37:890 (1,2) -
3. 00:40:490 (4,5) - 00:21:290 (4) -
4. 01:41:890 (1) - 01:22:690 (1) -
5. 01:22:690 (1) - 01:31:290 (2,1) - Exception for this one. Consistency is really needed here to follow the previous structures.
6. 01:44:090 (2,3,4,5) - 01:24:290 (1,2,3) -

So yeah, that's all from me. I hope it helped.
Good luck! Thank you!

AzureDoctor wrote:

placeholder for return M4M, will mod tomorrow =w=

CucumberCuc wrote:

Hi
M4M

[All diffs]
02:38:690 maybe put circle for sound? I reckon there's no need for that. Gary's rapping just ended like 2 beats before. The break emphasises it.

[Normal]
00:15:490 - 00:41:090 after the spinner should be free 1-2 white ticks on this diff Not sure what you mean here...
00:59:890 (4) move to x:138 y:384 Not much change, but still did it.
01:11:890 (3) move to x:22 y:238 and 01:12:290 (4) end slider move up Well, the circle movement imo isn't needed and I want to keep the 4 parallel with 01:10:690 (2).
01:41:490 (4) move up and slightly left Why?
02:25:890 (4) move down Well, maybe a few pixels, it would look better.
02:29:090 (4) move slightly up and left No thanks, I would like to keep it there.
02:58:690 (1) move to x:198 y:144 for better distance That doesn't really look like better distance.
03:01:490 (4,1) move to x:24 y:328 for better distance ^
03:05:890 (2) end slider move to x:293 y:243 and copy-paste this slider and put on 03:05:090 The slider will become a perfect circle if I did that.
03:15:890 (2) move up I guess that works.

[Hard]
00:20:290 (1,2,3,4) slightly different from 00:23:490 (1,2,3,4) distance between objects I don't see how they are different.
00:29:890 (1,2) i think you can shortened slider to prev blue tick + remove circle and on red tick start new slider to next blue tick Well,
if I have a 1/4 slider at 00:29:490 (3) signifying the end of the phrase, the next start should be defined with a longer slider not two longer sliders as it would be weird.
00:57:090 (1,2) the distance between the objects is different from 00:58:290 (4,1) although, the distance between ticks is the same If you're going to tell someone that this is an issue, you should've tested the objects first.
01:04:290 (3) I'm not sure that it is a good choice blanket, maybe change it a bit? There's no blanket here, so no need to change.
01:17:090 (3) like i say above Well, how is this incorrect?

[Insane]
00:18:090 (1,2,3) slightly different range Sorry, not sure what you meant by this.
00:39:090 (5) maybe move to x:472 y:144? I'll think about this one.
00:45:490 (7) move to x:256 y:64? It doesn't make an outstanding difference in the map. I find that it's better to keep it as it is.
01:02:490 (4) I think it would be better to put this circle between circles 2 and 3 (x:116 y:176) like you do with circle 6 on 01:09:290 and 01:12:490 Yeah, this part looks a bit patchy so I'll do it.
01:31:690 (4,5,6) why the difference in length between these small circles, so if for example 01:41:290 (6,7,8), though with a difference in words, but with the same volume of the circles are far from each other? These two points in the map are at different times of the music. They don't relate to each other, so I have mapped them differently. No questions there.

AzureDoctor wrote:

placeholder for return M4M, will mod tomorrow =w=

[General]
i can barely hear the hitsounds, maybe turn it up a bit more? Yeah, I agree with you on this one.
it's not very clear to me what the blue and green combos are supposed to represent. at the start i thought it was to represent the singing but at the second kiai the blue and green don't start when the singing does. You need the video, then you'll see why the combo colours are like that.

[Normal]
00:49:090 (3) - imo a 1/2 slider would be better fitting here Ok, I'll take note of this. If anyone else says the same then I will change it.
01:23:890 - since there is a kick here maybe add a hitcircle? I guess so.
01:48:290 - i think you should map this part. a break here isn't very fitting Notice how after Gary's rapping at this part, there is no percussion until 02:52:290 (1) and it makes it feel like a break.

[Hard]
i think you could use a bit more distance emphasis. for this song i think htat a bigger jump every two measures would do a goodjob of emphasizing the strong parts of the song. overall solid difficulty though Thanks! But I'll take the "Little Jumps" into account. If anyone else tells me the same, I will do it.

[Insane]
00:44:590 (2,3) - not properly aligned w/ the slider It's a few pixels off but I might as well fix it

Once again sorry for the super late mod. it was very irresponsible of me. have some stars since i couldnt find that much in your maps to improve.
GL! Thank you so much!

xJ1 wrote:

Hey, from my mod queue

General:

Get the korean artist and title of the song and romanise those in english (Artist:(강개리) Song name:(바람이나 좀 쐐)) Yeah, I'll do that.

Normal:

00:33:090 (2,3,1) - Perfect triangle Fixed.

Hard:

02:51:090 (1,2) - Blanket opportunity I'm very sure that this is already blanketed.

Insane:

00:31:490 (1) - Maybe this should be curved to the left No need for that. This slider is meant to be parallel with the stream right next to it.

00:54:690 (5) - Try adding a triple here Doesn't really fit with the music.

02:33:490 (2,3,4) - Flow can be better I reckon I've made it better.

Fairly clean difficulties, not much else to say so GL! Thank you so much!

MyAngelMeinter wrote:

Hi

Normal

00:31:490 (1,2) - get circle beetwen this Newer players are unable to easily deal with constant rhythm repetitions, so the small breaks have been added to give the player some "breathing time".
01:22:690 (1,2) - ^^ ^
02:52:290 (1,2) - ^^ ^
02:55:490 (1,2) - ^^ ^
03:06:690 (3,1) - ^^ ^
AR 4 because it is normal Well, not necessarily. I can put it as AR5 as well and I reckon that's a better option.

Hard

AR 8 is too high Well... I guess AR7 will do then.
00:49:690 (3) - delete this No, that is a very imprtant note as it preserves the readability of the map.
Just think about patterns, because is too much space for make somethink M8, if you haven't noticed, there are already lots of patterns in this diff which work well together and represent the music.

Insane

I think this CS is a little problematic for HR players, change it for 4 or 4.5 Big NOPE on this one. CS5 is also rankable you know?
AR 9 Also a big NOPE on this one. The aim of this map is to make sure nobody can HDHR it or even try and sneak in DT mod.
00:44:890 (4,5,6,7,8) - No pattern in this place slightly hurt Ok, this actually is a pattern. It makes use of flow and other aspects of horizontal symmetry.

I think this is all
[lucky:1337]Good Luck [/lucky:1337]Thank you so much.

FiddleBlue wrote:

Hi from queue! Thank you so much for a lot of suggestions!
General

1. Combo color is a bit random. There seems to be no be no pattern in relation with the color and grayscale combo. How about making the colored combo be on the kiai part only? Have you seen the video that goes with it? For style purposes I'm following the video colours.

Normal

1. 01:33:490 - Perhaps a circle here since there's a drum sound and vocal. That works!

Hard

1. 00:45:890 (1) - Perhaps extend this 1/8 more so that the slider emphasize the vocal being held.There's no vocal being held here.
2. 01:06:290 (4,1,3) - Fix slider bodies, they're not perfectly parallel here. Only a slight imperfection, but I did it anyway.
3. 01:07:490 (3) - A 1/2 slider here instead as there's a sound on the blue tick. You can add a circle on the red tick instead. I'll think about this one, if more people say the same then I'll change this.
4. 01:21:290 - A circle here to emphasize the vocal ending, perhaps. I'm going to keep this the same for readability purposes.
5. 01:22:690 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3) - How about using this pattern instead for one measure in this section: https://gyazo.com/ac3b4f0d42ef0bb40c400b5d7ea38285.png
   I think it's better as emphasize the vocal more than the current version. I'll think about this one as well.
6. 02:06:490 (2) - Instead of simplifying this part, how about you do this: https://gyazo.com/287cd334583b4e9c5b9f80557457888c.png Note that If I complicate this diff too much I will shift the SR away from being perfectly linear. Besides, I don't ever use triples in the map, so I don't want to suddenly spring them up.
7. 02:38:290 (3) - Perhaps you can make this as a 1/1 slider instead as it kinda ends awkwardly and there's a sound on the white tick. Look at what I said for this in Insane.

Insane

1. 00:18:690 (1) - Not perfectly in the middle. The correct coordinates would be 350|194. It's not accurate since it’s rounded, but it'll be more precise to the center than the current one. Well, I used the approach circle of the start of 1 and I reckon it's perfectly in the center already.
2. 00:21:490 (4,3,5) - Perhaps you can overlap these together instead of them being very near to each other. I'll keep the 5 where it is,
   and I'll move the 4 to overlap the 3
3. 00:23:490 (1,2,3,4,5) - Why don't you make the flow here to be straight instead of being a bit to the right on the streams. Well, I could use convert slider to stream after making a 5 degree slider but now it looks like the stream is angled to the right. So I'm not sure how to really confront this properly.
4. 00:40:290 (3,4,5) - Triangle created by the slider end and two circles here aren't same angles. Fixed.
5. 00:42:690 (1,7) - Perhaps you can make this circle overlapping the slider body. ^
6. 00:53:490 (8,5) - Maybe you can overlap these instead. ^
7. 01:00:690 (3,4,6) - Why don't you align these in a straight line instead. No need for that, notice how 6 is the same distance from 01:00:690 (3,4) and it doesn't need to change.
8. 01:10:090 (2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - This looks messy :/ How about doing this instead:
   https://i.gyazo.com/760c734a8b7b3b1a3b7 ... 92b764.gif
   I think it looks neater with less overlapping. If you do agree the codes are:
   

   178,265,68890,1,0,0:0:0:0:
   244,83,69090,1,8,0:0:0:0:
   211,174,69290,1,0,0:0:0:0:
   178,265,69490,1,0,0:0:0:0:
   117,190,69690,1,8,0:0:0:0:
   84,280,69890,37,4,0:0:0:0:
   273,248,70090,1,0,0:0:0:0:
   149,100,70290,1,0,0:0:0:0:
   339,66,70490,1,0,0:0:0:0:
   273,248,70690,1,0,0:0:0:0:
   244,83,70890,1,0,0:0:0:0:
   292,75,70990,1,0,0:0:0:0:
   339,66,71090,1,0,0:0:0:0:

   To insert this: first delete 01:08:890 (4,5,6,7,8,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - , save, open the diff .osu file, find 337,158,68690,1,0,0:0:0:0:, paste the codes underneath it and save the .osu file. In the editor just do ctrl+L to refresh the map and those circles will be there. Great idea, this really fixes the chaos in this part. But I'm making the triple shorter.
9. 01:15:290 (3,2) - Why don’t you overlap these? Well, I just overlapped them.
10. 01:25:690 (5) - I can see that this is one of the circle for triangle created by 01:25:090 (3,4,5) - , but how about making it the center for 01:26:290 (2,3,4) - triangle? If you agree the coordinates for 01:25:690 (5) - would be: 260|184. You also need to adjust 01:25:490 (4) - to make it an equilateral triangle again, coordinates for that would be 173|364. I agreed with you, but I fixed it my way.
11. 01:27:490 (1,2,3,4,5) - Why don't you make the flow here straight instead of moving to the right in the streams? This is exactly like what I said before. I can never get it straight even though I use convert slider to stream.
12. 01:35:890 (2,3,4) - This isn't a perfect triangle. Unless it's intended it should probably be fixed. Fixed
13. 01:38:490 (5) - What about aligning this with 01:39:090 (2,3) - since 01:38:490 (5,2) - overlap each other? ^
14. 01:53:090 (1) - Slider body is rotated to the right a bit here. Why don't you make it align with 01:52:690 (7,8) It is, right?.
15. 02:07:890 (3,4,5) - These 1/6 snap devisor circles could cause confusion with the players. How about making it a repeating 1/6 slider instead? Well, the spacing is higher so there should be almost no confusion unless the player is half-retarded.
16. 02:09:090 (1) - Maybe put this in the center of 02:09:890 (4,5,6) - so that it'll look more organized. Coordinates will be 281|186 (not precise since results are in decimals, but it should be close enough). I changed this pattern, but in a different way to what you suggested. Nobody will notice the overlap unless the AR was any lower.
17. Why don’t you overlap this with any of 02:18:490 (8,2) - instead. Just a suggestion. What are you really asking?
18. 02:28:290 (1,3) - Why don't you blanket this? Changed, but in a different manner.
19. 02:38:290 (3) - Why not make this a 1/1 slider instead so that it can compliment the sound on the white tick and I think it makes the transition to break better. Well, I'm not doing this partially because of style and the fact that Gary's rapping stops at that point.
20. 02:38:290 (3,1) - Fix overlap Are you serious? There is no need to worry about the overlap because they are so far apart.
21. 02:55:890 (2,3,4) - Fix triangle Fixed.
22. 03:04:290 (5,6,7) - Why don't you resize this triangle so that 03:03:090 (5,6) - can overlap.

Hope this helps. It really did, thank you so much!
Good luck!

FiddleBlue wrote:

Hi, I have a way for you to fix 00:23:490 (1,2,3,4,5) - and others that are similar.
The last part of the video is to show the x-coordinates of the stream.

Mombei wrote:

From my modding queue Thank you for modding!

General

1. Modding Assistant flags this map's video to still contain its audio track, and while I couldn't hear it when checking the folder myself, I advise you doublecheck for yourself. Weird, my AiMod doesn't have any errors or issues...

Normal

1. 00:20:690 (2,3) - this pattern's rhythm structure is different from all subsequent instances of the same exact bit in the song (00:23:890 (2,3) - 00:27:090 (2,3) - etc.) Why is that? You should probably make the rhythm consistent across the map, or alternate it regularly. Putting a random variation at the beginning of the map isn't very pretty. Well, I seriously love map variations in every way, but this form of variation I reckon should be fixed.
2. 01:06:690 (1,2) - This shape is kind of awkward for 01:09:490 (3) - to play into, I advise you make the curve smoother so that you can blanket 2 and 3 Well, I'll think about that one...
3. 01:38:690 (1) - This slider slightly overlaps with the health bar, bring it down a little. Fixed.
   
   Otherwise fairly solid. Flow is iffy most of the time, but I reckon it's fine for a normal

Hard

I don't find anything substantially unrankable with this map, although 03:14:690 (1) - looks like it would be offscreen. It isn't for me but I have a 16:9 monitor, so it might differ for 4:3 aspect ratio users. No, it is not offscreen, it looks colpletely fine.=

Insane

1. 01:03:490 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - The difference in spacing you use to introduce 1/3 is barely noticeable, I think you should map it passively first, like this or anything similiar. Well, if someone else mentions this, then I will change it.
2. 01:13:090 (1,2,3,4) - These should be snapped in 1/6, probably an oversight I reckon these should also be snapped in 1/6, but that's when readability becomes an issue.
3. 02:07:890 (3,4,5) - These look exactly like the 1/4 streams you've been putting after sliders the whole map. It's extremely unintuitive. I suggest you rearrange this to look different, or map it passively. I reckon it looks better with larger spacing.
   
   Otherwise fairly ok. Thank you.

That's all. Thanks for using my queue!

1. Try higher tickrate for Hard and Insane? Those heavily rely on 1/2 and 1/4s, so tickrate 2 would feel nice.
2. Where did you get the metadata from? Looks like literally every source I could find in google lists the artists as GARY or Gary. So, if there's no better source, let's take this one
   
   

   Artist: 개리
   Romanised Artist: GARY
   Title: 바람이나 좀 쐐 (Feat. MIWOO)
   Romanised Title: GET SOME AIR (Feat. MIWOO)

3. The video isn't supposed to have any audio in it. This is a rule in order to save some disk space and allow slightly hihger in quality videos.

1. The main issue I have is that at times rhythm feels overgeneralized. 03:05:090 (1,2) - here for example (1) follows back vocals, (2) switches towards the instruments and it is really hard to figure out why. While the majority of the objects seem to be following the drum line, there is a bumber of things that stand out and shift towards vocals, for instance 00:59:890 (4) - or 01:03:090 (4) - which seem to follow purely vocals. Removing some of these things and making the rhythm shift more towards instruments would force players to listen to the song itself a lot more, and at the same time it'd help players get the concept of the rhythm game.
   
   Alternatively, you can make the map lean more towards vocals, though this would require some a bit more tricky snapping. (01:19:090 (4) - Ctrl+G here, for example, so that the vocal peaks would be highlighted with clickable objects).
   
   Apart from that I feel like everything else was pretty good.

1. 00:31:890 (2) - would work a lot better with the vocals as two circles. You've already done this for 00:35:090 (2,3) - so let's try keeping things consistent.
2. 00:46:290 - is here any reason this beat is ignored? I assumed you were trying to focus on vocals, but then I noticed that 00:46:490 (2) - is mappd without any vocal support
   Note: in case you were following vocals, then just 00:45:890 (1) - finish this slider on 00:46:190 and remove 00:46:490 (2) - since it's not following vocals.
   
   Sort of the same thing as the one that I've mentioned for Normal. You try to keep things simple, but the rhythm is asking for something a bit more complex. 00:53:290 (4) - this one for example starts on nothing as the vocals are on 00:53:390 - so you can either try something with 3/8 sliders or you can simplify it to the drum line and use more 1/2ish rhythm. It happens just for a few pattern, testplay and see what parts can be improved.
   
   Again, apart from a few patterns that feel a bit mixed up the rest is very much enjoyable.

1. 00:19:890 (4,1) - 00:23:090 (5,1) - shouldn't these two use larger spacing to highlight (1)'s strong beat? This however, happens in quite a few patterns like 00:28:090 (5,1) - 00:32:690 (5,1) - so probably I am just missing out and there's a reason for that.
2. 02:53:490 (4,1) - the same jump thing goes here, 3-4 gives the flow a nice momentum, why not use that to make 4-1 a good jump as well?

Bakari wrote:

'ello! I know it took me forever to get here and I am sorry about that! Thank you so much for modding!

General

1. Try higher tickrate for Hard and Insane? Those heavily rely on 1/2 and 1/4s, so tickrate 2 would feel nice. Sure, that works.
2. Where did you get the metadata from? Looks like literally every source I could find in google lists the artists as GARY or Gary. So, if there's no better source, let's take this one Well, I used that source. Also, Kang Gary is actually also valid.
   If this becomes a major issue then I will change it.
   
   

   Artist: 개리
   Romanised Artist: GARY
   Title: 바람이나 좀 쐐 (Feat. MIWOO)
   Romanised Title: GET SOME AIR (Feat. MIWOO)

3. The video isn't supposed to have any audio in it. This is a rule in order to save some disk space and allow slightly hihger in quality videos. There's audio in it? I can't open the avi file on my computer because I'm on mac and I don't know where to make the video have no audio.

Normal

1. The main issue I have is that at times rhythm feels overgeneralized. 03:05:090 (1,2) - here for example (1) follows back vocals, (2) switches towards the instruments and it is really hard to figure out why. While the majority of the objects seem to be following the drum line, there is a bumber of things that stand out and shift towards vocals, for instance 00:59:890 (4) - or 01:03:090 (4) - which seem to follow purely vocals. Removing some of these things and making the rhythm shift more towards instruments would force players to listen to the song itself a lot more, and at the same time it'd help players get the concept of the rhythm game. I did the first part of this suggestion, but I feel like I can better represent the song when there is a balance between hitobjects on both vocals and instruments. If this gets more serious then I will change this.
   
   Alternatively, you can make the map lean more towards vocals, though this would require some a bit more tricky snapping. (01:19:090 (4) - Ctrl+G here, for example, so that the vocal peaks would be highlighted with clickable objects). Well, no need for this.
   
   Apart from that I feel like everything else was pretty good. Thank you so much.

Hard

1. 00:31:890 (2) - would work a lot better with the vocals as two circles. You've already done this for 00:35:090 (2,3) - so let's try keeping things consistent. I agree with you on this one!
2. 00:46:290 - is here any reason this beat is ignored? I assumed you were trying to focus on vocals, but then I noticed that 00:46:490 (2) - is mappd without any vocal support
   Note: in case you were following vocals, then just 00:45:890 (1) - finish this slider on 00:46:190 and remove 00:46:490 (2) - since it's not following vocals. Well, 00:46:490 (2) - is meant for 1. Readability, and 2. It kinda follows the vocals
   
   Sort of the same thing as the one that I've mentioned for Normal. You try to keep things simple, but the rhythm is asking for something a bit more complex. 00:53:290 (4) - this one for example starts on nothing as the vocals are on 00:53:390 - so you can either try something with 3/8 sliders or you can simplify it to the drum line and use more 1/2ish rhythm. It happens just for a few pattern, testplay and see what parts can be improved.
   
   Again, apart from a few patterns that feel a bit mixed up the rest is very much enjoyable.

Insane

1. 00:19:890 (4,1) - 00:23:090 (5,1) - shouldn't these two use larger spacing to highlight (1)'s strong beat? This however, happens in quite a few patterns like 00:28:090 (5,1) - 00:32:690 (5,1) - so probably I am just missing out and there's a reason for that. I want to make this beatmap as uncomfortable as possible but still rankable. That's why I put CS5 and AR8. Perfect for a hip-hop song!
2. 02:53:490 (4,1) - the same jump thing goes here, 3-4 gives the flow a nice momentum, why not use that to make 4-1 a good jump as well? Same thing for here as well, I wanna make this beatmap uncomfortable.

The spread is a bit extreme, but I still believe it works well. I'd say that with a bit more attention to rhythm in lower difficulties this would become an amazing mapset.Thank you so much! And quick question: why is the spread extreme? It's almost 100% linear: https://puu.sh/x39qK/05118cd8db.png