1. Timing: The offset is way too early. Use offset 1075 (+14ms).

1. 02:41:861 (7) - I suggest that you split this somehow, I find it quite inconsistent for this diff since you didn't do this anywhere else. You could use a circle at 02:41:861 and then map a slider 02:42:261 - 02:42:661. Place a new combo on that slider in that case, and remove it from the upcoming circle. It's better this way because it follows the music better and you aren't forced to use gimmicks such as mapping slider ticks.
2. 02:58:661 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - Fix the spacing in this combo. Such odd rhythm (blue ticks) could be hard to sight read. I am aware that there was a spot like this before, but if it breaks nothing and only helps, then why not do it. This is required because 03:00:061 (5) this note is 3/4 away from the last instead of 1/2 like it was in the first occurence of such rhythm.
3. 04:10:661 (1,2) - Yeah, I guess you could do the same for these, split them so they don't go over everything, instead they could follow the vocal, rhythm or whatever.

1. Since this is your easiest difficulty, such high difficulty settings are quite inappropriate. Try these.
2. 00:33:061 (1,2) - I am totally against this. They don't follow the music at all. Even though double repeaters are kinda frowned upon, I suggest that you make 2 double repeaters here. They will be long enough to notice an additional repeat. Just try to position them somehow. Silencing slider returning points is a very bad thing to do, espeically in the easiest diff because it can only cause confusion.
3. 03:35:461 (1,1) - This circle comes too soon after a spinner for the easiest difficulty. I suggest shortening the spinner to 03:37:061.
4. 03:48:061 (1,1) - The slider comes too soon after a spinner for the easiest difficulty. It is also very far away from the center of the screen. I suggest removing the slider entirely and just having those circles there is good enough to follow the music nicely.

lolcubes wrote:

[Normal]

1. 00:33:061 (1,2) - I am totally against this. They don't follow the music at all. Even though double repeaters are kinda frowned upon, I suggest that you make 2 double repeaters here. They will be long enough to notice an additional repeat. Just try to position them somehow. Silencing slider returning points is a very bad thing to do, espeically in the easiest diff because it can only cause confusion.I do not see how this could cause confusion. The only thing that is silenced is the slider path on the way back. You can still hear it a little, too, so why is this all bad? Also, do you know any normal players? if so, can you make them play the normal diff and tell me if it's easy or not? I find this fine as it is, plus, listen to the music in the background closely. It kind of makes sense to put these here. Sorry, I am just strongly against you wanting me to change this.
2. 03:35:461 (1,1) - This circle comes too soon after a spinner for the easiest difficulty. I suggest shortening the spinner to 03:37:061. This is Contradicting. If I do that, then I will place notes at 03:37:475 and 03:37:875 anyways, because it'd be obvious to do so. If I do that, it will be the same length away as (1) currently is from the spinner atm. Sorry, but i'm just not doing this. I hate empty space.
3. 03:48:061 (1,1) - The slider comes too soon after a spinner for the easiest difficulty. It is also very far away from the center of the screen. I suggest removing the slider entirely and just having those circles there is good enough to follow the music nicely.Imo, if I removed the slider, it would look butt-butt ugly. Plus, It follows the music fine. Having only those three circles make it feel empty and wrong.

1. 03:25:875 - it appears that you forget to add a short kiai time in this place. (Hard diff had one on this place)
2. 00:33:061 (1,2) - I don't see any problem with this, except for the low volume slider repeat. I think the slider repeats are perfectly fit with the music (cause I hear a beat on that place). If you are worried about the slider tick, you can just move the timing section on 00:33:675 to 00:33:775, this way the slider repeat will be audible without having to worry the weird sound on the slider tick.

1. 00:34:475 (5,1) - I see that you are trying to follow the music in the background, if you are, 00:34:675 (1) should be on 00:34:475 instead and the next rhythm should be a similar rhythm as 00:34:675 (1) too (starting at 00:35:275 ). You can easily add a circle on 00:36:275 to fill the space also to make it consistent with the next rhythm
2. 01:29:075 (3) - I suggest to use a 1/4 slider just like on 01:27:475 (1). It's better if you use the same 1/4 slider repeat for 01:29:075 (3) cause it fits with the music better than a 1/2 slider repeat (you even use 1/4 beats on the collab too)
3. 02:33:075 (3) - ^
4. 01:55:175 (3) - maybe use a similar rhythm as 02:59:175 (2,3,4) rather than an vague one like this?
5. 04:15:975 (3) - ^

1. 01:35:475 (1) - This NC is unnecessary
2. 02:12:875 - 30% volume is still inaudible, maybe use 50%?
3. 02:32:675 (3,4,5,6,1) - rather than compressing the stream, it's better to spread them using normal spacing cause I think that those close distance stream doesn't fit with the pace of the music
4. 03:26:475 (2) - maybe move this to 03:26:675 ? I just think it'll be better to make it consistent with 03:29:075 (1,2)

Sallad4ever wrote:

ok then

[Normal]

1. 03:25:875 - it appears that you forget to add a short kiai time in this place. (Hard diff had one on this place) Fixed it on this diff and collab~
2. 00:33:061 (1,2) - I don't see any problem with this, except for the low volume slider repeat. I think the slider repeats are perfectly fit with the music (cause I hear a beat on that place). If you are worried about the slider tick, you can just move the timing section on 00:33:675 to 00:33:775, this way the slider repeat will be audible without having to worry the weird sound on the slider tick. All done for both of these sliders!

[Hard]

1. 00:34:475 (5,1) - I see that you are trying to follow the music in the background, if you are, 00:34:675 (1) should be on 00:34:475 instead and the next rhythm should be a similar rhythm as 00:34:675 (1) too (starting at 00:35:275 ). You can easily add a circle on 00:36:275 to fill the space also to make it consistent with the next rhythm Sorry, I dislike doing this. It kind of sounds weird to me. D:
2. 01:29:075 (3) - I suggest to use a 1/4 slider just like on 01:27:475 (1). It's better if you use the same 1/4 slider repeat for 01:29:075 (3) cause it fits with the music better than a 1/2 slider repeat (you even use 1/4 beats on the collab too) Gonna have to reject this. I did a slider like this so that it wasn't boring because you just played (1) and expecting the same thing would just be boring. XD <3 Sorry~
3. 02:33:075 (3) - ^
4. 01:55:175 (3) - maybe use a similar rhythm as 02:59:175 (2,3,4) rather than an vague one like this? Done
5. 04:15:975 (3) - ^ Done

[Collab]

1. 01:35:475 (1) - This NC is unnecessary Fixed!~
2. 02:12:875 - 30% volume is still inaudible, maybe use 50%? Okay. Fixed.
3. 02:32:675 (3,4,5,6,1) - rather than compressing the stream, it's better to spread them using normal spacing cause I think that those close distance stream doesn't fit with the pace of the music Aiiiight, Fixed.
4. 03:26:475 (2) - maybe move this to 03:26:675 ? I just think it'll be better to make it consistent with 03:29:075 (1,2) Done!

Call me back after you've fix those. Please reply to what you fix and what you don't

Elly-chan wrote:

[Hard]

1. 00:34:475 (5,1) - I see that you are trying to follow the music in the background, if you are, 00:34:675 (1) should be on 00:34:475 instead and the next rhythm should be a similar rhythm as 00:34:675 (1) too (starting at 00:35:275 ). You can easily add a circle on 00:36:275 to fill the space also to make it consistent with the next rhythm Sorry, I dislike doing this. It kind of sounds weird to me. D:
2. 01:29:075 (3) - I suggest to use a 1/4 slider just like on 01:27:475 (1). It's better if you use the same 1/4 slider repeat for 01:29:075 (3) cause it fits with the music better than a 1/2 slider repeat (you even use 1/4 beats on the collab too) Gonna have to reject this. I did a slider like this so that it wasn't boring because you just played (1) and expecting the same thing would just be boring. XD <3 Sorry~

1. 02:03:475 (3) - Remove clap.
2. 02:36:875 (3) - You have a clap on the slidertick. Use some timing sections to remove it.
3. 02:45:475 (6) - I see you improvised with claps around this section, but why not place it here as well when you were placing it on every 2nd and 4th white tick?
4. 02:58:675 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - You should probably use the same hitsounds (i.e. no claps) like you did at 01:54:675 (1,2,3,4,5). Sounds inconsistent and weird to me.
5. 03:26:675 (2) - I think you're missing claps.
6. 04:01:075 (1) - That clap on the start bugs me, sounds like it's extra. Remove it?

1. 04:15:475 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7) - Slightly inconsistent hitsounds compared to other occurences like this. If you really want it, I'm ok with it, but just warning if you this wasn't intentional.

1. 00:52:275 - This timing section makes the hitsounds go normal, instead of custom normal. Intentional?
2. 01:11:875 (3,4,5,6) - You could use some claps here if you wanted, I think they would sound nice.
3. 01:27:075 (4) - This clap felt out of place because you didn't use it around here, I think it's best to remove it.
4. 02:09:075 - Same as 00:52:275.

lolcubes wrote:

[Collab]

1. 02:03:475 (3) - Remove clap.
2. 02:36:875 (3) - You have a clap on the slidertick. Use some timing sections to remove it.
3. 02:45:475 (6) - I see you improvised with claps around this section, but why not place it here as well when you were placing it on every 2nd and 4th white tick?
4. 02:58:675 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - You should probably use the same hitsounds (i.e. no claps) like you did at 01:54:675 (1,2,3,4,5). Sounds inconsistent and weird to me.
5. 03:26:675 (2) - I think you're missing claps.
6. 04:01:075 (1) - That clap on the start bugs me, sounds like it's extra. Remove it?

Done Everything


[Hard]

1. 04:15:475 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7) - Slightly inconsistent hitsounds compared to other occurences like this. If you really want it, I'm ok with it, but just warning if you this wasn't intentional.

Done

[Normal]

1. 00:52:275 - This timing section makes the hitsounds go normal, instead of custom normal. Intentional?Intentional
2. 01:11:875 (3,4,5,6) - You could use some claps here if you wanted, I think they would sound nice. Done
3. 01:27:075 (4) - This clap felt out of place because you didn't use it around here, I think it's best to remove it. Done
4. 02:09:075 - Same as 00:52:275. Intentional

Tell me what you want to fix and I'll rank.

Elly-chan wrote:

i got bad ratings already ;(

thank you

Orkel wrote:

Elly-chan wrote:

i got bad ratings already ;(

thank you

Dumb trolls rating it 1 because of Shiirn I bet, like they did on this.

Awesome map btw.

S i R i R u wrote:

Halozyyyyyyyyyyyyy

LunarSakuya wrote:

Congrats!! WE NEED MORE HALOZY

Zelos wrote:

Uhhh isn't the easiest difficulty supposed to be 2.99 stars or below to go for ranking?
Last couple of times i tryed getting away with a diff under 3.5 stars I was told no it can not go for ranking without a diff under 3 stars.

Elly-chan wrote:

Zelos wrote:

Uhhh isn't the easiest difficulty supposed to be 2.99 stars or below to go for ranking?
Last couple of times i tryed getting away with a diff under 3.5 stars I was told no it can not go for ranking without a diff under 3 stars.

If the difficulty is found easy enough to be under 3 stars, it is rankable.

Besides, the difficulty settings were lower under my Normal difficulty settings for the diff.