Nothing to say. Sorry
Thanks!!!!!!!Venix wrote:
Hello! From queue~
[Easy][Insane]
- 00:42:896 (1,2,3) - Flow between these objects can be a bit more smoother like you did on similar patterns. What are you think about something like http://osu.ppy.sh/ss/8005883 this. It should works better, because transition 00:42:896 (1,2) - here will be circular and comforable and 00:44:396 (3) - this slier will continue it well. changed
- 01:38:396 (3,4) - What are you think about changing these shapes to others, like http://osu.ppy.sh/ss/8005902 this to obtain better music fitting, because 01:38:396 - here you've a bit other kind of rythm. It will works for aesthetics aswell, because by this you'll avoid 4x the same slider, which is a bit boring. littele change
- 01:42:896 (1,2) - Here you've small antiflow. What are you think about CTRL+H on 01:42:896 (1) - (like you did it 01:57:896 (1,2) - here) this slider. It should works better. keep for now.
Ok! That's all from me, good luck~!
- 00:11:583 (2,3,4) - I think this spacing is a bit unlogical, because you don't emphasised the most important ryth here. You should emphasise 00:11:958 (4) - this circle by increasing spacing (Like you did it 00:37:833 (1,2,3) - here), because this rythm is the strongest here and it's need it. little change
- 00:39:333 - I think you can get here nice aesthetics visual by moving 00:39:333 (4) - this circle a bit to up to make blanket with 00:39:521 (1,2,3,4,1) - this stream, like this. http://osu.ppy.sh/ss/8006010 nice
- 01:01:458 (3,4) - You should increase spacing here, because rythm is not that light like you emphasised it. You can do it easily by 01:01:458 (3) - moving this circle a bit to right, because in comparsion 01:01:083 (2,3) - this spacing seems overspaced. okay
Thanks!!Morroni wrote:
Hi, a little mod how I can
[Easy][Normal]
- 00:12:521 (3) - maybe delete it? sounds better no
- 00:37:833 (3) - I don't know if it is good idea, but you can try to replace this with one circle or something similar for more interesting souind desuyone
[Hard]
- 00:11:771 (6,7) - replace with slider? keep for now
- 00:30:146 (6) - sounds better without it emphasize key sound
- 01:48:146 (6) - ^
- 02:00:146 (6) - ^
I can't mod Light Insane and Insane because I can't find something wrong there. You can just make them more readable (DS, overlaps and so on) I'll check
- 00:00:896 (1,2,3,4,1,2) - maybe you can make this through more interesting patterns for eyes? hm... remove stack?? xD
- 00:03:896 (1,2,3,4,1,2) - ^
- 00:06:896 (1,2,3,4,1,2) - ^
- 00:46:833 (3,4,1) - a bit hard to aim for semi-newbies, I think... this little jump to slider is more suitable for kiai-time llittle changed
- 00:51:896 (1) - you can start this from a circle and then from spinner... too hearable place no
Very nice work, good luck!
Nice mod!!Lami wrote:
diff name
light insane => insane
insane => custom diff name or etc // insaneより expert難易度に近いですかも
LightInsaneを削除したので、Insaneはこのままでいきますー
normal
00:27:333 (6) - このnoteをここで00:27:146 - 運んでください
hard
00:13:271 (2,4,1) - 00:14:958 (3,5,1,2) - 、etc.... unsnap
00:38:771 (1,2) - hardでは 3/4は読むのが大変かも知りません 確かに。。 でも少し保留で。
01:00:802 (5) - 01:12:802 (5) - overmapped、特にbeatがないので、敢えてnoteを使うのはよくないと思います
01:06:896 (1,2) - このよに急なjumpは避けてください。hardのjumpは基本的には問題ないですが、全体的にjumpみたいのがないので
特別な音がないばしょうでのjumpは不自然です。
01:07:083 (2) - ・・ ここに 01:07:271 - vocalもあるし、beatもあるので、1/1sliderを1/2rhythmで返してください。
01:14:021 (5,1) - blanket
01:38:396 - 強いbeatをskipするのはなんか変な感じがします
02:07:271 (2,3,4) - DSがビジュアルてきに一致しません。ここと比べれば...(02:20:958 (3,4) - )
light Insane
00:19:646 (3,4,5) - 、00:21:521 (5,6) - 、00:43:458 (4,5) - 、00:49:458 (4,5) - 、01:17:958 (3,4) - ... etc
rhythm自体が理解できないのではないですが、insane diffにある同じpartと比べれば、insaneより もっと きついrhythmを 使っています。
light insaneが 下位難易度という点で、rhythmを 上位難易度よりsimpleにするのも考え見るほうもいいと思います。
00:12:333 - Rhythmの Gapが 長すぎると 感じるので、1/4sliderもいいとおもいます。
00:38:208 (6) - ほかのdiffでは ただのnoteだったのに...(特にhard diffより rhythmがないです。)
01:21:896 (1,2) - make smaller ds、insaneを参考して...(2)はよわいbeat、(3)はつよいbeat、dsも beatの強さを表現すろほうが
いいと思います。
Insane
00:06:521 - hitsoundがmusicと似合わないですね
00:14:021 (5,6) - (6)にあまり強い音がないので、ここでのjumpは気まずい感じdesu
00:30:521 (8) - 、02:00:521 (1) - 一致しないnc rule。
00:39:052 (2,3) - ・00:38:771 (1,2) - dsが 小さいので、3/4は読みづらいです
このsnareみたいな 音よりは(00:52:927 (5) - )、このdrumがある この部分が 00:53:302 - 重要と思います。
01:05:771 (3,4) - ええ、this jump is too big
01:28:646 (3) - ctrl+g
01:44:771 (3,4) - same ^
01:20:396 - だいたい、音楽がdrumで成っているので、mappingするほうがいいとおもいます。
01:24:427 (5) - 01:30:427 (5) - overmapped
personally think, would be better if you recheck how to use your rhythm usage. gl
Thanks"osuskrub wrote:
Hello there!
[General]
the "cv" should be capitalized so it's "CV" no
[Easy]
00:41:396 (3,4) - i honestly think you should curve these a little more or just leaving them straight
00:48:896 (1,4) - i feel like these two should be somewhat similar, they might not be expressing same sound, but it doesn't look that great aesthetically
02:02:958 (5,1) - the entry to 5-1 could be better and more linear imo
keep
[Normal]
00:27:333 (6,1) - this looks realllly ugly, i would ctrl + > and fix ds
00:34:458 (2) - i would make this a 1/2 slider because you are missing the important sound on the white tick
00:36:896 (1,2,3) - this still kinda looks ugly imo, maybe move 3 around x:469 y:37 to make it have like a diagonal flow downwards, it looks better
01:41:208 (3,4) - i would just make 4 go along with the flow of 3
[Hard]
lemme start off with some ds errors
01:07:083 (2,3) -
01:07:646 (3,4) -
02:20:958 (3,4) -
onto the actual map
00:12:896 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,5) - all of this is very confusing. you start off with drums then do the vocals and then back to drums? 00:14:396 - is an important beat i think you should map and overall the rhythm should be more clear
00:23:677 (2,3) - i'd probably just stack these on the end of 1 cause that's very irregularly spaced for a hard
00:33:802 - there's a note here
00:51:427 - and here
01:07:083 (2) - you seem to be mapping vocals here? but i think a reverse slider would work better
01:18:521 (5,6,7) - reverse slider because hard players aren't very good at playing somewhat awkward rhythm
01:37:271 (3,4) - this overlap would look a lot better if you curved 4 some more
02:03:802 - a note here
i'm not very good with light insanes so i'll just skip it
[Insane]
00:12:521 (2,3,1) - the flow here is very weird, i understand you are trying to do a different type of flow, but introducing it like this isn't very intuitive
00:14:583 (1,2,3) - i would try and make these as equal as you can
00:57:521 (5) - i was expecting this slider to be ctrl+g
01:44:677 (2) - overmapped?
02:10:083 (2,3) - this distance is WAYYYYYYYYY too far and it's at a very awkward angle, i'd reduce the distance and make the flow more comfy
good luck
No idea who you are or why you getting involved, you seem to be more concern as if this is drama rather than a debate. Since you are not a forum mod or even bother to check any of our facts (info) in the posts, you are being more irrelevant than US politics in this thread. Get your feelings out of here no one cares, I'm here to mod and want this map to get ranked with correct information.Time Capsule wrote:
@Alveryn Please don't make something that actually just a piece of dot on paper become a novel. If it does really annoy you I suggest you to just leave (will really appreciate it tho lol). Peoples have their own prespective about stuff and yes, its not wrong to critized or even point out their mistake. but please keep in mind this sentence because it was so doesn't mean it was so . Restricted a map to not get check by others is just "meh". In simple way, if bn does point out again about CV or cv usage, he will prolly fix it immidiently. if NOT just let what it be. Thanks and have a good day
ps. this is not discussion forum, its mod one
Does that mean that the notation of the CD is incorrect?Alveryn wrote:
Your sources (Designed, Bold-text, Green bad font) are mistakes in production/design, not OFFICIAL notations. -> https://auctions.c.yimg.jp/images.aucti ... s28489.jpg
I already replied to this matter.Alveryn wrote:
My sources (Raw, plain-text, correct format, not-designed) are corrected and done in the right way without design limitations. Saying your fail-design "cv" is correct is false af. ->
http://www.yuzu-soft.com/ja/post/5692/% ... 83%AB.html (This part: https://puu.sh/vORDD/76a3ce3e7e.jpg which YOU sent? Like can't you see it?)
Non-official sites are also displayed in google search.Alveryn wrote:
Even google search of song title shows 99% of the answers to have "CV" and not "cv", it's like writing "adhd" instead of "ADHD" it's nothing but mistake and poor english. https://www.google.co.jp/search?q=Masak ... itani+Hana)+-+Daisuki+Nanda&oq=Masaki+Gaillard+(cv%3A+Kiritani+Hana)+-+Daisuki+Nanda&aqs=chrome..69i57.1807j0j4&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8
I do not think that it is necessary.Alveryn wrote:
You can't take a design image text and use that as "proof" of being "official", you need the Raw text. Many thing are written differently when designed (Logo's for example) yet are written in a different way when shown in plain text.
If it gets the state of qualified, QAT will be checked so we know which is right.Alveryn wrote:
BN please dont bubble until you have fixed this mistake
ALBUM INFORMATION
Original name: 「天色*アイルノーツ」キャラクターソングVol.4 大好きなんだ
Artists: Masaki Gaillard (CV: Kiritani Hana), Shirley Warwick (CV: Kitami Rikka), Amagiri Yune (CV: Toyota Sera), Shiraga Airi (CV: Natsuno Koori)
Lyricist: Nakayama♥Mami (Angel Note)
Composer: Famishin (Yuzusoft)
Arranger: Shinohara Mizuki (Angel Note)
Release date: May 31, 2013
Catalog number: YSCD-0030
Publisher: Yuzusoft
AUDIO INFORMATION
Format: MPEG-1 Layer 3
Channels: 2
Sample rate: 44100 Hz
Compression level: MP3 LAME V0
http://www.yuzu-soft.com/ja/post/5692/%E7%9C%9F%E5%92%B2+%E3%82%AB%E3%82%99%E3%82%A4%E3%83%A4+%E3%83%AB.htmlThis is not the alias of the song, it's a character introduction.
Image 1 and Image 2 (Sources: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XvclwsR ... .be&t=1m7s and https://auctions.c.yimg.jp/images.aucti ... s28489.jpg)These are the only official sources so far (i.e. the rar you have posted). So, you are obliged to stick to it, no matter how the other unofficial references show.
Can't believe someone can be in this much denial when given straight out facts. This is some next-level tin-foil hat.Asuka_ wrote:
but I can not judge that should use whitch by myself because there are official sites, not official websites, sites that I do not know whether it is official or not.
That is a horrible example as if "mistakes have never been made" before. I checked both threads and no one mentioned "cv" on either at all they seem to just went long with it. Your information is beyond worthless compared to mine. Prove that they are not mistakes? Since they are ranked it should be easy right? Official METADATA and not front-side of the CD cover. Very weak argument.IamKwan wrote:
You also mentioned design mistake, how can you prove it? I mean, there are also some other songs which use small letters instead of big ones in their artists, like this one or this one. There is basically no way to verify and what you said is thus pretty much worthless.
Why would yuzusoft give false information to ALL retail sites because there is NO store so far that have been selling the CD under the metadata info with "cv". And the fields are in japanese? You can even buy the song from Amazon.jp and get official metadata SAME as mine?IamKwan wrote:
Amazon and all the other third party retail sites (also the mp3 file, I supposed you downloaded them online? Fields are not even in Japanese?) are not official, so they have zero value on justifying usage of CV in the Artist. Shitty or not shitty is not the matter to judge the accuracy of metadata, correctness is the officality in this game, not based on the usual / common practice. What the official says has the highest priority.
I don't know if you are blind? Maybe? This is the whole album info on a JAPANESE Amazon, and fields are in JAPANESE? Buy the god damn album maybe and check for yourself and see yourself waste 450 yen to prove yourself wrong. https://www.amazon.co.jp/s/ref=ntt_srch ... ch-type=ss ImageIamKwan wrote:
Amazon and all the other third party retail sites (also the mp3 file, I supposed you downloaded them online? Fields are not even in Japanese?) are not official
That is the stupidest thing you've said so far (maybe? you might have said worse things before). If frontside of cover is credible and official reference a.k.a "source" for being the title. Then why the hell is the backside not?IamKwan wrote:
Let me repeat again, the cover is definitely the only credible and official reference showing the current artist, all your justifications and what you linked are unfortunately untenable because none of them falls into the category of official references.
Since IamKwan and Asuka_ don't seem to understand what metadata is neither the meaning of the word "OFFICIAL", please some other BN/QAT to check out proofs and decide. They consider their frontside of CD cover to be official song information metadata, while I give retail info, official backside of the CD and the official ASL CD download metadata info, they are still somehow in denial.This is the current level of ignorance I see from this mod and mapper. and currently I am very frustrated about this situtation I didn't think people could have this little understanding.
Their proofs of official title being "cv": Frontside of Cover. And YouTube video stylized font. Image 1 and Image 2
My proofs of official title being "CV":
Retails selling the CD with metadata GIVEN BY YUZUSOFT. http://www.suruga-ya.jp/product/detail/302064229001
http://music-book.jp/music/Artist/870080/Album/aaa63au0
https://www.amazon.co.jp/%E5%A4%A9%E8%8 ... B06VT4CCDH
https://pc.dwango.jp/portals/album/2642 ... o=official
http://blog.sina.com.cn/s/blog_b0d77c7a0101a3d0.html
Official Amazon product (Album) with info that must have come from Yuzusoft https://www.amazon.co.jp/s/ref=ntt_srch ... ch-type=ss
Barcode/QR-code to buy the official album (Which redirects to retails selling it as CV:). 4560100333805
Scans of the fcking CD (Inside, frontside, backside, everyfcking thing). http://puu.sh/vPZQR/ee1172c75d.rar
BACKSIDE OF THE CD COVER WHICH IS USUALLY CORRECTED FROM STYLIZED FRONT-SIDE. https://i.ppy.sh/5c682d54e78932a96ee870 ... 312e6a7067
Ephemeral said that "CV" is reasonable, so I will follow it.I wrote:
I understand that "CV" should be given priority in cases where both "CV" and "cv" are present.
In this case, I think that "CV" is probably correct.
Let's finish the discussion.
Alveryn wrote:
But the most convincing and real proof is the fact that I got the backside (you can even Barcode-scan it) and as I suspected IT HAS CV! Which disproves all your false accusations of "being on the cover means it's the official way to write" as we can see it's corrected here in the BACKSIDE
.
None of the songs here is the exact same song as 大好きなんだ? They are some other songs.Alveryn wrote:
If you think retail site such as Amazon is "not official" why not use my other 3490312471941 sources I linked? For example, the Backside and Barcode?? Why are you mentioning only Amazon as if it's my only reference?
You are trying very hard to make my post as invalid as possible by ignoring all the important parts. And the fact that you are awaiting IamKwan who's just as much in denial as you, he will obviously say no, you guys don't care about the facts you just want me to be wrong.
First, The backside barcode image does not indicate any songs namely 大好きなんだ. Second, you can't prove neither the official frontside image being incorrect nor using "cv" as a stylistic choice. Thus, I don't agree discussion is over. Please do not pop in and end our discussion suddenly. Please.Ephemeral wrote:
"CV" is the correct metadata given from Alveryn's assertions and associated proof via the backside barcode image. Though the front side denotes "cv", acronym use is traditionally purely in uppercase (ie: CV) and the official frontside image is either incorrect or uses "cv" as a stylistic choice.
In respect to the common nomenclature and official metadata, "CV" is plainly the right choice for this particular case and needs no further discussion from either party, though I would encourage both of you to be more civil in your discussions in the future, even if such things can be rather frustrating at times.
This is by far the weakest argument you've had so far. Yes you are right, the song is not stated there on the backside, but do you notice how there are 3 other songs? (Vol 1, Vol 2, Vol 3)IamKwan wrote:
None of the songs here is the exact same song as 大好きなんだ? They are some other songs.
I have pretty much repeated many times that we have to stick with the exact alias for this exact song. I am also not against you on this matter but judging everything based on facts and rules.
Original name: 「天色*アイルノーツ」キャラクターソングVol.3 アオゾラキャンバス
Artists: Shiraga Airi (CV: Natsuno Koori), Shirley Warwick (CV: Kitami Rikka), Amagiri Yune (CV: Toyota Sera), Masaki Gaillard (CV: Kiritani Hana)
Lyricist: kala (Angel Note)
Composer: Famishin (Yuzusoft)
Arranger: Inohara Satoru (Angel Note)
Release date: May 17, 2013
Catalog number: YSCD-0029
Publisher: Yuzusoft
Original name: 「天色*アイルノーツ」キャラクターソングVol.2 私だけの空
Artists: Amagiri Yune (CV: Toyota Sera), Shirley Warwick (CV: Kitami Rikka), Shiraga Airi (CV: Natsuno Koori), Masaki Gaillard (CV: Kiritani Hana)
Lyricist: Riryka (Angel Note)
Composer: Famishin (Yuzusoft)
Arranger: Shiranui Tsubasa (Angel Note)
Release date: April 19, 2013
Catalog number: YSCD-0028
Publisher: Yuzusoft
I just did, just read the text above. And also this does not justify making yours any more valid. If we both can't prove which one is correct format, why should we use yours? QAT powers wins? Luckily, I've won so that's not an issue.IamKwan wrote:
You can't prove neither the official frontside image being incorrect nor using "cv" as a stylistic choice
This is kind of true. This would be true if there was maybe one or two sites that used incorrect format, but in this case EVERY retail, website, torrent, backside, store uses CV as if they were given CV as album information? I mean you can CLEARLY see that it says "cv" on the frontside, but album information given to these companies says CV? Why are they all using CV, there must be some retail that sells it in the metadata of "cv"? Is it just a coincidence that all companies are wrong?IamKwan wrote:
Amazon and other retail stores are not treated as official reference for a while because they have already given us so many incorrect metadata examples in recent years. When there are direct materials released from the official, why do we bother to follow those unofficial third party information outside? If you need examples, I can grab some for you.
修正しました! ありがとうございます~ 返信遅くなってほんとすいません!wwwKanau wrote:
一つだけ思うところがあったので書かせて頂きます、正直割とどうでもいいと思う人もいるので無視でも構いません
01:53:958 (5,1) - 同じような配置/音取りをしている00:23:958 (5,1) - に比べSVが高く設定されているにもかかわらず十分なdistanceが確保できておらず、
カーソルの流れの延長線上にあるのも加えて1/2に誤認される可能性があると思いました。
この状態からさらにdistanceを広げるのは厳しいなので、流れを折って1/1スペースであると認識させやすくするために右下に01:54:333 (1) - を移動させる、
例えばこのような感じにするのはいかがですか?
[]
good mapです! 桐谷華好きなんで頑張ってください
sorry, i forgot places i fixed...osuskrub wrote:
could i get a proper response to my mod please?