Masaki Gaillard (cv: Kiritani Hana) - Daisuki Nanda

posted
Total Posts
97
show more
Narcissu
Multiple account ?
Topic Starter
Asuka_-
@Narcissu no..
The low Playcount and Playtime are because I was playing offline before.
I am sorry for the chaos caused...

thanks kds~
Mitkoff
Hello
NM from q

[Easy]
  1. 00:59:396 (3) - 01:11:396 (3) - don't understand why hss are different... Clap (with drum additions) on 2nd one i guess should be on head of slider instead of reverse tail?
  2. 01:39:896 (1,2,3,4) - don't want to try https://puu.sh/vGjrP.jpg? for emphasis on 01:41:208 (3) - strong sound here
  3. 02:05:208 (2,3) - not a big deal actually, but might stack them
  4. 02:20:396 - snap timeline, instead of 02:20:404 -
  5. 00:12:896 - 00:54:896 - useless grennlines i guess , You can delete it. You might also check other diffs for stuff like these


[Normal]
  1. 00:00:896 - snap timeline
  2. 00:01:646 (2) - shape supposed to be less curved than others?
  3. 00:12:708 - imo start as combo and new part from vocals not really good idea. i suggest snap start on down beat. It's more intuitive. https://puu.sh/vGkAo.jpg
    Also it's more consistent with your usually map structure.
  4. 00:34:833 (3,4) - ctrl-g for rythm. imo more fits vocals. don't foget resnap hss as well.
  5. 00:59:396 (5) - additions to drum? looks like it's according to all diffs, pls recheck 00:59:396 - 00:59:771 - 01:00:146 - 01:11:396 - 01:11:771 - 01:12:146 - for HS consistency
  6. 01:36:896 (1,2,3,4,5) - suggestion: http://puu.sh/vGkUv.jpg or https://puu.sh/vGl0z.jpg for save your rhythm but less dense and 01:37:646 - not clickable since imo it's really weak beat


[Hard]
  1. 00:38:775 01:18:906 01:36:900 unsnapped lines
  2. 00:23:677 - honestly it's really weak beat, but 00:23:864 - this one is noticeable for sure. You set your priorities the other way. :? mb https://puu.sh/vGlgg.jpg ? Or https://puu.sh/vGltp.jpg for better fits music. Same stuff for higher Light Insane i guess, but with more dense stuff
  3. 01:53:208 (1,2) - ^ same
  4. 01:18:896 (1,2) - i suggest crl-g for rhythm, for better following instruments by following melodic sound 01:18:896 - using slider
  5. 01:24:896 (1) - ^ also i'll get a bit more variation with 01:30:896 (1) - and 01:36:896 (1) - witch sounds a bit more sharp
  6. 02:14:396 (1,2,3,4,5) - https://puu.sh/vGlZP.jpg or http://puu.sh/vGn3J.jpg for fits guitar better, it's solo part so i guess make sense to emphasis on it


[light Insane]
  1. 00:00:906 00:38:775 01:18:906 unsnapped lines
  2. 00:28:646 (3,4,5) - make a squre?
  3. 00:41:583 (2) - questinoble spacing because 00:42:333 (5) - low ds
  4. 00:41:208 (1) - if You are based Ncs on guitars punches, so 00:41:958 - Hs it as well for consistency , according for other places with same souds
  5. 01:04:646 (3,4,5) - mb make even triangle (with same sides)?

[]
That's it.
Hope You'll find smting usefull.
GL~
Topic Starter
Asuka_-

Mitkoff wrote:

Hello
NM from q

[Easy]
  1. 00:59:396 (3) - 01:11:396 (3) - don't understand why hss are different... Clap (with drum additions) on 2nd one i guess should be on head of slider instead of reverse tail? ok
  2. 01:39:896 (1,2,3,4) - don't want to try https://puu.sh/vGjrP.jpg? for emphasis on 01:41:208 (3) - strong sound here keep for mow
  3. 02:05:208 (2,3) - not a big deal actually, but might stack them no
  4. 02:20:396 - snap timeline, instead of 02:20:404 - ok
  5. 00:12:896 - 00:54:896 - useless grennlines i guess , You can delete it. You might also check other diffs for stuff like these ok


[Normal]
  1. 00:00:896 - snap timeline
  2. 00:01:646 (2) - shape supposed to be less curved than others?
  3. 00:12:708 - imo start as combo and new part from vocals not really good idea. i suggest snap start on down beat. It's more intuitive. https://puu.sh/vGkAo.jpg
    Also it's more consistent with your usually map structure. nice
  4. 00:34:833 (3,4) - ctrl-g for rythm. imo more fits vocals. don't foget resnap hss as well. keep for mow
  5. 00:59:396 (5) - additions to drum? looks like it's according to all diffs, pls recheck 00:59:396 - 00:59:771 - 01:00:146 - 01:11:396 - 01:11:771 - 01:12:146 - for HS consistency
  6. 01:36:896 (1,2,3,4,5) - suggestion: http://puu.sh/vGkUv.jpg or https://puu.sh/vGl0z.jpg for save your rhythm but less dense and 01:37:646 - not clickable since imo it's really weak beat
    i should follow 01:38:396 - for bigginer i think. keep


[Hard]
  1. 00:38:775 01:18:906 01:36:900 unsnapped lines
  2. 00:23:677 - honestly it's really weak beat, but 00:23:864 - this one is noticeable for sure. You set your priorities the other way. :? mb https://puu.sh/vGlgg.jpg ? Or https://puu.sh/vGltp.jpg for better fits music. Same stuff for higher Light Insane i guess, but with more dense stuff
  3. 01:53:208 (1,2) - ^ same
  4. 01:18:896 (1,2) - i suggest crl-g for rhythm, for better following instruments by following melodic sound 01:18:896 - using slider its fine
  5. 01:24:896 (1) - ^ also i'll get a bit more variation with 01:30:896 (1) - and 01:36:896 (1) - witch sounds a bit more sharp its fine
  6. 02:14:396 (1,2,3,4,5) - https://puu.sh/vGlZP.jpg or http://puu.sh/vGn3J.jpg for fits guitar better, it's solo part so i guess make sense to emphasis on it nice


[light Insane]
  1. 00:00:906 00:38:775 01:18:906 unsnapped lines
  2. 00:28:646 (3,4,5) - make a squre? i try
  3. 00:41:583 (2) - questinoble spacing because 00:42:333 (5) - low ds its fine
  4. 00:41:208 (1) - if You are based Ncs on guitars punches, so 00:41:958 - Hs it as well for consistency , according for other places with same souds keep its fine
  5. 01:04:646 (3,4,5) - mb make even triangle (with same sides)? k

[]
That's it.
Hope You'll find smting usefull.
GL~
Thanks!!! good mod!!
xDololow
Nothing to say. Sorry :o:o:o
Venix
Hello! From queue~

[Easy]
  1. 00:42:896 (1,2,3) - Flow between these objects can be a bit more smoother like you did on similar patterns. What are you think about something like http://osu.ppy.sh/ss/8005883 this. It should works better, because transition 00:42:896 (1,2) - here will be circular and comforable and 00:44:396 (3) - this slier will continue it well.
  2. 01:38:396 (3,4) - What are you think about changing these shapes to others, like http://osu.ppy.sh/ss/8005902 this to obtain better music fitting, because 01:38:396 - here you've a bit other kind of rythm. It will works for aesthetics aswell, because by this you'll avoid 4x the same slider, which is a bit boring.
  3. 01:42:896 (1,2) - Here you've small antiflow. What are you think about CTRL+H on 01:42:896 (1) - (like you did it 01:57:896 (1,2) - here) this slider. It should works better.


[Insane]
  1. 00:11:583 (2,3,4) - I think this spacing is a bit unlogical, because you don't emphasised the most important ryth here. You should emphasise 00:11:958 (4) - this circle by increasing spacing (Like you did it 00:37:833 (1,2,3) - here), because this rythm is the strongest here and it's need it.
  2. 00:39:333 - I think you can get here nice aesthetics visual by moving 00:39:333 (4) - this circle a bit to up to make blanket with 00:39:521 (1,2,3,4,1) - this stream, like this. http://osu.ppy.sh/ss/8006010
  3. 01:01:458 (3,4) - You should increase spacing here, because rythm is not that light like you emphasised it. You can do it easily by 01:01:458 (3) - moving this circle a bit to right, because in comparsion 01:01:083 (2,3) - this spacing seems overspaced.


Ok! That's all from me, good luck~!
Morroni
Hi, a little mod how I can
[Easy]
  1. 00:12:521 (3) - maybe delete it? sounds better
  2. 00:37:833 (3) - I don't know if it is good idea, but you can try to replace this with one circle or something similar for more interesting souind

[Normal]
  1. 00:11:771 (6,7) - replace with slider?
  2. 00:30:146 (6) - sounds better without it
  3. 01:48:146 (6) - ^
  4. 02:00:146 (6) - ^

[Hard]
  1. 00:00:896 (1,2,3,4,1,2) - maybe you can make this through more interesting patterns for eyes?
  2. 00:03:896 (1,2,3,4,1,2) - ^
  3. 00:06:896 (1,2,3,4,1,2) - ^
  4. 00:46:833 (3,4,1) - a bit hard to aim for semi-newbies, I think... this little jump to slider is more suitable for kiai-time
  5. 00:51:896 (1) - you can start this from a circle and then from spinner... too hearable place


I can't mod Light Insane and Insane because I can't find something wrong there. You can just make them more readable (DS, overlaps and so on)
Very nice work, good luck!
Topic Starter
Asuka_-

Venix wrote:

Hello! From queue~

[Easy]
  1. 00:42:896 (1,2,3) - Flow between these objects can be a bit more smoother like you did on similar patterns. What are you think about something like http://osu.ppy.sh/ss/8005883 this. It should works better, because transition 00:42:896 (1,2) - here will be circular and comforable and 00:44:396 (3) - this slier will continue it well. changed
  2. 01:38:396 (3,4) - What are you think about changing these shapes to others, like http://osu.ppy.sh/ss/8005902 this to obtain better music fitting, because 01:38:396 - here you've a bit other kind of rythm. It will works for aesthetics aswell, because by this you'll avoid 4x the same slider, which is a bit boring. littele change
  3. 01:42:896 (1,2) - Here you've small antiflow. What are you think about CTRL+H on 01:42:896 (1) - (like you did it 01:57:896 (1,2) - here) this slider. It should works better. keep for now.


[Insane]
  1. 00:11:583 (2,3,4) - I think this spacing is a bit unlogical, because you don't emphasised the most important ryth here. You should emphasise 00:11:958 (4) - this circle by increasing spacing (Like you did it 00:37:833 (1,2,3) - here), because this rythm is the strongest here and it's need it. little change
  2. 00:39:333 - I think you can get here nice aesthetics visual by moving 00:39:333 (4) - this circle a bit to up to make blanket with 00:39:521 (1,2,3,4,1) - this stream, like this. http://osu.ppy.sh/ss/8006010 nice
  3. 01:01:458 (3,4) - You should increase spacing here, because rythm is not that light like you emphasised it. You can do it easily by 01:01:458 (3) - moving this circle a bit to right, because in comparsion 01:01:083 (2,3) - this spacing seems overspaced. okay


Ok! That's all from me, good luck~!
Thanks!!!!!!!
Topic Starter
Asuka_-

Morroni wrote:

Hi, a little mod how I can
[Easy]
  1. 00:12:521 (3) - maybe delete it? sounds better no
  2. 00:37:833 (3) - I don't know if it is good idea, but you can try to replace this with one circle or something similar for more interesting souind desuyone

[Normal]
  1. 00:11:771 (6,7) - replace with slider? keep for now
  2. 00:30:146 (6) - sounds better without it emphasize key sound
  3. 01:48:146 (6) - ^
  4. 02:00:146 (6) - ^

[Hard]
  1. 00:00:896 (1,2,3,4,1,2) - maybe you can make this through more interesting patterns for eyes? hm... remove stack?? xD
  2. 00:03:896 (1,2,3,4,1,2) - ^
  3. 00:06:896 (1,2,3,4,1,2) - ^
  4. 00:46:833 (3,4,1) - a bit hard to aim for semi-newbies, I think... this little jump to slider is more suitable for kiai-time llittle changed
  5. 00:51:896 (1) - you can start this from a circle and then from spinner... too hearable place no


I can't mod Light Insane and Insane because I can't find something wrong there. You can just make them more readable (DS, overlaps and so on) I'll check
Very nice work, good luck!
Thanks!!
Lami
diff name

light insane => insane
insane => custom diff name or etc // insaneより expert難易度に近いですかも

normal

00:27:333 (6) - このnoteをここで00:27:146 - 運んでください

hard

00:13:271 (2,4,1) - 00:14:958 (3,5,1,2) - 、etc.... unsnap
00:38:771 (1,2) - hardでは 3/4は読むのが大変かも知りません
01:00:802 (5) - 01:12:802 (5) - overmapped、特にbeatがないので、敢えてnoteを使うのはよくないと思います
01:06:896 (1,2) - このよに急なjumpは避けてください。hardのjumpは基本的には問題ないですが、全体的にjumpみたいのがないので
特別な音がないばしょうでのjumpは不自然です。
01:07:083 (2) - ・・ ここに 01:07:271 - vocalもあるし、beatもあるので、1/1sliderを1/2rhythmで返してください。
01:14:021 (5,1) - blanket
01:38:396 - 強いbeatをskipするのはなんか変な感じがします
02:07:271 (2,3,4) - DSがビジュアルてきに一致しません。ここと比べれば...(02:20:958 (3,4) - )


light Insane

00:19:646 (3,4,5) - 、00:21:521 (5,6) - 、00:43:458 (4,5) - 、00:49:458 (4,5) - 、01:17:958 (3,4) - ... etc
rhythm自体が理解できないのではないですが、insane diffにある同じpartと比べれば、insaneより もっと きついrhythmを 使っています。
light insaneが 下位難易度という点で、rhythmを 上位難易度よりsimpleにするのも考え見るほうもいいと思います。

00:12:333 - Rhythmの Gapが 長すぎると 感じるので、1/4sliderもいいとおもいます。
00:38:208 (6) - ほかのdiffでは ただのnoteだったのに...(特にhard diffより rhythmがないです。)
01:21:896 (1,2) - make smaller ds、insaneを参考して...(2)はよわいbeat、(3)はつよいbeat、dsも beatの強さを表現すろほうが
いいと思います。

Insane

00:06:521 - hitsoundがmusicと似合わないですね
00:14:021 (5,6) - (6)にあまり強い音がないので、ここでのjumpは気まずい感じdesu
00:30:521 (8) - 、02:00:521 (1) - 一致しないnc rule。
00:39:052 (2,3) - ・00:38:771 (1,2) - dsが 小さいので、3/4は読みづらいです
このsnareみたいな 音よりは(00:52:927 (5) - )、このdrumがある この部分が 00:53:302 - 重要と思います。
01:05:771 (3,4) - ええ、this jump is too big
01:28:646 (3) - ctrl+g
01:44:771 (3,4) - same ^
01:20:396 - だいたい、音楽がdrumで成っているので、mappingするほうがいいとおもいます。
01:24:427 (5) - 01:30:427 (5) - overmapped

personally think, would be better if you recheck how to use your rhythm usage. gl
defiance
Hello there!

[General]

the "cv" should be capitalized so it's "CV"

[Easy]

00:41:396 (3,4) - i honestly think you should curve these a little more or just leaving them straight

00:48:896 (1,4) - i feel like these two should be somewhat similar, they might not be expressing same sound, but it doesn't look that great aesthetically

02:02:958 (5,1) - the entry to 5-1 could be better and more linear imo

[Normal]

00:27:333 (6,1) - this looks realllly ugly, i would ctrl + > and fix ds

00:34:458 (2) - i would make this a 1/2 slider because you are missing the important sound on the white tick

00:36:896 (1,2,3) - this still kinda looks ugly imo, maybe move 3 around x:469 y:37 to make it have like a diagonal flow downwards, it looks better

01:41:208 (3,4) - i would just make 4 go along with the flow of 3

[Hard]

lemme start off with some ds errors

01:07:083 (2,3) -

01:07:646 (3,4) -

02:20:958 (3,4) -

onto the actual map

00:12:896 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,5) - all of this is very confusing. you start off with drums then do the vocals and then back to drums? 00:14:396 - is an important beat i think you should map and overall the rhythm should be more clear

00:23:677 (2,3) - i'd probably just stack these on the end of 1 cause that's very irregularly spaced for a hard

00:33:802 - there's a note here

00:51:427 - and here

01:07:083 (2) - you seem to be mapping vocals here? but i think a reverse slider would work better

01:18:521 (5,6,7) - reverse slider because hard players aren't very good at playing somewhat awkward rhythm

01:37:271 (3,4) - this overlap would look a lot better if you curved 4 some more

02:03:802 - a note here

i'm not very good with light insanes so i'll just skip it

[Insane]

00:12:521 (2,3,1) - the flow here is very weird, i understand you are trying to do a different type of flow, but introducing it like this isn't very intuitive

00:14:583 (1,2,3) - i would try and make these as equal as you can

00:57:521 (5) - i was expecting this slider to be ctrl+g

01:44:677 (2) - overmapped?

02:10:083 (2,3) - this distance is WAYYYYYYYYY too far and it's at a very awkward angle, i'd reduce the distance and make the flow more comfy


good luck
Topic Starter
Asuka_-

Lami wrote:

diff name

light insane => insane
insane => custom diff name or etc // insaneより expert難易度に近いですかも
LightInsaneを削除したので、Insaneはこのままでいきますー

normal

00:27:333 (6) - このnoteをここで00:27:146 - 運んでください

hard

00:13:271 (2,4,1) - 00:14:958 (3,5,1,2) - 、etc.... unsnap
00:38:771 (1,2) - hardでは 3/4は読むのが大変かも知りません 確かに。。 でも少し保留で。
01:00:802 (5) - 01:12:802 (5) - overmapped、特にbeatがないので、敢えてnoteを使うのはよくないと思います
01:06:896 (1,2) - このよに急なjumpは避けてください。hardのjumpは基本的には問題ないですが、全体的にjumpみたいのがないので
特別な音がないばしょうでのjumpは不自然です。
01:07:083 (2) - ・・ ここに 01:07:271 - vocalもあるし、beatもあるので、1/1sliderを1/2rhythmで返してください。
01:14:021 (5,1) - blanket
01:38:396 - 強いbeatをskipするのはなんか変な感じがします
02:07:271 (2,3,4) - DSがビジュアルてきに一致しません。ここと比べれば...(02:20:958 (3,4) - )


light Insane

00:19:646 (3,4,5) - 、00:21:521 (5,6) - 、00:43:458 (4,5) - 、00:49:458 (4,5) - 、01:17:958 (3,4) - ... etc
rhythm自体が理解できないのではないですが、insane diffにある同じpartと比べれば、insaneより もっと きついrhythmを 使っています。
light insaneが 下位難易度という点で、rhythmを 上位難易度よりsimpleにするのも考え見るほうもいいと思います。

00:12:333 - Rhythmの Gapが 長すぎると 感じるので、1/4sliderもいいとおもいます。
00:38:208 (6) - ほかのdiffでは ただのnoteだったのに...(特にhard diffより rhythmがないです。)
01:21:896 (1,2) - make smaller ds、insaneを参考して...(2)はよわいbeat、(3)はつよいbeat、dsも beatの強さを表現すろほうが
いいと思います。

Insane

00:06:521 - hitsoundがmusicと似合わないですね
00:14:021 (5,6) - (6)にあまり強い音がないので、ここでのjumpは気まずい感じdesu
00:30:521 (8) - 、02:00:521 (1) - 一致しないnc rule。
00:39:052 (2,3) - ・00:38:771 (1,2) - dsが 小さいので、3/4は読みづらいです
このsnareみたいな 音よりは(00:52:927 (5) - )、このdrumがある この部分が 00:53:302 - 重要と思います。
01:05:771 (3,4) - ええ、this jump is too big
01:28:646 (3) - ctrl+g
01:44:771 (3,4) - same ^
01:20:396 - だいたい、音楽がdrumで成っているので、mappingするほうがいいとおもいます。
01:24:427 (5) - 01:30:427 (5) - overmapped

personally think, would be better if you recheck how to use your rhythm usage. gl
Nice mod!!
Thanks!
Topic Starter
Asuka_-

osuskrub wrote:

Hello there!

[General]

the "cv" should be capitalized so it's "CV" no

[Easy]

00:41:396 (3,4) - i honestly think you should curve these a little more or just leaving them straight

00:48:896 (1,4) - i feel like these two should be somewhat similar, they might not be expressing same sound, but it doesn't look that great aesthetically

02:02:958 (5,1) - the entry to 5-1 could be better and more linear imo

keep

[Normal]

00:27:333 (6,1) - this looks realllly ugly, i would ctrl + > and fix ds

00:34:458 (2) - i would make this a 1/2 slider because you are missing the important sound on the white tick

00:36:896 (1,2,3) - this still kinda looks ugly imo, maybe move 3 around x:469 y:37 to make it have like a diagonal flow downwards, it looks better

01:41:208 (3,4) - i would just make 4 go along with the flow of 3

[Hard]

lemme start off with some ds errors

01:07:083 (2,3) -

01:07:646 (3,4) -

02:20:958 (3,4) -

onto the actual map

00:12:896 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,5) - all of this is very confusing. you start off with drums then do the vocals and then back to drums? 00:14:396 - is an important beat i think you should map and overall the rhythm should be more clear

00:23:677 (2,3) - i'd probably just stack these on the end of 1 cause that's very irregularly spaced for a hard

00:33:802 - there's a note here

00:51:427 - and here

01:07:083 (2) - you seem to be mapping vocals here? but i think a reverse slider would work better

01:18:521 (5,6,7) - reverse slider because hard players aren't very good at playing somewhat awkward rhythm

01:37:271 (3,4) - this overlap would look a lot better if you curved 4 some more

02:03:802 - a note here

i'm not very good with light insanes so i'll just skip it

[Insane]

00:12:521 (2,3,1) - the flow here is very weird, i understand you are trying to do a different type of flow, but introducing it like this isn't very intuitive

00:14:583 (1,2,3) - i would try and make these as equal as you can

00:57:521 (5) - i was expecting this slider to be ctrl+g

01:44:677 (2) - overmapped?

02:10:083 (2,3) - this distance is WAYYYYYYYYY too far and it's at a very awkward angle, i'd reduce the distance and make the flow more comfy


good luck
Thanks"
Topic Starter
Asuka_-
LIがびみょいので、削除。
InsaneとHardを軽く修正して、spread的に問題がないようにしました。

bn req
hyouri
Well do as you want then because "cv" is blatantly wrong, since you also don't seem to know what CV even stands for. Your References/Sources for "cv" are only, and only written in the design formats (which clearly is a mistake, probably due to the font), no RAW/plain text.

My images are official, since they are from YOUR sources?

I don't know how to explain this simpler but:
Your sources (Designed, Bold-text, Green bad font) are mistakes in production/design, not OFFICIAL notations. -> https://auctions.c.yimg.jp/images.aucti ... s28489.jpg

My sources (Raw, plain-text, correct format, not-designed) are corrected and done in the right way without design limitations. Saying your fail-design "cv" is correct is false af. ->
http://www.yuzu-soft.com/ja/post/5692/% ... 83%AB.html (This part: https://puu.sh/vORDD/76a3ce3e7e.jpg which YOU sent? Like can't you see it?)
Even google search of song title shows 99% of the answers to have "CV" and not "cv", it's like writing "adhd" instead of "ADHD" it's nothing but mistake and poor english. https://www.google.co.jp/search?q=Masak ... itani+Hana)+-+Daisuki+Nanda&oq=Masaki+Gaillard+(cv%3A+Kiritani+Hana)+-+Daisuki+Nanda&aqs=chrome..69i57.1807j0j4&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8

You can't take a design image text and use that as "proof" of being "official", you need the Raw text. Many thing are written differently when designed (Logo's for example) yet are written in a different way when shown in plain text.

If that even was "IamKwan"'s image [https://auctions.c.yimg.jp/images.auctions.yahoo.co.jp/image/dr000/auc0212/users/3/6/9/1/hiper_77-img600x450-1482073792ul04zs28489.jpg] (probably not?) ask him to read the backside for the plain-text name of songs rather than a failed design bold text in green.

Your only references seem to be the garbage-designed text on CD https://puu.sh/vORLa/0b7f1038cc.jpg and SAME FONT in videos, but no plain/raw text which I have shown plenty of.

BN please dont bubble until you have fixed this mistake
Time Capsule
@Alveryn Please don't make something that actually just a piece of dot on paper become a novel. If it does really annoy you I suggest you to just leave (will really appreciate it tho lol). Peoples have their own prespective about stuff and yes, its not wrong to critized or even point out their mistake. but please keep in mind this sentence because it was so doesn't mean it was so . Restricted a map to not get check by others is just "meh". In simple way, if bn does point out again about CV or cv usage, he will prolly fix it immidiently. if NOT just let what it be. Thanks and have a good day

ps. this is not discussion forum, its mod one
hyouri

Time Capsule wrote:

@Alveryn Please don't make something that actually just a piece of dot on paper become a novel. If it does really annoy you I suggest you to just leave (will really appreciate it tho lol). Peoples have their own prespective about stuff and yes, its not wrong to critized or even point out their mistake. but please keep in mind this sentence because it was so doesn't mean it was so . Restricted a map to not get check by others is just "meh". In simple way, if bn does point out again about CV or cv usage, he will prolly fix it immidiently. if NOT just let what it be. Thanks and have a good day

ps. this is not discussion forum, its mod one
No idea who you are or why you getting involved, you seem to be more concern as if this is drama rather than a debate. Since you are not a forum mod or even bother to check any of our facts (info) in the posts, you are being more irrelevant than US politics in this thread. Get your feelings out of here no one cares, I'm here to mod and want this map to get ranked with correct information.

And most BN's/QAT don't bother caring or are simply too lazy to care about such tiny title mistakes since we've seen these happen to get ranked before so I'm here to convince the mapper to get it correct, if you don't like it, put on your tinfoil hat and ignore my posts. Or if you go as far as getting triggered, feel free to report my posts.
Topic Starter
Asuka_-
Im not good at english. sorry.

Even though "CV" is written on the official website, if "cv" is written in the official CD and CD introduction, I think that "cv" should be used preferentially. (I do not know if it is a design font, but obviously small letters)

Alveryn wrote:

Your sources (Designed, Bold-text, Green bad font) are mistakes in production/design, not OFFICIAL notations. -> https://auctions.c.yimg.jp/images.aucti ... s28489.jpg
Does that mean that the notation of the CD is incorrect?
You might think that it is wrong.
However, since the production side says "cv", we should use "cv" regardless of whether it is wrong or not wrong.

Alveryn wrote:

My sources (Raw, plain-text, correct format, not-designed) are corrected and done in the right way without design limitations. Saying your fail-design "cv" is correct is false af. ->
http://www.yuzu-soft.com/ja/post/5692/% ... 83%AB.html (This part: https://puu.sh/vORDD/76a3ce3e7e.jpg which YOU sent? Like can't you see it?)
I already replied to this matter.

Alveryn wrote:

Even google search of song title shows 99% of the answers to have "CV" and not "cv", it's like writing "adhd" instead of "ADHD" it's nothing but mistake and poor english. https://www.google.co.jp/search?q=Masak ... itani+Hana)+-+Daisuki+Nanda&oq=Masaki+Gaillard+(cv%3A+Kiritani+Hana)+-+Daisuki+Nanda&aqs=chrome..69i57.1807j0j4&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8
Non-official sites are also displayed in google search.
Generally, "CV" is used, so I think that "CV" is used on informal sites.
e.g. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=itDhg5HEJfg (Your previous reference)

Alveryn wrote:

You can't take a design image text and use that as "proof" of being "official", you need the Raw text. Many thing are written differently when designed (Logo's for example) yet are written in a different way when shown in plain text.
I do not think that it is necessary.
I think they use the keyboard when They make character design of video and images.
If they want to make it "CV", they just have to type "CV".
However, it is written as "cv".
Is there a rule that we should not use letters on images, videos?


I think should use "cv".
But You think should use "CV".
We have grounds to each other and we probably will not reach the answer by us alone.
The opinion of a third party is necessary to solve this discussion.
so please acknowledge that there is a post of a third party.

Discussion
t/585239/start=16
t/585239/start=18
t/585239/start=32
t/585239/start=33
t/585239/start=52

Meta
t/585239/start=18

To be honest, It is not sticking to "cv" separately. xd
but i can not agree with your opinion for now.
If you present a convincing reference, I will change it immediately.


Alveryn wrote:

BN please dont bubble until you have fixed this mistake
If it gets the state of qualified, QAT will be checked so we know which is right.
Your this remark is really uncomfortable and not really constructive.

im checking to IamKwan

Edit : fix my English.
IamKwaN
According to the ranking criteria, metadata of songs in this game should all stick to official references. If you ever find an official site stating the song having an alias of CV instead of cv, please let us know.
hyouri
I don't care how good or bad your English is, that's irrelevant. It's common sense and correct grammar to use capital letters for abbreviations.

All I'm saying (and I don't know how you can not understand this) is that your source is wrong, you are using only ONE source and that is the CD image cover font.

Image 1 and Image 2 (Sources: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XvclwsR ... .be&t=1m7s and https://auctions.c.yimg.jp/images.aucti ... s28489.jpg)

They both use same shitty green failed design and misleading font, which is still wrong. You should use RAW/Plain text as source, and not stylized font. As I stated earlier "Many thing are written differently when designed (Logo's for example) yet are written in a different way when shown in plain text. "


I checked even deeper and found more sources using CV a.k.a the official yuzusoft Amazon retail. And also the whole album.

More sources: Mysound is a popular japanese site to buy official songs here's the article and yes it's using CV. http://mysound.jp/song/3154965/
More: http://www.suruga-ya.jp/product/detail/302064229001
http://music-book.jp/music/Artist/870080/Album/aaa63au0
https://www.amazon.co.jp/%E5%A4%A9%E8%8 ... B06VT4CCDH
https://pc.dwango.jp/portals/album/2642 ... o=official
Random blog post? Even this says CV: http://blog.sina.com.cn/s/blog_b0d77c7a0101a3d0.html

Also all album information I've sound so far (official or not) have said to have CV instead of cv. The only thing showing a hint of CV is nothing but that badly designed green text font.

ALBUM INFORMATION
Original name: 「天色*アイルノーツ」キャラクターソングVol.4 大好きなんだ
Artists: Masaki Gaillard (CV: Kiritani Hana), Shirley Warwick (CV: Kitami Rikka), Amagiri Yune (CV: Toyota Sera), Shiraga Airi (CV: Natsuno Koori)
Lyricist: Nakayama♥Mami (Angel Note)
Composer: Famishin (Yuzusoft)
Arranger: Shinohara Mizuki (Angel Note)
Release date: May 31, 2013
Catalog number: YSCD-0030
Publisher: Yuzusoft

AUDIO INFORMATION
Format: MPEG-1 Layer 3
Channels: 2
Sample rate: 44100 Hz
Compression level: MP3 LAME V0


And I even have a ASL (CD-RIP) with official scans and release information and it says same as the code above.

But the most convincing and real proof is the fact that I got the backside (you can even Barcode-scan it) and as I suspected IT HAS CV! Which disproves all your false accusations of "being on the cover means it's the official way to write" as we can see it's corrected here in the BACKSIDE
Actually if you QR/Barcode scan it it will redirect to Amazon but the article has been removed (it's only in Japanese Amazon).
The article number is: 4560100333805 and if you google it you will get mostly the CD purchase: https://www.google.se/search?q=45601003 ... e&ie=UTF-8
http://www.getchu.com/soft.phtml?id=769308
http://mnrate.com/item/aid/B00CQWK82K

At this point it's nothing but false and being delusional if you think the official art designed font of the COVER http://puu.sh/vPXiQ/c425e6f1da.jpg is valid use of a title. English is not well-known in Japan and it's not uncommon for companies to make mistakes about things especially when shipping to an non-Japanese audience. All I'm saying is, it's a design mistake. And you can't even admit it. Read this Wiki page on Abbreviations if you want to understand why it's CV and not cv grammatically correct. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abbreviation

The scans: http://puu.sh/vPZQR/ee1172c75d.rar
Official Windows MP3 file info (unedited): https://puu.sh/vPZTG/9534a95c87.png

I win.
show more
Please sign in to reply.

New reply