1. Saigyou Ayakashi (3.82 stars, 876 notes)

1. 00:52:783 - vocal here and 00:52:888 - drum beat here. since u followed it at 00:59:287 (1) - and etc, why not there as well?
2. 01:12:504 (4,1) - shouldn't this be the 1/1 slider instead of 01:12:713 (1) - ? as of now, you're not following the vocals here and you skipped the drum at 01:12:923 -
3. 01:25:930 (4,1) - ^ ye i see these in the second kiai and third kiai so.. consider these.
4. 03:00:336 (2) - this would easily be mistaken as part of the stream due to its spacing imo.just space them out a bit or make 03:00:126 (1) - a repeat slider.
5. 03:56:979 (3,4) - i feel like u do this a lot idk why but the 1/1 slider should go first lol there's nothing on the white tick.
6. 04:49:112 - there's actually a drum beat here, dunno if u wanna map it or not but i thought i should point this out lol.
7. 05:02:644 (1,2) - same

Bearizm wrote:

M4M https://osu.ppy.sh/s/585723

1. 00:52:783 - vocal here and 00:52:888 - drum beat here. since u followed it at 00:59:287 (1) - and etc, why not there as well? I see argument for this, but rhythm is based around vocals and piano, that occasionally highlights drum parts like "rim click/snare/ride cymbal" and not the complimentary drum filler used. Though sure this can be valid I haven't found a solution to this other than to not change.
2. 01:12:504 (4,1) - shouldn't this be the 1/1 slider instead of 01:12:713 (1) - ? as of now, you're not following the vocals here and you skipped the drum at 01:12:923 -
3. 01:25:930 (4,1) - ^ ye i see these in the second kiai and third kiai so.. consider these. this is more of a general issue you are finding with the design of the kiai rhythm, so I will try to argue it from that standpoint. The rhythm is based around prioritizing the vocals for the most part. I recognized at the start of the slider's in each example seems to be some slurred lyric that is then held for the duration of the slider. There was not another rhythm that would compliment both the start of the lyric and the hold it provides to the next white tick without cutting the hold.
4. 03:00:336 (2) - this would easily be mistaken as part of the stream due to its spacing imo.just space them out a bit or make 03:00:126 (1) - a repeat slider. I see your issue with this. It is more of a design flaw than anything else, I chose to represent drums in kiai with a specific spacing that forced movement, and for the piano sections the design is to represent the pitch with specific spacing. it also just happens that these go back to back. Though the problem you have is with difficulty. Though I assure the more abruptness this arrangement entails is most appropriate to represent this music, and if I were to only change this instance (or the latter one) then my map would have glaring inconsistencies.
5. 03:56:979 (3,4) - i feel like u do this a lot idk why but the 1/1 slider should go first lol there's nothing on the white tick. explained prior.
6. 04:49:112 - there's actually a drum beat here, dunno if u wanna map it or not but i thought i should point this out lol. this is actually a synth lmao
7. 05:02:644 (1,2) - same explained prior

sry i havent done this for a while, u agreed to it anyways to be fair, u can only just mod like 2 or 1 diff of my map then, up to u.

1. 00:09:986 (6) - if you're going to do the increased spacing to represent the scaling up in the piano notes, then this should also be two circles; doesn't make much sense for these to be sliders based on the intent of the pattern. also applies to 00:16:699 (6) - 00:18:587 (6) - 00:48:797 (7) - etc.
2. 00:21:525 (4,5,6,7) - to follow with the intent of your patterning here, the 4->5 should have higher spacing, the 5->6 should have much more higher spacing, and the 6->7 should have lower spacing than the 5->6, e.g. something like below. also applies to 00:35:161 (5,6,7,1) -
   
   SPOILER

   
3. 00:33:063 (4) - what is this following? it doesn't follow vocals or the piano that well
4. 00:43:133 (3,4,5,6,1) - did you map yourself into a corner here? this is pretty messy and is inconsistent with the rest of your patterns
5. 00:52:154 (7) - doesn't make sense to emphasize this if your pattern here is decreasing in distance snap to represent the scaling down in the piano notes
6. 01:09:566 (1,2,3) - lacks emphasis. song is building up here and leads right into the chorus afterwards. even for a slow-bpm song, this is really underwhelming. also applies to 02:31:804 (1,2,3) -
7. 01:32:434 (3,1) - could space this out more to emphasize the cymbal crash. also applies to 02:07:888 (6,1) - 04:07:678 (2,3) - etc.
8. 01:56:979 (5,1) - looks like the (5) should be blanketing the (1)
9. honestly your choice to do the distance snap scaling pattern to represent the scaling in the piano notes can feel really random at times; i'm having trouble making out why you decided to put it at some places and ignore it at others
10. 02:59:706 (6,7,8,9,1,2) - don't do this thanks. if you don't know what i'm referring to, i'm referring to the spacing. why the hell is stream spacing the same as the 1/2 spacing? it just causes reading problems
11. 03:22:153 - 03:22:363 - i wouldn't ignore the drums here but since you're mapping to the piano here it might be okay
12. 03:36:210 (2,3,4) - similar to the above; there's a noticeable drum sound at 03:36:629 - since you're following piano it might be okay though
13. 05:02:224 (6,7,8,9,1,2) - please stop
14. 05:02:643 - i'd argue that the time signature here changes to 3/4 since the piano follows a 6/8 time signature structure; you might want to get someone to look at the timing to make sure

Doormat wrote:

m4m

[Saigyou Ayakashi]

1. 00:09:986 (6) - if you're going to do the increased spacing to represent the scaling up in the piano notes, then this should also be two circles; doesn't make much sense for these to be sliders based on the intent of the pattern. also applies to 00:16:699 (6) - 00:18:587 (6) - 00:48:797 (7) - etc. if I do this I have to make all piano sounds clickable, which I can find applicable to the 1/1 gaps, though I found the movement the slider and the object after the slider forces creates the decreased movement for the lower pitch. Also I think the sound is pretty weak and that this slider sets up the idea that piano sounds can exist on slider ends, changing similar things after this would cause inconsistency.
2. 00:21:525 (4,5,6,7) - to follow with the intent of your patterning here, the 4->5 should have higher spacing, the 5->6 should have much more higher spacing, and the 6->7 should have lower spacing than the 5->6, e.g. something like below. also applies to 00:35:161 (5,6,7,1) -
   
   SPOILER

   
3. 00:33:063 (4) - what is this following? it doesn't follow vocals or the piano that well this follows the piano PERFECTLY!!!
4. 00:43:133 (3,4,5,6,1) - did you map yourself into a corner here? this is pretty messy and is inconsistent with the rest of your patterns LOLOLOL yes I did, but I decided I could easily get out of the corner so I decided to use this because its technically not inconsistent with the design I'm using (plus it kind of introduces the later section 03:00:126 (1) - like here. where it goes back and forth
5. 00:52:154 (7) - doesn't make sense to emphasize this if your pattern here is decreasing in distance snap to represent the scaling down in the piano notes you mother fucker I just changed some stuff where I made this more acceptable because on highlighting important drum sounds
6. 01:09:566 (1,2,3) - lacks emphasis. song is building up here and leads right into the chorus afterwards. even for a slow-bpm song, this is really underwhelming. also applies to 02:31:804 (1,2,3) - disagree.
7. 01:32:434 (3,1) - could space this out more to emphasize the cymbal crash. also applies to 02:07:888 (6,1) - 04:07:678 (2,3) - etc. it has natural emphasis because of where it is according to measures.
8. 01:56:979 (5,1) - looks like the (5) should be blanketing the (1) no
9. honestly your choice to do the distance snap scaling pattern to represent the scaling in the piano notes can feel really random at times; i'm having trouble making out why you decided to put it at some places and ignore it at others i tried ;w;
10. 02:59:706 (6,7,8,9,1,2) - don't do this thanks. if you don't know what i'm referring to, i'm referring to the spacing. why the hell is stream spacing the same as the 1/2 spacing? it just causes reading problems reading is problem for some not represented by rank similar to how difficulty isn't accurately represented by SR
11. 03:22:153 - 03:22:363 - i wouldn't ignore the drums here but since you're mapping to the piano here it might be okay I ignored them for the most part this section, they more played filler to the melodic line in this section rather than highlighting it.
12. 03:36:210 (2,3,4) - similar to the above; there's a noticeable drum sound at 03:36:629 - since you're following piano it might be okay though yeah it is similar :^)
13. 05:02:224 (6,7,8,9,1,2) - please stop
14. 05:02:643 - i'd argue that the time signature here changes to 3/4 since the piano follows a 6/8 time signature structure; you might want to get someone to look at the timing to make sure this is arguable, though if this is true I need to change the time signature at 03:00:126 - to be 2 3/4 measures followed by a 2/4 measure and repeat it for the section. though I would also find it strange the song would "end" on the 3rd beat of a 3/4 measure, in which case I would say the start of the measure would make sense to follow the highest pitch notes. anyways I would love to talk about what this time signature is or if anyone could provide some sort of sheet music to this song it would be super cool and appreciated.

dsco wrote:

not much to say as usual cause ur choices are very delineated and clear

i know its intentional but the kiais feel too similar. at least some level of deeper variance would be nice. not necessarily with spacing / rhythms but with angles.
00:09:776 (5,6) - sharpest jump/slider angle you use in the entire intro, flows much differently than the rest imo. doesnt follow the 1,2,3,4,5 curve like others as a visual aspect I can see where you are coming from so I tried to adjust it as such
00:49:112 - why is this green tick here its not unrankable, but I'm going to overhaul this map with green lines at some point so stay tuned :^)
00:22:993 (4,5) - i find this pattern pretty misleading since tiny spacing is very commonly used for 1/2 in the map, even out of sliders (00:42:504 (1,2) - etc). i'd make the kickslider overlapped under slider tail to match the section starting at 00:49:217 There isn't really anything inherently wrong with making 1/2 spacing the same as 1/4 spacing, if this was a hard diff I would see what you meant, but this is a marathon. Also I have two reasons for why I made this 1/4 slider spaced like this. The first reason is becasue, when I make the tail of the slider also overlap the objects visually seem together, thus making a small indicator to break the conventional 1/4 gap after 1/4 slider stereotype. Secondly, spacing this as such helps set up reading as an element of gameplay.
01:37:469 (6,7,8,9,1) - the net angle on this / curve feels super high compared to how slightly everything else in the map is curved. super minor tho lo there are lots of times I use sharp angles, both in 1/2 gaps and 1/1 gaps.
02:59:706 (6,7,8,9,1,2) - this spacing feels a little problematic cause of 1,2 being so similar, especially on ar8 explained in the block of text above.
03:00:126 - dont like NCing in this section. spacing is fine but the root note of each of these patterns is the large white tick still. all other instruments are still emphasizing and playing on the white ticks, as well. further founded by 03:10:196 (1) - d
03:42:084 - overlaps in this section aren't necessarily problematic but feel out of place, most other spots in the map you don't overlap 1/1 gaps. primarily 03:42:084 (1,2) - and 03:44:392 (4,1) - the idea behind these was to lower the movement density, becasue it just dropped from a relatively intense section.
04:07:049 (1,3) - don't like the perfect overlap, i think slight overlap is better like you do in the kiais / rest of the map adjusted somethings to apply this fix, moved 2 down a bit towards the head of 1 and psuedo stacked 3 under the head of 1.
05:02:224 (6,7,8,9,1,2) - same as earlier (+ NCs) explained prior.

good luck gUY

Ellyu wrote:

[General]
drum-hitclap.wav
drum-hitnormal.wav
drum-hitwhistle.wav
soft-hitclap.wav
these hitsound files are less than 100ms. every .wav file should be at least 100ms or it's unrankable.
The total drain time are 4:59. maybe u can add a long slider before the first circle to make it >5min.
Too many Ctrl+c+v.From 00:49:217 (1) - to 01:11:035 (1) - and from 02:11:455 (1) - to 02:33:273 (1) - is just look like a same part which just got a ctrl+g and move few objects. And other parts is also the same. tbh, I feel like play a very short but long map,and sure,definitely unrankable. So my mod is very short cuz I don't want to point out the same question once and once. what did you use to get this information, because all of those files are at least 400ms long and the drain time is longer than 5 minutes.

[Gameplay]
00:16:490 (5,6,1) - too many overlap and make it a little messy. you can avoid the overlap between (6) and (1). overlapping is ok
00:23:308 (5) - make the beat on the red tick clickable bcz it's much heavier than the beat on the blue tick..so maybe you can move the slider to 00:23:413 (5) - . I used 1/4 slider to simplify rhythm so its not as dense in this section
00:30:021 (5) - same as
00:51:000 (2,3) - not stack here will be better. disagree.
02:13:238 (2,3) - same as^
01:17:119 (5,6,7) - the space suddenly be enlarger and it's a little strange. try to make the space at 01:17:119 (5,6) - larger? spacing here is to cause stretch in the players aim to give more strength to the triple so the vocal can be more empahsized
01:30:546 (5,6,7) - 02:39:357 (5,6,7) - 02:52:783 (5,6,7) - same as^
01:28:028 (2,3) - space is a little small. and this overlap is not that good imo. its good to me
01:42:923 (1) - make it start from 01:42:818 no need, its fine how it is.
03:32:224 (2,3) - no overlap will be more clear to read. this makes it easier to see the triple so no.
04:07:049 (1,2) - make a blanket here no

Halfslashed wrote:

Nice diff name fam. credit to UC the legend
[Saigyou Ayakashi]
00:12:923 (2) - I can't really see how this expresses the pitch differences between 00:19:636 (2). It fits with how the rhythm is structured, but considering your focus on the piano pitches, I'd at least recommend changing the entry angle of the slider for a motion similar to this. Something that relates more with 00:25:720 (1,4) - also works. I don't really consider these angle changes with 1/1 sliders since they have minimal effect overall. the distance theme I have with circles would be nearly impossible with these slider shapes which currently fit the aesthetic theme and enable 1/1 slider to circle gap angles like I did while still providing some kind of real feedback with the 1/1 beats that other slider shapes would not be able to provide. (tl;dr its my style)
00:43:552 (5) - I just find it weird how you introduced a direction change in the middle of the piano scale since you didn't do it anywhere else earlier on. It'd be cool if you could either find a way to incorporate it earlier, since it does fit this part of the music pretty well or move this around so you're not stuck in the corner. I kind of talked about this in doormats mod response. but its possible I could argue I in fact do these direction changes with circle patterns earlier just not this extremely in the case of circle to circle, and I do roughly this when its circle to slider.
00:52:154 (7) - How about two circles here, since you're still mapping piano. It would add a bit more stress to 00:52:573 (1) as well, which would be nice. this doesn't really work because I'm trying to highlight the drums with sliders like this when they come important like at this location and other locations.
01:35:371 (3,4,5,6) - 02:57:608 (3,4,5,6) - 04:33:273 (3,4,5,6) - Nice meme. :^)
02:01:385 (1,2) - Aw man, you've got this nice 2/1 gap and you're having the player just stay still. I'd recommend experimenting with spacing here, since I don't really think a total stop in motion works too well here. I did a thing :^)
03:03:483 (5) - I wish you did something to acknowledge these piano chords. Here there is a direction change, but since you have direction changes after every 4 notes, they don't really reflect the chords. I don't know what I could suggest here though. I worked some majick :^)

My bor's second ranked map incoming. Good luck! thanks a bunch for the mod <3

Shanipika wrote:

Mmm hai requested mod through in game chat owo

[Saigyou Ayakashi]
02:45:860 (3,4,5,6,7,8) - Maybe not really important but both other instances of those 2 triple in the other kiais are perfect mirror in angles (Ctrl J H G) and this one isnt, maybe it could use the same angle without the Ctrl G cuz obviously this one, the second triple goes the opposite way. Maybe would make the movement between 02:46:490 (8,1) - a little less intuitive but I dont think it necessarly have to point toward it to be intuitive either since both other dont either point staight at next slider. Could make this overlap 02:45:441 (2,6,7,8) - potentially a little bit more similar to other overlap in the map since I think that one is a bit different (More overlapped if you dont count the piano part) than other overlap. Not necessarly being a problem but kinda just a thing I noticed.
03:00:126 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - NC in this part arent consistant with the one at the end 05:02:644 (1,2,3,1,2,3) - I feel the one at the end help with the readability of the pattern more than this one too. And I don't think those slider in the first one justify that those have different NC?

I'm sorry kinda short mod Q-Q I'm not really good at modding lower diff in general (Or modding in general maybe) and I just feel like I can agree with most of what you did in the map, not that I would do them the same but just that they do make sense I think and arent problems? Well thats imo. thanks a bunch for checking out the map and the feedback. I ended up changing the 2 instances of triples to match the middle kiai one and I fixed NC's

osuskrub wrote:

shit mod

bor why is your song choice so sexy man

[dab my bois]
General

soft-hitclap.wav might have an unrankable delay of over 5ms. u rite u rite

02:50:265 (2) - this slider is unsnapped oop

Saigyou Ayakashi

00:33:063 (4) - as much as i understand that you want to map main piano sounds you are missing 2 piano sounds on the white ticks. actually these are synthesized drum hits

00:35:161 (5,6,7) - how come you decide to decrease ds from 6-7 when the piano is getting higher in pitch its not getting higher in pitch,
its getting lower.

01:15:650 (4,1) - Nazil i think you should be slightly more precise with this, you overlapped the slider with more than half the circle on 01:14:392 (1,2) - so i would make it just a little more consistent They look the same, if its like a pixel off fuk u

01:51:315 (1) - did you mean to stack this this has to be custom perfect overlap because the slider will push them up.

02:23:832 (3,4,5,6,7,8) - i think you should have kept the triple going linearly, so like x:50 y: 353I don't. refer to 01:02:224 (6,7,8) -

03:00:336 (2) - i feel like the player would recognize this as part of the stream considering how the spacing is from 1-2, i would make it a little more obvious that it's not get better at reading, I'm pretty sure this was explained prior so you should respond to that explanation instead of reiterating something that was already mentioned.

03:10:196 (1) - honestly this slider is not symmetric, I would try the best you can to make it that way. how is it not symmetric? its slightly tilted to the side.

03:52:783 (2) - the very middle anchor is slightly up a little bit and its triggering me bor it has the same effect regardless of this change, so no change.

04:31:385 (3) - maybe u should stack it on 1's slider end its fine where it is.

04:32:853 (2) - mayb u should ctrl +g this its fine how it is.

barely curved sliders r sex

gl

Sinnoh wrote:

00:25:720 (1) - looks a little better if ctrl-j but opinion opinion
01:03:902 (3,1) - maybe reduce spacing, kinda far slider leniency makes this easier
01:10:196 (4,7) - these are a really large diff spike, should really stack at least the second one. It's a lot harder to slow cursor movement, rather than just change direction. not really, its just different difficult to set up for the kiai movement concepts.
heck, ctrl-g might actually make it easer. won't repeat it for the others, same thing.
02:26:140 (3) - maybe rotate so it has same visual spacing for 02:26:560 (1) - and 02:24:881 (1) - but 02:24:881 (1) - disapears before 02:26:560 (1) - appears, these don't need to even the visual spacing if you can't tell
03:00:336 (2) - that's really not going to fly, at least space enough so that it doesn't overlap to indicate change what is the problem with this, and what would you suggest to fixing it? because right now I have specific spacings for the piano centric sections and specific spacing for kiai times.
03:03:483 (5) - unclear slider body since it's stacked This is incorrect, 3 is mostly faded before you have to click 5 so you can see that its a 1/8 slider, though you won't get a 100 if you play it like a regular 1/2 beat.
03:13:972 (2,1) - not readable at all, no way to predict because entire previous section was 0.7x to 1.1x distance, and it jumps to 2.6x out of nowhere. you have a silly logic to this, the spacing change indicates some kind of change, which makes it readable, you might just be too weak for this.
03:21:944 (1) - can do those 1/4 sliders like previous slow part i don't understand what you mean, they are all the same speed.
04:00:336 (4) - could look better if curved maybe in your eyes you see this, but i don't
04:11:874 (4) - weird angle here for circular movement, maybe change stuff so angle is less than 180 degrees I am not using a circular movement for this section.
04:43:552 (3) - could have spicier movement if moved down left this would be bad for the movement I am going for, plus ruin the integrity of the spacing I use
04:48:587 (5,6) - thing i mentioned before, this one's easier to play because sharp angle thing I mentioned before but without the thing i mentioned before :^)
04:53:832 (3,1) - kinda undermaps the song here, finish on tail of 3, + unmapped kick on 1 I think you failed to understand what this section is for. you should notice its less intense than the kiai because there is lack of vocals, because of this I reduce the rhythm density by puting sounds I'm following on the heads and tails of sliders while ignoring the sounds I'm not mapipng to.
^ that's the important thing to fix
04:55:511 (5,6) - increase spacing? kinda small compared to next section because the next section is stronger and more intense because the increase of the rhythm density from the drum set, so this is of course smaller than the upcoming section.
05:08:308 (4) - could make the red point less sharp by adding some curve, since there's no sound on it there doesn't need to be a sound that the slider art moves to. its just a slider art.

idk because no hitsounds yet, but you need one of those where the two sticks clack

metadata 東方Project should ideally be changed to whatever game the song is actually from you may think this, though i use the same source as the ranked version of this song, in which case I will need to contact kwan to confirm the meta data

Error- wrote:

you should say to me if you want m4m asjdhduifwf but ok m4m
Good its not CS7

00:22:154 (7) - You should have more gap here, you've just map 00:21:525 (4,5,6) - more gap due to stronger sound, and this note has more stronger sound, so more gap. this is incorrect, I am following the pitch of the piano, since the pitch is going down then so does the spacing.
00:26:350 (4) - and 00:33:063 (4) - I don't know why you map this a bit wasy while there are so much sound here. I am following the piano
00:42:504 (1,2) - You sure this will not causing reading issue? I almost tought that this is 1/4 note this will not cause a reading issue because all of the notes are supposed to be 1/2 unless stacked, since they distances are progressively changing higher and lower by the small amount,
it is readable.
00:43:972 (1,2) - ^
01:00:126 (2,3,4) - They have same sound, why not same spacing? there is a couple of reason I can come up with, first is vocalist pitch is increasing, second is the stack has a sound its mapped to different from the previous two notes which would make it stronger.
01:05:371 (3,4) - No stack? you do stacks before and after, why slider? I do sounds like this on 1/4 sliders before, though I notice I'm going to have a lot of 1/4 a little later so I lower the density a bit here
02:01:385 (1) - These seems awkward becouse you're following the guitar or maybe the vocal before, so.. end it at 02:01:594? I extended the slider to the red tick after since there is a strong beat there and its unclear where the vocals end.
03:00:336 (2) - Well I missread this :< I know, though I explain this before, I want to also say you are just too weak ~
03:34:532 (2) - There are 1/8 sound here. I think its a 1/6 beat, though these are grace notes, which are less important that the real note, so for now i leave them out until I can include them all.

Well i dont find anything wrong again, gl!

borborygmos wrote:

Sinnoh wrote:

03:21:944 (1) - can do those 1/4 sliders like previous slow part i don't understand what you mean, they are all the same speed. i meant 1/8 http://i.imgur.com/ya3JHZk.png

metadata 東方Project should ideally be changed to whatever game the song is actually from you may think this, though i use the same source as the ranked version of this song, in which case I will need to contact kwan to confirm the meta data What I meant is that you can change the source to:
東方妖々夢　～ Perfect Cherry Blossom
If you check here, it's more common that songs would use the name of the game they're from, rather than just "Touhou Project" Series Title vs Game Title

Sinnoh wrote:

Sinnoh wrote:

03:21:944 (1) - can do those 1/4 sliders like previous slow part i don't understand what you mean, they are all the same speed. i meant 1/8 http://i.imgur.com/ya3JHZk.png

metadata 東方Project should ideally be changed to whatever game the song is actually from you may think this, though i use the same source as the ranked version of this song, in which case I will need to contact kwan to confirm the meta data What I meant is that you can change the source to:
東方妖々夢　～ Perfect Cherry Blossom
If you check here, it's more common that songs would use the name of the game they're from, rather than just "Touhou Project" Series Title vs Game Title

1. 00:21:525 (4,5) - I like how you vary DS to match the piano, BUT watch your followpoints!
   If you like having one odd followpoint, I would put it between 5 and 6 instead of 4 and 5.
2. 00:22:993 (4,5) - This was a bit awkward to play for me. Generally, you don't want to start sliders on blue, but there's really quiet piano there, so it may have been hard to come up with something. Thankfully, I have some possible solutions!
   (my preferred solution)
   (I feel two circles 4 and 5 work better than a short slider here)
   (or since the note on the blue tick is so quiet, I've omitted it)
3. 00:28:027 (3,4) - Followpoint works here because there's a big difference in note pitch.
4. 00:29:077 (1,2,3,4,5) - Refer to suggestions. (main thing is I want to click where 00:29:706 (4) 's slider end is.
5. 00:54:566 (2,3,4) - See 02:16:804 (2,3,4)
6. 01:01:594 (3) - After much contemplating, I think this should be a 1/4 slider.
7. 01:14:392 (1) - Move somewhere to the right and slightly above 01:14:182 (4) (so it covers the girls mouth). This creates some nice angular flow.
8. 01:56:979 (5,1) - Fix the blanket
9. 02:01:385 (1) - Shorten to 02:01:804 and add another slider of equal length at 02:02:014
10. 02:03:692 (5) - Cut in half and turn into a reverse slider so you get the nice piano sound at 02:03:902
11. 02:08:098 (1) - Shorten to 02:08:518 and add a circle at 02:08:727
12. 02:16:804 (2,3,4) - I recommend making these all sliders:
    (omitting the chime on 02:16:909 because I think the piano/bass is more prominent)
    (alternatively, you can cut slider 2 early)
13. 02:45:913 (3,4,5) - Watch the snapping!
14. 02:49:846 (1,2,3,4,5,6,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,1,2,3,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,5,6,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,1) - Remap this section. But whyyyyy?? It's waaaaay too similar to the first kiai starting around here 01:27:608 (1,2) ESPECIALLY because it's a slow song to begin with. Copy/pasting like this makes me want to quit the song early!!!
15. 03:19:636 (1,2) - Start the NC on 2
16. 03:22:154 (2) - I would add a 1/2 slider here for the drum beat.
17. 03:26:979 (1) - Starting with this section, try and ignore the guitar and map sliders where the piano starts:
    (example)
18. 03:29:601 (4,5) - Delete 5 and move 4 over 1/4 tick so it starts on the drum beat AND the piano.
19. 03:30:650 (2,3,4,5,6,7) - Same concept:
    (I made 2 a slider this time since there's a distinct drum beat)
20. 03:32:014 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - Try remapping this combo by starting sliders on the piano beats.
21. 04:25:511 (1,2,3,4,5,6,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,1,2,3,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,5,6,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,1) - Remap this for reasons stated earlier.
22. 05:08:308 (4) - Those slider ticks are loud. Silence them more!

Bluekrait wrote:

borborygmos (not enraged)'s #modhelp mod

[Saigyou Ayakashi]

1. 00:21:525 (4,5) - I like how you vary DS to match the piano, BUT watch your followpoints! If you like having one odd followpoint, I would put it between 5 and 6 instead of 4 and 5. fixed distance error
2. 00:22:993 (4,5) - This was a bit awkward to play for me. Generally, you don't want to start sliders on blue, but there's really quiet piano there, so it may have been hard to come up with something. Thankfully, I have some possible solutions! I like my way best
3. 00:29:077 (1,2,3,4,5) - Refer to suggestions. (main thing is I want to click where 00:29:706 (4) 's slider end is.
4. 00:54:566 (2,3,4) - See 02:16:804 (2,3,4)
5. 01:01:594 (3) - After much contemplating, I think this should be a 1/4 slider. why
6. 01:14:392 (1) - Move somewhere to the right and slightly above 01:14:182 (4) (so it covers the girls mouth). This creates some nice angular flow. I don't map flow
7. 01:56:979 (5,1) - Fix the blanket its not a blanket
8. 02:01:385 (1) - Shorten to 02:01:804 and add another slider of equal length at 02:02:014 then you would be clicking something not a vocal
9. 02:03:692 (5) - Cut in half and turn into a reverse slider so you get the nice piano sound at 02:03:902 wtf is this timestamp
10. 02:08:098 (1) - Shorten to 02:08:518 and add a circle at 02:08:727 why
11. 02:16:804 (2,3,4) - I recommend making these all sliders:
    (omitting the chime on 02:16:909 because I think the piano/bass is more prominent) I'm following the drums for this
12. 02:45:913 (3,4,5) - Watch the snapping! FIXED!!!
13. 02:49:846 (1,2,3,4,5,6,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,1,2,3,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,5,6,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,1) - Remap this section. But whyyyyy?? It's waaaaay too similar to the first kiai starting around here 01:27:608 (1,2) ESPECIALLY because it's a slow song to begin with. Copy/pasting like this makes me want to quit the song early!!!whatever you think was copy pasted wasn't. having them similar is not unrankable.
14. 03:19:636 (1,2) - Start the NC on 2 why, this is the same kind of nc as 03:16:280 (1) -
15. 03:22:154 (2) - I would add a 1/2 slider here for the drum beat. I wouldn't
16. 03:26:979 (1) - Starting with this section, try and ignore the guitar and map sliders where the piano starts:
    (example) no
17. 03:29:601 (4,5) - Delete 5 and move 4 over 1/4 tick so it starts on the drum beat AND the piano. no. im mapping guitar
18. 03:30:650 (2,3,4,5,6,7) - Same concept: same comment
19. 03:32:014 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - Try remapping this combo by starting sliders on the piano beats. no thank you
20. 04:25:511 (1,2,3,4,5,6,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,1,2,3,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,5,6,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,1) - Remap this for reasons stated earlier. no thank you
21. 05:08:308 (4) - Those slider ticks are loud. Silence them more! they are okay

That should do it!

1. drum-hitnormal20.wav
2. drum-hitnormal25.wav
3. normal-hitfinish2.wav
4. soft-hitfinish2.wav
5. soft-hitnormal21.wav

Log Off Now wrote:

lol sry im slow uni's been killing me, im done now tho so ya im here xd

[General]

if you wanted to you could scale this bg up to 1920x1080 using waifux2 with barely any quality loss

[japan]

00:21:944 (6,7) - i would maybe want a bit more spacing on here because these two notes feel much more powerful than the previous spacing is based on pitch, pitch goes down spacing goes down.
00:43:972 (1) - this kinda feels a bit awkward to play because the slider moves in the opposite direction to what i would expect and is the only one so far in the map that does this what do you mean lol, 00:10:406 (1) - this slider does the same thing
01:16:909 (3,4,5) - i would prefer it if these were more spaced out like 01:17:539 (7,8,1) - since the snare is playing fully sounded notes instead of ghost notes like on 01:17:539 (7,8) - , but it has less spacing, so i would swap this around (i hope that made sense)
01:30:336 (3,4,5) - 01:30:965 (7,8,1) - similar thing to above (same for other choruses) I prefer it my way since I am representing them consistently.
01:35:790 (5,6) - ik you probs won't like this suggestion but i don't think this curve shape really matches the intensity of the music very well here, maybe im just a metafag but because the vocals and music reaches its climax at this point i expect sharper angles to reflect that, also because the drums are each playing a different part of the kit on each of these notes grouping them up into a curve doesn't fit that well imo, i would maybe try I think the open angles are harder to play and less comfortable so I think they fit something like this
01:42:923 (1) - maybe start on blue tick? I like the red tick cuz there is like a mini pause
02:32:434 (4,5) - i think this spacing is a bit big, i would prefer if 5 was a bit closer to 4 so the most intense part of this vocal buildup is emphasised a bit more the spacing has to accomodate for the slider leniency from (4) to create the open angle hard stuff for buildup.
02:56:559 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - this looks almost identical to the first choruses ending and i get that consistency is a thing but because of how similar it is i would like it if something about this pattern changed, if you decide to keep the curve ending to the choruses maybe have it so it follows (2)'s slider end this time? no
03:24:881 (4,1) - would again like some more spacing on this one since the tomtoms in the drums have almost the same spacing but feel way less intense than this crash cymbal there is already enough spacing emphasis for this note esp since its in a more calmer section
03:51:105 (6) - eee idk about this slider end being on such an important vocal but im not sure how you can make it work without making this section feel too click intensive so idk what i would do, maybe get some second opinions on this? the number of slider ends on vocals is a lot especially in the calmer sections, that's just how I chose rhythm density/intensity
third choruses ending feels super similar to the previous two again, would maybe add a bit of variation in the positioning of the notes no
05:08:308 (4) - im having flashbacks, i agree with the previous mods tho and i think the slider ticks should be a little quieter at the start of the slider, the rest of the sliders volume is good to me I think I did something to lower it a little, but I can't lower it too much :/

hope this helps cool map and song

Mir wrote:

hello there

[Saigyou Ayakashi]
Are these unused cuz MA is complaining apparently you aren't done hitsounding

1. drum-hitnormal20.wav
2. drum-hitnormal25.wav
3. normal-hitfinish2.wav
4. soft-hitfinish2.wav
5. soft-hitnormal21.wav

gonna have to re check these after I'm done yea

- 02:01:385 (1) - I'm kinda skeptical about this skipping the vocal because it's in focus for the combo before and after this slider. did a thing
- 02:32:853 (5) - I feel like you can do something cooler with this instead of a normal 1/2 slider, this is a pretty noticeable sound and isn't really shown off. I think the angle awkwardness makes up for it
- 02:59:706 (6,7,8,9,1,2) - This.. might be a bit confusing to play... but I don't know how else to make it easier besides putting a slight spacing change before the 1, happens again later. I've written about this before and I've been aware it may be tricky to play, but the way I mapped the intro and kiai makes it difficult for there to be another way to map this

03:00:126 - 03:13:552 - & 05:02:643 - 05:08:308 - Beautiful. <3

- 03:35:371 - 03:37:049 - I think.. the timing might be off here? the piano is unsnapped but the drums are snapped to mentronome ~~
not sure what to do lol
- 05:08:308 (4) - Up to you but NC? its my style :3

what can i say, this is probably the best thing you've ever made. I love it. <3 ty

call me back when hs are done