Monstrata wrote:

Hard
00:48:825 - Was kinda expecting a circle here too. I feel a better emphasis on the start of the slider is more important here than on the previous ones.

Normal

00:36:134 (1,2) - This part felt rather empty, considering the vocals. Given how low the intensity the music is at this point, I think this should be appropriate.
01:11:706 (1,2,3,4) - Same here. The rhythm just feels so much sparser than 01:13:929 (1,2,3,4,5) - Undermapping feels really neat at this point though before bursting again at 01:13:929 - . It's kind of the same thing i did in Moesane

[]

Got metadata somewhere? Good set, you can call me back ^^

Emilia wrote:

ko short song bles i try my best

[in]

1. wow ok i can't play this diff at all, a lot of rhythm and distance choices i can't really agree with\
   
   distance:
2. 00:00:839 (2,3,4) - too similar for different time difference
3. 00:00:839 (2,3) - vs 00:01:580 (1,2) - inconsistent distance for same timing
4. 00:27:796 (3,4,5,6,7) - was stuck with the idea that 1/3 meant stack, but then 7 suddenly transitioned into a nonstack and its very uncomfortable to play the spacing was chosen in a way that it's both fairly playable and highlighting the vocal pitch in this section. This one's a bit tricky yea, but I don't agree with the uncomfortable play, i tested it myself
5. 00:32:706 (5,1,2,3,4) - slower SV but huge spacing? would prefer the spacing to be a lot smaller considering its 1/3 and its the slow section Spacings are bigger and flow more jarring due to irregular vocal notes.
6. 00:34:188 (1,2) - the inconsistent spacing is really messing me up, do you want to stack all 1/3 or not because it gets very very messy
7. 00:50:863 (2,3,4) - make the distance more different
8. 00:54:197 (1,2) - vs 00:54:753 (3,4) - vs 00:54:939 (4,5) - , 1st and 2nd have the same timing difference but has very different distances, 2nd and 3rd have similar distances but very different timing
9. 00:56:606 (2,3,1) - the stack and nonstack having the same timing here is very jarring and surprising to play disagree here, it might be a bit unexpected coming from 0 momentum to fastslider->sliderjump, but nothing that would be that uncomfortable to play and it fits the song well
10. 01:27:268 (1,2,3,1,2,3) - these are mapped on 1/4 shouldnt their distances be more different? Given the way how I spaced things on this map, there's no good way to make it distinct from the 1/3 rhythms.. and I don't think it's necessary either. The current ones are fine.
    
    turn on distance snap or something. mapping distances freely on 1/3 on an anime song with fairly consistent intensities is very very unintuitive to play. it just looks very messy since there is no consistency with how you handle 1/3 distances. a lot of the time i was confused as to whether it was a 1/3 or 1/4 or if it was a 1/6 or a 1/3 because of the weird way you used distances. these issues repeat throughout the map and if no consistency is achieved players cannot effectively play this map. If you replace 1/3 with 1/2 in your first sentences you have basically the same issue that existed years ago before people decided to put DS off. This song is already based on 1/3 for about 96% of its duration, so variation in spacing should be appropriate to not make it monotonous and I tried do it in a fair and intuitive way - which also works. I really can't agree with you on that point, I tp'd the map myself several dozen times along with some other testplayers and I never got the complaint about unintuitive gameplay. Maybe it's because my focus of the map was primarily on vocals which makes it confusing to play for you?
    
    rhythm:
11. 00:05:008 - why are so many big white ticks missed as click beats?? what is the purpose of that? Vocals are prioritized throughout the whole map, and this is reflected on the way i layed out my rhythm - so white beats were left out on purpose in order to emphasize the vocal layer better.
12. 00:11:400 (2) - what do you actually hear on the reverse cuz i hear nothing it fits the sound well enough at this point
13. 00:18:625 (1,1,1,1) - would suggest you just map this as 1/3 instead, even though it doesnt sound like it, it fits better with the playing aspect of it see 1st explanation on 'rhythm'
14. 00:21:034 (2) - the slidertail is the strong beat here, i can never hit this on time because i keep thinking the slider starts on the drum. the vocal here shouldnt be required to be a clickbeat because imo its a lot less important than the drum, though you can map it with a slidertail see 1st explanation on 'rhythm'
15. 00:26:036 (1,2) - similarly^ see 1st explanation on 'rhythm'
16. 00:39:654 - is there really a need to skip this? you've definitely mapped more intricate rhythms for held vocal notes before Don't think it's necessary to map it out here and it adds more emphasis on the 00:40:024 - 00:40:302 - sounds this way
17. 00:43:544 (5) - similar to above with vocal-drum emphasis see 1st explanation on 'rhythm'
18. 00:44:656 - 00:44:749 - why not just map 00:44:471 (3) - as 2 sliders see 1st explanation on 'rhythm'
19. 00:45:027 (1,1,1,1,1,1) - this looks alright at best, and its also not doing a good job of mapping strong beats to the song. just dont Sorry, but these are more interesting to follow and notorious than the 'stronger' beats of the drums.
20. 00:50:492 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - 00:52:715 (1,2,3,4,5) - for whatever reason you've chosen to map 2 similar song sections in very different ways which emphasise very different beats; sometimes its vocals, sometimes its drums, sometimes its a weird mix of both(??) this is bound to get players confused with when to tap Overall logic behind this is: Make the first part tap-heavier because vocals are higher-pitched as is the intensity of the song, and decrease density on the second because pitch goes down.
21. 00:59:385 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - 01:01:608 (1,2,3,4) - similar^ ^
22. 01:05:684 (3,4) - what do you hear here exactly because yet again i hear nothing umm, I hear clear beats on those
23. 01:27:268 (1,2) - 01:28:102 (1,2) - suggest mapping this as 1/3 as well or at least in sliders 1/3 would be completely wrong here. Sliders might be an alternative, but given how strong those beats are I prefer circles at this place.
    
    the way you did your rhythms was really messy. 80% of the time im not very certain of what you were trying to emphasise. consider revising your rhythm by adding clickbeats to only strong sounds (esp drums) and mapping the vocal through slidertails which is a lot more applicable in my opinion. often, the vocal is deemed inconsistent, so mapping them as clickbeats will only confuse the player. try getting more playthroughs and asking for opinions because maybe i'm just bad at the game looool I can't see how my rhythm choices are messy, you didn't seem to notice that a very major part of it is based on the vocals. I agree on vocals not being the best choice to set the foundation of your rhythm patterns on, but in this case they are very consistent in following the swing rhythm, with very few exceptions such as 00:18:625 (1,2,3,4) - or the final 1/4 patterns. Focussing on drumbeats can be an option too, but this is clearly not my intention here and would make the map generic as hell to play on a song that can deliver more than that - at least for me.

i'll only mod this one diff, its too tiring to look at and play Well, can't please everyone. I fixed some things that you mentioned to mitigate the problems that you see on the map, so thanks - really appreciate it.