1. make your shapes more uniform pls, they look messy and haphazardly placed (which is the main problem imo)

1. why do you end so many of your sliders on downbeats aaaaaa, the downbeats should be clickable imo
2. make your ds more constant, it moves around from 1.3x to like 1.45x through the entire map
3. 00:40:312 (4,1) - nazi blanket

1. slider velocity seems a little too fast for a normal especially on this bpm, nerf pls
2. 00:04:687 (3,4,5) - i'm not sure about the viability of this pattern in a normal, stacks are hard for newer players to read
3. 00:10:078 (2,3) - fix blanket
4. 00:12:187 (3,4,2,3) - could be two triangles? seems a bit messy the way it is now imo
5. 00:15:000 (1,2,3) - refer to 00:04:687 (3,4,5) - , i won't mention the rest of these
6. 00:15:937 (3,2) - kinda ugly overlap
7. 00:36:093 (2,1) - overlap could be neater, i get what youre trying to do here tho
8. 00:38:437 (3) - grazes the hit error bar

1. 00:12:890 (4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - could have made the hexgrid more uniform, it looks manually placed rn so it's made of imperfect triangles (ie not equilateral)
2. 00:25:781 (1) - unnecessary nc
3. 00:35:625 (1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2) - make hexgrid neater

HeyItsSins wrote:

Hi! From #modreqs


[ General]

1. Your AR should have a consistent change between each diff right now 0 to 5 to 8 does not see appropriate Ez changed to AR2,5

[ Easy]

1. Consider changing your SV to .9 right now you have a lot of stubby looking sliders that can confuse new players (If you decide to change this also make sure to make your DS 1) wait what no. firstly, most of easy's SV is less than 0.9, mostly around 0.5-0.75. and about DS, if I map it with 1x DS, sure it will be bad.
   
2. Change your stack leniency to 10 Too high, 8 instead
   
3. 00:00:937 (2) - I don't like this rhythm mostly because this slider ends on a downbeat. I think you should consider splitting it into a 1/1 slider and placing a circle on 00:01:875 - If you hear that I map from the "ding" sound, mostly in this diff do that, so it should not be a problem.
   
4. 00:01:875 - NC here because of the downbeat Since above is not applied, this also not be applied. And, since this is an easy, I would not NC every downbeat, bc that means I will NC every 2-3 combo lol
   
5. 00:03:750 (1) - why is this a different rhythm from 00:00:000 (1,2) - even though the sounds are the same? I think you should be consistent uh, they're the same '-'
   
   From now on, I'll only answer the accepted mod. Others are rejected with the same reason as above.
   
6. 00:05:625 (3) - NC
   
7. 00:06:562 (4) - again this slider ends on a downbeat, you should try to keep the downbeats clickable
   
8. 00:08:437 (2) - ^
   
9. 00:09:843 - NC because of downbeat
   
10. 00:13:125 (3) - ^
    
11. 00:14:062 (4,1) - This flow is a tad too sharp imo. I think you should nerf it a bit. I understand you're trying to represent a new section/sound in the music but this flow will definitely cause problems for beginners Since the AR is already changed, that sharp flow should not be a problem,
    that would be readed by beginners easily.
    
12. 00:23:906 (2) - this flow is way too sharp for an easy especially since there is no important sound on 00:23:906 (2) - try to move this in the sliders direction
    
13. 00:24:375 (3,4) - again with the rhythm change, these sounds are the same as 00:00:937 (2,3,4) - so why are they so different? You should be more consistent with your rhythm. Also put an NC on 00:24:375 (3) -
    
14. 00:28:125 (3) - NC
    
15. 00:29:531 (4,1) - Overlap nopee
    
16. 00:35:625 (3) - Fix this triangle ok
    
17. 00:38:906 (2) - Same idea as before, there is no important sound on this so why is the flow so sharp? Changed slider
    
18. 00:41:250 (1) - Flow is too sharp here as well

[ Normal]

1. Take a look through this map and try to make sure that you place your NCs on the downbeat (or right after if a slider goes over it) that was a reoccuring problem
2. The SV in this a a dramatic change from the easy the song is very slow but the sv is very fast
   
   

   Error- wrote:

   Lol, It just really hard for me to map normal with lower SV.
   Through its not make the mapset unrankable :p

3. 00:01:875 (1) - Make this a 1/2 repeating slider. The combo before it follows the melody so why suddenly switch to the harmony?
   
4. 00:03:750 (1,2,3) - The rhythm here is different from 00:00:000 (1,2,3) - ,again I think you should be more consistent and follow the same rhythm
   
5. 00:04:687 (3,4,5,1,2) - This looks like a mess, higher the AR or try not to make such stacks because these are really hard to read
   
6. 00:06:093 - take NC here and place it on 00:05:625 (5) - because of the downbeat
   
7. 00:07:031 (3,1) - Try to make these sliders relate, right now they look aesthetically unpleasing ok and a bit changes
   
8. 00:09:375 (1) - Why is this mapped to the harmony? The combo before you mapped to the melody so I think it only makes sense that this would apply here.
   
9. 00:15:000 (1,2,3) - again this looks like a mess and is hard to read
   
10. 00:17:343 (2) - try not to overlap with 00:15:937 (3) -
    
11. 00:17:812 (3) - why this is mapped to the harmony? I understand you want to represent to continuous sound on 00:17:578 - but I recommend you make a rhythm like this:
    SPOILER

    
12. 00:19:687 (3,4,1,2) - why does this ignore so much of the melody? Also the NC should be on 00:20:625 (4) - NC applied
    
13. 00:22:500 (1,2,3,4,5) - with an AR this low this is impossible to read
    
14. 00:28:593 (2,3) - again I think you should make the rhythm like this:
    SPOILER

    
15. 00:31:640 - Note here? because you are following the melody
    
16. 00:33:515 (4) - is touching 00:31:875 (1) - this whole pattern would look nicer if you tried to make every object spaced evenly and not just evenly space notes consecutively
    
17. 00:39:843 (2,3,4) - again change the rhythm to this:
    SPOILER

    
18. 00:42:890 - Note here?
    
19. 00:43:359 (1) - Try not to make a this slider end on a white tick because of slider emphasis
    
20. Most problems you had in this diff was inconsistent shifts between mapping to the melody and then the harmony.

I'll mod the hard later ( I sound so lazy ) , but gl! thx

newton- wrote:

hi, from queue

[general]

1. make your shapes more uniform pls, they look messy and haphazardly placed (which is the main problem imo) Be more specify, plz ^^

[ easy]

1. why do you end so many of your sliders on downbeats aaaaaa, the downbeats should be clickable imo Thats not really counted on Easy imo
2. make your ds more constant, it moves around from 1.3x to like 1.45x through the entire map :thinking:
3. 00:40:312 (4,1) - nazi blanket It should be fineeee~

[ normal]

1. slider velocity seems a little too fast for a normal especially on this bpm, nerf pls
2. 00:04:687 (3,4,5) - i'm not sure about the viability of this pattern in a normal, stacks are hard for newer players to read As the AR is not 5,5. It should be able to read.. ok fine fixed xd found another alternate way without masseing up with DS
3. 00:10:078 (2,3) - fix blanket seems fine here
4. 00:12:187 (3,4,2,3) - could be two triangles? seems a bit messy the way it is now imo fixeed
5. 00:15:000 (1,2,3) - refer to 00:04:687 (3,4,5) - , i won't mention the rest of these ok fixed
6. 00:15:937 (3,2) - kinda ugly overlap Since ^ is moved, so this is not a problem
7. 00:36:093 (2,1) - overlap could be neater, i get what youre trying to do here tho Hmm, i dont get this one, example plz?
8. 00:38:437 (3) - grazes the hit error bar Should be a bit fixed now

[ hard]

1. 00:12:890 (4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - could have made the hexgrid more uniform, it looks manually placed rn so it's made of imperfect triangles (ie not equilateral) Since I only focus on the triangle, now it should be fixed
2. 00:25:781 (1) - unnecessary nc fixed
3. 00:35:625 (1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2) - make hexgrid neater should be fixed now

good luck! thx~

Yoshino-- wrote:

from q

mod

General:


You don't have tags whoops, added

75% hitsound volume? Isn't that a little high for that song? 50%

Decrease hitsound volume on 00:45:000 (1) - or silence the end? 25%



Normal:


Your SV is too high not really, still acceptable through

00:01:875 (1) - change to 2 sliders + circle?

00:12:890 (4,1) - blanket

00:20:625 (1,2) - I feel like this should be two 1/2 sliders

00:23:437 (3,5) - confusing overlap for new players

00:29:062 (3,1) - ^

00:31:640 - why is this empty when you previously mapped it

00:33:750 (1) - that slidershape xd

00:35:390 - same as before

00:39:140 - ^

00:42:890 - hi again no sound here


Easy seems fine and idk much about hards.

gl with your map thx~

dankmemes5577 wrote:

Easy

I don't see anything wrong here. Great job!

Normal

Not a lot of stuff to say.
Sometimes, the slider head is not in perfect sync with the actual sound, but its just by a very small margin.

Hard

Nothing much to say here.

Basically, this map is really standard and aims to be easy for beginners. It does reach this goal pretty well.
The only thing I see that could be improved at this point is the aesthetics of some sliders. nopee it seems fine, be more spesific plz
Some of them are not inclined, like here 00:31:875 (3) - and here 00:21:093 (2) - and here 00:39:375 (1) - no, they look pretty good, just see the pattern, etc
Its just a question of preference, but most people prefer when they are like this 00:14:531 (5) - not really.

- Frontier - wrote:

from q

[General]

1. You could add "sans the skeleton, frisk, character" in tags as this map does. thanks for that!
   Applied~
2. Adding custom soft-hitclap in this map may great. Using default soft-hitclap here seems not fit with the song. Added now, this hitsound seems syncs with the song.
3. Tick out "Widescreen Support" since your map has no storyboard. oh whoops! I didn't really check about that, thanks for reminding~
4. I think countdown is unnecessary so maybe you should tick out enable countdown too. ok disabled

[Easy]

1. Looks like Distance Snap in this diff isn't consistent. (I'm not sure what actual DS here is T_T) You should fix DS here. :thinking:
2. Maybe change CS to 2? CS in Normal is 3 and Hard is 4. Too big

[Normal]

1. Seems like SV in Normal is faster than Hard. You should avoid this. why does everyone complaining this ;-; Its still acceptable
2. 00:00:468 (2,3) - not perfectly blanket. Maybe move (2) to x:191 y:163.
3. 00:10:078 (1,2) - ^, also in (2) and (3) nope, its blanket perfectly
4. 00:12:890 (4,1) - ^
5. 00:35:390 (4,1) - ^

[Hard]

1. AR8 is kinda fast for this kind of song. Maybe reduce to AR7? The jump would look bad

Sorry for a very bad mod T_T. its helpful enough ^^
GL~ thx!

Cris_1 wrote:

M4M from your queue (t/579508)

Remember mod my map: https://osu.ppy.sh/s/580549

Normal

1. Reduce AR to 5 please ok decrase again, this time is now fixed, due to Normal wiki
   
2. 00:01:875 (1,2) - Separate this, actually is very close together Since its a slider, Its fine, its not breaking DS through
3. 00:08:437 (5) - Move this a bit up, actually is offscreen It doesnt even touch the scorebar
4. 00:14:062 (4,5,1) - Make this part how this > 00:39:375 (1,2,3) No, they not sounds the same
5. 00:23:437 (3) - Make this more circular ok
6. 00:29:062 (3) - Set the tail directly to the next circle No, DS
7. 00:33:750 (1) - Ugly slider, please change this noo, others will ruin other sliders/circle. And using Red anchor only is not really good here.. And I try to blanket it too (and that is a Gero-ish slider either :p)
8. 00:43:125 (4) - Closed jump, please make this more open I'm not really sure about this.. Coz its still a 1/1 gap and seems good here. NC instead

Hard

1. 00:17:109 (2,3) - Closed jump It should be fine, since placing it others will ruin the pattern.
2. 00:18:281 (5,6,7) - Consider stack this A no would be better
3. 00:18:750 (1,2) - Stack nooo plz no anti jump
4. 00:19:687 (4) - Why this ends in 1/8? End this at 00:20:039 If you listen with 50& speed, it ends with 1/8 or maybe 1/16
5. 00:21:328 (4,5,6) - Closed jump Same as above
6. 00:25:781 (5,1) - Move this further ok
7. 00:27:187 (4,5) - Fix blanket It just feels kinda weird becouse of the spacing, but that blanket is good imo
8. 00:28:593 (3) - Set this at x:244 y:352 Good idea
9. 00:28:828 (4) - ^ x:328 y:320 ok and some modification
10. 00:42:187 (3) - End this at 00:42:539 Same as above

Good job with this mapset thx~
Good luck!~

[- Mizki -] wrote:

Hi! From the OSUWOT modq. Sorry for late, irl matters kicked me atm. A bit concerned about combo color blending on the background, but I think it's fine. The map is already very, very polished so I don't think I need to discuss more stuff.

Easy

-00:15:000 (5) - NC?

Normal

-00:07:968 (4) - NC?
-00:30:000 (5) - NC?

Hard

-00:16:875 (1) - would be cool if this circle goes exactly the same to the path of circle 3 and slider 4 so... move a bit lower? (12 pixels lower I suggest). Example: 00:20:625 (1,2,3,4,5,6)
-00:40:078 (4) - is fine if this slider curves upwards

I don't think I could say anything more bc this is good already. Good luck! (also hs 40% is better imo) noo too low

ViolentBoo wrote:

From #modreq chat

I recommend either using ctrl 1 for tiny grid size or turning off grid snapping because some spacings are a bit awkard, just one i'm looking at now
00:02:343 (3)
Easy
There should be a green line in the beginning? nope
00:15:000 (1) - Blanket is slightly off. (Near the beggining to close and at the end a bit wider.)
00:17:812 (4,1) - Blanket is slightly off.
00:40:312 (4,1) - Fixing the grid snapping would fix this blanket.

Normal:

00:11:250 (1,2,3) - *Optional* The sliders here should be different, like this combo 00:03:750 (1,2,3) nah, I prefer the original one, saving more space
00:28:593 (2,3) - Why is this so different from this? 00:06:093 (1,2,3). Fore some reason, I made some parts different so its not boring, new players should learn how to learn new pattern when they're in the middle of the map.


This is a fine map, but it's important to stay consistent with aspects you start off with to be repeated later on in the song. Especially of the song rhythmically doesn't change. same as above tho

Hope this helps!
Map I'm working on if you are interested: t/536476

[[Pika]] wrote:

short map for short map m4m go mod this https://osu.ppy.sh/s/593336

note:
numberhere|numberhere is a coordinate
find a note's coordinate on the top right, next to distance snap (it's in yellow

general
check your offset im pretty sure it's like -10

easy
00:00:000 (1) - maybe relax this curve a little https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/7846199
00:00:937 (2) - why not just make this just a straight slider? either remove the red node or make the angle a little more obvious is what i'd do ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
00:02:812 (4,1) - blanket nazi ♥
00:11:250 (1) - would be better if you flipped this horizontally for sound change & motion emphasis https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/7846213
00:14:062 (4,1) - blanket nazi ♥
00:17:812 (4,1) - see above What? flip horizontally? nono, it will overlap with 00:17:812 (4) - and doesn't flow good
00:16:406 (2,3) - i'd shift these a little more up to make the slider flow break more emphasized Example plz? I need to keep the DS consistent tho
00:20:625 (3,4) - make these parallel? good eye tho
00:30:000 (1) - relax this angle a little bit, you've mostly used curves and wide angles. https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/7846239 weird image but i hope you get what im saying Curve instead :3
00:36:562 (4) - why not just copy paste 00:35:625 (3) - like you've done previously? I do prefer the original one, but changed a bit
00:37:500 (1) - for this section, i'd change the rhythm a little bit because the bass line changes. maybe have the rhythm be just 00:37:500 (1,2) - until the spinner or something, it makes for a less boring experience if there's a little variation <3 I dont sure about this tho, through its not really boring for an easy diff, also, changing them might ruin everything, including SR, so I still want to keep them

normal
00:00:000 (1) - would move to around 90|19 coordinate for more intended slider flow DS :/
00:03:281 (5,1) - maybe make (5) curvier so it blankets with (1) better
00:07:031 (3) - feels weird not being able to click a downbeat in a normal ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
00:10:078 (2,3) - nice blanket kek, would change (3) so it doesnt look like failed blanket
00:17:812 (3,1) - blanket nazi ♥
00:20:625 (1,2) - this aesthetic could be better imo, you just need to shift (1) down-left to about 119:198 but then your ds is ruined :think: found another way :3
00:20:625 (1,2,3,4) - emphasis is a little lower than i'd like, perhaps change flow more to show that you're prioritizing the chiptune synth over the bassline? Due to ^ I changed 00:20:625 (1,2) - tho, should be fine now imo
00:32:343 (2,3) - i personally dont like this type of blanket very much but eh ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
00:30:937 (3,4,1) - fix distance snap please
00:42:187 (3,1) - spacing is kinda misleading but eh ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

hard
00:03:750 (1,2) - blanket nazi ♥
00:14:062 (1,2,3,4,1) - why is there such a big spacing between (1) and (2), the chiptune synth doesn't really represent that I want to keep the SR to 3*, so I made them a bit chill, through they have the same instrument, so its fine to do that imo
00:12:890 (4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1) - monstrata found :eyes:
00:16:640 (5,1,2,3) - clean this half-xegon up
00:18:281 (5,6,7) - this triple is barely on anything, a reverse slider'd work better here imo nooo
00:19:687 (4,5) - why didnt you use this rhythm more at the start wdym?
00:21:562 (5,6,7,8) - wide jumps are bad for newer players imo, too much horizontal movement not really tho, its a chill jump, 128BPM with 1/2 jump is still chill.
00:25:312 - rip sound lol, but already sounded with hitsound tho
00:31:406 (1,2,3,1) - move the second (1) more to around 153|75 for aesthetic
00:42:656 (4) - would flip this on the y axis instead https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/7846385
00:44:765 (8) - why not place at 121|17 instead? gud idea

Pika wrote:

monstrata found :eyes:

Wikozo wrote:

Easy

In 00:00:703 add circle and will be cool. Noo its easy I dont want a 1/2
do kiai

Normal

In 00:20:390 add circle bcs there is a clear sound No there isn't
do kiai

Hard

00:40:898 (6) - remove bcs there is no clear sound in this moment There is a sound there
do kiai
_______________________________________________________________________

Generally do kiai in this moment (00:22:500) to this moment (00:45:000) in every diff Good map bro B) nope, it has the same sound with before that part, so no kiai.

Rizen wrote:

Easy

1. 00:11:250 (1) - remove finish? doesn't really fit when finish was used recently at 00:06:562 (4) - . orr consider moving the finish to the slider head at 00:15:000 (1) - (don't forget to whistle because of that bell sound)
2. 00:15:000 (1) - clap at slider end?
3. 00:33:750 (1) - finish is a bit excessive since you used it again at 00:37:500 (1) -
4. 00:41:250 (1) - remove finish for consistency with 00:18:750 (1) - ?
5. need to be careful with DS. even though it's on, it can still cause aesthetics issues such as at 00:26:250 (1,2,3) - when the DS is at their extremities
6. overall, look out with your finish usage as it is a bit inconsistent considering the song just loops itself twice

Normal

1. consider revising the hitsounds here... they're a bit of a mess compared to the other two diffs
2. 00:02:343 (2) - move this a little higher to give more visual spacing with 00:01:875 (1) - ?
3. 00:05:625 (5,1) - consider ctrl+g the rhythm so it's circle then slider? this is due to me thinking the red tick should be clickable
4. 00:06:328 (2,4) - consider reworking the pattern here so this overlap doesn't happen since it looks rather awkwardly placed
5. 00:28:359 (1,2,3) - perhaps a 1/2 slider, 1/1 slider then circle would work better, similar to what you did at 00:05:859 (1,2,3) - . that held instrument at 00:28:827 - should be mapped with a 1/1 slider imo
6. 00:39:375 (1,2,3) - keep visual spacing between the sliders the same?

Hard

1. 00:10:078 (7) - forgot to hitsound this slider tick
2. 00:22:265 (4,1) - reposition circle 4 so there is spacing emphasis to sldier 1? slider 1 is on a rather prominent large white tick so spacing emphasis for it would be nice
3. 00:28:828 (4,5) - DS, maybe move slider 5 a bit so DS between the two is 1.2x
4. 00:32:578 (3,4,1) - keep DS between the objects the same would be better imo, no reason to decrease it to circle 1
5. 00:43:593 (3,4) - doesn't make sense to space circle 4 this far out imo, that sound intensity is basically the same as 00:43:359 (2,3) - which has smaller spacing. would make more sense to space circle 5 and/or circle 6 more

gl

Incomp wrote:

Hey there. From #modreqs.

[Hard]

00:14:062 (1,2) - I don't think this jump is justified by the song.

[Normal]

00:32:812 (3) - This slider isn't a perfect blanket, and it doesn't lead to 00:33:515 (4) - properly.

[Easy]

I couldn't find anything wrong with this diff.

This map is obviously heavily polished, and that's good. Thank you >///< This short mod is either proof of that or the fact that I'm not good enough at mapping to find issues with maps of this quality. If you don't find any of my two critiques useful, don't give me kudosu.

Better get ranked soon.

CucumberCuc wrote:

Hi
M4M

[Easy]
00:00:937 (2,3) are close ?
00:05:156 (2,3) 1 times right break ds
00:08:437 (2,3) start slider 1 times up, circle 1 times down no for de circle
00:16:875 (3) end slider 1 times up
00:24:375 (3) 1 times down
00:31:873 (3) 1 times up

[Normal]
00:02:343 (2,3) are close ???
00:04:687 (3,4) ^ ^
00:07:968 (3) 2 times left
00:09:140 (3) 1 times right nah
00:14:531 (5) slider end ^ breaks aesthetic
00:26:953 (2) 1 times left breaks stack
00:27:890 (4,5) are close ???
00:28:828 (2) 1 times left and end slider 1 times up no, breaks DS :<
00:34:687 (3,4) are close ???
00:37:500 (1,2) slightly far
00:42:890 put circle No for jump

[Hard]
00:09:843 (6,7) slightly far its stacked so its ok
00:11:953 (2) 1 times right breaks DS
00:16:640 (5,1,3,4) maybe 5,1 and 3,4 stack? Im trying to make a triangle here :^)
00:19:687 (4,5) are close 1/8 so fine
00:23:203 (2) 1 times left
00:42:187 (3,4) are close saem as above.

Macanache wrote:

Hello!
I am from #modreqs and we agreed to a M4M(my map: https://osu.ppy.sh/s/606814)

I am new to modding so don't expect much from me. Im just going to give my own opinion.

Easy and Normal look perfect.

[Hard]
00:07:031 (4,5,6,1) - Check the distance snapping. 00:07:968 (5,6,1) - are not equal. okay

00:19:687 (4,5) - Are you sure about this? Seems a little awkward to me. its fineeee

00:24:140 (4,1,2) - Don't look equal. okay

00:42:187 (3,4) - again. same

00:07:968 (5) - NC. 00:08:437 (1) - Remove NC. 00:08:906 (2) - NC. nah

- Magic Bomb - wrote:

gd as promised with hitsounds

Bubblun wrote:

From #modreqs doing m4m

General
The 2 combo colors are too similar to rank. I suggest blue and white instead. There is no kiai so it should be fine.
For the std diffs every soft finish should be slightly quieter. They stick out way too much considering the calm nature of the song.

Easy
00:00:937 (2) - Considering the simplicity of your mapping style you should compliment the slider tick by lining up the red anchor on it.
^ I personally think you should map these kinds of sliders with that in mind across all diffs just for aesthetics.
Well, imo it still fine if I didnt put the red anchor in the 1/2 tick, even so the whole map is almost has the same positition in red anchor,
which is in 1/8 or 1/4, so it will be really no problem :^)
Normal
The SV is way too high compared to hard which has 1.5 and Easy which is .6 SV is fine guys plz this is a slow BPM map :<
Besides the sv, the next biggest issue seems to be the overall aesthetics. You have your main ideas down, but they need polishing. 00:08:906 (2,3,1) - These for example would look better if that corner lined up with 2, and the visual spacing at 00:13:828 (3,5) - could be spread out more so it fits into the overall structure better. Also this 00:23:437 (3,4) - blanket could be improved. okay so this might be a lil bit problem, well aesthetic seems fine to me, you'll ask "why the heck is this using 2 circle instead of 1 slider" well thats becouse if I use any slider instead of these 2 circle, it will flow bad and couse way more horrible aesthetic, and "why not stacking" no, firstly, almost, or maybe no stacks in this diff, so if I do stacks it will just mess up the whole diff with "inconsistency".

Hard
00:21:562 (1,2,3,4) - These aren't intuitive. (In other words, they play bad) https://puu.sh/vI4Ub/904fa0ac6d.png I put the 4 notes into 2 antijumps (Stacks or stops, whatever you wanna call them) and spaced them out more. I felt my way played and looked better, but if you can think of a better way you gotta change that. This is slowly increasing the spacing, so its fine. Also testplayers is fine with that
00:30:000 - Minor inconsistency with the hitsounding. You need a finish here.

Overall the Normal (sadly) might need to be redone, and the Hard diff is in dire need of polishing, but it shouldn't take too long to fix considering the length of the song. gl

borborygmos wrote:

M4M: https://osu.ppy.sh/s/600882

General

1. Your hitsounding is different across all diffs, you should try to make them the same. But they're the same '-'
2. You must have some sort of sound for either soft-slidertick.wav or soft-sliderslider.wav. Ranking criteria states You must not silence both slider ticks and slider slides together. Oh whoops I accidently add that, removed
3. There is a 4ms delay on soft-hitwhistle.wav you should aim to reduce this even though 4ms is not unrankable. I think its should be fine.
4. The Based slider velocity between the difficulties is unrankable. You should gradually increase the base slider velocity as difficulty increases. I'll explain later.
5. Slider tick rate must be set according to the song, therefore slider tick rate must be consistent between difficulties. Well since Normal has some problem with hitsound, it has 2 slider tick rate, well others not. becouse of..
   
   

   Avoid using high tick rates combined with low slider velocity. Receiving feedback from slider ticks that are not visible can be uncomfortable.

6. Raise overall hitsounds to 60 or 65, right now they blend too well with the song and are hard to hear for me.

Easy

1. 00:07:500 - you should consider making this beat clickable, since you never put this sound on a slider end past this point or before this point.
2. The base SV is very low, and the Distance snap is very high, you should greatly consider using a high SV so that 1/1 will not overlap with a 1.0 - 1.2 DS.

Normal

1. 00:07:968 (1) - why is there a pause before and after this point? you don't have something similar to this in the rest of the map.
2. 00:32:343 (1) - remove NC
3. also, when you remap this to fix the SV problem, you should not have long chains of 1/2 rhythm.

Hard

1. 00:07:031 (4) - what?
2. 00:07:968 (5) - nc this and 00:08:437 (1) - remove this nc, then nc 00:09:375 -
3. 00:30:468 (1,2,3,1,2,3) - you should not NC based on symmetry because the song does not support it. so remove 00:31:406 (1) - and 00:32:109 (1) - , then NC 00:31:875 (3) -
4. 00:43:125 (1,2,3,1,2,3,4,5) - this is same as above, i would remove nc 00:43:828 (1) - q

elena2705 wrote:

Hi~
Just mod it...
Everithing is primitively...? what no :<
Why do you not use yellow combo colour? not match with BG

Hard

Why at the beginning usual clap and 00:01:875 (1) - here also. It is strange... ? its like that and no probs about it.

Normal

00:31:875 (1) - why it is in one combo? 00:35:625 (1) - here not in one combo... ?? I dont get it

Easy

Good, very good)

So... Good luck

elena2705 wrote:

So...
When i said primitively, i told about song>< So don't woory) oh lool
Yellow colour will be good! (Yellow eye in BG) And contrast is good! Just try, it fits: sorry but the yellow color is not dominant enough to be used as combo colour.

probs??? About what you?
But now i can't see about what i told you....Maybe it's my computer lags? So, sorry

Error- wrote:

M4M: https://osu.ppy.sh/s/600882

[notice]

General

[list]
[*]The Based slider velocity between the difficulties is unrankable. You should gradually increase the base slider velocity as difficulty increases. I'll explain later.
[*]Slider tick rate must be set according to the song, therefore slider tick rate must be consistent between difficulties. Well since Normal has some problem with hitsound, it has 2 slider tick rate, well others not. becouse of..

Avoid using high tick rates combined with low slider velocity. Receiving feedback from slider ticks that are not visible can be uncomfortable.

why I keep Normal's SV high, but Easy's SV is low
Firstly, I want to keep Easy pretty simple and basic, couse mostly new player ofc will play easy. then my Normal is way much faster?
1. with low SV, it will couse SR will drastically low, making the spread broke.
2. broke aesthetic, etc.
3. I will mostly do stacks due to its slow slider.
4. boring
5. Its pretty much a slow BPM map, and 1.8 is fair enough for a Normal diff.

anyway thanks for modding!

Difficulty Spread
Generally star rating is a value which is calculated based on the objects in a map in order to estimate how difficult the map is. Hence, it should be treated as such and it should be noted that it cannot be used to determine how difficult a map actually is with 100% accuracy.
As a nominator, you may want to value linear spreads. This means that the difficulty progression throughout the mapset is approximately even. Gameplay wise this will never be perfectly possible so one difficulty will be further apart from another in most if not all cases. However, if you encounter a really large gap in comparison to the rest of the set, it should be addressed properly. Common issues in this sector are:
Large increase in density from one difficulty level to the next: If one difficulty is twice as dense as the previous one, while the density increase otherwise is much smaller, you may want to investigate if adding another difficulty between the two makes sense.
Large increase in complexity of the spacing concept from one difficulty level to the next: If one difficulty is completely snapped to one distance and the difficulty that follows it is consisting mostly of jump patterns, reducing the amount of jumps in the jumpy difficulty can be used to balance out the spread, provided that it does not impact the difficulty gap to other difficulties in a harmful way.
Large differences in difficulty spikes between two difficulties. If a difficulty has a difficulty spike which makes it significantly harder, it should also be present in some form in the preceding and following difficulties.

borborygmos wrote:

a

Error- wrote:

M4M: https://osu.ppy.sh/s/600882

[notice]

General

[list]
[*]The Based slider velocity between the difficulties is unrankable. You should gradually increase the base slider velocity as difficulty increases. I'll explain later.
[*]Slider tick rate must be set according to the song, therefore slider tick rate must be consistent between difficulties. Well since Normal has some problem with hitsound, it has 2 slider tick rate, well others not. becouse of..

why I keep Normal's SV high, but Easy's SV is low
Firstly, I want to keep Easy pretty simple and basic, couse mostly new player ofc will play easy. then my Normal is way much faster?
1. with low SV, it will couse SR will drastically low, making the spread broke.
2. broke aesthetic, etc.
3. I will mostly do stacks due to its slow slider.
4. boring
5. Its pretty much a slow BPM map, and 1.8 is fair enough for a Normal diff.

anyway thanks for modding!

Because the guidelines say you should set it according to the song, if you think the tick rate will be too high on one diff it will be too high on the other's also, thus you should lower all tick rates to one. otherwise they should all be 2.

As for the base SV, it should go up progressively, though right now the Base SV is higher than the Hard diff,

this would be considered a Large difference in difficulty spikes created by the SV change (for slider speed) and the increase in spacing. Also consider making base SV for the easy higher, since the difference in slider speed and speed between objects is so drastically different for no reason.