1. 00:01:964 (4) - 00:04:631 (4) - I think these are better off ending on the red tick. Having the next note only be a 1/4th away in the timeline just feels awkward to me.
2. 01:10:797 (1) - or 01:14:798 (1,2) - needs to change. They represent the same sound but are mapped differently.
3. 01:16:964 (1,2) - This reads as a 1/2 or something, I recommend just overlapping the 1 on the 2 somehow, like you do everywhere else in this section (01:20:631 (4,1) - 01:24:631 (4,1) - )
4. 01:53:463 (1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2) - Why does spacing increase here when pitch decreases? In my opinion, it makes the last two (01:54:130 (1,2,1,2) - ) end up being way too large as you currently have it mapped. Bring down the spacing on those last two to be around the same as the first, and it should be fine.
5. 04:47:210 (1,2,3,4,5,6,1,2,3,4,5,1) - or 04:55:210 (1,2,3,4,5,1,2,3,4,5) - Aren't these essentially the same rhythms/sounds at different points? What lead to the different patterns?
6. 04:57:877 (1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2) - Not a huge fan of this. 04:57:877 (1,2,1,2,1,2) - Has an odd linear feel with flow breaks on the end of each 1/2, but then you break the patterning going from 04:58:543 (1,2,1,2) - which is more of a zig-zag. IMO, based off the rest of the map, zig-zag works better, but if you want that weird linear-short-stop sort of feel, change the kicks to fit it as well. (You'll have to change a bit about the kick jumps but it shouldn't be too hard to work in based off your current patternings.)

Cryptic wrote:

A few things:

1. 00:01:964 (4) - 00:04:631 (4) - I think these are better off ending on the red tick. Having the next note only be a 1/4th away in the timeline just feels awkward to me. ++++
2. 01:10:797 (1) - or 01:14:798 (1,2) - needs to change. They represent the same sound but are mapped differently. ++++
3. 01:16:964 (1,2) - This reads as a 1/2 or something, I recommend just overlapping the 1 on the 2 somehow, like you do everywhere else in this section (01:20:631 (4,1) - 01:24:631 (4,1) - ) ++++
4. 01:53:463 (1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2) - Why does spacing increase here when pitch decreases? In my opinion, it makes the last two (01:54:130 (1,2,1,2) - ) end up being way too large as you currently have it mapped. Bring down the spacing on those last two to be around the same as the first, and it should be fine. ++++
5. 04:47:210 (1,2,3,4,5,6,1,2,3,4,5,1) - or 04:55:210 (1,2,3,4,5,1,2,3,4,5) - Aren't these essentially the same rhythms/sounds at different points? What lead to the different patterns? I hear 04:55:210 (1,2,3,4,5,1,2,3,4,5) - stronger beats, so i map it like only notes. It is very important for me to show this moment.
6. 04:57:877 (1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2) - Not a huge fan of this. 04:57:877 (1,2,1,2,1,2) - Has an odd linear feel with flow breaks on the end of each 1/2, but then you break the patterning going from 04:58:543 (1,2,1,2) - which is more of a zig-zag. IMO, based off the rest of the map, zig-zag works better, but if you want that weird linear-short-stop sort of feel, change the kicks to fit it as well. (You'll have to change a bit about the kick jumps but it shouldn't be too hard to work in based off your current patternings.) ++++ . i change pattern

That should be about it, call me back.

Namki wrote:

smth passing by

okay, I can agree with undermapped prominent sounds at the beginning but 01:08:131 (4) - can you hear something here 01:08:297 - ? Having such prominent piano sound undermapped feels sorta weird to me. Consider emphasis it somehow. ++++
also, timing seems kinda off, recheck it once again, please. All is well with him, it was checked many times.

best of luck

_Erra_ wrote:

wtf i can't open diff

SPOILER

Cryptic wrote:

Apparently quite a few people can't download or it doesn't open/show-up or something, so I'm going to try and figure out what causes that. It worked fine for me, but I'll look into it.

Also, before I qualify & recheck, I'd like you to change the diffname to something related to the song, as right now it's quite out-there and random.

tokiko wrote:

жаль, что не "Extra Stage"

cacipan wrote:

02:43:297 (1) - overlapping the combo number when standard layout resolution

screenshot

Cryptic wrote:

While the widescreen support and overlapping combo number do not matter, the epilepsy warning should be disabled. Also, while you're at it, make Combo 1 or Combo 2 color slightly more different from one another. They're a bit too similar at the moment.

I can directly requalify though, so call me back.

Naotoshi wrote:

can u also get a slightly better but not as dumb diff name while you're at it

Naotoshi wrote:

can u also get a slightly better but not as dumb diff name while you're at it

Naotoshi wrote:

can u also get a slightly better but not as dumb diff name while you're at it

Lama Poluna wrote:

Naotoshi wrote:

can u also get a slightly better but not as dumb diff name while you're at it

We can't make the file name longer, otherwise it may not open at some people.

F1r3tar wrote:

Naotoshi wrote:

can u also get a slightly better but not as dumb diff name while you're at it

Using that on a marathon has been more original than most other approved maps.