forum

gmtn. vs. kozato (fw. LUZE) & gmtn. (witch's slave) - squart

posted
Total Posts
134
show more
Monstrata
00:48:797 (1,2,3) - I would remove the circle on 2. You can hear there's a pause before the 1/4's begin on the red tick.
00:55:131 (2,3) - not a good rhythm choice. You make 3 the point of emphasis with this rhythm but it's a weak blue tick.
00:57:797 (3,4) - felt rather empty. I think you could have used a 1/2 slider and added some more density. But if you want rhythm variety i'll accept that as a valid argument (but only if you mean it).
01:02:797 (1,2) - Not a good rhythm either. for the same reason as earlier. I would shorten 01:02:797 (1) - to a 3/4 slider and use the same rhythm i recommended earlier.
01:45:714 (1) - Sounds entirely unnecessary imo.
01:46:047 (3,4) - These are all wrong. Put them on white ticks please. Listen to 01:46:130 - 01:46:464 - :P your current rhythm has no rhythmic value since you do a 2x repeat, then a 3x repeat, then a 1x repeat. its impossible to read how many repeats there should be on a 1/4 slider.
01:56:130 - 02:06:797 - This section is waaaay more difficult than the earlier section. I don't think its appropriate at all, its too much of a step up and already feels like the kiai section in terms of intensity. Also, the triplets are very overmapped.
02:54:713 (2,3) - Stacking is better. It's really hard to aim a 1/4 jump like this and still have to slow down to catch 3 due to them being spaced.
02:56:463 (1,1,1,1,1) - These are 1/6.
03:09:463 (3,4,1) - The overlap makes the pattern a bit unpolished for me
03:14:463 (1,2,1,2) - use streams instead? You spam 1/4 sliders so often that when i hear clear 1/4 beats i wish you used something different. Here is a good opportunity.
03:19:630 (4) - Make this a 1/4 slider because 03:19:797 - is a really important beat. You have to keep it clickable or you ruin the 3/4 rhythm here. 03:20:047 (2,3) - is good.
03:20:463 (1,2,3,1) - I would just not map it... the snapping is somewhere between 1/12 and 1/8 and probably requires a bpm shift. simplify rhythm here unless you want to time it, because the current snap is definitely wrong/
03:36:380 (2) - Remove this since you don't do 1/4 jumps on the second one. Imo the 1/4 jump is too much of a spike for this section anyways.
03:39:047 (2) - ^
03:50:797 (1,1) - Huge jump out of nowhere...
04:01:130 (4,5) - This jump is really inappropriate too... why does 5 need such large spacing?
04:14:797 (1,2) - I think its too hard to see the repeats on slider 2. Don't stack and do a different pattern that keeps the slider visible.
04:25:463 (1,1,1,1,1) - 1/6
05:09:543 (4) - two circles instead? The beat on red tick is pretty important too.
05:11:543 (3) - Same here. You map 05:11:210 (2,3) - similarly, but they sound different, the second one has two notes.
05:14:543 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - Same here. You map them the same, but the first is just two notes, theres no beat on the blue tick. Remove 05:14:626 (2) - .
05:18:876 (1,2) - Ctrl+G slider 1 two times (and adjust the inconsistency) before you copy paste/ Slider 2 is off because you didn't do this step.
05:20:543 (1,2) - You could use the same slider design imo.

[]

Pretty good map. I like how it isn't stream heavy. I think you overdo the 1/4 sliders a bit too much though so you could cut back a bit and put a bit more short streams on the kiai's. I mentioned like one or two places. Generally the set is pretty well designed, but that section in the middle with the triplets is my biggest concern.

Also, please properly reply to previous mods. You left a lot of stuff blank. I assume you fixed? and what is +++++?
Topic Starter
Lama Poluna

Monstrata wrote:

00:48:797 (1,2,3) - I would remove the circle on 2. You can hear there's a pause before the 1/4's begin on the red tick. ++++
00:55:131 (2,3) - not a good rhythm choice. You make 3 the point of emphasis with this rhythm but it's a weak blue tick. ++++
00:57:797 (3,4) - felt rather empty. I think you could have used a 1/2 slider and added some more density. But if you want rhythm variety i'll accept that as a valid argument (but only if you mean it). I made a mistake... I don't know why it looks empty. But then I missthe note at 01:01:381 - , like this 00:57:714 (2) - .
01:02:797 (1,2) - Not a good rhythm either. for the same reason as earlier. I would shorten 01:02:797 (1) - to a 3/4 slider and use the same rhythm i recommended earlier. ++++
01:45:714 (1) - Sounds entirely unnecessary imo. ++++
01:46:047 (3,4) - These are all wrong. Put them on white ticks please. Listen to 01:46:130 - 01:46:464 - :P your current rhythm has no rhythmic value since you do a 2x repeat, then a 3x repeat, then a 1x repeat. its impossible to read how many repeats there should be on a 1/4 slider. ++++
01:56:130 - 02:06:797 - This section is waaaay more difficult than the earlier section. I don't think its appropriate at all, its too much of a step up and already feels like the kiai section in terms of intensity. Also, the triplets are very overmapped. The music intensifies and I have to show it. I asked many times to play this map and this part was not so difficult.
02:54:713 (2,3) - Stacking is better. It's really hard to aim a 1/4 jump like this and still have to slow down to catch 3 due to them being spaced. ++++
02:56:463 (1,1,1,1,1) - These are 1/6. ++++
03:09:463 (3,4,1) - The overlap makes the pattern a bit unpolished for me ++++
03:14:463 (1,2,1,2) - use streams instead? You spam 1/4 sliders so often that when i hear clear 1/4 beats i wish you used something different. Here is a good opportunity. If you looked at my map completely, you noticed that the sounds I'm using these sliders. This is the concept map.
03:19:630 (4) - Make this a 1/4 slider because 03:19:797 - is a really important beat. You have to keep it clickable or you ruin the 3/4 rhythm here. 03:20:047 (2,3) - is good. ++++
03:20:463 (1,2,3,1) - I would just not map it... the snapping is somewhere between 1/12 and 1/8 and probably requires a bpm shift. simplify rhythm here unless you want to time it, because the current snap is definitely wrong/ ++++
03:36:380 (2) - Remove this since you don't do 1/4 jumps on the second one. Imo the 1/4 jump is too much of a spike for this section anyways. ++++
03:39:047 (2) - ^ ++++
03:50:797 (1,1) - Huge jump out of nowhere... ++++
04:01:130 (4,5) - This jump is really inappropriate too... why does 5 need such large spacing? ++++
04:14:797 (1,2) - I think its too hard to see the repeats on slider 2. Don't stack and do a different pattern that keeps the slider visible. ++++
04:25:463 (1,1,1,1,1) - 1/6 ++++
05:09:543 (4) - two circles instead? The beat on red tick is pretty important too. ++++
05:11:543 (3) - Same here. You map 05:11:210 (2,3) - similarly, but they sound different, the second one has two notes. ++++
05:14:543 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - Same here. You map them the same, but the first is just two notes, theres no beat on the blue tick. Remove 05:14:626 (2) - . ++++
05:18:876 (1,2) - Ctrl+G slider 1 two times (and adjust the inconsistency) before you copy paste/ Slider 2 is off because you didn't do this step. ++++
05:20:543 (1,2) - You could use the same slider design imo. And is it so bad?

[]

Pretty good map. I like how it isn't stream heavy. I think you overdo the 1/4 sliders a bit too much though so you could cut back a bit and put a bit more short streams on the kiai's. I mentioned like one or two places. Generally the set is pretty well designed, but that section in the middle with the triplets is my biggest concern.
Thank you very much. I just map it as I hear this song.

Also, please properly reply to previous mods. You left a lot of stuff blank. I assume you fixed? and what is +++++?
If I leave something blank, it means that I don't like this idea. I just don't want to write "I don't like it" every time. ++++ - it means that I agree
Monstrata
Artist: gmtn. vs. kozato (fw. ルゼ) & gmtn. (witch's slave)
Romanised Artist: gmtn. vs. kozato (fw. LUZE) & gmtn. (witch's slave)
Title: squartatrice vs. disperagioia

Since this is a combination of two songs, you should specify the correct artist metadata for both songs in the "Artist" field. gmtn is used twice yes, but we should distinguish "gmtn. vs. kozato (fw. ルゼ)" from "gmtn. (witch's slave)". Right now, it sounds like kozato (fw. LUZE) composed disperagioia, but that's not the case at all, since both of them composed squaratrice.

Once you've applied this fix, I can nominate. (You can remove the witch's slave from tag I guess)
Topic Starter
Lama Poluna

Monstrata wrote:

Artist: gmtn. vs. kozato (fw. ルゼ) & gmtn. (witch's slave)
Romanised Artist: gmtn. vs. kozato (fw. LUZE) & gmtn. (witch's slave)
Title: squartatrice vs. disperagioia

Changed!

Since this is a combination of two songs, you should specify the correct artist metadata for both songs in the "Artist" field. gmtn is used twice yes, but we should distinguish "gmtn. vs. kozato (fw. ルゼ)" from "gmtn. (witch's slave)". Right now, it sounds like kozato (fw. LUZE) composed disperagioia, but that's not the case at all, since both of them composed squaratrice.

Once you've applied this fix, I can nominate. (You can remove the witch's slave from tag I guess) ++++

thank you! <3
X Light
Masterpiece
Monstrata
Remember you only need one more BN now thanks to the new BN rule! Nominated~
vanucik
еее лама ещё одну иконку и всё
Cryptic
A few things:

  1. 00:01:964 (4) - 00:04:631 (4) - I think these are better off ending on the red tick. Having the next note only be a 1/4th away in the timeline just feels awkward to me.
  2. 01:10:797 (1) - or 01:14:798 (1,2) - needs to change. They represent the same sound but are mapped differently.
  3. 01:16:964 (1,2) - This reads as a 1/2 or something, I recommend just overlapping the 1 on the 2 somehow, like you do everywhere else in this section (01:20:631 (4,1) - 01:24:631 (4,1) - )
  4. 01:53:463 (1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2) - Why does spacing increase here when pitch decreases? In my opinion, it makes the last two (01:54:130 (1,2,1,2) - ) end up being way too large as you currently have it mapped. Bring down the spacing on those last two to be around the same as the first, and it should be fine.
  5. 04:47:210 (1,2,3,4,5,6,1,2,3,4,5,1) - or 04:55:210 (1,2,3,4,5,1,2,3,4,5) - Aren't these essentially the same rhythms/sounds at different points? What lead to the different patterns?
  6. 04:57:877 (1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2) - Not a huge fan of this. 04:57:877 (1,2,1,2,1,2) - Has an odd linear feel with flow breaks on the end of each 1/2, but then you break the patterning going from 04:58:543 (1,2,1,2) - which is more of a zig-zag. IMO, based off the rest of the map, zig-zag works better, but if you want that weird linear-short-stop sort of feel, change the kicks to fit it as well. (You'll have to change a bit about the kick jumps but it shouldn't be too hard to work in based off your current patternings.)
That should be about it, call me back.
Topic Starter
Lama Poluna

Cryptic wrote:

A few things:

  1. 00:01:964 (4) - 00:04:631 (4) - I think these are better off ending on the red tick. Having the next note only be a 1/4th away in the timeline just feels awkward to me. ++++
  2. 01:10:797 (1) - or 01:14:798 (1,2) - needs to change. They represent the same sound but are mapped differently. ++++
  3. 01:16:964 (1,2) - This reads as a 1/2 or something, I recommend just overlapping the 1 on the 2 somehow, like you do everywhere else in this section (01:20:631 (4,1) - 01:24:631 (4,1) - ) ++++
  4. 01:53:463 (1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2) - Why does spacing increase here when pitch decreases? In my opinion, it makes the last two (01:54:130 (1,2,1,2) - ) end up being way too large as you currently have it mapped. Bring down the spacing on those last two to be around the same as the first, and it should be fine. ++++
  5. 04:47:210 (1,2,3,4,5,6,1,2,3,4,5,1) - or 04:55:210 (1,2,3,4,5,1,2,3,4,5) - Aren't these essentially the same rhythms/sounds at different points? What lead to the different patterns? I hear 04:55:210 (1,2,3,4,5,1,2,3,4,5) - stronger beats, so i map it like only notes. It is very important for me to show this moment.
  6. 04:57:877 (1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2) - Not a huge fan of this. 04:57:877 (1,2,1,2,1,2) - Has an odd linear feel with flow breaks on the end of each 1/2, but then you break the patterning going from 04:58:543 (1,2,1,2) - which is more of a zig-zag. IMO, based off the rest of the map, zig-zag works better, but if you want that weird linear-short-stop sort of feel, change the kicks to fit it as well. (You'll have to change a bit about the kick jumps but it shouldn't be too hard to work in based off your current patternings.) ++++ . i change pattern
That should be about it, call me back.
thank you ;w;
Namki
smth passing by

okay, I can agree with undermapped prominent sounds at the beginning but 01:08:131 (4) - can you hear something here 01:08:297 - ? Having such prominent piano sound undermapped feels sorta weird to me. Consider emphasis it somehow.
also, timing seems kinda off, recheck it once again, please.

best of luck
Topic Starter
Lama Poluna

Namki wrote:

smth passing by

okay, I can agree with undermapped prominent sounds at the beginning but 01:08:131 (4) - can you hear something here 01:08:297 - ? Having such prominent piano sound undermapped feels sorta weird to me. Consider emphasis it somehow. ++++
also, timing seems kinda off, recheck it once again, please. All is well with him, it was checked many times.

best of luck
thanku
_Erra_
wtf i can't open diff
Topic Starter
Lama Poluna

_Erra_ wrote:

wtf i can't open diff


lol i can
Cryptic
Apparently quite a few people can't download or it doesn't open/show-up or something, so I'm going to try and figure out what causes that. It worked fine for me, but I'll look into it.

Also, before I qualify & recheck, I'd like you to change the diffname to something related to the song, as right now it's quite out-there and random.
Topic Starter
Lama Poluna

Cryptic wrote:

Apparently quite a few people can't download or it doesn't open/show-up or something, so I'm going to try and figure out what causes that. It worked fine for me, but I'll look into it.

Also, before I qualify & recheck, I'd like you to change the diffname to something related to the song, as right now it's quite out-there and random.
fixed diffname
Cryptic
Now that that's fixed, everything should be good to go.

Fixed a few hitsounds and changed the combo colors to be more readable in general; Qualified!
Topic Starter
Lama Poluna
yayy <3
schoolboy
congrats bby <333
Namki
поздравляю!
Shmiklak
Ура лама вышел из помойки
_Hou
Gratzzz
Topic Starter
Lama Poluna
Спасибо всем, люблю <3
tokiko
жаль, что не "Extra Stage"
gambatte
ламочка поздравляю это лучшая карта в мире :!: :!: :!:
Kilabarus
PandaHero

tokiko wrote:

жаль, что не "Extra Stage"
Так это же из другого аниме :thinking:
Monarch
03:53:797 (1,2,1,2,1,2) - so we can just have jumps on anything now? xD
moph
congrats! great job
- Frontier -
OMGGGGGGGGGGG CONGRATZ LAMA ><
cacipan
02:43:297 (1) - overlapping the combo number when standard layout resolution

Topic Starter
Lama Poluna

cacipan wrote:

02:43:297 (1) - overlapping the combo number when standard layout resolution


yeees

and we forgot to disable widesreen support and epilepsy warning...


dq is coming
wait Cryptic
Cryptic
While the widescreen support and overlapping combo number do not matter, the epilepsy warning should be disabled. Also, while you're at it, make Combo 1 or Combo 2 color slightly more different from one another. They're a bit too similar at the moment.

I can directly requalify though, so call me back.
Topic Starter
Lama Poluna

Cryptic wrote:

While the widescreen support and overlapping combo number do not matter, the epilepsy warning should be disabled. Also, while you're at it, make Combo 1 or Combo 2 color slightly more different from one another. They're a bit too similar at the moment.

I can directly requalify though, so call me back.

fixed
Nao Tomori
can u also get a slightly better but not as dumb diff name while you're at it
Kilabarus
Shmiklak

Naotoshi wrote:

can u also get a slightly better but not as dumb diff name while you're at it
He doesn't really need it. I don't see any reasons to change it, Extra is good enough especially if nobody can provide Lama a better diffname. Though it depends on Lama's wishes
Topic Starter
Lama Poluna

Naotoshi wrote:

can u also get a slightly better but not as dumb diff name while you're at it
We can't make the file name longer, otherwise it may not open at some people.
Nao Tomori
oh, rip.
Cryptic
Requalified.

Extra is the safest diffname we have since we know it works. The other stuff has also been addressed.
Topic Starter
Lama Poluna
~ yay , thank you all
show more
Please sign in to reply.

New reply