Anxient wrote:

to be honest i really agree with you, but the reason why i kept the DS as lowering was coz while they might sound as intense, i felt like keeping them as consistent DS would feel like overkill. So i decided on gradually reducing them.

(it wouldnt fit anyway even if i tried to >.>)

HabiHolic wrote:

M4M:3 Sorry for late

00:25:499 (2) - move here. - why tho..?

SPOILER

01:16:422 (1) - NC remove? - ok
02:04:275 (3,1) - NC swap. - nah i want the 3 note widestream to be emphasized on its own. like its own special thing. same goes with 02:04:568 (1,2,3) - gives it a sense of emphasis for the 3 vocal segments: Road Of...

very solid map. Good Luck.. - big thank
i don't your map pick big problem :3 - huwa? ;w;

Nerova Riuz GX wrote:

no kd - SHIT

Shiguma wrote:

Modding pro mapper stuff is hard T_T

00:04:709 (1,1) - Stacking is off - crap
00:18:768 (1,1) - did you want to line up the 00:19:948 (1) - with sliderend of 00:18:768 (1) - ? - ITS PERFECT
00:22:279 (1,2,1,2,1,2) - you could rearrange these notes to make a nice pentagon actually, it would look pretty sick imo - ill stick to my 3 unreadable triangles.
00:33:847 (3,2,3,4) - idk if you wanna make some weird triangle relationship between these notes with visual spacing or something - too far
00:37:212 (1) - I don't agree that this slider should have the most spacing in this 00:36:919 (1,2,1) - section, there is not that strong of a sound there - made it more noob
00:57:251 (1) - move this up 1 pixel and right 1 pixel (reason: i am dumb and find it necessary to comment on px fixes) - you coulve just sent me the coordinates but ah well. precision mapping is still relevant apparently
01:00:764 (3) - needs to be moved so visual spacing is uniform in 01:00:471 (1,2,3) - this pattern, if you want 01:00:764 (3) - to have more actual spacing in this combo, i would make it uniform and then ctrl + g 01:00:764 (3) - tldr make everything equal distance got it.
01:01:349 (2,1) - ummm I think 01:01:495 (1) - this should have the big spacing, not 01:01:349 (2) - objection! (1) has no drum kick! and even if it does, its not stronger!
01:07:788 (3,2) - Stacking is off - appled
01:23:885 (4) - I love when osu does this, this needs to be manually pushed 1px down and 1px right - this is my life now
01:24:910 (3) - ctrl + g this - b-but my triangle
01:24:471 (1,1) - stack is off x d - how the fuck
01:34:129 (4,7) - ^ - does this even happen
01:39:837 (1,2,3) - you should be mean and map the vocals here >:D - D:
01:43:495 (1,2) - ctrl + g - nein
02:22:422 (2,3) - wtf so little spacing lol - itll be overkill if i made it any bigger
02:27:983 (3,1) - ctrl + g, i know this changes how the entire pattern plays but that's my point - >:[
02:36:177 (5,5) - ahhh so close, can the stream be adjusted to stack them? - id have to increase the DS, and that wont reflect the song
02:47:300 (5) - NC? - weird.
02:52:276 (1,2,1,2,3,1,2,1,2,1,2,3,4,5,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,1,2,1,2,3,1,2,1,2,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,1,2,3,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,5,1,2,1,2,3) - I know what you're doing here and it's cool and all but the music is pretty awesome here and the undermap here feels bad imo. Maybe kicksliders to up the density in this section would be a good idea? - as long as i get the feeling of intensity in this section, i think its fine. kicksliders is unecessary
03:20:081 (4,5,1) - Don't think this flows well - it doesnt flow badly either.
03:29:007 (1,2,3) - I think 03:29:300 (3) - should have the most spacing in this pattern - zig zag jumps gives more emphasis than big jumps imo so nah
04:11:593 (4,2,3) - visually space these equally? - BUT I REFUSE
04:28:276 (1,2,3) - this looks kinda off to me, i'm not sure if i'm just imagining things? - just you
04:59:990 (1,1) - This is so gay lol spinners are kms no spinners pls replace with notes i beg u ill do anything if u delete these spinners pls i love u man - DDDDD:

I'll pm you my map in like 2-3 days when I finish it hahaha thanks for doing m4m

SnowNiNo_ wrote:

free mod for anxienty san as always :3 - qtpie
00:08:520 (1) - snap isnt right imo, 1/3 sound much better to me - oh youre right
00:39:836 (1,2) - should be the same as the rest since there are sound at 00:40:056 - either - i tried
01:16:276 (1) - the cymbol sound here deserved more spacing - i dont think so :l i feel like its fine as is tbh
01:19:203 (1,1) - unnecessary imo, no need to emphasis here - mm i only put a bit of emphasis her tbh, i think its still important
01:45:544 (1) - no need to NC here imo xd - but why tho?
01:58:129 - hmm a stream here would be nicer - b-but muh buildup
02:47:300 (5) - NC for flow change - ok
03:37:642 - spacing change here isnt necessary since the music sound the same as b4 - really? coz when i hear this part, i feel like the song is calming down for this part 03:39:105 -
03:52:276 (5) - NC for flow change - imo melody didnt change noticeably enough for me to warrant a change ;x sorry

nic - tk

Mking wrote:

hey there! Here from modding requests~
(I'm pretty new to mapping so my friend told me to do this to improve so sorry if I say weird things) - its fine~ everyone has to start somewhere right?

Lone wolf

Ok so first of all I feel like are some parts that might be a little to hard, even if it's a 6 star map, for example; - tbh i stopped caring about SR a long time ago lol (since my 4.5 star map on another set is alot harder than 4.5 stars buet lets not get into that
00:22:279 (1,2,1,2,1,2,1) - Like here, these things are really hard to hit with this spacing and with CS 5 and on top of that the last stream flows in another direction (maybe I'm just bad xd) - m well i imagine people wouldnt play this as roughly as you think it actually is really. http://puu.sh/uqghZ/5504cf700a.jpg coz if anything i think it flows quite normally. besides, this is a 6+ star map i woudlnt expect it to be easy yo.
02:13:349 (7,8) - why is 7 not just 1 1/2 slider instead of a 1/4 and a circle? - if you listen to this part, 02:13:422 - theres a drum beat. thats normal, but 02:13:495 - this part is more emphasized than the others. i want to put special focus into that note.
03:35:739 (2,3) - This circle would be really hard to hit with the slider, especially when the next slider is somewhere way different than where the circle leads you - to be fair, if you got through this far into the map i think this shouldnt be so hard
00:28:426 (2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,1,2,3) - why do these first 2 have different directions and the second 2 same directions? - 00:28:426 (2,3,4) - down - up coz the pitch increases from 00:28:426 - and 00:28:572 -, 00:29:011 (2) - pitch increases again, but would play too linearly if i kept going up.
00:55:203 (1,2,3) - if they went from direction 3 to 1 it would be more logical imo (flows better with the next objects too) - oh crap youre right
02:03:983 (5,1,2,3) - spaced triple would be hard to hit hereafter these sliders - i made it like that coz the song was intensifying llike crazy. besides, the momentum carried from 02:03:837 (4,5,1,2,3) - makes it easy to hit those streams. trust me ;d
so hard to mod a professional mappers' map >.>

I think I said this is too hard a little to much and I think you're actually trying to get that hard vibe with your map but oh well xd
Anyways I hope I helped at least a tiny little bit xd the map is so cool holy gj on that - it did, dont worry and thanks :3!
gl with getting this ranked!

1. 00:30:767 (1,2,3) - ctrl G to stay consistent with 00:25:791 (1,2,3,1,2,3) and 00:28:426 (2,3,4,1,2,3,4)
2. 01:06:616 (5) - I'd want to emphasize this too and make 01:06:032 (1,1) - the second note in the direction change. Something like this: http://puu.sh/uqYKz/087c80f749.jpg (-after looking through the whole map)
3. 01:19:203 (1,2) - Switch these on the timeline like so: http://puu.sh/uqZ4a/61fe29af42.jpg
4. 01:57:690 (1) - Replace with two kick sliders like 01:57:983 (2)
   
   NC Mod:
5. 01:15:398 (5) - NC
6. 01:52:861 (5) - ^
7. 03:18:617 (4) - ^
8. 04:00:177 (5) , 04:02:519 (6) , 04:03:690 (5) - NC since 03:57:836 (1)
9. 01:38:227 (1) - NC not needed
10. 01:45:251 (1) - ^
11. 01:49:642 (1) - ^
12. 03:21:544 (5,1) - Start NC on 5
13. 04:20:081 (3,1) - Start NC on 3
14. 04:24:764 (1) - 1 note NC looks weird
15. 04:26:959 (1) - ^
    !!!Please get another NC mod!!!

Bluekrait wrote:

Anxient's free #modhelp request

[Lone Wolf]

1. 00:30:767 (1,2,3) - ctrl G to stay consistent with 00:25:791 (1,2,3,1,2,3) and 00:28:426 (2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - oo nice catch
2. 01:06:616 (5) - I'd want to emphasize this too and make 01:06:032 (1,1) - the second note in the direction change. Something like this: http://puu.sh/uqYKz/087c80f749.jpg (-after looking through the whole map)
3. 01:19:203 (1,2) - Switch these on the timeline like so: http://puu.sh/uqZ4a/61fe29af42.jpg - there isnt any beats in 01:19:276 - tho.
4. 01:57:690 (1) - Replace with two kick sliders like 01:57:983 (2) - i feel like with what i have currently feels more natural coz the instruments feel more prominent in that part. yes that means a loss in consistency but i think its something worth sacrificing.
   
   NC Mod:
5. 01:15:398 (5) - NC - why tho
6. 01:52:861 (5) - ^
7. 03:18:617 (4) - ^
8. 04:00:177 (5) , 04:02:519 (6) , 04:03:690 (5) - NC since 03:57:836 (1)
9. 01:38:227 (1) - NC not needed
10. 01:45:251 (1) - ^
11. 01:49:642 (1) - ^
12. 03:21:544 (5,1) - Start NC on 5
13. 04:20:081 (3,1) - Start NC on 3
14. 04:24:764 (1) - 1 note NC looks weird - and the one below: no it doesnt
15. 04:26:959 (1) - ^ - applied everything except for the ones i mentioned
    !!!Please get another NC mod!!! - oko dad

Kroytz wrote:

mod 4 u <33 - wao senpai

Lone Furry

General: I'm preeeetty sure there's a LOT of NC things to go over here but there's too much action going on I can't really tell which ones are intentional, which ones are stylistic, or which one can be inconsistencies or errors even. So I'll skip over the NCs but I think they should really be looked into carefully. - :thinking:




00:07:064 (1) - I expected this to be similar to 00:04:709 (1) - since they're both the same noise but it's clear you didn't wanna do it so idk. - ye i felt like if i repeated the same thign in such a short period of time it would feel weird so na.

00:10:295 (3) - might work better as a slider since there's a leading-off guitar pitch - tbh i like it better as a suspense note.

00:11:743 (1,1) - not completely 90 degree angle? - if i did that it would look super stiff. not my aim there.

00:21:109 (1) - would've preferred to see more rhythm here. slider circle slider circle works better imo - made an addition

00:22:572 (1,2,1,2,1,2,3,4,1) - I'm not really keen on this flow since if you were to look at them as circles youd see the spacing kinda varies a bit (5,6,7) is really glaring. (circles) http://puu.sh/uGVZ6/662d4d7476.jpg - tbh id keep it as it is since in your screenshot, you can see the change in direction. i think thats good enough. (this part also filters the noobs from the people who can actually play this but dont tell anyone

you could try something with a star base or a hexagon if you wanted something more linear
(star) http://puu.sh/uGWfa/fb48256177.jpg
(hexagon) http://puu.sh/uGWis/753abe7088.jpg

00:34:870 (4,4) - triggering overlap tbh - cant be helped tbh

00:37:212 (1) - I'd say the same here but this seems intentional. I don't really like how it looks still. moving it upwards instead of backwards looks better to me - ill fix the overlap
(ex) http://puu.sh/uGWr8/ffcc71ffc9.jpg

00:39:836 (1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2,3) - how come underemphasized? more spacing or something that may go outwards could be good. - i actuallt think thats overemphasis. rip ;w but tbh i feel like this is fine as is.
(ex) http://puu.sh/uGWva/f2c93d5af2.jpg

00:55:788 (3,1) - The distance here feels really close compared to the other drum roll. - buffed. i think.

01:00:764 (3) - Maybe two more kick sliders would make this sound less awkward since by holding on the guitar note, it makes the drums feel weaker (previous measures had stronger drums). - im gonna be real rn, this part sounds like a clusterfuck even without the notes, so im just going with whatever is clearly audible rn lmao

01:04:861 (3) - Make this a downward pointing kick slider please trust. its sooo much better - i hope this isnt going to bite me in the butt later. fixed.

01:05:739 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,1) - This is a really cool stream I'm actually impressed. Good job - >AAAA<

01:11:446 (5) - Maybe make this a kick slider like (4)? - yeah ok sure

01:12:910 (2,3,4) - angle seems to be a bit off compared to 01:12:764 (1) - paranoid. fixed.

01:15:398 (5) - Should be NC'd. - gochu

01:20:227 (1) - Kind of a weird one since you never used a 1/1 red slider before. I think it's rhythmically more sound if you make the first red beat a circle and then a 1/2 slider on the next white tick. - i woudl actually do that if 01:20:373 - wasnt so devoid of sound except for that guitar so cant be helped tbh.

01:21:105 (2) - also weird because 3/4 slider. if you make that 3/4 then 01:21:398 (3) - should be 3/4 but thatd also be weird right? Maybe just make (2) a triple instead. - 01:21:324 - coz this note was particularly defined and 01:21:251 - is still null'd.

01:24:910 (3) - the white tick starts the stong guitar thingy so 01:25:203 (1,2,3) - should actually have a (4) kick slider to follow the music more properly. (now that I hear it more, the guitar starts on a previous blue tick so its even weirder but I still think using 4 kicks starting on white is a bit better) - nah ill keep it. the hold note was meant for the guitar hold.

01:25:788 (1) - here also triple. otherwise just make 01:25:642 (1) - as a 3/4 slider and have a circle on the strong white beat 01:25:934 - same reason as above.

01:29:593 (3) - this angle seems off since its not like the rest from before - this is gonna be really elaborate and unecessarily complicated: 01:29:593 - higher guitar pitch, 01:29:812 - lower guitar pitch

01:32:373 (3) - maybe space this off a bit so that the slider-ends have some visual cue to them. perflect stacked slider ends kinda looks odd imo - relocated

01:33:837 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,1) - I like how you reduced the emphasis in this manner. Structurally fitting - =w=

01:35:593 (1) - undermapping? you dont do that for all the other vocals only 01:38:520 (1) - fixed.

01:38:959 (2) - Eh, this just looks kinda weird since it's off angle of the previous one. Maybe keeping them the same angles would look nicer - it would look too smooth.

01:41:446 (5) - wtf is this - an anomaly in spacetime. seriously, even i know when to use curve sliders :c

01:44:080 (3) - Could find a way to emphasize this more? - EMPHASIZED.

01:45:837 (1,2) - a nice way to keep it interesting might be to ctrl g (1) and then ctrl g (2) so that it goes opposite flow - that would make it play weird :C

01:46:715 (1) - 1/2 slider works better and is more consistent - ok i guess. also added a triple coz i missed something.

01:47:593 (2) - Not same angle as 01:47:300 (1) - ? could look better that way - id make it the same if the vocals werent there. but alas, they are.

01:47:885 (1,1) - same could be said about these two relationships regarding their angles - second vocals have lower pitch, facing the lower side is to reflect that.

01:50:959 (2) - The slider-end beat is stronger than the red so triple+ kick on white could be good here - i tried.

01:58:129 (1) - you could try to add another 1/2 circle overlapping the (1) because the undermapping here feels a bit uncanny since the drum still keep rolling. - made a triple. hopefully its good enough yeah?

02:02:812 (5) - blegh - absolutely HIDOI

02:13:349 (7,8) - This looks really cool but I'm uncertain about it's playability since the momentum is stopped too suddenly for that inner beat. The flow afterwards seem good but it's still a bit strange... Possible to leave it as is but at a glance it looks like it wouldn't flow all that well. Still a cool design~ - if it makes you feel better alot of players didnt miss here. momentum is a cool thing w

02:16:276 (2) - This angle be similar to 02:15:983 (1) - sorry it took so long to explain but i dont like to use the same slider direction twice unless it looks visually better. so :L

02:17:739 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - What I don't like about this stream is that the strong vocal happens on (5) but the spacing change happens earlier. Also, 02:17:154 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - is a more dominant vocal then the latter half so I think this entire design is backwards. Should be a quick fix if you ctrl g them all and then give 02:18:031 (5,6,7,8) - a different emphasis by adding kick sliders or something - i actually had 02:17:154 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - be the way it is because if i were to be given the chance to use a 1/4 holds slider i would use it here coz of the way the vocals are suspended with RUUUUUUUー. i had 02:17:739 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - be the way it is because unlike the previous stream which is a more hold-suspended kinda vocal, this one is more free with its vocals, since it had 2 words: NA and RA. hopefully this clears things up

02:22:568 (3) - I expected this to be overlapping with 02:22:568 (3) - slider-end tbh. the triangle design is finished if you do it like that - wow youre right. altered.

02:31:349 (2) - 3/4 is awkwardly introduced. 1/2 my friend - 02:31:495 - blame this part for being so fucking empty yeah :C

02:37:934 (2) - ctrl g this and then ctrl g that 02:38:227 (1) - flows nicely~ - it does but that kinda nerfs the slowdown effect. youd be surprised how fast things slow down.

02:43:934 (4) - sinful - i am a failure

02:45:251 (1,2) - should be identical to one of your previous rhythms since this starts to undermap - rhythm fixed.

02:46:422 (1) - This is a more accurate rhythm - bonus: remapped
(ex) http://puu.sh/uGYoA/06b39f3543.jpg

02:51:983 (3) - split into two kicks? - naw. i dont near your 2nd kick

03:11:300 (2,3) - spacing feels oddly closer than from (1,2). only because the vocal is shared on the (3) so maybe use equal-er spacing to keep them in place with the vocals. - i think its fine tbh. the sounds in here isnt so defined that i need to change it.

03:13:056 (2) - keep same angle as 03:12:764 (1) - ? its so that 03:11:885 (5,1) - is complimentary - you win this time

03:26:227 (1) - eh, the repeat isn't so necessary here, it throws the flow of things off a bit since the movement is halted. pretty sure i still halted it anyway.

03:39:690 (1,2,3,4) - Maybe try rhythm like this instead - nah, coz i dont hear anything here 03:40:129 - so might as well go suspended note.
(ex) http://puu.sh/uGYHV/979eb1c60c.jpg

03:41:886 (2) - why this overlaaaaap ;_; - is it so bad? :C

03:44:666 (3) - possible triple - denied.

03:53:154 (1) - 1/2 slider and add a circle on the blue tick might be better - nothing represents guitar screams better than 3/4 sliders.

03:55:203 (3,4,5,6,1,2,3,4,5) - to be honest, i think this stream really looks bad lol. change the 2nd half into two kick sliders for that stronger guitar maybe - i wasnt even going for looks here. this is literally the best pattern i could think of that plays nicely with the entire section.

04:10:715 (1,2,3,4) - I dunno how to feel about how these look together since they all face differently. try to keep it a bit more structured together - changed

04:15:983 (9) - This has another emphasis to it that I think might be better if followed more accurately - mm nah. i think its fine as is, but ill change it if someone else mentions it.

04:19:349 (1,2) - m o r e s p a c i n g ! ! keep it equal or similar to 04:18:910 (1,2) - made it equal. NICE PP MAPPING

04:35:593 (2) - triple - nice catch

04:43:056 (3) - keep to same angle as (1) ? - 9

04:46:715 (3) - maybe try single repeating slider. it would look waaaaaaaaay cooler if it was done that way - BADASS
(ex) http://puu.sh/uGZ6p/2e2956dcc1.jpg

04:49:056 (2) - make as two kicks would add emphasis to the ending measures. sounds better this way imo - nah. i feel like the slowdown part is necessary.

04:50:227 (1) - change this angle to be 90 degree with 04:50:520 (1) - aha aha

04:50:812 (2) - please keep the rest of the measure as 1/2 sliders ;; it only makes sense :< - 04:50:959 - too bad this part is so empty right
even a simple pattern like this could work http://puu.sh/uGZor/d4cb2e350a.jpg

04:52:861 (3) - better if this aims upwards like somewhere around. - im going for pitch relevance thingie. doesnt make sense to put a note upwards when the song is clearly lowering its pitch
(ex) http://puu.sh/uGZvx/96170d7c05.jpg

04:54:032 (1) - lower sv and the repeat is kinda offputting to me. - cant be helped. the song is literally slowing down.

04:58:152 (1,2,3,4) - since the timing is different here so should the spacing be different as to not confuse the player. - please lmao. if a player actually made it this far without NF, im pretty sure they wont get trapped by this thing.

I gotta say, I really love the streams in this map. Some weren't as accurately represented but they could be easily fixed. Your designs are really nice. Gj~ - tfw you mapped the stream parts with jumps coz you secretly cant map streams

Realazy wrote:

00:21:109 (1) - hey that's not a straight sli- - crud
00:22:718 (2) - you could space this out further so you get a clear progressive spacing during the whole pattern? - i was following sliderhead on a 45 degree angle tho so idk i should change it. plus i think its fine on its own
00:33:553 (4,1) - swap those NCs since that's what you did earlier - gotcha
00:33:992 (1,2,3,4) - you could arrange those in patterns of 2 to be more consistent with the start, also NC on 3 - probably...
00:37:065 (2,1) - there is a note on 1 indeed but it's not as audible imo since it's kinda overshadowed by the held note, at least stack those? - its the start of a drum kick so i dont think i should make it stack
01:00:178 (1) - this shouldn't be NC since you didn't use one for your previous slider patterns - oko
01:09:983 (2,1) - those aren't the same sliders!! actually it's pretty noticeable that they aren't so i assume it's intentional - it is ;;
01:13:056 (4,5) - why are those single notes? the pauses kinda sound awkward since this is a constant 1/4 stream - since this part's 1/4 isnt as noticeable as the other parts. spamming 1/4 is too much of a bother anyway
01:19:495 (1) - i don't really see a reason as to why this is a NC - same
01:28:861 (1) - ^ - removed
01:34:715 (5) - i assume you're NCing based on pitch/the instrument you're focusing and whatnot so this could use a NC - m.
01:42:105 - isn't there a note? - there is.
02:00:763 (5,1) - you should swap those NCs since 5 is pretty significant - gotcha
03:12:764 (1) - remove NC for consistency - k
03:32:520 (1) - ^ - was focusing on NC every stream tho

sorry i can't mod this well lol the song sounds like a mess imo - same tbh, now that i re listened to it. still a good map tho lmao
nice job on the map though

1. 00:55:203 (1) - triple like you did on 00:55:642 (1,2,3) is more fit imo. triple there is pretty strong compared to other rhythm.
2. 01:13:934 (1,2,2) - I think you could add finish on head every of them.
3. 01:20:959 (1) - missing finish here?
4. ok since I can't mod this much let me list the missing finish.
   
   01:02:227 (1)
   01:11:593 (1)
   01:20:959 (1) -
   01:30:032 (1) -
   01:31:495 (1) -
   01:32:666 (1) -
   01:35:007 (1) -
   01:37:349 (1) -
   01:39:690 (5) -
   01:44:081 (3)
   01:44:373 - you could spam finish on every white tick
   01:51:398 (1,1) -
   01:57:251 (1) -
   02:17:154 (1) -
   02:17:739 (1) - now this part have more finish than 02:17:739 (1) . make them consistent?
   02:39:398 (1,1) -
   02:42:032 (1,2,3) -
   02:54:617 (1) - since you add 02:56:373 (1)
   02:59:300 (1,1,1,2) -
   03:01:642 (1) -
   03:23:885 (1,2) - on tail to follow your finish pattern
   03:33:398 (2,2) - head
   03:11:007 - this part you could add finish on every 2 big white tick.
   03:49:642 (1) -
   umm and more, I'm afraid you will annoys this mod
5. 04:20:081 (1) - remove NC? it's 1/2 but NC make it more like 1/1

P A N wrote:

1. 00:55:203 (1) - triple like you did on 00:55:642 (1,2,3) is more fit imo. triple there is pretty strong compared to other rhythm. - i think its less about the speed rather than the impact. if i used a triple there it would feel weak imo. if i used a 1/4 it would feel too repetitive.
2. 01:13:934 (1,2,2) - I think you could add finish on head every of them.
3. 01:20:959 (1) - missing finish here?
4. ok since I can't mod this much let me list the missing finish. - i kinda borrowed stole the hitsounds from monstrata's version so
   
   01:02:227 (1)
   01:11:593 (1)
   01:20:959 (1) -
   01:30:032 (1) -
   01:31:495 (1) -
   01:32:666 (1) -
   01:35:007 (1) -
   01:37:349 (1) -
   01:39:690 (5) -
   01:44:081 (3)
   01:44:373 - you could spam finish on every white tick
   01:51:398 (1,1) -
   01:57:251 (1) -
   02:17:154 (1) -
   02:17:739 (1) - now this part have more finish than 02:17:739 (1) . make them consistent?
   02:39:398 (1,1) -
   02:42:032 (1,2,3) -
   02:54:617 (1) - since you add 02:56:373 (1)
   02:59:300 (1,1,1,2) -
   03:01:642 (1) -
   03:23:885 (1,2) - on tail to follow your finish pattern
   03:33:398 (2,2) - head
   03:11:007 - this part you could add finish on every 2 big white tick.
   03:49:642 (1) -
   umm and more, I'm afraid you will annoys this mod
5. 04:20:081 (1) - remove NC? it's 1/2 but NC make it more like 1/1 - completely redone the NCing here tbh

I can't find much problem here except the hitsound, good luck xd

UnLock- wrote:

Rank when

Nofool wrote:

taikos already been modded mang, tell me when you'r ready and ill find a BN

Insp1r3 wrote:

OH NO NOT ANOTHER ONE

Realazy wrote:

Insp1r3 wrote:

OH NO NOT ANOTHER ONE

yo that's like way better than the other ranked maps dude

also just to make sure: we rechecked the map with anxient a bit on irc since i already modded the map a while ago, and it hasn't changed much since it was graved in the meantime

• 00:06:744

MashaSG wrote:

y so straight?

1. 00:07:064 (1) - Why this slider is much faster than 00:16:422 (1) - ? Imo sounds are almost same, I think you just forgot to put green line on 00:07:064 - with x0,75 like you did on 00:16:422 -
   
2. 00:23:450 (1) - Why do you undermap these drums? In this part you follow them constantly. I know that there is a stream before this, but you can at least put 1/4 repeat slider to match drums. Tho you do it on 00:28:133 (1) - 00:32:822 (1) - etc
   
3. 00:55:203 (1,2,3) - and 00:55:642 (1,2,3,1,2) - are identical sounds, but in 1st case you map 00:55:422 - drum on here as slider end and in 2nd case you drop that drum, why?
   
4. 00:56:373 (1,2,3,1) - Pitch of the guitar is increasing, why spacing isn't doing so? + 00:57:251 (1) - is underspaced but this is a climax of the part???
   
5. 01:18:910 (2) - Why this slider starts on weak sound ( Actually I can't hear a prominent sound for such slider here ) and ends on strong drum? Same 01:23:007 (5) -
   
6. 01:19:349 (5,6) - I can hear drums on the ends of a sliders here, but what's about 01:21:544 (4) - this one? Why is this not a circle?
   
7. 01:29:593 (3,4) - Why you use such movement for (4) here? You didn't use it anywhere else in this part of the song ( 01:33:105 (3,6) - doesn't count because it's just an overlap with previous circle )
   
8. 02:13:349 (5,6,1) - uhhh this one is subjective but flow here is bad imo, why don't just Ctrl + G these? In this way you get good flow and both sounds are emphasized even better
   
9. 02:40:422 (3,4,1) - Why is spacing here so small?? Even if we compare it with previous two sliders 02:39:398 (1,2) - which have 1/1 gap between this triple must be place at least somewhere here In this way you can readjust your next pattern like this Hope you get the idea
   
10. 04:15:398 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16) - You follow guitar through the whole map but here you have pretty much stuff to do with changes in the vocal and guitar pitches, but you just put very low spaced, what is the purpose??? I would've emphasize vocals on 04:15:983 (9,13) - as they are the most
    emerging here
    
11. 04:34:129 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,1) - There is nothing unique or strong here to put such spaced stream, I barely can hear drums, not like in moments like 04:37:642 (1,2,3,4,5,1,2,3,4,5) - when you have x0.5 spacing in compare with 1st case
    
12. 04:54:032 (1) - Why you put reverse on 04:54:324 - if there is actually nothing on that tick? Same 04:55:643 (2) -
    
13. 04:58:152 (1,2,3,4,1) - Nice pattern, I like it ( seriously )

MashaSG wrote:

bla-bla I have some questions about your map bla-bla

1. 00:07:064 (1) - Why this slider is much faster than 00:16:422 (1) - ? Imo sounds are almost same, I think you just forgot to put green line on 00:07:064 - with x0,75 like you did on 00:16:422 - imo it just feels right lol; giving them the same speed wouldnt do the guitar justice imo; but i see where youre coming from
   
2. 00:23:450 (1) - Why do you undermap these drums? In this part you follow them constantly. I know that there is a stream before this, but you can at least put 1/4 repeat slider to match drums. Tho you do it on 00:28:133 (1) - 00:32:822 (1) - etc - i want to emphasize the melody. if i put way too many 1/4s so early in the map it would make the rest of the map feel forwardmoving forward
   
3. 00:55:203 (1,2,3) - and 00:55:642 (1,2,3,1,2) - are identical sounds, but in 1st case you map 00:55:422 - drum on here as slider end and in 2nd case you drop that drum, why? - the main idea of this map is to change some of the parts that would normally be used as streams for 1/2s; this is kind of an opener to that idea. subtle as shit but it is what it is i guess
   
4. 00:56:373 (1,2,3,1) - Pitch of the guitar is increasing, why spacing isn't doing so? + 00:57:251 (1) - is underspaced but this is a climax of the part??? - ya know i never really understood the logic behind the higher pitch = high DS; its not like the song is getting ultra intense; id increase the DS if this was on the later parts of the song but this is literally the first 5 seconds of the real start so thats like a really bad idea to stuff a sudden diffspike in there
   
5. 01:18:910 (2) - Why this slider starts on weak sound ( Actually I can't hear a prominent sound for such slider here ) and ends on strong drum? Same 01:23:007 (5) - vocal track is much more prominent in here than the drums so i chose to try to emphasize vocals instead of drums
   
6. 01:19:349 (5,6) - I can hear drums on the ends of a sliders here, but what's about 01:21:544 (4) - this one? Why is this not a circle? - i guess i missed that, but it fits the general tone of the part so i dont think its TOO big of a problem. if this ever gets DQd because of some really big issue i missed then i'll go fix it though
   
7. 01:29:593 (3,4) - Why you use such movement for (4) here? You didn't use it anywhere else in this part of the song ( 01:33:105 (3,6) - doesn't count because it's just an overlap with previous circle ) - lowering pitch, it would feel weird to keep the slider moving forward and if i did have it face forward it would give me a shitty overlap and no way in hell and im doing that in one of my maps; noooooope
   
8. 02:13:349 (5,6,1) - uhhh this one is subjective but flow here is bad imo, why don't just Ctrl + G these? In this way you get good flow and both sounds are emphasized even better - flow isnt so bad as you think imo, 02:13:349 (5,6) - has weaker noises compared to 02:13:495 (6,1) - so your fix would make it flow better sure but it would treat all the sounds as the same volume which is NG imo
   
9. 02:40:422 (3,4,1) - Why is spacing here so small?? Even if we compare it with previous two sliders 02:39:398 (1,2) - which have 1/1 gap between this triple must be place at least somewhere here In this way you can readjust your next pattern like this Hope you get the idea - sharp cooldown coz by then the song is already slowing down alot. it would be a lot more obvious if these werent 02:39:398 (1,2) - sliders but thats kinda the idea. i dont think this is a problem imo
   
10. 04:15:398 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16) - You follow guitar through the whole map but here you have pretty much stuff to do with changes in the vocal and guitar pitches, but you just put very low spaced, what is the purpose??? I would've emphasize vocals on 04:15:983 (9,13) - as they are the most
    emerging here - buildup!
    
11. 04:34:129 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,1) - There is nothing unique or strong here to put such spaced stream, I barely can hear drums, not like in moments like 04:37:642 (1,2,3,4,5,1,2,3,4,5) - when you have x0.5 spacing in compare with 1st case - 02:17:154 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - same logic here, but just harder
    
12. 04:54:032 (1) - Why you put reverse on 04:54:324 - if there is actually nothing on that tick? Same 04:55:643 (2) - placeholder notes just so that the part plays better; it would feel empty otherwise imo
    
13. 04:58:152 (1,2,3,4,1) - Nice pattern, I like it ( seriously ) - haha thanks

Sorry for my poor English