1. osu! forums
  2. Beatmaps
  3. Ranked/Approved Beatmaps
show more
posted
00:01:402 (1,2) - 00:01:919 (1,2) - 00:02:436 (1,2) - sound is EVer SO slightly getting a little louder on these so u could maybe increase spacing and sv on each of them just a little if u want
00:23:298 (2) - NC?
00:31:229 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - why are these getting smaller whnn the sound is getn ing louder??
00:55:367 (9,10,11,12) - sound is getting increasingly louder on these and it might start on the note beforei dk if im deaf but yh. also u should NC when u increase the spcaing!!
01:46:057 (1) - remove NC here mby bcz it sounds like it's just a continutation of the sound in thep revious slider so u ccould have them obth on the same combo butidk
02:33:816 (1) - idk fi it's a good idea bu t u could make this into a red anchor point cos the sound is prertty sHARP
02:45:540 (1) - u should amake the SV slower bcz it sounds to me like the slidr is oln a weaker sound.
02:51:057 - 02:53:643 - 02:53:816 - ur missing sounds in these parts and a lot of other similar parts later on but it's intentional so. i dont mind but ij ust want to know why if u dont mind !
03:22:953 (3) - 03:23:643 (6) - 03:24:505 (10) - imo i'd put an NC on these to emphasise the sounds
03:42:953 (1) - 03:44:333 (1) - 03:45:712 (1) - i think these should all hvae sepearte higher svs cos the sound is getting loudER
ok i tyhink that's it hopefull y i could hlep and btw send free iphone to 10 downing street in london i'll be wating thx
posted

yea

  1. why use stack leniency so high when you have so many stack >:( if you use like 3 itll make a lot of the stacks look so much better
  2. 00:27:781 (5) - NC cause u NCd here 00:17:091 or just dont NC at that one, i know theres a different amount of time between them but i noticed it while playing so it seems inconsistent
  3. 00:52:781 (5) - NC this one too for consistency with 00:47:264 (1) -
  4. 01:04:333 (1,1) - not like this
  5. 01:07:091 (1,1) - gah
  6. 01:16:402 (3) - i dont think this counts as burai especially with the new RC but im not sure
  7. 01:17:609 (2) and 01:18:298 (2) - can u avoid this cause ur structure is good until its not with this
  8. 01:19:678 (2,3,4,5,6) - you could make this a proper triangle or make 01:20:022 (4,5,6) - go straight down from 01:19:850 (3) - for a cleaner look rn its off
  9. 01:21:229 (3,6,2) - WTF HAPPENEd
  10. 01:26:574 (2,3,4) - this flow is weird and also isnt a proper line, if you're keeping the line make it a proper line but maybe just change it to be a zig zag like the others and move the 01:27:436 (7,8) to correspond with this
  11. 01:31:919 - why do you NC spam here? i get that the velocity is slightly different for each one but NC spam isn't needed to read it and it would look a lot better with pairs of 2
  12. 01:38:126 (1,2,3,4) - surprised this doesnt increase in spacing as well, maybe you could keep this spacing the same and make the 01:37:781 (1,2,3,4) - spacing less to transition it a bit better? then you could also seperate the 01:38:471 (1) - even further for emphasis
  13. theres a lot of NC suggestions in this part because i think the NC spam ruins the emphasis if you do it a lot
  14. 01:43:471 (1) - if your stack leniency was just higher shit like this would look way nicer
  15. 01:43:471 (1) - also for consistency you shouldnt NC this
  16. 01:46:057 (1) - imo this NC is unnecessary
  17. 01:47:091 (1) - same
  18. 01:49:333 (1) - personally i think this one could be not NC'd too for more emphasis on the 01:49:505 (1) -
  19. 01:50:885 (1,2,1) - cute but it would be cuter if you could set it up so 01:51:229 (1) - stacks on the slider end of 01:49:505 (1) - im not sure if that would make the stream spacing weird but it feels a little high for the angle rn regardless
  20. 01:51:574 (1) - no NC if you took the other one for consistency
  21. 01:52:609 (2,2) - actually stack these
  22. go through the NCs and make sure they're consistent if you change them: NC spam lowers emphasis so much unless literally everything needs it to be readable: which it really doesnt here because you have intuitive slider design
  23. 01:56:402 - is it just me or are these hitsounds a little loud compared to the others? kind of jarring and weird sounding
  24. 02:00:885 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1) - see what you did here is what i was talking about at 01:38:126 (1,2,3,4) in the earlier point if you didnt get it from my explanation
  25. 02:02:609 (1,2) - these aren't the same angle
  26. 02:03:988 (1) - or 02:04:160 (1) - no NC
  27. 02:05:540 (1) - no NC
  28. 02:06:919 (1) - 02:07:264 (1) - 02:07:609 (1) - this would be more emphasis if NCd in pairs of 2, so no NC on these notes imo
  29. 02:07:781 (1,1) -
  30. 02:08:126 (1) - no NC
  31. 02:08:298 (1,1,2,3) - why not structure this as a proper shape? like make the rectangle even so it doesnt look fuckd
  32. 02:11:574 (3) - this SHOuld be NC'd if you applied the point at 02:06:919
  33. 02:13:643 (1) - 02:13:816 (2) - swap these NCs for consistency if you applied before
  34. 02:15:022 (2) - no NC
  35. 02:16:402 (1,1) - this flow is pretty ???? to me, also no NC on 02:16:402 (1) -
  36. 02:18:126 (1) - same as before with these 3
  37. 02:22:609 (3) - NC
  38. 02:23:298 (1,2,1) - this flow is kind of gross, moving 02:23:643 (1,2) - down and to the left would improve it a lot, maybe something like this
  39. 02:28:471 (1,2) - really nazi one
  40. 02:31:229 (3) - NC this and no NC 02:31:919 (1) - this for consistency
  41. 02:31:574 (2) - is there a reason this specific slider isnt extended? the same sound has an extended slider when it occurs later and this is the only non extended slider
  42. 02:33:298 - consider not using the NC spam until 02:33:988 - for emphasis
  43. 02:34:850 (1,2,3,4,5) - this flow is icky i know you wanna stack it but like doing this or something similar is 10x better flow
  44. 02:43:643 - can you unfuck the structure in this part? here is an example of a structured possible solution cause ur current pattern kinda ruins your whole structure you have going on through all the slider wubs
    see it makes a triangle just do some shit lik that so its not icky as heLL
  45. 02:57:953 (2,3) - move this 2 up a bit so the overlap is better? i also moved the whole pattern including 02:57:953 (2,3,4) - to the side a little in the screenshot to keep the same flow
  46. 03:00:195 (1,2,3) - triangle
  47. 03:05:195 (7,2) - >:( avoid this overlap u have all the space in the world to avoid it
  48. 03:10:712 (9,1) - pretty surprised this isnt a blanket, i know suggesting blankets where they arent is a bad suggestion but like this seems pretty obvious considering the structure/patterning of the last 15 seconds
  49. 03:13:298 (4,5) - nazi
  50. 03:14:505 (2,3,4,5,1,2,3) - if ur gonna do this hexagon grid shit please make it a proper grid with proper spacing
  51. 03:15:712 (3,4) -
  52. 03:17:091 - the note is clearly here if you want it to be extended then just make it a triplet
  53. 03:18:816 (1,2,3,4,1) - this is fuckd
  54. 03:20:885 - should be NCd
  55. 03:33:988 (5,6,7,8,9) -
  56. 03:34:678 (1,2) - make straight because the line and flow of 03:35:367 (5) - makes it look really off cause its not straight
  57. 03:36:057 (1,2,3,4,5) - this is not a proper line, how i noticed i will never know but its not right LOL
  58. 03:37:436 (1,2) - this one is much more straight than the last
  59. 03:53:298 - im not sure why throughout this section you ignore this note, its like the most important note in the whole rhythm and its not clickable ever, and since its never clickable the whole section feels fuckd rhythm wise
  60. 03:55:367 - why is this stream kinda fucked up like this when all the others aren't? since its the first one its super weird to read, i think you should make it just like any of the other ones like at 04:05:712 -
  61. 03:57:264 (3,1) - i know you're blanketing but it would just look a lot better if you fully seperated 03:57:436 (1,2,3,4) - from 03:57:005 (2) - (the 1 is stacked on the slider end of 03:55:540 (3) - in the screenshot for reference
  62. 03:58:816 - these should def be clickable
  63. 04:04:419 - see the note you're trying to hold for with 04:04:333 (4) - actually starts here, which is why there is that awkward disconnect and it feels funny to play
  64. 04:08:729 (1) - no NC
  65. 04:08:816 (2) - NC (this was probably a mistake)
  66. 04:09:936 - how come u do it properly here >:(
  67. 04:13:298 (1,2,3,4) - make the spacing higher if you're gonna not stack them because it just kinda looks fucked by accident like this, not cool
  68. 04:14:678 - NCing stuff applies here too, but i think maybe the NC spam is okay in this kiai? idk just use your own discretion and look over it for what you'd change for consistency
  69. 04:24:333 - when u copy ur streams from lesjuh
  70. 04:34:333 (1) - can u nudge this up so it doesnt have the overlap with 04:33:643 (1,2,3,4)
  71. 04:35:195 (2) - and 04:34:505 (2) - why whenever u do 1-2 jumps does it ruin your structure :? please make this good structur
  72. 04:37:436 - same not clickable complaint
  73. 04:42:953 - these slider ends are just as important as the held note cause if you make it not lead in with it being clickable the held note feels so bad lol
  74. 04:48:471 - you do it correct here
  75. 04:53:988 - a
  76. 05:07:781 (7) - this should be NC'd based on your other NCs

short mod
posted

Skeep wrote:

00:01:402 (1,2) - 00:01:919 (1,2) - 00:02:436 (1,2) - sound is EVer SO slightly getting a little louder on these so u could maybe increase spacing and sv on each of them just a little if u want no need
00:23:298 (2) - NC? Nope it belongs on 00:22:953 (1) -
00:31:229 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - why are these getting smaller whnn the sound is getn ing louder?? ur write. fixedx
00:55:367 (9,10,11,12) - sound is getting increasingly louder on these and it might start on the note beforei dk if im deaf but yh. also u should NC when u increase the spcaing!! spacing is fine :o
01:46:057 (1) - remove NC here mby bcz it sounds like it's just a continutation of the sound in thep revious slider so u ccould have them obth on the same combo butidk
02:33:816 (1) - idk fi it's a good idea bu t u could make this into a red anchor point cos the sound is prertty sHARP sure
02:45:540 (1) - u should amake the SV slower bcz it sounds to me like the slidr is oln a weaker sound. its a lower note in the song and the intensity is about the same so no changes
02:51:057 - 02:53:643 - 02:53:816 - ur missing sounds in these parts and a lot of other similar parts later on but it's intentional so. i dont mind but ij ust want to know why if u dont mind ! the beats are barely audible and i like having the pauses
03:22:953 (3) - 03:23:643 (6) - 03:24:505 (10) - imo i'd put an NC on these to emphasise the sounds okey
03:42:953 (1) - 03:44:333 (1) - 03:45:712 (1) - i think these should all hvae sepearte higher svs cos the sound is getting loudER nah
ok i tyhink that's it hopefull y i could hlep and btw send free iphone to 10 downing street in london i'll be wating thx
thanks for the mod! heres ur iphone
posted
holy shet

Kaifin wrote:

yea

  1. why use stack leniency so high when you have so many stack >:( if you use like 3 itll make a lot of the stacks look so much better stack leniency daddy :weary:
  2. 00:27:781 (5) - NC cause u NCd here 00:17:091 or just dont NC at that one, i know theres a different amount of time between them but i noticed it while playing so it seems inconsistent OKAY
  3. 00:52:781 (5) - NC this one too for consistency with 00:47:264 (1) - OKAY
  4. 01:04:333 (1,1) - not like this
    ya
  5. 01:07:091 (1,1) - gah
    yah
  6. 01:16:402 (3) - i dont think this counts as burai especially with the new RC but im not sure
  7. 01:17:609 (2) and 01:18:298 (2) - can u avoid this cause ur structure is good until its not with this sure made them overlap cuz i tried other methods but they all look bad :d
  8. 01:19:678 (2,3,4,5,6) - you could make this a proper triangle or make 01:20:022 (4,5,6) - go straight down from 01:19:850 (3) - for a cleaner look rn its off triangle
  9. 01:21:229 (3,6,2) - WTF HAPPENEd life
  10. 01:26:574 (2,3,4) - this flow is weird and also isnt a proper line, if you're keeping the line make it a proper line but maybe just change it to be a zig zag like the others and move the 01:27:436 (7,8) to correspond with this
    made it a zig zag and moved things to correspond with it
  11. 01:31:919 - why do you NC spam here? i get that the velocity is slightly different for each one but NC spam isn't needed to read it and it would look a lot better with pairs of 2 i really like the rainbow coloured rice krispys
  12. 01:38:126 (1,2,3,4) - surprised this doesnt increase in spacing as well, maybe you could keep this spacing the same and make the 01:37:781 (1,2,3,4) - spacing less to transition it a bit better? then you could also seperate the 01:38:471 (1) - even further for emphasis I will go with your suggestion
  13. theres a lot of NC suggestions in this part because i think the NC spam ruins the emphasis if you do it a lot
  14. 01:43:471 (1) - if your stack leniency was just higher shit like this would look way nicer it is now!
  15. 01:43:471 (1) - also for consistency you shouldnt NC this ok
  16. 01:46:057 (1) - imo this NC is unnecessary ok
  17. 01:47:091 (1) - same ok
  18. 01:49:333 (1) - personally i think this one could be not NC'd too for more emphasis on the 01:49:505 (1) - ok
  19. 01:50:885 (1,2,1) - cute but it would be cuter if you could set it up so 01:51:229 (1) - stacks on the slider end of 01:49:505 (1) - im not sure if that would make the stream spacing weird but it feels a little high for the angle rn regardless stacked and also moved 01:51:143 (2) - to the left a bit to form a < pattern, ur cute too btw
  20. 01:51:574 (1) - no NC if you took the other one for consistency ya
  21. 01:52:609 (2,2) - actually stack these they were stacked idk why they fell apart like my life lol.
  22. go through the NCs and make sure they're consistent if you change them: NC spam lowers emphasis so much unless literally everything needs it to be readable: which it really doesnt here because you have intuitive slider design
  23. 01:56:402 - is it just me or are these hitsounds a little loud compared to the others? kind of jarring and weird sounding its the same volume but its probably cuz i hitsounded the entire stream
  24. 02:00:885 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1) - see what you did here is what i was talking about at 01:38:126 (1,2,3,4) in the earlier point if you didnt get it from my explanation got it now :o
  25. 02:02:609 (1,2) - these aren't the same angle shit
  26. 02:03:988 (1) - or 02:04:160 (1) - no NC removed NC on 02:03:988 (2) -
  27. 02:05:540 (1) - no NC okey
  28. 02:06:919 (1) - 02:07:264 (1) - 02:07:609 (1) - this would be more emphasis if NCd in pairs of 2, so no NC on these notes imo ye
  29. 02:07:781 (1,1) -
    nut
  30. 02:08:126 (1) - no NC okey
  31. 02:08:298 (1,1,2,3) - why not structure this as a proper shape? like make the rectangle even so it doesnt look fuckd
  32. 02:11:574 (3) - this SHOuld be NC'd if you applied the point at 02:06:919
  33. 02:13:643 (1) - 02:13:816 (2) - swap these NCs for consistency if you applied before
  34. 02:15:022 (2) - no NC
  35. 02:16:402 (1,1) - this flow is pretty ???? to me, also no NC on 02:16:402 (1) -
  36. 02:18:126 (1) - same as before with these 3 yes
  37. 02:22:609 (3) - NC done
  38. 02:23:298 (1,2,1) - this flow is kind of gross, moving 02:23:643 (1,2) - down and to the left would improve it a lot, maybe something like this
    used your suggestion
  39. 02:28:471 (1,2) - really nazi one
    reminds me of the time when my calc teacher gave me 39.75/40 on a quiz
  40. 02:31:229 (3) - NC this and no NC 02:31:919 (1) - this for consistency ok
  41. 02:31:574 (2) - is there a reason this specific slider isnt extended? the same sound has an extended slider when it occurs later and this is the only non extended slider not really. changed the slider
  42. 02:33:298 - consider not using the NC spam until 02:33:988 - for emphasis ok
  43. 02:34:850 (1,2,3,4,5) - this flow is icky i know you wanna stack it but like doing this or something similar is 10x better flow
    yeah, it probably plays bad. fixed it
  44. 02:43:643 - can you unfuck the structure in this part? here is an example of a structured possible solution cause ur current pattern kinda ruins your whole structure you have going on through all the slider wubs
    see it makes a triangle just do some shit lik that so its not icky as heLL done
  45. 02:57:953 (2,3) - move this 2 up a bit so the overlap is better? i also moved the whole pattern including 02:57:953 (2,3,4) - to the side a little in the screenshot to keep the same flow
    okay
  46. 03:00:195 (1,2,3) - triangle ▶
  47. 03:05:195 (7,2) - >:( avoid this overlap u have all the space in the world to avoid it
  48. 03:10:712 (9,1) - pretty surprised this isnt a blanket, i know suggesting blankets where they arent is a bad suggestion but like this seems pretty obvious considering the structure/patterning of the last 15 seconds blanketed
  49. 03:13:298 (4,5) - nazi
    not rlly nazi thats pretty visible but thanks!
  50. 03:14:505 (2,3,4,5,1,2,3) - if ur gonna do this hexagon grid shit please make it a proper grid with proper spacing remapped this part
  51. 03:15:712 (3,4) -
    ded
  52. 03:17:091 - the note is clearly here if you want it to be extended then just make it a triplet im deaf
  53. 03:18:816 (1,2,3,4,1) - this is fuckd
    unfuckd
  54. 03:20:885 - should be NCd ye
  55. 03:33:988 (5,6,7,8,9) -
    ya
  56. 03:34:678 (1,2) - make straight because the line and flow of 03:35:367 (5) - makes it look really off cause its not straight okay!
  57. 03:36:057 (1,2,3,4,5) - this is not a proper line, how i noticed i will never know but its not right LOL fixd
  58. 03:37:436 (1,2) - this one is much more straight than the last i say that about my friends too
  59. 03:53:298 - im not sure why throughout this section you ignore this note, its like the most important note in the whole rhythm and its not clickable ever, and since its never clickable the whole section feels fuckd rhythm wise ez solution
  60. 03:55:367 - why is this stream kinda fucked up like this when all the others aren't? since its the first one its super weird to read, i think you should make it just like any of the other ones like at 04:05:712 - fixed
  61. 03:57:264 (3,1) - i know you're blanketing but it would just look a lot better if you fully seperated 03:57:436 (1,2,3,4) - from 03:57:005 (2) - (the 1 is stacked on the slider end of 03:55:540 (3) - in the screenshot for reference
    done
  62. 03:58:816 - these should def be clickablethey are now
  63. 04:04:419 - see the note you're trying to hold for with 04:04:333 (4) - actually starts here, which is why there is that awkward disconnect and it feels funny to play fixed!
  64. 04:08:729 (1) - no NC ok
  65. 04:08:816 (2) - NC (this was probably a mistake) indeed
  66. 04:09:936 - how come u do it properly here >:( i'll fix the others using this rhythm :0
  67. 04:13:298 (1,2,3,4) - make the spacing higher if you're gonna not stack them because it just kinda looks fucked by accident like this, not cool sorrie it was meant to be stacked
  68. 04:14:678 - NCing stuff applies here too, but i think maybe the NC spam is okay in this kiai? idk just use your own discretion and look over it for what you'd change for consistency nah i'll fix the NC spams
  69. 04:24:333 - when u copy ur streams from lesjuh lesjuh is blu dragon backwards
  70. 04:34:333 (1) - can u nudge this up so it doesnt have the overlap with 04:33:643 (1,2,3,4) yes
  71. 04:35:195 (2) - and 04:34:505 (2) - why whenever u do 1-2 jumps does it ruin your structure :? please make this good structur suk at jumpz
  72. 04:37:436 - same not clickable complaint clickable now
  73. 04:42:953 - these slider ends are just as important as the held note cause if you make it not lead in with it being clickable the held note feels so bad lol ^
  74. 04:48:471 - you do it correct here
  75. 04:53:988 - a b
  76. 05:07:781 (7) - this should be NC'd based on your other NCs
okey

short mod
thanks for the super thorough mod!
posted
mod from discord spam

map plays bad delete

give kudOsu
posted

Dunois wrote:

mod from discord spam

map plays bad delete

give kudOsu
posted
hi~

00:28:126 (2) - : Akward placement,i recommend doing this https://puu.sh/v3Pb1/df44f23d92.png
00:49:160 (6) - : Add NC
01:23:212 - : Uhm,add a circle?
01:55:367 (1) - : Really bad placement.First of all,ctrl + h itself and then place it exactly like this https://puu.sh/v3Qb9/023f3e440f.png

You stack almost every slider's head to the previous slider's end.It's a nice effect but sometimes annoying.

02:02:781 (2) - : Why you have to place it like this?Look at how much area you have.Τake advantage of it https://puu.sh/v3QV4/509afd215b.png
02:03:643 (1) - : Look at how much area you have up there.Extend slider's body a bit and maybe do this https://puu.sh/v3R0P/b2605d9b4f.png
02:23:988 (1) - : Make a stream here https://puu.sh/v3RYh/fff4034582.png
02:25:022 (1,2) - : Try this https://puu.sh/v3SjQ/56435ba3d4.png
02:38:816 (1) - : Akward note,remap it.
04:16:574 (1) - : This note's placement is sad af.Emphasize it in a more creative way.
04:17:953 (2) - : Ctrl + g itself
04:24:333 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - : That's cringy,remap it.
04:48:816 (7,8) - : Change the direction,so it goes from right to left.
04:56:057 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - : You are avoiding huge rhythm beats here and you kinda overmap.The most solid rhythm to map here it's this https://puu.sh/v3TLz/5222e45711.png
posted

Nikakis wrote:

hi~

00:28:126 (2) - : Akward placement,i recommend doing this https://puu.sh/v3Pb1/df44f23d92.png sure
00:49:160 (6) - : Add NC ok
01:23:212 - : Uhm,add a circle? why? theres no beat there
01:55:367 (1) - : Really bad placement.First of all,ctrl + h itself and then place it exactly like this https://puu.sh/v3Qb9/023f3e440f.png that would cause really awkward flow and would play badly

You stack almost every slider's head to the previous slider's end.It's a nice effect but sometimes annoying. ya

02:02:781 (2) - : Why you have to place it like this?Look at how much area you have.Τake advantage of it https://puu.sh/v3QV4/509afd215b.png The jump would be way too large, and it was placed there so that it overlaps with 02:02:264 (1) -
02:03:643 (1) - : Look at how much area you have up there.Extend slider's body a bit and maybe do this https://puu.sh/v3R0P/b2605d9b4f.png it wouldn't lead into whats after that if i did that
02:23:988 (1) - : Make a stream here https://puu.sh/v3RYh/fff4034582.png there's no 1/4 beat
02:25:022 (1,2) - : Try this https://puu.sh/v3SjQ/56435ba3d4.png ok sure
02:38:816 (1) - : Akward note,remap it. I don't see what's awkward about it
04:16:574 (1) - : This note's placement is sad af.Emphasize it in a more creative way. same
04:17:953 (2) - : Ctrl + g itself that would cause TERRIBLE flow lol
04:24:333 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - : That's cringy,remap it. It's mapped to the music, where the split in the music is depicted by the jump streams and the gradual increase in intensity is depicted by the spacing increase. How is it "cringy" lol
04:48:816 (7,8) - : Change the direction,so it goes from right to left. no reason to
04:56:057 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - : You are avoiding huge rhythm beats here and you kinda overmap.The most solid rhythm to map here it's this https://puu.sh/v3TLz/5222e45711.png
That is more undermapped than overmapped. Also the rhythm of 04:56:057 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1) - follows the background beats of the music perfectly so
Thanks for the mod!
posted
12:47 Adore: mod my asshol
12:47 VINXIS: OkLol
12:47 VINXIS: irc
12:48 VINXIS: irc
12:49 Adore: FUK
12:49 Adore: LET ME PASS THIS MAP FIRST
12:49 Adore: then get in osu canada discord voic
12:49 VINXIS: nO I cnt vc rn
12:51 Adore: FUYK
12:51 Adore: ok
12:51 Adore: ic
12:52 Adore: lets do dis
12:52 Adore: redl map if u havent already btw
12:52 VINXIS: i did
12:52 VINXIS: y is this over 10 mb
12:52 Adore: ok
12:52 Adore: idk
12:52 Adore: hitsounds and two approval length diffs?
12:52 Adore: :d
12:52 VINXIS: .osu files r lik 10 kb or smth
12:52 VINXIS: hitsounds r lik 100 kb or smth each
12:53 VINXIS: fix ur bg res -___
12:53 VINXIS: http://waifu2x.udp.jp/
12:53 Adore: which one
12:53 VINXIS: both
12:53 Adore: ok
12:53 VINXIS: OkNic
12:54 Adore: `is it just default settings
12:55 VINXIS: default settings has upscaling at 0.0x
12:55 VINXIS: so no
12:55 VINXIS: :
12:55 Adore: )
12:55 Adore: wat do i use
12:55 VINXIS: make them larger than 1080p and then resize them back to 1920x1080
12:55 VINXIS: using waifu2x
12:56 VINXIS: make them larger than 1080p using waifu2x* and then resize them back to 1920x1080 using wotevr
12:56 VINXIS: w45tglwrec
12:56 Adore: okey
12:58 VINXIS: ok
12:58 VINXIS: take out th artst naem from tagz
12:58 VINXIS: redundanc,y
12:58 Adore: redundant
12:58 Adore: http://i.imgur.com/JgN5KYp.jpg
12:58 Adore: ok hows this
12:58 Adore: oh wait
12:58 Adore: NOT THAT
12:58 Adore: wrong LINK
12:59 VINXIS: nic
12:59 Adore: http://i.imgur.com/FtCdNST.jpg
12:59 Adore: ok
12:59 VINXIS: ok
12:59 VINXIS: i mean it looks th same
12:59 VINXIS: its just tht the res is larger
12:59 Adore: they are the same
12:59 Adore: the first link was right LOOOL
12:59 VINXIS: Aimey
13:00 VINXIS: f3
13:00 VINXIS: OK
13:00 VINXIS: 00:06:057 - y r ther 2 1/6 sldiers
13:00 Adore: wait let me replace bg
13:00 VINXIS: kLol
13:02 Adore: ok
13:02 Adore: is it bad to have 2 1/6 sliders
13:02 VINXIS: if thers no reason to have 2 of them ther then mite as well just make them into 1
13:02 VINXIS: so it deosnt play as Bayd
13:03 Adore: needs 2 cuz 00:06:172 has a beat
13:03 Adore: should i just make the first slider 1.4
13:03 Adore: 1/4*
13:03 VINXIS: a beat
13:03 VINXIS: isnt it just piano
13:03 VINXIS: 6 1/6 piano notez
13:04 Adore: ya
13:04 Adore: it used to be a 6 note 1/6 stream lol
13:04 Adore: but everyone said it was too aids
13:04 VINXIS: i mean doign ths http://puu.sh/v8aT3/218e35350e.jpg
13:04 VINXIS: not leaving the notes out Lol
13:04 Adore: ya i can do that
13:05 VINXIS: osu
13:05 Adore: Fun and exhilarating game!
13:05 VINXIS: aNimey
13:05 VINXIS: 00:26:747 (3,4) - thisd b cooler if 4 was in between 2 and 3 instead of 3 being in the middl
13:06 Adore: https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/7731433
13:06 Adore: hows this
13:06 VINXIS: OkLol
13:07 VINXIS: th htisound volumes
13:08 VINXIS: som of them feel 2 loud relative 2 the sound
13:08 VINXIS: osong*
13:08 VINXIS: not som
13:08 VINXIS: most
13:08 Adore: should i tone it down from 70% to 60%
13:08 Adore: or just specific ones
13:09 VINXIS: id bring it down to lower thnan 60 or smth
13:10 VINXIS: like 50 is sounding nic 2 me but IDK X DXXDXDXD
13:10 Adore: i used 50 on atomosphere and people said it was too quiet
13:10 Adore: wouldn't it be like the same case here
13:10 VINXIS: but ppl on osu dont kno how 2 mix
13:10 VINXIS: :D
13:10 VINXIS: wtf
13:10 VINXIS: :d
13:10 VINXIS: ther we go
13:10 Adore: :d
13:10 VINXIS: :d
13:10 Adore: okay 50 it is
13:10 VINXIS: G
13:11 VINXIS: 01:37:436 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1) -
13:11 VINXIS: r u probox
13:11 Adore: i am myself
13:11 VINXIS: cancr curvd spacstream -________
13:11 VINXIS: probox
13:11 VINXIS: Owel
13:12 Adore: :3
13:12 VINXIS: 01:59:505 (1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2,1) -
13:12 VINXIS: the underemphasis on som of these (1) circles r weird
13:13 Adore: wait fixing volume first
13:13 VINXIS: 02:05:022 (1,1,2) - dam tht feels and looks rediculously tite4 no reason >:99
13:13 VINXIS: okkLol
13:14 Adore: how should i fix the underemphasis
13:15 Adore: 02:05:022 (1) - ya ik :<
13:15 VINXIS: id space them out evenly based on DS but u cud make the underemphasis consistent or emphasize the (1)s only instead of the 2s
13:15 VINXIS: or smth
13:16 VINXIS: 02:05:022 (1) - if u tilt this to the rite instead of the left u get more space for both sliders
13:16 VINXIS: Lik http://puu.sh/v8bFr/02c2d02712.jpg
13:17 VINXIS: 02:16:574 (1,1) - wots the point of th nc cuz it looks redundan,t
13:18 Adore: accident
13:18 VINXIS: 02:33:643 (1,2) - dam i was expecting the opposite sizes tbh wher 1 wud b big and 2 wud b smaller cuz of the volume of the strings
13:18 VINXIS: yeq
13:18 VINXIS: O
13:19 VINXIS: wait nvm i mean wher 1 wud b bigger than the 1 before it and 2 wud b even bigger
13:19 VINXIS: Lol
13:20 Adore: wot
13:20 VINXIS: 02:33:643 (1) - y is it so smol
13:20 Adore: so is it fuked or not fuked
13:20 Adore: staying consistent with 02:33:298 (1) -
13:21 VINXIS: dam
13:21 VINXIS: id jus make 02:33:298 (1,2,1,2) - increase in sv by each slider
13:21 VINXIS: cuz of slider pitch/volume
13:22 Adore: http://i.imgur.com/6mAQXXJ.png
13:22 Adore: hows this
13:22 VINXIS: OkLol
13:22 Adore: should I nc each of them
13:22 VINXIS: if u wana
13:22 VINXIS: i wud
13:22 VINXIS: but yea
13:22 Adore: alright
13:24 VINXIS: do u not use stack view
13:24 Adore: idk
13:25 VINXIS: view -> stacking
13:25 VINXIS: is it on
13:25 Adore: yeah
13:25 VINXIS: o ok
13:25 VINXIS: cuz
13:25 VINXIS: 04:36:747 - the DS is fukd for the streams cuz of stacking
13:25 VINXIS: 04:36:747 - onward*
13:25 Adore: sheit
13:26 Adore: is that a problem tho
13:26 VINXIS: no unless if u dont want that .2x DS differenc on the last notes
13:27 Adore: i think its fine
13:27 VINXIS: okhg
13:27 Adore: o ya before u flame me about the nc on 04:44:678 (5) - i fixed it just now
13:27 Adore: :d
13:27 VINXIS: SHIET
13:27 Adore: wait
13:27 Adore: the stream is fuked
13:27 Adore: FUCK
13:27 VINXIS: ye
13:27 VINXIS: : d
13:28 VINXIS: same with 04:55:626 (4,1) - cuz of the turn on 4 and not 1
13:28 VINXIS: but not as fukd
13:28 VINXIS: as tht 1
13:29 Adore: hmmmm
13:29 VINXIS: the more i look at it the more i think stacking 04:36:057 (1,2) - wud b much coolr Lol
13:29 VINXIS: for stop motion FX
13:30 Adore: asdasdasdsafadfdsf
13:30 Adore: have to remap the stream prior to it then
13:30 Adore: does than mean eyebrow into circle stream
13:30 VINXIS: u dont have 2
13:30 Adore: actually yeah I'm going to keep it that way
13:30 VINXIS: http://puu.sh/v8cvr/563dea4bc3.jpg
13:30 VINXIS: hahaLol
13:31 VINXIS: moving the streams lets u keep the steram shapes/styles and just remap the jumps befopr wich is easier
13:31 VINXIS: but yea
13:31 Adore: ya right
13:31 Adore: i'll keep it
13:31 VINXIS: okLol
13:31 Adore: oh btw is this stream fine
13:31 Adore: 04:33:298 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1) -
13:31 VINXIS: yea
13:32 Adore: cuz its like a jump stream from the first two streams but theres no jump between 04:33:902 (4,1) -
13:32 Adore: o ok.
13:32 VINXIS: 04:58:816 - to end
13:33 VINXIS: did u randomly choos wot u blanketed and wot u didnt cuz it looks kinda messy in tht aspect
13:33 VINXIS: lik i was expecting 05:02:264 (3,4) - to b a blanket cuz of th shit befor
13:34 Adore: yeah
13:34 Adore: i can make that a blanket rn tho
13:34 VINXIS: LolK
13:34 VINXIS: 05:14:850 (6,1) - another Rly Close To Each Other Pattern
13:35 VINXIS: 04:17:264 (1) - 04:28:298 (1) - Y
13:35 Adore: https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/7731680
13:35 Adore: ya
13:35 VINXIS: Yq
13:35 VINXIS: ya
13:36 VINXIS: yea thts all
posted
Thanks!
posted
01:43:298 (1) - Move up a little to align with 01:43:471 (2) - properly
01:42:609 (1,2) - Fix the stack, it is slightly off.
02:20:195 (1,2,3) - 3 is not perfectly centered, fix it.\
02:20:712 (1) - Rotate by -3 to align it better with 02:20:540 (3) -
02:38:471 (2,1) - Stack is off, fix it
04:31:747 (1) - This feels tight but doesn't really matter I think.

GL!
posted

Bzer wrote:

01:43:298 (1) - Move up a little to align with 01:43:471 (2) - properly okay
01:42:609 (1,2) - Fix the stack, it is slightly off. okay
02:20:195 (1,2,3) - 3 is not perfectly centered, fix it.\ okay
02:20:712 (1) - Rotate by -3 to align it better with 02:20:540 (3) - okay
02:38:471 (2,1) - Stack is off, fix it okay
04:31:747 (1) - This feels tight but doesn't really matter I think. same

GL!
thanks for the mod!
posted
here are my illegal kds
posted

Storyboarder wrote:

here are my illegal kds
posted
ice barrage

[Ye XD]

widescreen support off? unless sb by sb

00:33:988 (1) - XDDDDDDDDDD (first few seconds of the hitsound sound like its booting up aol or som shit :/)

00:55:712 (1) - not sure about this one but most of your streams don't end off with a "jump" like that, try putting this one more in "line" with the curve of the stream

01:59:505 (1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2) - spacing between the 2s and 1s is a bit off, like 01:59:678 (2,1) - is a really big jump in comparison to 02:00:367 (2,1) - and the other jumps
like 02:11:919 (1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2) - is a bit more balanced in terms of spacing

02:18:816 (1) - bend this slider a little bit more so the rightmost curve (2nd red dot) is more in line with the bend on 02:19:333 (2) -

02:33:471 (1) - pretty big jump here, since the music builds up there should be a little less spacing between 02:33:471 (1,1) - and more between 02:33:643 (1,1) -

02:53:126 (4,5) - i would suggest more spacing between these 2 but there isnt a lot of space to move around like 02:50:540 (5,6) -

03:00:195 (1) - move down/out a little (nazi blanket with 02:59:678 (7) - xddd)

03:53:988 (1) - wew this one barely stays in playfield and this one 03:58:126 (1,2) -

04:54:764 (2,3,4,1) - maybe make them line up xd, shift 04:55:367 (1,2,3,4) - a tiny bit up so its not noticable

im tired so i probably messed something up but i used a ruler so 8-)8-)8-) 📏📏📏📏

also for fiance's catharsi(((sb))) is the kiai at 03:27:781 (1,2) - supposed to be there
posted
posted

blizzardice wrote:

sb by sb
posted

blizzardice wrote:

ice barrage

[Ye XD]

widescreen support off? unless sb by sb widescreen support should always be on

00:33:988 (1) - XDDDDDDDDDD (first few seconds of the hitsound sound like its booting up aol or som shit :/) when u hear this in the wilderness holy fuk

00:55:712 (1) - not sure about this one but most of your streams don't end off with a "jump" like that, try putting this one more in "line" with the curve of the stream there is a VERY strong beat on 00:55:712 (1) - , which is why there is a jump

01:59:505 (1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2) - spacing between the 2s and 1s is a bit off, like 01:59:678 (2,1) - is a really big jump in comparison to 02:00:367 (2,1) - and the other jumps that's fine
like 02:11:919 (1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2) - is a bit more balanced in terms of spacing g

02:18:816 (1) - bend this slider a little bit more so the rightmost curve (2nd red dot) is more in line with the bend on 02:19:333 (2) - okey

02:33:471 (1) - pretty big jump here, since the music builds up there should be a little less spacing between 02:33:471 (1,1) - and more between 02:33:643 (1,1) - okey

02:53:126 (4,5) - i would suggest more spacing between these 2 but there isnt a lot of space to move around like 02:50:540 (5,6) - moved it a bit further

03:00:195 (1) - move down/out a little (nazi blanket with 02:59:678 (7) - xddd) okey

03:53:988 (1) - wew this one barely stays in playfield and this one 03:58:126 (1,2) - ya

04:54:764 (2,3,4,1) - maybe make them line up xd, shift 04:55:367 (1,2,3,4) - a tiny bit up so its not noticable

im tired so i probably messed something up but i used a ruler so 8-)8-)8-) 📏📏📏📏 the fucking ru📏er mod LOOOL

also for fiance's catharsi(((sb))) is the kiai at 03:27:781 (1,2) - supposed to be there
yeah the minigame makers intended for it im pretty sure
thanks for the mod!!
posted
pm me for a free iphone 4
posted

blizzardice wrote:

also for fiance's catharsi(((sb))) is the kiai at 03:27:781 (1,2) - supposed to be there
ye
show more
Please sign in to reply.