yea
- why use stack leniency so high when you have so many stack if you use like 3 itll make a lot of the stacks look so much better
- 00:27:781 (5) - NC cause u NCd here 00:17:091 or just dont NC at that one, i know theres a different amount of time between them but i noticed it while playing so it seems inconsistent
- 00:52:781 (5) - NC this one too for consistency with 00:47:264 (1) -
- 01:04:333 (1,1) - not like this
- 01:07:091 (1,1) - gah
- 01:16:402 (3) - i dont think this counts as burai especially with the new RC but im not sure
- 01:17:609 (2) and 01:18:298 (2) - can u avoid this cause ur structure is good until its not with this
- 01:19:678 (2,3,4,5,6) - you could make this a proper triangle or make 01:20:022 (4,5,6) - go straight down from 01:19:850 (3) - for a cleaner look rn its off
- 01:21:229 (3,6,2) - WTF HAPPENEd
- 01:26:574 (2,3,4) - this flow is weird and also isnt a proper line, if you're keeping the line make it a proper line but maybe just change it to be a zig zag like the others and move the 01:27:436 (7,8) to correspond with this
- 01:31:919 - why do you NC spam here? i get that the velocity is slightly different for each one but NC spam isn't needed to read it and it would look a lot better with pairs of 2
- 01:38:126 (1,2,3,4) - surprised this doesnt increase in spacing as well, maybe you could keep this spacing the same and make the 01:37:781 (1,2,3,4) - spacing less to transition it a bit better? then you could also seperate the 01:38:471 (1) - even further for emphasis
- theres a lot of NC suggestions in this part because i think the NC spam ruins the emphasis if you do it a lot
- 01:43:471 (1) - if your stack leniency was just higher shit like this would look way nicer
- 01:43:471 (1) - also for consistency you shouldnt NC this
- 01:46:057 (1) - imo this NC is unnecessary
- 01:47:091 (1) - same
- 01:49:333 (1) - personally i think this one could be not NC'd too for more emphasis on the 01:49:505 (1) -
- 01:50:885 (1,2,1) - cute but it would be cuter if you could set it up so 01:51:229 (1) - stacks on the slider end of 01:49:505 (1) - im not sure if that would make the stream spacing weird but it feels a little high for the angle rn regardless
- 01:51:574 (1) - no NC if you took the other one for consistency
- 01:52:609 (2,2) - actually stack these
- go through the NCs and make sure they're consistent if you change them: NC spam lowers emphasis so much unless literally everything needs it to be readable: which it really doesnt here because you have intuitive slider design
- 01:56:402 - is it just me or are these hitsounds a little loud compared to the others? kind of jarring and weird sounding
- 02:00:885 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1) - see what you did here is what i was talking about at 01:38:126 (1,2,3,4) in the earlier point if you didnt get it from my explanation
- 02:02:609 (1,2) - these aren't the same angle
- 02:03:988 (1) - or 02:04:160 (1) - no NC
- 02:05:540 (1) - no NC
- 02:06:919 (1) - 02:07:264 (1) - 02:07:609 (1) - this would be more emphasis if NCd in pairs of 2, so no NC on these notes imo
- 02:07:781 (1,1) -
- 02:08:126 (1) - no NC
- 02:08:298 (1,1,2,3) - why not structure this as a proper shape? like make the rectangle even so it doesnt look fuckd
- 02:11:574 (3) - this SHOuld be NC'd if you applied the point at 02:06:919
- 02:13:643 (1) - 02:13:816 (2) - swap these NCs for consistency if you applied before
- 02:15:022 (2) - no NC
- 02:16:402 (1,1) - this flow is pretty ???? to me, also no NC on 02:16:402 (1) -
- 02:18:126 (1) - same as before with these 3
- 02:22:609 (3) - NC
- 02:23:298 (1,2,1) - this flow is kind of gross, moving 02:23:643 (1,2) - down and to the left would improve it a lot, maybe something like this
- 02:28:471 (1,2) - really nazi one
- 02:31:229 (3) - NC this and no NC 02:31:919 (1) - this for consistency
- 02:31:574 (2) - is there a reason this specific slider isnt extended? the same sound has an extended slider when it occurs later and this is the only non extended slider
- 02:33:298 - consider not using the NC spam until 02:33:988 - for emphasis
- 02:34:850 (1,2,3,4,5) - this flow is icky i know you wanna stack it but like doing this or something similar is 10x better flow
- 02:43:643 - can you unfuck the structure in this part? here is an example of a structured possible solution cause ur current pattern kinda ruins your whole structure you have going on through all the slider wubs see it makes a triangle just do some shit lik that so its not icky as heLL
- 02:57:953 (2,3) - move this 2 up a bit so the overlap is better? i also moved the whole pattern including 02:57:953 (2,3,4) - to the side a little in the screenshot to keep the same flow
- 03:00:195 (1,2,3) - triangle
- 03:05:195 (7,2) - avoid this overlap u have all the space in the world to avoid it
- 03:10:712 (9,1) - pretty surprised this isnt a blanket, i know suggesting blankets where they arent is a bad suggestion but like this seems pretty obvious considering the structure/patterning of the last 15 seconds
- 03:13:298 (4,5) - nazi
- 03:14:505 (2,3,4,5,1,2,3) - if ur gonna do this hexagon grid shit please make it a proper grid with proper spacing
- 03:15:712 (3,4) -
- 03:17:091 - the note is clearly here if you want it to be extended then just make it a triplet
- 03:18:816 (1,2,3,4,1) - this is fuckd
- 03:20:885 - should be NCd
- 03:33:988 (5,6,7,8,9) -
- 03:34:678 (1,2) - make straight because the line and flow of 03:35:367 (5) - makes it look really off cause its not straight
- 03:36:057 (1,2,3,4,5) - this is not a proper line, how i noticed i will never know but its not right LOL
- 03:37:436 (1,2) - this one is much more straight than the last
- 03:53:298 - im not sure why throughout this section you ignore this note, its like the most important note in the whole rhythm and its not clickable ever, and since its never clickable the whole section feels fuckd rhythm wise
- 03:55:367 - why is this stream kinda fucked up like this when all the others aren't? since its the first one its super weird to read, i think you should make it just like any of the other ones like at 04:05:712 -
- 03:57:264 (3,1) - i know you're blanketing but it would just look a lot better if you fully seperated 03:57:436 (1,2,3,4) - from 03:57:005 (2) - (the 1 is stacked on the slider end of 03:55:540 (3) - in the screenshot for reference
- 03:58:816 - these should def be clickable
- 04:04:419 - see the note you're trying to hold for with 04:04:333 (4) - actually starts here, which is why there is that awkward disconnect and it feels funny to play
- 04:08:729 (1) - no NC
- 04:08:816 (2) - NC (this was probably a mistake)
- 04:09:936 - how come u do it properly here
- 04:13:298 (1,2,3,4) - make the spacing higher if you're gonna not stack them because it just kinda looks fucked by accident like this, not cool
- 04:14:678 - NCing stuff applies here too, but i think maybe the NC spam is okay in this kiai? idk just use your own discretion and look over it for what you'd change for consistency
- 04:24:333 - when u copy ur streams from lesjuh
- 04:34:333 (1) - can u nudge this up so it doesnt have the overlap with 04:33:643 (1,2,3,4)
- 04:35:195 (2) - and 04:34:505 (2) - why whenever u do 1-2 jumps does it ruin your structure please make this good structur
- 04:37:436 - same not clickable complaint
- 04:42:953 - these slider ends are just as important as the held note cause if you make it not lead in with it being clickable the held note feels so bad lol
- 04:48:471 - you do it correct here
- 04:53:988 - a
- 05:07:781 (7) - this should be NC'd based on your other NCs
short mod