This map has been deleted on the request of its creator. It is no longer available.
Thank You! I'm glad You liked itBitCritterSpyro wrote:
*sees "ADITALFIAN.DEVIANTART.COM" at the top-left corner of the beatmap wallpaper*
Uh, did you ask permission to use the picture? I know) This picture..., i simply took it from Youtube video ("diversity" chanel if i remember correctly), i'll change it when i'll find something appropriate
Anyway...
[General]
Maybe put a Kiai section at 00:55:877 through 01:17:820 not enough hype,i save one kiai for the most hyped moment
[Easy]
Nothing. Literally nothing.
[Not so easy]
Nothing here either, but these two sections are glorious: 00:28:963 (2) - and 01:09:592 (1,1,2,1,2,1,2,1,1,2,1,2,1,2) -
[Just play!]
Damn, you're so good at this. You literally left me with only one thing to recommend.
Thank You for modding.Blan_C wrote:
Yo, NM from #modreqs Yo O/
- Just play
- 00:11:992 (1,2) - Blanket is a bit off
- 00:16:449 (4,5) - ^
- 00:17:842 (2,3) - ^
- 00:19:192 (4,5) - ^ fixed all ^
- 00:23:649 (2,3,1) - You can make triangle: end of slider (2), circle (3) and slider (1) 60degrees tringle? let it be
- 00:28:963 (1) - Try to make this slider look better, bend it somehow i like how "free" is it xD
- 00:34:277 (2,3,4) - http://puu.sh/tyaqZ/8f87d5047f.jpg Nope,i want a blanket for 2 circles from this slider
- 00:38:391 (2,4) - blanket is a bit off should be good now
- 00:44:135 (5,1) - i dont like this overlap yeah, it supose to stack, fixed
- 00:45:934 (5,2) - ^ Nah, I like it
- 00:59:134 (2,3,4) - this and 00:59:820 (5,6,7) - are the same things but spacing is different fixed
- 01:07:192 (2,3) - Blanket is a bit off fixed
- 01:10:106 (2,3,4,5,6,7) - Spacing ^
- 01:41:134 (1,4) - I dont like this overlap fine for me and i have bo idea how to avoid this without changing flow
- 01:43:191 (4,1) - This one too ^
- 01:43:705 (6,5) - stack mb? yep
- 01:46:277 (5,1) - you can make a blanket here i prefer pverlap for saving bigger spacing (strong beat)
- You shall avoid placing sliders at red ticks, because more important beats starts on white tick just like here 00:50:906 (3,4,5) - or 00:57:077 (6,7,8) - The main idea is highlighting "back" sounds and vocal witch starts on red ticks here
Imo its better to place them on white ticks
Map is good without many issues, avoid ovrlaps to make map clean and easier to read
GL
Thank You for mod!BOUYAAA wrote:
Hi M4M Hello
Respond properly please I tried
Easy :
00:24:334 (1,1) - song isn't strong enough tu justify NC spam i suggest you remove this one 00:24:334 (1) - done
00:22:963 (1,1) - That's more of a personal opinion but i think objects being this close make the map look kinda crowded I do not see anything wrong here
00:35:306 (1) - move this down a bit so it looks a bit more balanced http://puu.sh/tyboL/0f4cfa0c38.jpg done , 00:39:077 (2,1,1) - done here too
00:36:677 (1) - I don't really understand your reasoning for ending this slider here, the vocal is pretty weak. You have a strong vocal on this tick 00:37:363 - so i'd suggest making the slider end here The idea was making identical rhythm as 00:33:934 (1) - but changing pattern. The main idea of easy diff is simple rhythm, with small changes for diversity
00:38:049 (1) - same for those that follow. You lose too much emphasis on strong vocals by doing this. also 3/2 gaps are hard to read for beginners It's easy to read because of i use same rythm from 00:33:934 - to 00:42:163 - witch starting with sliders
About emphasis? Yes i sacrifice it for easier rythm. Yes, i think it is easy. This is best variation for this section what i could find
00:45:592 (1,2,1) - If I understood correctly you're trying to follow the slight synth sound. If that's the case i suggest you try this rythm http://puu.sh/tybPo/093db4b8cc.jpg Yep, You understood right, but your suggestion is harder...
01:04:449 (2,3) - these look too close imo no it's fine
kiai is good
Hard? : Not too hard
00:12:506 (2) - if you wanna follow the continuous sound i'd say extend it to here 00:12:849 - . As of right now your slider ends on a sound that has nothing to do with the synth which sounds a bit weird hmm, honestly i don't think so... I wanted to get two this sounds together so...
00:26:734 - you've been following the vocals since the beginning so why not map this? 00:26:777 - because it starts here, i cant map 1/8 sound and don't want to under map it... Yes it's wierd 00:26:392 - let it be circle here hmmm
00:28:106 - same here, seing the density of what's coming up there is no real reason to leave this out 00:27:763 - synth sound end here, for emphasis this one i silenced 00:28:106 - vocal here( it's weak vocal so not a big deal)
00:37:363 (3,1) - idk man flow really isn't good here. Movement is completely broken which is kind of not recomended for easier diffs i already understood that we have different ideas about good flow after modding your map lol. Here i wanted to force the player make an anticlockwise move, 00: 37: 877 - with this break, flow should be fine.
00:42:849 (3) - so uh notice how there is a huge sound ont he sliderend. This should probably be clickable. And if your answer to that is following vocals than you should probably make this sliderend clickable 00:43:534 (1) -. Any of both would work Yes, i follow vocal, now 00:43:877 (2) - clickable
00:53:477 (1,1,1) - ncing is awkward if you wanna pair beats pair the right ones 00:53:134 (1,1) - 00:53:820 (2,1) - 00:54:506 (2,1) - so that rythm is still clear to the player It's kinda strange but i NCing vocal here. i think in this way it's easier to read
01:30:849 (3,4,5) - until now your flow was pretty smooth but here you completely break it by having that backward/forward movement. I don't really see it being justified here Vocal again, repeating structure. I tried to map this whole vocal in a diversity process, and decide to break flow here to 01:30:677 (2,3,4,5) - 2 similar patterns.
Insane :
00:26:220 - 00:27:934 - 00:28:277 - why no notes here there are clearly distiguishable vocals it's weak vocal points, i don't want to spam a 1/4s in the beginning. it supposed to be slow
00:48:163 (3,4) - These sliders feel really off. They start on a very weak sound and end on something huge. This messes up rythm as the player doesn't click on prominent sounds anymore. Having these sliderends clickable would be way better imo
This issue is repeated here : 00:50:906 (3,4) -
00:53:134 - anything before here based mainly on vocal , 00:48:848 (5,1,5,1) - only here i starting highlight really strong sounds for player, prepering for part without vocals and then tring to follow both of them...
01:33:591 (1,1) - 01:31:877 (1) - 01:58:277 (1,1) - Questionable NCs Yep, tipical pp jumps xD
01:46:277 (5,1) - Yopu kinda do this alot but to improve aesthetics a little i suggest you don't make objects touch like that when they appear at the same time on the screen. Either stack them a decent amount or separate them i made better overlap overlap, 01:46:277 (5,6,1,4) - should be looks much better
Alright that's it. Nice song choice.
Gl!
Underdogs wrote:
testplay for 3 star
since i like Muzzy, have a mod
[Easy]Rhythm choice is kind of random here, and some should be pointed out in my modfixed
Also check AiMod in Easy (unsnapped object)Mod
00:20:220 (1,1) - overlap noticed in editor and gameplay changed
00:25:363 (1) - slider end should be clickable mb no
00:26:734 (3) - i dont suggest mapping vocal, because you map 1/1 slider and then suddenly the slider goes long, which I think it is inconsistent nothing wrong for me, if i will not map vocal, what should i map here xD?
00:36:677 (1,2,1,2,1,2,1) - why change the note to 3/2 slider and circle? It sounded the same as 00:33:934 (1,1) - so I think mapping this the same as the notes 00:33:934 (1,1) - would be consistent and help newbies to feel the buildup rhythm for diversity mapping
00:42:163 (1,2,3) - this look bad tbh. reposition 00:42:163 (1) - should be better now
00:53:134 (1) - wat is this lol just a slider
00:59:134 (2,3,4) - I don't like how you map this part. You miss a lot of hitsounding potential by mapping the offset of the map that was an idea, map offset xD
01:00:506 (4) - On this note, 01:01:020- has stronger priority than the blue tick. Don't worry about removing. Just make the slider 1/1 and add a circle it' make a bit less emphasis on offset
01:02:392 (3) - the repeat arrow should be clickable hmm, fine for easy
01:06:849 (1) - finisher hitsound here mmm, it is here already
01:08:049 (3) - I don't hear anything from the blue tick, consider changing there isn't anything xD, just emphasis long offset part , i should think about it
01:09:592 (1,2) - potential blanket so let it be
01:11:478 (4) - the blue tick didnt have a sound. Change this as well
01:13:363 (3,4) - could be blanket Nope
01:17:477 (6) - after this note add another one. The big tick shouldn't be missed this kick is less strong than previous, it makes no sense
01:20:563 (1) - on this section before kiai, I think the rhythm choice is something i should not recommend. Easy players are trying to adapt to the rhythm game and the rhythm choice you use is somehow confusing. I'd map this 1/1 all the way rather than adding circles like 01:21:249 (2) - to avoid confusion it's fine for me hmmm, 1/1 is boring. I don't want it.
01:34:277 (1,2,1,2,1,2) - Why is the intensity of the circle goes low here? It sounded the same as 01:31:534 (1,2,3,4) - lol , vocal flow... 01:31:534 (1,2,3,4) is way faster
lazy to mod all diff aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
sullywally wrote:
#modreqs
[General]Anyway...
- Hard? It's not recommended to use custom diffname, if its not the highest diff why not? it's clearly understandable whith level is it... right?
- Those SR gap are quite huge, (especially the normal & hard), might want to slip in another diff. idk hmm, +1,6 +1,3, maybe, but i tried to make hard without 1/4 and hard flows. Will see what others are thinking about it. secretly i have half mapped 2,4 star diff
- 01:01:877 - might want to consider to lower the hitsound volume (especially in the Insane, its.. really.. loud...) to 80 %
[Just Play]I'm not gonna comment on the aesthetic since your style of mapping is probably different from mine (yes i know there's one up there, but its triggering me so much) mmm
- There's alot of distinguishable vocal in the beginning you didnt map (00:14:563 - 00:17:306 - 00:20:049 - etc.), you could put circle or just some slider, it help to map the beat, it also help emphasize the tempo / flow of the vocal (you'll get the idea :/)it makes rhythm indistinct, less structured. I skipped weak vocal points for making a rhythm more stable
- 00:20:563 (2,3) - purely aesthetic, make this parallel Nope, i like it
- 00:33:592 (10) - this is a 3/4 slider, not a repeat slider yep
- 00:35:306 (1) - you got a bit too much 1/2, start the beat at 00:35:477 - 00:35:306 - there is beat actually
- 00:42:163 (1) - ^ (if it because the instrument its not emphasizing really well, and its pointless since the next part you map is following the vocal, might as well stick with it) ^
- 00:53:476 (5) - this need more emphasizing... (kickslider?) ye why not
- 00:55:191 (1) - make this horizontal instead of vertical it make a better flow, imo. (On side note 00:55:534 - just a suggestion but it'll better if you cut the repeat slider and make a slider here, but.. yknow) mmm haha, i know that it make a better flow. It is not noticeble right now like it was in 1st update, but i tried to picture "gun fire" xD i guess i keep that one
- 01:16:449 (1,2,1,2,1,2) - I think you got the rhythm wrong, try listening it slowly, try this one i heared 01:17:049 - beat , i think it is much low hype.
- 01:19:534 (6) - NC? it help with reading since 01:19:192 (5,6) - and 01:19:534 (6,7) - is roughly the same Yep
- 01:34:105 (1) - why NC? i fogot remove it from last mod xD
- 01:33:591 (1) - this definitely follow the instrument, why the sliderend so stronk how should i know? ask muzzy lol . there is stronk soud - i make clap. i 'm simple man.
Good luck ranking this Thank You
6th wrote:
Hey yo
[Easy]
00:22:963 (1,2,3) - Increase the spacing a bit to make it look neater. It won't affect the gameplay. a bit
00:45:592 (1,2) - I'm really unsure that beginners are able to suddenly catch a note on red tick after such low note density. I suggest using CTRL+G to them and moving the circle to white tick. Same goes for the rest ofc. hmmm i don't think so.
00:57:077 (3) - Repeating it on a tick that represents nothing is really annoying tbh... you can't do that. i can xD, the problem is why i shouldn't. because of here no beat? so i could silence the slider end and change slide point sound for easy.... Flow? It flows easy as hell.
01:01:706 (1,2,3) - Having 3 circles clickable in a row is a bit too sudden for an Easy diff, isn't it ? it isn't 02:00:334 (1,2,3,4) - 4 here
[Not so Easy]
00:11:991 - 00:14:734 - 00:17:477 - Try having a consistent rhythm since they sound the same. Vocals aren't that important and are undermapped so those 1/1 sliders aren't necessary. i don't get it
00:52:792 (4,1) - Space them more for aesthetics purpose. done
01:01:363 (1,2) - Fully stack them ? That fake stack is misleading and looks a bit random. fine
01:05:476 (2) - You should convert it to 2 circles to emphasize downbeat/vocals. don't think so
01:15:763 (3,4,5,6) - This is a difficulty spike, space them less. Don't forget doubles are much harder to play. right
01:07:363 (2,3,4,5) - Having an irregular spacing is really inconsistent with that previous stack 00:56:734 (3,4) - why not?
01:58:277 (3,4) - Why is spacing decreasing between them ? i tried to avoid overlap, changed
[Just play]
00:28:963 (1) - You never followed vocal that accurately previously, that big slider is meaningless. There wasn't strong vocal enough.
00:54:848 (1) - That slowdown is really unpredictable, since it looks like most 1/2 sliders of the map. Also it breaks the momentum so just map it normally. Stream is slow flow so i think you can prepare for it.
01:05:306 (2,3) - Spacing should increase between them rather than decrease. In fact you should move (2) closer from (1).
01:16:449 (1,2) - Blue ticks shouldn't have clap since it's not as intense as other ticks. yep
01:27:248 (6) - Move it a bit up so it makes a triangle with 01:26:734 (4,5) - done
01:43:877 (1) - It could be more interesting to play if you use CTRL+G to it imo since it would give some emphasize to the vocals by changing the flow. You suggest to changing flow in kiais too many times
01:51:077 (2,3) - That stack feels rather random for a map that is based on movement. mmm , i want change circle flow here, and did't find smthing better than stack
01:58:105 (2,1,2,1,2) - That curve is super uncomfortable to play tbh... mind using CTRL+G to 01:58:448 (2,1) - ? it's just hard. Noone likes old patterns nowdays i'll change it for your variation if more people call it unplayable
That's all from me. Good luck! Thanks
smau5 wrote:
#modreqs
General[Just play!]
- you should enable widescreen support hmm, why? it's for storyboards.
- 00:21:249 (3) - before this, it was mapped to the vocals but this slider is mapped to nothing rhythm heritage
- 00:33:249 (6,7,8) - not perfect curve it's changed
- 00:33:249 (6) - better to start NC should be fine
- 00:38:049 - i think is better to map this tick because there is a sound every white tick yeh, but looks like the most of peoples don't hear it in a gameplay so i decide to avoid it
- 00:40:792 - same ^ ^
- 00:42:677 (4,5) - should be the same spacing or more as 00:42:505 (3,4) - because the hype part. I think it's enough spaced
- 00:43:534 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - every tick has a beat except 00:44:306 - this tick, i think you should map those , for example 00:43:620 - , 00:43:792 - and 00:43:963 - has the same sound hmm i don't hear it honestly
- 00:44:477 - this too ^
- 00:54:420 (4,5) - why this has more spacing than the previous circle yep, i changed it
- 00:55:191 (1) - this should start here 00:54:420 (4) - listen closely aaaa, i know i skiped beat, i tried to picture "gun fire"
- 00:57:077 (6) - NC 00:57:077 (6,7,8) - dont want to make differences for woob sounds, this part based on it
- 00:59:820 (1) - NC ^ same reason
- 01:01:534 (2) - try with ctrl + G, i think it should not overlap it's not the same sound don't get the reason
- 01:01:877 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14) - i don't understand the sliders, if you are mapping part of the bass, 01:03:249 (11) - this should be shorter and do something like you did here 01:03:592 (12,13,14) - listen carefully offset 01:03:249 (11) - extended sound with catching 01:03:420 - that beat
- 01:08:049 (6) - NC i told why
- 01:10:792 (1) - NC
- 01:12:849 (3,4,5,6,7,8,9) - why is the rhythm different than this part 01:08:049 (1,2,3,4,5) - same sounds but just more quiet, try to use the same pattern but less spacing because the "background" sounds different, and i like to make diversity rythm
- 01:14:563 (10,11) - why overlap, kick and snare are different sounds so? i want stop flow before next part.
- 01:16:792 (1,2,1,2) - these two are the same but 01:16:449 (1,2) - is not, try overlapping them It's not really noticable in gameplay
- 01:19:705 (7) - NC 01:19:534 (1) - should be better
- 01:22:792 (5,6,7) - why triple 01:22:877 - because i shoud map this sound
- 01:27:420 (1) - NC actually why not
- 01:28:791 (1,2,3) - the rhythm here looks really random until here 01:32:563 - for example 01:28:791 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - this part and this part 01:30:163 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - are not even the same rhythm, same 01:31:448 (1,2,1,2,3,4,1) - i don't understand what are you mapping I tried to folllow vocals.
- 01:33:248 (2,3,4,5,1) - why stream? ^same reason
- 01:33:591 (1) - with this slider you are ignoring 01:33:763 - and 01:33:934 - both are strong beats yeh, it was made for emphasize difference between vocal flows 01:28:791 (1,2,3,4,5,6,1,2,3,4,5,6,1,2,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,5) - here and 01:34:277 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,5) - here
- 01:39:248 (3) - why this is not a slider it should follow the same rhythm as before increases hype by 01:39:248 (3,4) -
- 01:39:763 (1) - from here the spacing looks random, i think you should emphasize the beats for example 01:40:620 - this is a strong beat, but you made it a slider end i think it should be a slider head or a circle backgraud sounds
- 01:41:134 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - i like this part because you are mapping part of the vocals and the beats, makes sense.
- 01:44:905 (5,6,1) - this should have more spacing than before, more intensity you are right, increased
- 01:58:277 (1,2,1,2) - weird , angles too wide and this should be 2 sliders to match the vocals like you did before changed
- 01:59:820 (1) - NC to match the beat nope
- 02:00:334 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12) - make each triple NC yep
- check the NC of the whole song, you should use it do diferentiate patterns and secctions, some combos you are doing it too long, it goes up to 14, this is ok if is a stream but they aren't
Thank You for your suggestionsJoaoGMR wrote:
#modreq
Sorry i have bad English.. Translate help meJust play!First offset "wrong" it's 11991
00:11:992 (1,2) - i think. and test, can have 1 more slider like This i keep this section, i want save 2 this souds without weaks beats
00:26:734 (4,1) - 4: slider 1 "delete" (like This) 00:27:077 - this beat seems important for me
00:28:105 (3) - 1 circle In the previous red (like This) mmm, ye , why not, it fits well
00:35:305 (1,2,3) - i don't know. 1 in the red (start) and delete 2? (this) But I liked how it was before No, thx
00:43:533 (1) - I do not know how to explain it, but I thought it was better this way But if you did not like it well. It's cool the same Your variation is stoping flow, in this section i wanted to make cool smooth flow.
01:16:449 (1,2,1,2,1,2) - can have triples? or. slider round trip (I do not know what the name, i'm sorry) i have triples here 01:38:391 (1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2,3,4) - and here 02:00:334 (1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2,3) - , so for more variety, I prefer something else
And.. it's all.. i can modded easy and normal (because.. i'm only mapped extra+) Thanks with you like it
Благодарю!Danii wrote:
Привет, нм с очереди СНГ мапперов Привет O/
[General]
- Судя по критериям ранкинга, кастомной диффа может зваться только одна (в аппруве понятно, в мапсете самая высокая), только если это не какие-то тематические названия из игры какой-нибудь (гитар хиро, лига легенд, ещё какая-то музыкальная игра название которой я не помню, которая с адванседами хайперами и т.д.). Эта песня же не этот случай Там написано, что названия должны отражать сложность, когда меня убедят, что мои не подходят, тогда поменяю.
- Добавь в тэги "drum and bass electronica F Minor Factory EP" (последнее это название альбома (или EP, без разницы)) кк
[Pls enjoy gameJust Play!]
- вот так будет круче по ритму по моему разница не велика
- 00:14:563 - 00:17:306 - 00:20:049 - почему бы здесь не поставить ноты чтобы выделить вокал? всё-таки это инсейн и думаю лишним не будет
- 00:26:220 - ^ Я не хочу, чтобы ритм вышел слишком рандомный, в начале если за мапать весь вокал, будет очень сложно ориентироватться имхо
- 00:29:477 - тут такой сильный бит, а ты его пропустил...странно Вокал мне кажется важнее
- 00:33:849 - мб ноту? раз уж так близко поставил слайдер лучше спейсану
- 00:43:706 (3) - сделай репит (до 00:43:877 - , не дальше) Не хочу тормозить флоу
- 00:48:163 (3) - 00:50:906 (3) - слайдеры заканчиваются на сильную долю (вокал, сильный бит, всё такое), что не есть хорошо. Сделай эту долю кликабельной надо больше мнений, я хучу здесь оставить так
- 00:55:534 - тут прям звук такой выделяющийся, хочется выделить его двумя кикслайдерами 00:53:134 (1,2,3,4,5,6,1,2,3,4,5,1,1) - никто не видит пулемет
- 00:57:077 (6) - нк все 4 "бэк" звука в оду секцию
- 00:59:820 (5) - ^ ^
- 01:02:734 (8) - ^ да
- 01:08:049 (6) - ^ тоже самое
- 01:10:792 (5,1) - поменяй местами нк нет, с 1 наоборот снял xD
- 01:13:535 (6) - нк и нет
- 01:13:535 (6,9) - вполне сильные биты здесь и такой маленький спейсинг такой же как в предыдущей секции
- 01:30:763 - 01:31:105 (5) - чёто вообще по ритму не сочетается с 01:28:791 (1,2,3,4,5) - , лучше убери 01:31:106 (5) - и поставь ноту на 01:30:763 - там вокала нет... все 1/4 тут только под вокал
- 01:33:591 (1) - ненужный нк согласен
- 01:34:791 (3) - 01:36:163 (3) - 01:37:534 (3) - какие-то некрасивые слайдеры почему?
- 01:46:277 (5,1) - фиксани бланкет, слайдер правее к
- 01:46:449 (6,4) - стакни ладно
- 01:58:791 (2,3) - очень близко к
- 02:01:706 - мб выделить звук нотой а потом уже спиннер? да
[Not so easy]
- 00:24:334 (3) - убери какую-нибудь из точек на последнем завороте слайдера, а то не слишком красивым слайдер получается убрал
- 01:07:706 (3,4) - игрок ориентирующийся на хардики (без дт) скорее всего не прочитает это, так что ctrl+g ладно
- 01:11:992 (2) - 01:12:849 (1) - не оч выглядит, лучше стакни конец слайдера и ноту нормально выглядит
- 01:27:420 - не очень нравится что ты здесь сильный вокал пропустил. Я конечно понял твою идею с тем чтобы игрок немного отдохнул, но не здесь Ну а где? предыдущая секция построенна точно также, если ломать, то ломать и там тоже по структурному принципу, я пока хз вообщем. Читается это нормально, пока оставлю...
- 01:28:106 (3,1) - фикс бланкет к
- 01:31:364 (5) - про подобное я тебе уже говорил в ласт диффе, на самом деле, опишу кратко - сделай конец слайдера кликабельным 01:28:792 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,5,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,1,1,1) - вся секция как тут так и в инсейне тут по вокалу. А акценты в вокальном плане расставлены на 01:30:334 - 01:30:849 - 01:31:363 - 01:31:877 - и т.п., поэтому они кликабельны
- 01:44:391 (2,1) - стакни так вроде и так стакнуто
And i made some minor changes in Hard , about theme what You mentioned yesterday in PMKyomaku wrote:
Hi. From #Modreqs, although I'm a little inexperienced, so let's see if this can be of help to you. Feel free to skip.
[General]
I find the beatmap names to be a little confusing. Not sure if these are supposed to be Easy, Normal, Hard or Normal, Hard, Insane. Maybe consider renaming the difficulties?
[Just play!]
Map seems good on a first impression. I choked tho. Let's see what I can find. Looked pretty overall.
00:22:277 (1,2,1) - Sounds a bit off to me. First 2 circles are mapped to the vocals, then the slider ignores the vocals. Song has a tough rhythm. Consider extending the slider a bit? Making it start 2 ticks earlier (on the red tick). Like this. Give it a try, maybe you'll like it. i agree, but want to keep down beat clicable, so added circle on red tick.
00:26:220 - You could add a circle here, vocals allow it (like the 3 circles you placed prior to this part). You could also add the circle and make the one after it a slider, like this. Both really optional though, but it sounds good to me. done
[Not so easy]
Good map, everything had a good flow.
Tags are off/missing in this difficulty, though. fixed
Well that's as much as I found! I'm not really good at easier difficulties, due to them ignoring the rhythm of the song most of the time, so I don't think I can help with those. Good luck! Maybe you'll want to add another difficulty, though. Maybe
Now it has normal.Left wrote:
ehh.. is this finished map..? maybe no normal diff now?
(if ok i'll mod as it is now)
Thank You!Left wrote:
came back
[General]
change mp3 to 192kbps now unrankable later
[Easy]
00:11:991 (1) - rather than just 2/1, how about 3/2 reverse + 2/1 slider? drum isn't loud here and 00:12:506 - 00:13:020 - has strong sound
00:14:734 (1) - same
00:17:477 (1) - ^ sounds cool
00:35:306 (1) - NC isn't necessary in easy right
00:38:049 (1) - ^ ^
00:36:677 (1) - just 2/1 is better cuz sound in 00:37:363 - is bigger and better to read than now.
00:38:049 (1,1,1) - ^ i did smthing but don't know what exactly xD should be more 2/1 slider parts
00:42:163 (1,2,3) - DS0.96 and overlap need improvement fixed
00:53:134 (1) - slider isn't nice and slightly touching 00:56:392 (2) - not touching anymore
01:01:363 (5,1,2) - too many circles in easy, you can use 1/1 instead. let it be
01:14:391 (4,1) - DS yep
01:16:449 (3,4,5,6) - too hard
01:34:277 (1,2,1,2,1,2) - this song has more than just 2/1 circle yep but i make contrast between fast and slow vocal parts
02:00:334 (1,2,3,4) - too hard
Fine i changed places which uses more than 2 circles in a row. Decreases SR by 0.06, hmm. I have no idea why easy players can't clic 4 circle in row but fine. Now we have E icon on E.
[Normal]
00:33:934 (1,2) - blanket fixed i guess
00:58:106 (3,4) - too circle is hard for nubs. can use 1/2 slider
01:03:420 (4,5,6) - same, use 1/2 + circle pls
It appears again and again
So i can't use it in normal too? No way.
01:40:277 (2,3,4) - flow is super hard, just https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/7282070 is better yep
01:46:963 (2,3,4,5,1,2,3,4,1,2,3) - note train is too long, 01:49:020 (4) - can change this to 1 circle to give a break for nubs i make a bit pause
I made some flow changes, should be easier now.
[Hard]
00:32:563 (1,2,3,4) - too overlapped each other, can avoid it easily. Yep but it flows easily, that was the reason
00:33:934 (1,2,3,1,2,3,1) - I think u have intention in each slider, but it just looks dirty when it came togeter. no logic in overall pattern, just blanket there. basic slider use is better than now. Maybe You're right not completely but right Changed some sliders here
01:50:734 (1) - overlap and stack like this isn't good idea in hard diff don't think so
02:00:334 (1,1,1,1) - is nc really necessary lol i think overused why not?
[Insane]
00:40:792 (1) - why suddenly didn't map downbeat? not good This down beat, not really down beat... xD I mean this beat is too weak and miss it acceptable
no distance logic, pattern also not logical in most part. have to think more about it i disagree
should i really comment it?
good luck!
Thanks!P A N wrote:
your map is the 5th map after I post so here is my mod How is it even work? edit.: looks like, sometimes i am getting luck xD
Insane
- 00:31:191 (1,2,3) - make their spacing consistent will be better for visual and playable, spacing from 2 to 3 looks like an error and 1/4 tbh. visually should be similar
- 00:32:563 - http://puu.sh/uG0d3/9737cf27ef.jpg current stream feels kinda off imo, follow the kick and snare instead? I mean make jump on every kick and snare. example pattern: http://puu.sh/uG0to/64a7141208.jpg The idea was - to create a simple stream, because this dense part placed between 2 "calm" sections, so i decide to simplify kick jumps here . No changes for now , but i'll keep it in mind.
- 00:57:077 (6,7,8) - this pattern looks too simple imo, not beautiful. sometimes sipmle way - best way anyway i haven't ideas now...
Hard
- 00:43:534 (1,2,3) - make them like this is easier to read that it's 1/4. the jump is pretty tricky (for hard diff). okay , but i'll anyway use a bit increased spacing because of hold structure of this pattern. Should be more readable and not to hard to catch.
- 00:44:906 (1) - this kind of note is pretty strong so I suggest to unstack for more impact and fun to play. same as 00:50:220 (4,1) good idea
- 01:10:106 (1) - I don't mind inconsistent pattern from 00:59:134 but I think remove NC is better. there doesn't even fit for color change. k
- 01:12:849 (1) - same as above. ^
- 01:16:449 (1,2,3,4) - it's better to get these four the same spacing. oops
Normal
- 00:19:192 (1) - please avoid overlapped in normal diff. done
- 00:36:677 (1) - PLEASE NO, this is even kinda unrankable. normal diff player can't read this tbh. okay( , fixed
- 01:28:792 (1,2,3,1,2,3,4,5,1,2,3) - too dense for normal diff imo. Yeah i want to get more opinions about this moment... 01:30:334 (1,2,3,4) - wanna keep at least 4 reverse sliders, but 01:32:563 and 01:29:820 (3) - i fine with nerf here. will see...
pretty good map, good luck!
I finally solve the problem that I can't update my map so I said "I will do a free mod on the 5th map after this" in #modreqs and yep. it's your map XDMitkoff wrote:
P A N wrote:
your map is the 5th map after I post so here is my mod How is it even work?
Thanks! I have a lot of stuff for thinking now...eeezzzeee wrote:
Hello Hello O/
NM from my queue
[Insane]
- 00:14:563 - try adding a note here for the vocals
- 00:17:306 - same
- 00:20:049 - same I don't want overmap the beginning, ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ , it's a bit too much imo
- 00:26:220 (3) - try putting it somewhere on the other side to flow better with the next slider http://puu.sh/uH6Sk/209dd6ca4c.jpg let it be
- 00:28:449 (1) - try using a 1/2 slider instead of just a circle, as the vocal is two syllables and lands on the red tick let it be
- 00:28:963 - ehhh for a long vocal like this, its usually better to try to map some other sounds instead, especially on higher difficulties. This is not very engaging for players of this level. No changes for now
- 00:31:877 (2,3) - maybe you should use the same 1/4 ds as earlier already done
- 00:33:934 (1,1) - try using the same rhythm for these parts as they are basically the same sound lol i don't get it they are the same...
- 00:37:363 (3,1) - this can be difficult to properly judge the timing as I think most players will be expecting a 1/1 timing between objects due to the rhythm of the previous patterns like 00:34:620 (4,1) - etc. I suggest adding a note at 00:38:049 - Honestly i thought the same at the beginning, but after some test plays i was confused... Some people were say to delete note at 00:38:049 - some were fine with it. I have not big counting of opinions ,but looks like: as high rank player as more chance to expecting down beat note. It make sense as Insane diff, but maybe not bad to make diff more playable for all players, hmmm. Actually this sounds pretty weak and not even close to strong vocal wich place nearly close, so... For diffently gameplay i keep it, at least for now.
- 00:40:106 (3,1) - same ^
- 00:48:848 (5,1) - why the random bent sliders though. 00:51:592 (6,1) - this is the same thing and its not bent Yep, they were bent earlier, removed now.
- 00:51:934 (1,3) - blanket is off fixed
- 01:01:877 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,1,2,3,4,5,6,7) - no need to use so many whistles, it sounds pretty awful especially since the custom hs is so strong. I think one every red tick would be great. also even though there are whistles lets not forget to add the claps too good point
- 01:05:134 (1,3) - swap NC okie
- 01:05:820 (1) - remove nc ^
- 01:13:878 (7,8) - maybe this one should be a slider too to match the instrumental in this section. compare with 01:08:049 (6,7,8) - It sounds differently for me Orz, thats why i changed rhytm
- 01:20:563 - comparing this section to 01:28:792 - the music is basicaly very similar, drums are the same and rap is almost the same. however, your map changes from all 1/2 patterns to lots of 1/4 patterns here and there. I think you should try to use a more consistant style between these similar parts of the song, you can try adding some triples to the first part or removing them from the second one.
I don't know how correctly explain the idea here in English hmmm. My knowledge is pretty poor as You can notice. I'll try anyway.
So, as You said i tried carefully follow vocal in my map. There is 3 part of "rap flow" in 01:20:563 - 01:38:392 . I mean 3 kind of emphraise text.
1st part 01:20:563 - 3 times 8/1 parts with constant 1/2 rhytm, we have mapped only 1/2 notes.
2nd part 01:28:792 - 1/2 rhythm overloads a lot of s/h sounds wich make "(vocal) flow" more tense and smooth, i am tring to emphraise it with a lot of new 1/4s.
3rd part 01:34:277 - and finally rest part wich uses pauses in vocal flow like 01:35:477 - and 01:36:849 -. We have a good moment for variativity and i emphraise diferences between heavy (01:28:792 -) and calm (01:34:277 -) sections.
I know it's not best variation of map it, but i feel it like i described it...
About a lot of missed 1/4s, i wanted to map all stuff in Extra diff, but my imagination hurt me especially for the beggining parts. Also my ability mapping Extra sucks xD. I haven't smthng decent for Ex now. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ Yeah, bad news for mapset at all...- 01:31:877 (1) - delete NC done
Shapes and object placement can use more polishing but I think the biggest problem preventing this from being a great map is the constant 1/2 rhythm that is used during parts that have many 1/4 and other possible sounds too. It makes for a bland playing experience and does not represent the song well imo.
Some general ideas about how to improve the rhythms used in this map:
i see that you are trying to closely follow the vocals whenever they are present, but that ends up neglecting the drums and instruments. you should try to include those too whenever possible to make a more complete map of the music provided. also having more variety in the rhythm of the map makes for a more interesting playing experience.
For example, 01:20:905 (2,3,4) - its quite obvious that between the objects there is drum on the blue ticks. as you probably know, dnb emphasizes the drums! so maybe your map should include them too xd
also try to avoid empty spaces during very intense parts of the song like 01:35:477 -
That's all from me. Don't give up! Fighting! c:
UndeadCapulet wrote:
From my queue:Good luck with your future mapping!General
Your bg seems to be of very low quality, it's very grainy and blurry. I think you should try to find a crisper, cleaner bg for this song. (Also maybe something that isn't from an unrelated anime lol..) Who cares? i like it. Mb later.
---Insane
Your intro rhythms are very random imo, you seem to mostly follow vocals, but also frequently skip over strong vocal beats like 00:20:049 - or add extra beats like 00:26:906 (5) - . You also randomly follow instrumental like at 00:21:249 (3) - . I think you should try to restructure your intro rhythms to fit either the instrumental or the vocals better. If you follow instrumental, you can show off the 3/2 rhythms and stuff like 00:16:792 - and 00:18:506 - . (This applies to all difficulties) image: i cut intro for 2 parts: 00:11:991 - 00:22:277 - . Less dense, more dense. Should be more sence with this criteria.---
- Extending 00:33:592 (10) - to the kiai would fit well with how you extend sliders in the kiai. Yep
- You skip beats like 00:38:049 - even though you mapped 00:35:306 - earlier. I think focusing so much on vocals here that you skip these beats really kills the pacing of your map.
- Really really think you should have some sort of clickable object at 00:55:534 - to map that laser out ;; hmmm, i wanted to make 2 reverse kicksliders anyway so yea, why not
- I think skipping the 01:35:477 - and 01:36:849 - beats kills the pace of this section a lot. Since it's kind of a fast constant vocal rap section ending any hitsound beats, esp when there are drum ticks there, feels weird. I don't think so
- 01:39:248 (3) - Should prob be a kickslider to match the surrounding rhythms. i made it as circle for emphraise emphraise 01:39:420 (4) - beat as end of rap section.
- 01:59:820 (4,5,6) - Separating these notes more from 01:59:648 (3) - would emphasize the drums better. It's good point
Hard
01:42:506 (5) - and NC here, I know you didn't so these sliders would fit with the previous pattern, but that's not a good enough reason to have NC inconsistency imo. Same for 01:53:477 (5) - . Yes
---Normal
Please avoid having entire sections where the DS results in tiny overlaps like 01:41:820 (2,3,1) - . Honestly for a normal that kiai spacing might be too much anyway, but these tiny overlaps especially are unsightly. I can't avoid tiny overlaps and use chnging ds in Normal at the same time ohhhh... I try 1.05 greenline for now, overlaps now much bigger...
---
rockrick wrote:
Hey, from modreqs ^^ Hello O/
normal
00:38:049 (1,2,3) - i can see you wen't with the electronic sound on the background, but emphasizing the vocal on this part would be better imo. i would instead do something like this this I'm fine with current variation. actually i tried to have smthing between vocal and instruments
00:57:249 (4) NC i did't make NC for consistancy with sections like (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - where i skipping down beats
01:08:220 (4) ^ ^
01:24:334 (4) there is a lider end on a measure start here, making 4 a cicle and 5 a slider starting on 01:24:677 would do the trick i'll remember that but now no changes
01:27:077 (4) same here
01:48:677 (2,3) - these two feel a bit too close Yep but i can't make jumps in Normal
insane
00:28:963 (2) - You sometimes make some sliders distorted according to the song like in 00:39:420 (1) and 01:06:163 (10) so i would suggest you make this long slider a bit wobbly or something on the first half, since it's following the vocal, which would also make for some good slider art It's good point let's see...
00:35:963 (4) - 00:38:734 (3) - 00:41:477 (3) - since this part is following vocals, i would make these sliders 1/2 beat, not full beat, because the vocals are emphasized half a beat after the slider beginning You know, people mention that i'm not constant in intro too much xD. I will not changing it more haha
00:54:506 (5,1) - 00:55:192 (5,1) - these 1/4 jumps are a bit too close for this difficulty, especially the second one because it's longer than the ones before it, i would consider it a diff spike, so just getting them a bit closer would do the trick~ In lower diff 1/4 jumps really tricky for players, at least you shoud make it with not clicable object imo
00:58:277 (10) - you can make this slider wobbly like i mentioned on the beginning of the mod, it would add up to the others making things prettier :> Another good catch, and reminder fore me
01:14:734 (11,1) - putting the slider underneath 11 and making it point toward 2 would make it look nicer let it be
01:34:792 (3) - 01:36:163 (3) - maybe it's just me, but i don't think these slider shapes fit the style youré going for in the rest of the map. maybe using red sliderpoints? Idea was 01:37:020 (1,2,3) - make every pattern with "loop flow" which actually a circularity xD that why dots are white
might have missed some stuff, but nice map and cool streams, good luck with it!
edit:timestamps were bugging xd
Спасибо за мод, Loreley.Loreley wrote:
m4m https://osu.ppy.sh/s/506551 (да, она не моя, моддишь только последнюю диффу)
[Insane]
- 00:19:535 (5,1) - 00:16:792 (5,1) - ты тут игоришь вокал на красных тиках, хоть основной инструмент в этой части - это вокал, так что просто поставь туда серклы, ну, и во всех подобных моментах. По идее, я хотел оттенить сильные доли от слабых, но кажись это никого не ебет
- 00:21:249 (3,1) - странная пауза, чтобы не сбиться с ритма, можно поставить серкл на белый тик, там есть какой-то звук Очень слабый звук,честно , не думаю, что тут очень сложно сбиться с ритма
- 00:22:449 (2) - а из этого сделать слайдер, так как он лучше выделяет вокал(вот тут дропается звук 00:22:792 (3) - ), и слайдер этот лучше замедлить.
- 00:23:649 (2) - вообще, не люблю маленькие вейв-слайдеры, потому что они все по-ублюдски смотрятся, но если делать правильно, то лучше вот так http://puu.sh/uLRHp/1d6446c9dc.png ( но я бы вообше его заменил) Мне нравятся
- 00:24:334 (1) - а еще вейвы эстетически хуево смотрятся под таким углом, обычно их применяет только вертикально или горизонтальнос небольшим наклоном
- 00:28:963 (2) - ну мы же в 2к17, можно и что-нибудь поинтереснее придумать, чем дугу Ну что-то типа того, по эститике правда все рано слабовато
- 01:00:506 (8) - слишком маленький спейсинг для этого 1/1 бита апнул до предыдущих
- 01:45:249 (1) - поправить оффскрин бы опустил немного
- 01:58:620 (5,2) - пониже опустить 5 и ctrl+g для кругового, а значит более удобного флоу Я умышленно не стал тут крутить, до этого слишком много крутили
Phyloukz wrote:
HelloInsane00:11:992 (1,2) - i feel like theres a bit off a missemphasis: as you can hear the sounds at 00:12:506 - and 00:13:020 - are really strong (stronger than the sounds you covered with the sliderheads) and currently covered by slidertails (slidertails have the weakest emphasis) which leads to the missemphasis. try to make those 2 sounds clickable
00:15:763 (3) - the same thing appears here. additionally the vocalist pitches her voice up so it should be even more emphasized. Feels fine actually, let's see, i remember it
00:14:563 - i recommend to place circle here for the vocal
00:20:049 - same Nope
00:22:449 (2) - maybe a 1/1 slider to the next red tick instead? for the vocal at the red tick 00:22:792 - Did You test it? it sounds cool, but i'm personaly confuses when i place 1/1 slider here
00:28:963 (2) - i dont see this slider fitting. i see that u wanted to map the vocal here but during the slider she (vocalist) changes her voice, like its not a continously sound- it gets changed (also you are missing a couple sounds too which should not be missed imo) Yep and i still want to keep it. Imo makes emphasis uncommon things is much more important than follow to common 1/1 rhythm
00:33:592 - maybe you can add a slight slider velocity decrease for this slider. i think it fits pretty well here (also NC it then). just a suggestion Yep, sounds cool
00:38:049 - i disagree missing this beat. i would just make 00:37:363 (3) - this a reverse slider so you cover the less important beat with a slidertail. same for 00:40:106 (3) - with unclicable beat i agreed, let it be
00:43:619 (2,3,4) - this flows awkwardly hmm, this sounds unclear
01:19:705 (7) - nc for what?
01:57:248 (5,3) - stack eventually for better structure i changed pattern here so...
02:07:192 - make the spinner end with 5% volume. really noisy sound for not having a sound there Not sure about 5% hmmm it's pretty noticable sound here, but let it be lower
i suck at hard sorry ><normalgeneral: i'm a bit concerned about the settings you chose here - you have 1.2x slider velocity and a consistent distance snap of x0.9 which is kinda awkward to play because the sliders have a very fast movement while the movement between each object is really slow (because of the low DS). thats really confusing for newbies and im not sure if you can keep this setting. A simple 1.0 slider velocity and x1.0 DS (+/- x0.2) is rather appropriate. id recommend you to decrease the sv by 0.2 i''l keep it for now, i guess. i have some reason for this settings, also i know some ranked Normal maps with this concept.
This diff is almost hard according osu!system, btw
00:15:763 (3,4) - in low diffs you should avoid this because the sliderend is not pointing to the next object. sure you can use this element for emphasis but you shouldnt do that with the exact opposite direction. kk
00:27:077 (3,1) - same for this, you get it i think
00:43:192 - the soudn changes here so therfore it should be clickable it's normal so, can't uses unconstant rhythm
00:44:906 (1,2,1,2,3,4,1,2,1,2,3,4,1,2,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1) - you constantly switch between very dense 1/2 rhythm and really slow rhythm. I dont know, i think its not a good thing since the music feels pretty much same intense in that section i don't see any hard to catch things so, tried to follow vocals with constant rhytm and that's it
01:15:764 (2,3,1,2,3,4) - the same problem appears here: you take away the rhythm density (of 1/2 rhythms) for no reason. or at least i can see no reason to because the music doesnt get slower and less intense in any way.. >< emphasis overstrong beats
01:21:420 (3,4) - why do u suddenly decide to stack those? i would rather recommend to make it consistent, so either space it or stack in throughout the map - just to be moire straightforward for newbs For newbs i have easy... i did it for gameplay variavity....
01:30:334 (1,2,3,4) - newbies get problems here because they have to react very quickly to the reverses (since they appear multiple times they have to react even faster) so they will most likely miss at that point. you should search for a different rhythm here You know i used 01:22:620 (6,6,6) - this sliders not for just to be, it should be preparation for this pattern. Player already knows how to cath it and it's should be much easier. Also i have some test plays from inexperienced players, thats was like 90% to FC moment.
01:38:392 (1,2,3) - this looks pretty neat at first view but theoretically the player has to do sudden movement changes to the right (so the players does down - right - down - right - down and that with a sharp 90° angle at 1/2 rhythm). thats really awkward and difficult movement i nerfed angle to 60
01:55:535 (2,2) - unintended overlap avoid it
02:00:334 (1,2,3,4) - and here you take away the density again, although this feels really intense (at least if u ask me) emphasis overstrong beats again
ok i hope my random mod gives you a few ideas that can improve your map!
i dont actually know where i picked this map up ><
Good Luck on further process! :3
Little wrote:
[General][Easy]
- Maximum rankable audio bitrate is 192kbps.
[Normal]
- 00:14:734 (1,2) - It would be nice if you could blanket this so (1) wraps around the head of (2) evenly. k
- 00:45:592 (1,2,1) - 3/2 beat spacing is hard for beginners to read, especially when you mix it with 2/1 beat spacing like 00:47:649 (1,2) so I would recommend choosing a different rhythm. i want smting interesting, ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
- 01:27:763 (4) - Missing clap. y
- Many of the blankets in the map could be cleaner. i polish some... also avoid some overlaps
[Hard]
- 00:21:592 (4) - Inconsistent distance spacing before and after. fixed
- 00:44:220 (2,1) - Would look neater if they weren't so close together. fine
- 00:58:963 (2,3) - This angle is awkward imo. Why not make it smooth (1,2,3) or stack (2,3)? Same at 01:09:935 (2,3) changed to line
- 01:04:106 (1,2,3,4) - This rhythm would fit the music better since it emphasizes the strong drum on 01:04:449 http://puu.sh/uX0hW/ad8ae8882f.jpg and less emphasizes 01:05:820 (4) - this one, 01:04:106 (1) - slider here for emphasize 01:04:277 - stretched sound before clap.
[Insane]
- 01:00:506 (6) - Use round slider (not bezier) so you can make a cleaner blanket. k
- 01:15:592 (2,3,4,5,6) - This feels kinda weird to play since there's no significant indication in the music for why (5) should be emphasized by unstack. Maybe go for something with (3,4) and (5,6) stacked: http://puu.sh/uX0CE/0a9bfe8fb3.jpg Let it be
- 01:22:277 (2) - Unsnapped. k
- 01:28:192 (6) - Unsnapped. k
- 01:54:334 (5,6) - This slider end stack is kind of unexpected since you didn't use it anywhere else in the map. I think you should just unstack it or make it a 1/4 beat triple.Yep i'll change it
Mir wrote:
Hi, from queue. Yo O/
[ Insane]Generally check visual spacing/blankets etc. and consistency.
- 00:14:563 - Not mapping this note when you mapped the same kind of vocal at 00:13:706 (2) - feels really weird to.. well, not play. I suggest at least putting a circle here. Applies for the rest of the intro.
FUCK MEtriend to emphasis vocals in 00:14:734 (1) - that way
- 00:22:792 - Would add a circle here, since you do it at 00:24:163 (3,1) too to map both vocals and downbeat. That feels wierd
- 00:28:449 (1) - Would be cooler as two circles, one of which spaced on top of the slider that comes up like this or something. Idk, just would make the pause of the vocal cooler because atm it's kinda lacking. Cool, let it be
- 00:31:192 (1,2) - Could make a blanket with this.
- 00:33:506 (9,1) - DS? You lowered SV and kept distance snapping on I assume. yep
- 00:35:991 (3) - Skipping the middle vocal on 00:36:163 - sounds very awkward considering you mapped the vocals at a high priority in the previous rhythm 00:34:620 (3,1,2). You could make 3 a reverse slider to capture the vocal while still keeping clicking at a minimum. maybe, i'll remember as option, not a bid difference to me
- 00:42:163 (1,2,3,4) - Could make a square. Some kind of
- 00:44:906 - There are three things about this section I want to cover.
- 00:44:906 (1) - This slider is weird rhythmically seeing as how all the strong sounds end up on its tail rather than the head. It would work as two circles.
- 00:46:106 - If you're trying to follow the background wub noise, your snapping is completely off. What you have is this and this is the actual snapping. Do we talking about same song hmm? Yeah, my ears are not that musically good, but this sounds not on blues ticks for sure
- 00:48:163 (3,4,5) - This rhythm is ambiguous to me because I can't figure out what you're prioritizing. It sounds like 5 is trying to follow the wub, but then why are 3 and 4 starting on red ticks? The bass drum is on the white tick. Yes woobs sounds priority. 00:49:877 - sounds like here emphasis visually, have no idea how to explain it
- 01:02:392 (7,1) - These could actually be repeats to keep the noticeable 1/4 still in rhythm. i avoid it for purpose
- 01:03:419 (13) - Kicksliders should start here no? This is where the wubs start to change. Yes
- 01:04:105 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17) - This whole combo is really chaotic and I can't figure out what you're following. 01:04:105 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - Seems to be following 1/4 which is fine, but 01:05:306 (7,8,9,10) - is following the wubs all of a sudden, then 01:05:992 (11,12,13,14,15,16,17) - follows the drums? The transition between all three of these is quite hard to understand in-game at least. I was wondering what it was following. I recommend sticking to one layer and trying to merge rhythms from other layers in passive rhythm such as slider ends or reverse arrows. Exactly like You describe, it's best fits music rhytm imo
- 01:28:277 (7) - What is this section following exactly? It's mixing between drums and vocals so I can't really get what you're following. 01:29:134 (2,3,4) - Feels like vocals seeing as how it's all clickable, and 01:30:420 (2,3,4,5) - sounds like it's following drums. mmm, it's vocal section with increases intensivity
- 01:33:248 (2,3,4,5,6) - This is overmapped, there's no 1/4 here and should be removed imo since it doesn't fit the song. There's plenty of 1/4 elsewhere in the section that you skipped like 01:32:134 (5,6) - yet here you create 1/4 out of nowhere. Continue to follow vocals...
- 01:34:277 - What are you following here? This rhythm doesn't even seem to prioritize any instrument, it just follows the 1/2 beat of the song. If you want to follow drums you should increase and change the rhythm to reflect that, for example this for 01:34:277 (1,2,3,4,5) which will allow a much clearer focus on the drums. I don't get point here. It's 1/2 sections with following general 1/2 rhytm, yea. And it's continue vocal's theme. 01:35:134 - i less emphasis this kicks for emphasis difference of vocals 01:30:163 (1,2,3,4,5,6,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,1,2,3,4,5,6,7) - and 01:34:277 (1,2,3,4,5,1,2,3,4,5,1,2,3,4,5) -
- 01:40:277 (3,4) - Ctrl+G'ing this rhythm would give more focus on the drums and the synth at the same time since the slider will be on the held synth and the circle will be on the clicked drum. No changes
- 01:54:334 (5) - Could be an actual triple because there is clickable 1/4 here. Yesx
- 01:55:191 (2,3,4,5,6,7) - This isn't really following anything with flow or placement and much less rhythm. It's quite stale and I suggest varying flow usage to emphasize vocals such as 01:55:534 - and a slider for 01:55:877 - like you did everywhere else? i on't think so, really
- 01:56:906 (3,5) - This blanket though. xD
- 01:58:105 (2,3,4,5,6) - Spacing looks quite inconsistent, and again the point about no emphasis using flow or placement of 01:58:791 (6) for the vocal.
[ Hard]Same comments as Insane really.
- 00:44:906 (1) - This being 1/1 doesn't make sense because you skip all of the 1/2 that's going on in this section. It's basically skipping beats that would play better if mapped. i don't think so... Big slider for strong spund on big white tic, why not
- 01:12:334 (1,2) - Could space these out slightly more so they don't look like they almost touch. a bit
- 01:32:220 (8,9) - This rhythm doesn't feel as good as 01:31:706 (6,7) - does to play. It's also weird because the vocal rhythm doesn't change yet you change the click emphasis of it. it's kind a vocal flow changes, feels fine for me hmmm
- 01:39:763 (1,3,5) - Visual spacing could be improved. Yes
- 01:42:163 (4,1) - No emphasis on this downbeat. Could space more or change flow to do so. Even changing the shape of 1 would work. // 01:53:134 (4,1) - 01:58:620 (4,5) -
- 01:58:277 (3,4,5) - 3 is slightly too far away. Okay , i made a visual emphasis for it now, lets see
Good luck, lower diffs aren't my forte.~