Blan_C wrote:

Yo, NM from #modreqs Yo O/

• Just play

1. 00:11:992 (1,2) - Blanket is a bit off
2. 00:16:449 (4,5) - ^
3. 00:17:842 (2,3) - ^
4. 00:19:192 (4,5) - ^ fixed all ^
5. 00:23:649 (2,3,1) - You can make triangle: end of slider (2), circle (3) and slider (1) 60degrees tringle? let it be
6. 00:28:963 (1) - Try to make this slider look better, bend it somehow i like how "free" is it xD
7. 00:34:277 (2,3,4) - http://puu.sh/tyaqZ/8f87d5047f.jpg Nope,i want a blanket for 2 circles from this slider
8. 00:38:391 (2,4) - blanket is a bit off should be good now
9. 00:44:135 (5,1) - i dont like this overlap yeah, it supose to stack, fixed
10. 00:45:934 (5,2) - ^ Nah, I like it
11. 00:59:134 (2,3,4) - this and 00:59:820 (5,6,7) - are the same things but spacing is different fixed
12. 01:07:192 (2,3) - Blanket is a bit off fixed
13. 01:10:106 (2,3,4,5,6,7) - Spacing ^
14. 01:41:134 (1,4) - I dont like this overlap fine for me and i have bo idea how to avoid this without changing flow
15. 01:43:191 (4,1) - This one too ^
16. 01:43:705 (6,5) - stack mb? yep
17. 01:46:277 (5,1) - you can make a blanket here i prefer pverlap for saving bigger spacing (strong beat)
18. You shall avoid placing sliders at red ticks, because more important beats starts on white tick just like here 00:50:906 (3,4,5) - or 00:57:077 (6,7,8) - The main idea is highlighting "back" sounds and vocal witch starts on red ticks here
    Imo its better to place them on white ticks

Map is good without many issues, avoid ovrlaps to make map clean and easier to read
GL

BOUYAAA wrote:

Hi M4M Hello
Respond properly please I tried


Easy :

00:24:334 (1,1) - song isn't strong enough tu justify NC spam i suggest you remove this one 00:24:334 (1) - done

00:22:963 (1,1) - That's more of a personal opinion but i think objects being this close make the map look kinda crowded I do not see anything wrong here

00:35:306 (1) - move this down a bit so it looks a bit more balanced http://puu.sh/tyboL/0f4cfa0c38.jpg done , 00:39:077 (2,1,1) - done here too

00:36:677 (1) - I don't really understand your reasoning for ending this slider here, the vocal is pretty weak. You have a strong vocal on this tick 00:37:363 - so i'd suggest making the slider end here The idea was making identical rhythm as 00:33:934 (1) - but changing pattern. The main idea of easy diff is simple rhythm, with small changes for diversity

00:38:049 (1) - same for those that follow. You lose too much emphasis on strong vocals by doing this. also 3/2 gaps are hard to read for beginners It's easy to read because of i use same rythm from 00:33:934 - to 00:42:163 - witch starting with sliders
About emphasis? Yes i sacrifice it for easier rythm. Yes, i think it is easy. This is best variation for this section what i could find
00:45:592 (1,2,1) - If I understood correctly you're trying to follow the slight synth sound. If that's the case i suggest you try this rythm http://puu.sh/tybPo/093db4b8cc.jpg Yep, You understood right, but your suggestion is harder...

01:04:449 (2,3) - these look too close imo no it's fine

kiai is good

Hard? : Not too hard

00:12:506 (2) - if you wanna follow the continuous sound i'd say extend it to here 00:12:849 - . As of right now your slider ends on a sound that has nothing to do with the synth which sounds a bit weird hmm, honestly i don't think so... I wanted to get two this sounds together so...

00:26:734 - you've been following the vocals since the beginning so why not map this? 00:26:777 - because it starts here, i cant map 1/8 sound and don't want to under map it... Yes it's wierd 00:26:392 - let it be circle here hmmm

00:28:106 - same here, seing the density of what's coming up there is no real reason to leave this out 00:27:763 - synth sound end here, for emphasis this one i silenced 00:28:106 - vocal here( it's weak vocal so not a big deal)

00:37:363 (3,1) - idk man flow really isn't good here. Movement is completely broken which is kind of not recomended for easier diffs i already understood that we have different ideas about good flow after modding your map lol. Here i wanted to force the player make an anticlockwise move, 00: 37: 877 - with this break, flow should be fine.

00:42:849 (3) - so uh notice how there is a huge sound ont he sliderend. This should probably be clickable. And if your answer to that is following vocals than you should probably make this sliderend clickable 00:43:534 (1) -. Any of both would work Yes, i follow vocal, now 00:43:877 (2) - clickable

00:53:477 (1,1,1) - ncing is awkward if you wanna pair beats pair the right ones 00:53:134 (1,1) - 00:53:820 (2,1) - 00:54:506 (2,1) - so that rythm is still clear to the player It's kinda strange but i NCing vocal here. i think in this way it's easier to read

01:30:849 (3,4,5) - until now your flow was pretty smooth but here you completely break it by having that backward/forward movement. I don't really see it being justified here Vocal again, repeating structure. I tried to map this whole vocal in a diversity process, and decide to break flow here to 01:30:677 (2,3,4,5) - 2 similar patterns.


Insane :

00:26:220 - 00:27:934 - 00:28:277 - why no notes here there are clearly distiguishable vocals it's weak vocal points, i don't want to spam a 1/4s in the beginning. it supposed to be slow

00:48:163 (3,4) - These sliders feel really off. They start on a very weak sound and end on something huge. This messes up rythm as the player doesn't click on prominent sounds anymore. Having these sliderends clickable would be way better imo
This issue is repeated here : 00:50:906 (3,4) -
00:53:134 - anything before here based mainly on vocal , 00:48:848 (5,1,5,1) - only here i starting highlight really strong sounds for player, prepering for part without vocals and then tring to follow both of them...

01:33:591 (1,1) - 01:31:877 (1) - 01:58:277 (1,1) - Questionable NCs Yep, tipical pp jumps xD

01:46:277 (5,1) - Yopu kinda do this alot but to improve aesthetics a little i suggest you don't make objects touch like that when they appear at the same time on the screen. Either stack them a decent amount or separate them i made better overlap overlap, 01:46:277 (5,6,1,4) - should be looks much better


Alright that's it. Nice song choice.

Gl!

Mod

1. Hard? It's not recommended to use custom diffname, if its not the highest diff
2. Those SR gap are quite huge, (especially the normal & hard), might want to slip in another diff. idk
3. 01:01:877 - might want to consider to lower the hitsound volume (especially in the Insane, its.. really.. loud...)

1. There's alot of distinguishable vocal in the beginning you didnt map (00:14:563 - 00:17:306 - 00:20:049 - etc.), you could put circle or just some slider, it help to map the beat, it also help emphasize the tempo / flow of the vocal (you'll get the idea :/)
2. 00:20:563 (2,3) - purely aesthetic, make this parallel
3. 00:33:592 (10) - this is a 3/4 slider, not a repeat slider
4. 00:35:306 (1) - you got a bit too much 1/2, start the beat at 00:35:477 -
5. 00:42:163 (1) - ^ (if it because the instrument its not emphasizing really well, and its pointless since the next part you map is following the vocal, might as well stick with it)
6. 00:53:476 (5) - this need more emphasizing... (kickslider?)
7. 00:55:191 (1) - make this horizontal instead of vertical it make a better flow, imo. (On side note 00:55:534 - just a suggestion but it'll better if you cut the repeat slider and make a slider here, but.. yknow)
8. 01:16:449 (1,2,1,2,1,2) - I think you got the rhythm wrong, try listening it slowly, try this one
   
9. 01:19:534 (6) - NC? it help with reading since 01:19:192 (5,6) - and 01:19:534 (6,7) - is roughly the same
10. 01:34:105 (1) - why NC?
11. 01:33:591 (1) - this definitely follow the instrument, why the sliderend so stronk

1. 00:21:249 (3) - before this, it was mapped to the vocals but this slider is mapped to nothing
2. 00:33:249 (6,7,8) - not perfect curve
3. 00:33:249 (6) - better to start NC
4. 00:38:049 - i think is better to map this tick because there is a sound every white tick
5. 00:40:792 - same ^
6. 00:42:677 (4,5) - should be the same spacing or more as 00:42:505 (3,4) - because the hype part.
7. 00:43:534 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - every tick has a beat except 00:44:306 - this tick, i think you should map those , for example 00:43:620 - , 00:43:792 - and 00:43:963 - has the same sound
8. 00:44:477 - this too ^
9. 00:54:420 (4,5) - why this has more spacing than the previous circle
10. 00:55:191 (1) - this should start here 00:54:420 (4) - listen closely
11. 00:57:077 (6) - NC
12. 00:59:820 (1) - NC
13. 01:01:534 (2) - try with ctrl + G, i think it should not overlap it's not the same sound
14. 01:01:877 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14) - i don't understand the sliders, if you are mapping part of the bass, 01:03:249 (11) - this should be shorter and do something like you did here 01:03:592 (12,13,14) -
15. 01:08:049 (6) - NC
16. 01:10:792 (1) - NC
17. 01:12:849 (3,4,5,6,7,8,9) - why is the rhythm different than this part 01:08:049 (1,2,3,4,5) - same sounds but just more quiet, try to use the same pattern but less spacing
18. 01:14:563 (10,11) - why overlap, kick and snare are different sounds
19. 01:16:792 (1,2,1,2) - these two are the same but 01:16:449 (1,2) - is not, try overlapping them
20. 01:19:705 (7) - NC
21. 01:22:792 (5,6,7) - why triple
22. 01:27:420 (1) - NC
23. 01:28:791 (1,2,3) - the rhythm here looks really random until here 01:32:563 - for example 01:28:791 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - this part and this part 01:30:163 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - are not even the same rhythm, same 01:31:448 (1,2,1,2,3,4,1) - i don't understand what are you mapping
24. 01:33:248 (2,3,4,5,1) - why stream?
25. 01:33:591 (1) - with this slider you are ignoring 01:33:763 - and 01:33:934 - both are strong beats
26. 01:39:248 (3) - why this is not a slider it should follow the same rhythm as before
27. 01:39:763 (1) - from here the spacing looks random, i think you should emphasize the beats for example 01:40:620 - this is a strong beat, but you made it a slider end i think it should be a slider head or a circle
28. 01:41:134 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - i like this part because you are mapping part of the vocals and the beats, makes sense.
29. 01:44:905 (5,6,1) - this should have more spacing than before, more intensity
30. 01:58:277 (1,2,1,2) - weird , angles too wide and this should be 2 sliders to match the vocals like you did before
31. 01:59:820 (1) - NC to match the beat
32. 02:00:334 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12) - make each triple NC
33. check the NC of the whole song, you should use it do diferentiate patterns and secctions, some combos you are doing it too long, it goes up to 14, this is ok if is a stream but they aren't

Underdogs wrote:

testplay for 3 star

since i like Muzzy, have a mod

[Easy]

Rhythm choice is kind of random here, and some should be pointed out in my mod

Also check AiMod in Easy (unsnapped object)

fixed

Mod

00:20:220 (1,1) - overlap noticed in editor and gameplay changed
00:25:363 (1) - slider end should be clickable mb no
00:26:734 (3) - i dont suggest mapping vocal, because you map 1/1 slider and then suddenly the slider goes long, which I think it is inconsistent nothing wrong for me, if i will not map vocal, what should i map here xD?
00:36:677 (1,2,1,2,1,2,1) - why change the note to 3/2 slider and circle? It sounded the same as 00:33:934 (1,1) - so I think mapping this the same as the notes 00:33:934 (1,1) - would be consistent and help newbies to feel the buildup rhythm for diversity mapping
00:42:163 (1,2,3) - this look bad tbh. reposition 00:42:163 (1) - should be better now
00:53:134 (1) - wat is this lol just a slider
00:59:134 (2,3,4) - I don't like how you map this part. You miss a lot of hitsounding potential by mapping the offset of the map that was an idea, map offset xD
01:00:506 (4) - On this note, 01:01:020- has stronger priority than the blue tick. Don't worry about removing. Just make the slider 1/1 and add a circle it' make a bit less emphasis on offset
01:02:392 (3) - the repeat arrow should be clickable hmm, fine for easy
01:06:849 (1) - finisher hitsound here mmm, it is here already
01:08:049 (3) - I don't hear anything from the blue tick, consider changing there isn't anything xD, just emphasis long offset part , i should think about it
01:09:592 (1,2) - potential blanket so let it be
01:11:478 (4) - the blue tick didnt have a sound. Change this as well
01:13:363 (3,4) - could be blanket Nope
01:17:477 (6) - after this note add another one. The big tick shouldn't be missed this kick is less strong than previous, it makes no sense
01:20:563 (1) - on this section before kiai, I think the rhythm choice is something i should not recommend. Easy players are trying to adapt to the rhythm game and the rhythm choice you use is somehow confusing. I'd map this 1/1 all the way rather than adding circles like 01:21:249 (2) - to avoid confusion it's fine for me hmmm, 1/1 is boring. I don't want it.
01:34:277 (1,2,1,2,1,2) - Why is the intensity of the circle goes low here? It sounded the same as 01:31:534 (1,2,3,4) - lol , vocal flow... 01:31:534 (1,2,3,4) is way faster

lazy to mod all diff aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa

sullywally wrote:

#modreqs

[General]

1. Hard? It's not recommended to use custom diffname, if its not the highest diff why not? it's clearly understandable whith level is it... right?
2. Those SR gap are quite huge, (especially the normal & hard), might want to slip in another diff. idk hmm, +1,6 +1,3, maybe, but i tried to make hard without 1/4 and hard flows. Will see what others are thinking about it. secretly i have half mapped 2,4 star diff
3. 01:01:877 - might want to consider to lower the hitsound volume (especially in the Insane, its.. really.. loud...) to 80 %

Anyway...

[Just Play]

1. There's alot of distinguishable vocal in the beginning you didnt map (00:14:563 - 00:17:306 - 00:20:049 - etc.), you could put circle or just some slider, it help to map the beat, it also help emphasize the tempo / flow of the vocal (you'll get the idea :/)it makes rhythm indistinct, less structured. I skipped weak vocal points for making a rhythm more stable
2. 00:20:563 (2,3) - purely aesthetic, make this parallel Nope, i like it
3. 00:33:592 (10) - this is a 3/4 slider, not a repeat slider yep
4. 00:35:306 (1) - you got a bit too much 1/2, start the beat at 00:35:477 - 00:35:306 - there is beat actually
5. 00:42:163 (1) - ^ (if it because the instrument its not emphasizing really well, and its pointless since the next part you map is following the vocal, might as well stick with it) ^
6. 00:53:476 (5) - this need more emphasizing... (kickslider?) ye why not
7. 00:55:191 (1) - make this horizontal instead of vertical it make a better flow, imo. (On side note 00:55:534 - just a suggestion but it'll better if you cut the repeat slider and make a slider here, but.. yknow) mmm haha, i know that it make a better flow. It is not noticeble right now like it was in 1st update, but i tried to picture "gun fire" xD i guess i keep that one
8. 01:16:449 (1,2,1,2,1,2) - I think you got the rhythm wrong, try listening it slowly, try this one i heared 01:17:049 - beat , i think it is much low hype.
   
9. 01:19:534 (6) - NC? it help with reading since 01:19:192 (5,6) - and 01:19:534 (6,7) - is roughly the same Yep
10. 01:34:105 (1) - why NC? i fogot remove it from last mod xD
11. 01:33:591 (1) - this definitely follow the instrument, why the sliderend so stronk how should i know? ask muzzy lol . there is stronk soud - i make clap. i 'm simple man.

I'm not gonna comment on the aesthetic since your style of mapping is probably different from mine (yes i know there's one up there, but its triggering me so much) mmm

Good luck ranking this Thank You

6th wrote:

Hey yo

[Easy]
00:22:963 (1,2,3) - Increase the spacing a bit to make it look neater. It won't affect the gameplay. a bit
00:45:592 (1,2) - I'm really unsure that beginners are able to suddenly catch a note on red tick after such low note density. I suggest using CTRL+G to them and moving the circle to white tick. Same goes for the rest ofc. hmmm i don't think so.
00:57:077 (3) - Repeating it on a tick that represents nothing is really annoying tbh... you can't do that. i can xD, the problem is why i shouldn't. because of here no beat? so i could silence the slider end and change slide point sound for easy.... Flow? It flows easy as hell.
01:01:706 (1,2,3) - Having 3 circles clickable in a row is a bit too sudden for an Easy diff, isn't it ? it isn't 02:00:334 (1,2,3,4) - 4 here

[Not so Easy]
00:11:991 - 00:14:734 - 00:17:477 - Try having a consistent rhythm since they sound the same. Vocals aren't that important and are undermapped so those 1/1 sliders aren't necessary. i don't get it
00:52:792 (4,1) - Space them more for aesthetics purpose. done
01:01:363 (1,2) - Fully stack them ? That fake stack is misleading and looks a bit random. fine
01:05:476 (2) - You should convert it to 2 circles to emphasize downbeat/vocals. don't think so
01:15:763 (3,4,5,6) - This is a difficulty spike, space them less. Don't forget doubles are much harder to play. right
01:07:363 (2,3,4,5) - Having an irregular spacing is really inconsistent with that previous stack 00:56:734 (3,4) - why not?
01:58:277 (3,4) - Why is spacing decreasing between them ? i tried to avoid overlap, changed

[Just play]
00:28:963 (1) - You never followed vocal that accurately previously, that big slider is meaningless. There wasn't strong vocal enough.
00:54:848 (1) - That slowdown is really unpredictable, since it looks like most 1/2 sliders of the map. Also it breaks the momentum so just map it normally. Stream is slow flow so i think you can prepare for it.
01:05:306 (2,3) - Spacing should increase between them rather than decrease. In fact you should move (2) closer from (1).
01:16:449 (1,2) - Blue ticks shouldn't have clap since it's not as intense as other ticks. yep
01:27:248 (6) - Move it a bit up so it makes a triangle with 01:26:734 (4,5) - done
01:43:877 (1) - It could be more interesting to play if you use CTRL+G to it imo since it would give some emphasize to the vocals by changing the flow. You suggest to changing flow in kiais too many times
01:51:077 (2,3) - That stack feels rather random for a map that is based on movement. mmm , i want change circle flow here, and did't find smthing better than stack
01:58:105 (2,1,2,1,2) - That curve is super uncomfortable to play tbh... mind using CTRL+G to 01:58:448 (2,1) - ? it's just hard. Noone likes old patterns nowdays i'll change it for your variation if more people call it unplayable

That's all from me. Good luck! Thanks

smau5 wrote:

#modreqs

General

1. you should enable widescreen support hmm, why? it's for storyboards.

[Just play!]

1. 00:21:249 (3) - before this, it was mapped to the vocals but this slider is mapped to nothing rhythm heritage
2. 00:33:249 (6,7,8) - not perfect curve it's changed
3. 00:33:249 (6) - better to start NC should be fine
4. 00:38:049 - i think is better to map this tick because there is a sound every white tick yeh, but looks like the most of peoples don't hear it in a gameplay so i decide to avoid it
5. 00:40:792 - same ^ ^
6. 00:42:677 (4,5) - should be the same spacing or more as 00:42:505 (3,4) - because the hype part. I think it's enough spaced
7. 00:43:534 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - every tick has a beat except 00:44:306 - this tick, i think you should map those , for example 00:43:620 - , 00:43:792 - and 00:43:963 - has the same sound hmm i don't hear it honestly
8. 00:44:477 - this too ^
9. 00:54:420 (4,5) - why this has more spacing than the previous circle yep, i changed it
10. 00:55:191 (1) - this should start here 00:54:420 (4) - listen closely aaaa, i know i skiped beat, i tried to picture "gun fire"
11. 00:57:077 (6) - NC 00:57:077 (6,7,8) - dont want to make differences for woob sounds, this part based on it
12. 00:59:820 (1) - NC ^ same reason
13. 01:01:534 (2) - try with ctrl + G, i think it should not overlap it's not the same sound don't get the reason
14. 01:01:877 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14) - i don't understand the sliders, if you are mapping part of the bass, 01:03:249 (11) - this should be shorter and do something like you did here 01:03:592 (12,13,14) - listen carefully offset 01:03:249 (11) - extended sound with catching 01:03:420 - that beat
15. 01:08:049 (6) - NC i told why
16. 01:10:792 (1) - NC
17. 01:12:849 (3,4,5,6,7,8,9) - why is the rhythm different than this part 01:08:049 (1,2,3,4,5) - same sounds but just more quiet, try to use the same pattern but less spacing because the "background" sounds different, and i like to make diversity rythm
18. 01:14:563 (10,11) - why overlap, kick and snare are different sounds so? i want stop flow before next part.
19. 01:16:792 (1,2,1,2) - these two are the same but 01:16:449 (1,2) - is not, try overlapping them It's not really noticable in gameplay
20. 01:19:705 (7) - NC 01:19:534 (1) - should be better
21. 01:22:792 (5,6,7) - why triple 01:22:877 - because i shoud map this sound
22. 01:27:420 (1) - NC actually why not
23. 01:28:791 (1,2,3) - the rhythm here looks really random until here 01:32:563 - for example 01:28:791 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - this part and this part 01:30:163 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - are not even the same rhythm, same 01:31:448 (1,2,1,2,3,4,1) - i don't understand what are you mapping I tried to folllow vocals.
24. 01:33:248 (2,3,4,5,1) - why stream? ^same reason
25. 01:33:591 (1) - with this slider you are ignoring 01:33:763 - and 01:33:934 - both are strong beats yeh, it was made for emphasize difference between vocal flows 01:28:791 (1,2,3,4,5,6,1,2,3,4,5,6,1,2,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,5) - here and 01:34:277 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,5) - here
26. 01:39:248 (3) - why this is not a slider it should follow the same rhythm as before increases hype by 01:39:248 (3,4) -
27. 01:39:763 (1) - from here the spacing looks random, i think you should emphasize the beats for example 01:40:620 - this is a strong beat, but you made it a slider end i think it should be a slider head or a circle backgraud sounds
28. 01:41:134 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - i like this part because you are mapping part of the vocals and the beats, makes sense.
29. 01:44:905 (5,6,1) - this should have more spacing than before, more intensity you are right, increased
30. 01:58:277 (1,2,1,2) - weird , angles too wide and this should be 2 sliders to match the vocals like you did before changed
31. 01:59:820 (1) - NC to match the beat nope
32. 02:00:334 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12) - make each triple NC yep
33. check the NC of the whole song, you should use it do diferentiate patterns and secctions, some combos you are doing it too long, it goes up to 14, this is ok if is a stream but they aren't