Oh hey o/
- Perhaps that offset feels a tad early. Try adding +14 to the offset? (I got 1,506)
[LOLCUBE'S EASY]This diff has a different offset to the rest (sounds early to me, check the timing I posted above ~), so you'll want to change the offset for that to the same as the other difficulties.Also, this has 1.5secs of lead-in, while the other difficulties have no lead-in. It's no big deal, but since they all start at the same spot, setting the lead-in the same for all difficulties makes sense.The map itself is very nice though. Harder than what I would say was an easy, but I'm picky with that, it's nicely made, and fun to play. Always great to see that in an easy difficulty. Nice work
[NORMAL]Personally I'd say this was more like a mild-hard rather than a normal, even if they stars are under 3. I dunno, the streams of those 1/1 notes and the size of some of those spinners don't feel like a normal to me. It's nice, so changing it isn't a priority, even if it's a tough normal.
As for the map, Not much to rag on, really. It stays on 1/2 and 1/1 though, and misses some nice little melodies that could have fitted in well, but it breaks up these parts so it's still fun. Just feels a little odd sometimes.
And just my opinion, but I think that the short-ish spinners (a.k.a every spinner apart from the last one), might work better if they were mapped with something else. they feel jarring and out-of-place to me. No big deal, and they are playable as they are, but that's just me
[P'S HARD]On the whole, I quite liked this difficulty. It mapped to the melodies quite nicely and suits the song too.
Could you turn the Stacking leniency up? With stacking leniency right down it is unrankable. Move it up by 2 or 3 notches?The main thing in this that irked me was some of the copy/paste jumps. symmetrical parts with huuuge jumps for little reason. with the rest of the map being the way it is, very little in the way of jumps, these feel so odd to me. Perhaps you could restructure them?00:13:844 (4,1) -
01:32:903 (4,1) -
01:35:727 (4,1) -
01:40:315 (1,2,3,4) - (these not so much, but are still pretty darn harsh)
00:59:197 (4,1) - Maybe stack these? or move (4) so the spacing between these are even? I dunno, but this looks rather ugly I think, and perhaps even a bit confusing for those who don't know the song. could be a quick double.
01:04:844 (4,1) - ^
[INSANE]That stream, oh god. It's pretty hectic, and perhaps you placed down a few too many triplets every so often, it's still fun, and suits the pace of the song quite well, so I can excuse the jumps and the streams.
02:00:080 (lotsofnotes) - but still, even though it's a guitar solo, is there any way you can have at least a tiny gap in this stream to readjust the hand? a solid 21 second stream with the odd slider is Insane. Your call though, that's just my opinion.
Apart from that, it's okay. the jumps and the pace suit the hectic pace of the song so I see how they fit in.
[INFINITE TAIKO!]As for that long stream, I'll say pretty much what I said for the stream in Insane. Is there any way you could break that stream up? Wether it be a small gap, or some other slow pattern to break it up? a 21 second solid stream is crazyness. That said, I do see what you were doing there, with a familiar pattern. 21 second stream is still a very very long stream.
(And I apologize for any possible grammar or spelling mistakes, or other silly mistakes. Kinda tired when I written this so it might be a bit rough
)
