This beatmap was submitted using in-game submission on Sunday, June 25, 2017 at 1:07:54 AM

Artist: League of Legends
Title: Bit Rush
Source: League of Legends
Tags: GhostFY [ owo] Retro Game 8-bit Riot Games techno arcade Login Screen Loop LoginScreenLoop
BPM: 102
Filesize: 5249kb
Play Time: 02:25
Difficulties Available:

1. Easy (1.38 stars, 130 notes)
2. Hard (3.68 stars, 385 notes)
3. Insane (4.66 stars, 542 notes)
4. Normal (2.18 stars, 217 notes)
5. Rush (5.51 stars, 655 notes)

Download: League of Legends - Bit Rush
Information: Scores/Beatmap Listing
---------------
This project is most definitely not a "Bit Rushed"
Original beatmap: https://osu.ppy.sh/s/347663
Story Board: GhostFY

ᕙ[ owo]つ¤=[]:::::::> ~~~~~~~[]=¤ԅ( ಠ益ಠ )ᕗ

M4M from my queue

[Easy]
00:38:820 (1) - Idk the meaning of this slow down in rhythm
01:47:055 - what's up with the NC sets behind?

[Normal]
SV gap is a little big between easy and normal
00:10:585 (1,1) - you should leave 2 white lines after spinner in normal
01:54:702 (2,3) - this is confusing in normal diff
this diff is a little harder than regular normal....I'm worrying about the diff spready

[Hard]
00:23:967 (2,3) - ctrl+g?
01:33:526 (2) - spacing?
01:48:232 (1,1) - I think you could make a little jump cuz of these strong beats
01:52:938 (1,1) - ^
01:56:467 (1,2,3,1,2,3) - better to make a smaller triangle imo
02:23:526 (1,2,1,2,1,2) - good pattern,but not suitable in hard imo
This is more like an insane diff..

[Insane]
00:22:202 (2) - better to make a jump according to your previous pattern
00:25:144 (2,3,1,2,3,4) - starting sliders at red tick is a little strange imo
01:41:173 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1) - the rhythm is more strong at the end,maybe you should put jumps on them

[Rush]
00:24:849 (2,3) - ctrl+g?
00:32:055 (2,3) - bad flow imo
01:06:467 (5,6) - feel strange that you made a stop here
01:39:261 - add a note?

No_Gu wrote:

M4M from my queue

[Easy]
00:38:820 (1) - Idk the meaning of this slow down in rhythm Following the low synth here, and it looks like this.
01:47:055 - what's up with the NC sets behind? Fixed. My motivation is to go blu > green for slow and red >yello for fast, and for the extra AESTHETICS, transotion between yello > green >yello exclusively.

[Normal]
SV gap is a little big between easy and normal x_x
00:10:585 (1,1) - you should leave 2 white lines after spinner in normal I've been eyeing other normals from lots of ranked mapsets, so i don't think this is an unrankable issue. maybe another normal will fix this, we'll see
01:54:702 (2,3) - this is confusing in normal diff personally i don't think so, so i'll ask around
this diff is a little harder than regular normal....I'm worrying about the diff spready

[Hard]
00:23:967 (2,3) - ctrl+g? maybe
01:33:526 (2) - spacing? did something
01:48:232 (1,1) - I think you could make a little jump cuz of these strong beats nah, i dont think it really fits.
01:52:938 (1,1) - ^
01:56:467 (1,2,3,1,2,3) - better to make a smaller triangle imo considering
02:23:526 (1,2,1,2,1,2) - good pattern,but not suitable in hard imo considering, but with the AR i think it might be fine.
This is more like an insane diff..

[Insane]
00:22:202 (2) - better to make a jump according to your previous pattern each subsequent jump of this fashion in this pattern has shorter ds, so this follows that pattern. (chiptune goes down in tune)
00:25:144 (2,3,1,2,3,4) - starting sliders at red tick is a little strange imo it is, but it is also interesting.
01:41:173 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1) - the rhythm is more strong at the end,maybe you should put jumps on them i dont think jumps fit here

[Rush]
00:24:849 (2,3) - ctrl+g? this fits music better but seems rather uncomfortable to play.
00:32:055 (2,3) - bad flow imo tried something different
01:06:467 (5,6) - feel strange that you made a stop here feels weird definitely... will remap later.
01:39:261 - add a note? forgive me, but i don't hear anything here.

Thanks for mod!

as requested, here's a cleaner bg (the current bg has a lot of compression artifacts).

thanks again and again!

Hello,M4M

[General]

1. select "Display epilepsy warning" in Design
2. In AiMod,about 3 losing imgs in your folder, maybe you should delete the code where has those img in osb.

[Normal]

1. 00:19:261 (4,5)、00:20:879 (2,3) this overlap is hard in the Normal diff
2. I think this Normal is harder than regular normal, because there are too many 1/4

[Hard]

1. 00:10:585 same as Rush
2. 02:14:702 add red NC here?

[Insane]

1. 00:06:320 stack it with 00:05:144 and move 00:06:173 (2)、00:06:908(1) downer
2. 00:25:330 stack it well with 00:23:614 (3)
3. 00:10:585 same as rush diff
4. 00:27:496 stack?
5. 00:32:938 (1) srack with 00:32:349 (3) is better to me..
6. 01:24:849 stack with 01:23:526 (1)

[Rush]

1. 00:10:585 add a note? because there is a drum and the spinner end in the same timing 00:12:644
   add the hitsound (Sanpleset:Soft | Additions:Normal+finish)
   
2. 00:20:732 (2) stack with 00:20:144 (2) it's better with the melody
3. 01:46:908 (8) stack with 01:45:879 (1) ?
4. 02:21:173 - 02:23:232 select NC with all sliders in this part
   (select all sliders with ctrl then click "new comco" 3 times)
   

that's all,easy diff is good, good luck~

Azure wrote:

Hello,M4M

[General]

1. select "Display epilepsy warning" in Design can do
2. In AiMod,about 3 losing imgs in your folder, maybe you should delete the code where has those img in osb.

[Normal]

1. 00:19:261 (4,5)、00:20:879 (2,3) this overlap is hard in the Normal diff a GD is on its way, should be easier than this, so the diff will hopefully be good
2. I think this Normal is harder than regular normal, because there are too many 1/4

[Hard]

1. 00:10:585 same as Rush i dont want to map this cause its not "melody"
2. 02:14:702 add red NC here? Maybe you've disabled the skin or whatever, but I want my combo colors specifically to go from green -> yellow -> green when transitioning between the two color scheme. A red combo here ruins it

[Insane]

1. 00:06:320 stack it with 00:05:144 and move 00:06:173 (2)、00:06:908(1) downer I see what you mean. done.
2. 00:25:330 stack it well with 00:23:614 (3) I'm afraid this one's unclear
3. 00:10:585 same as rush diff
4. 00:27:496 stack? although this one doesnt look too good unstack, when playing, you cant tell. also, i don't want it too close.
5. 00:32:938 (1) srack with 00:32:349 (3) is better to me.. did my own thing, but pretty much the same
6. 01:24:849 stack with 01:23:526 (1) alright

[Rush]

1. 00:10:585 add a note? because there is a drum and the spinner end in the same timing 00:12:644 hmmm, neither the beginning nor the end are concrete sounds to me, so no hitcircle or hitsound imo
   add the hitsound (Sanpleset:Soft | Additions:Normal+finish)
   
2. 00:20:732 (2) stack with 00:20:144 (2) it's better with the melody I used to do that, but too much stacking is actually harder to read (for me)
3. 01:46:908 (8) stack with 01:45:879 (1) ? too much jump for calm for me
4. 02:21:173 - 02:23:232 select NC with all sliders in this part I'd rather not, because the sliders are paired with the melody in my interpretation of it. Thus, NC every other is more appropriate.
   (select all sliders with ctrl then click "new comco" 3 times)
   

that's all,easy diff is good, good luck~

Thanks a lot for the mod!

From my queue!

Some stuff is off on the storyboard in the editor. Double-check that, will ya?

AIMod is complaining about missing files. Double-check that too.



You asked for a flow mod, and you got one. Nice song. I pointed out a couple of things while I was looking at flow too.~

Good luck!

Heyyo, thanks for the mod!

Miryle wrote:

From my queue!

Some stuff is off on the storyboard in the editor. Double-check that, will ya?

AIMod is complaining about missing files. Double-check that too.

SB stuff will be fixed very very soon.

Insane

Insane

1. 00:26:320 (3,2) – Stack opportunity. Alright
   
2. 00:39:114 (2,4) – Ctrl+G these individually. If you do, Ctrl+G 00:39:996 (1) too. This was originally for emphasis, but we'll see how it goes.
   
3. 00:43:526 (4) – Could space more because the sound is pretty strong. Maybe, but I'll see how it goes. I like it the way it is atm.
   
4. 01:13:673 (4) – Possible Ctrl+G. For repetition, no
   
5. 01:37:644 (1) – Idk how I feel about this NC. While it’s technically okay to NC downbeats, you did a NC at 01:37:938 (1) too… but it’s because 01:37:644 (1) is like a strong finish… idk. Up to you. This is for contrasting new sections... and for the color transition.
   
6. 01:40:585 (3,4) – Not aligned properly. fixed symmetry
   
7. 01:48:526 (2,4) – Possibly Ctrl+G indivually. Intentional, so no
   
8. 01:51:761 (1) – As mentioned above with the NC.^ This is for denoting different sounds... and to make the colors work again. oops
   
9. 02:23:526 (1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2) – Super hard to read because these 02:23:526 (1,2,1,2) are stacked. If you maybe moved them slightly it would be easier to read. I got it wrong on both testplays. (with and without relax) Alright, I changed the jumps a bit.

Hard

Hard

1. 00:51:173 (3) – Clap hitsound here? For consistency with a later part that sounds similar, I'd rather not
   
2. 01:15:879 (3) – Would play better if Ctrl+G but that would mess up 01:16:320 (1,2). Up to you what you wanna do. New combo on 01:16:467 (2) btw.
   I like it your way, Ctrl + G so I moved things around to make it work. No new combo tho, because I really want the color coordination of combos to work out, which means 01:17:496 (1,2) has to exist, which is hart to justify if I make a NC where you want.
   
3. 01:57:644 (1,2) – Swap these. I was initially worried about spacing, but with this AR it should be no worries.
   
4. 02:07:055 (1,2,3,4) – Circular flow here please in the clockwise direction. Move this 02:07:644 (1) so that is isn’t as big a jump too. By repetitive motion, I don't think rotational flow is necessary for these hitcircles.
   
5. 02:21:467 (2,4) - – Ctrl+G. Sacrificing some flow, I chose to do this on purpose to match the melody continuously going "up".
   
6. 02:22:349 (1) – ^ Same

You asked for a flow mod, and you got one. Nice song. I pointed out a couple of things while I was looking at flow too.~

Good luck!

@GhostFY
BASIC MOD START!
When in editor, TURN OFF GRID SNAP! It's useless and messes things up!
Change AR to 6.5 or 7. AR 4 is wayyy too low.
Change CS t- 3.5 or keep at 4
00:02:938 (4) - The "tail" of this slider (the end) is on a major beat. Players want to click major beats, so this slider is a bad idea.
00:05:291 (4) - Same here.
00:09:996 (2,3,1) - Why are these notes suddenly on the beat? They should follow the music and be off beat.
00:10:879 (1) - Don't end the slider on a beat. Slider ends aren't "powerful" because the player cannot "click" it.
00:16:173 (2) - The tail is important.
00:17:055 (4) - Same
00:19:996 (1,2) - This is VERY hard to read.
00:22:938 (1,2) - You're missing important beats.
00:41:173 (1) - Don't end with an important beat.
00:44:555 (2,3) - This just doesn't feel right... I'll talk about it later.
00:50:291 (4,1) - You have the player click everything but the IMPORTANT BEAT
01:14:408 (4) - Miss important beat at tail.
01:22:938 (1) - Important beat at tail.
01:26:761 (2,3,4) - Interesting, but now the player clicks on unimportant beats.
01:45:879 (1) - Please don't do this
01:47:349 (1,2,3,1,2) - Hitsounds are off for this whole section.
01:56:467 (1,2,3,4,5) - Clicks emphasize the music, and I think you are emphasizing the wrong beats.
01:59:702 (2) - Tail is imortant
02:00:585 (4) - Same
02:12:644 (1,2) - Important beats are missed.
02:14:996 (1) - I don't think this is representative of the music.
02:24:408 (2,1) - I don't think these are needed at all
02:24:996 (1) - Pls dont end the song with a slider ((

ART & RHYTHM MOD START!
Please use less curve sliders and more bent sliders (imo straightness fits this song better)
Also, please ABUSE BENT SLIDERS AND HEXGRID

To be frank, your difficulty doesn't look complicated, intricate, and beautiful enough. Work on it.
00:01:173 (1) - Long plain sliders look boring and unappealing (to me)
00:02:055 (2,3) - Too much empty space, and you're missing important beat
00:03:820 (1,2) - This doesn't look too good
00:04:408 (3) - Too bent, and doesn't fit nor flow well.
00:06:173 (1,2,3) - Doesn't fit and makes 00:06:908 (3) bend look weird
00:08:232 (3,4) - Don't stack, it makes reading a bit harder
00:09:261 (1,2) - Not a good blanket
00:13:526 (1) - Useless bend
00:13:526 (1,2,3) - Weird flow
00:15:291 (1,2) - 90 degree angle don't look good, especially when the "edge" isn't solid.
00:18:820 (3,4,5,1) - Flows but not very connected
00:19:996 (1) - Out of place curve
00:21:026 (2) - Out of place, but at least it looks better with 00:21:761 (3).
00:23:820 (2,3) - Not as good looking because 00:23:820 (2) doesn't point "towards" 00:24:408 (3).
Remap suggestion:
00:25:879 (3,4) - Why not straight? Looks weird when not aligned.
00:26:761 (5,1) - Not a good blanket
00:30:585 (3,4) - Would look better as bent sliders, not round.
00:43:526 (1) - Useless curve
00:45:585 (4,1) - Bad blanket: see for yourself

00:50:438 (1) - Curve too much!
00:50:879 (2) - Would look better as bent
00:51:467 (3,4) - Doesn't play bad but doesn't look good. What is the relationship between these two? Besides spacing, I see none.
00:52:938 (1) - Too plain. Look at this:
00:55:291 (1,2) - Bad blanket, and you don't want the overlap. Looks bad here.
00:56:761 (3,4,5,1) - Looks unorganized. Could use more connection.
00:59:408 (5,1) - Don't stack, and it looks plain.
01:00:879 (2) - Don't use a slider like this unless you use red anchor for better curves:
And with better flow:
01:04:114 (1,1) - Season it up!
01:04:702 (1,2,3) - Not the smoothest flow
01:07:055 (1,3) - Bad blanket
01:09:408 (1) - I think this is actually illegal because you can't see the "repeat" symbol due to visibility.
01:09:408 (1,2,3) - Now with more compactness:
01:12:644 (1) - Plain, and the flow is a bit meh:
01:16:467 (2,1) - Interesting, but too disjoint and not connected.
01:18:673 (1) - Looks a bit ugly and unfitting.
01:22:938 (1) - Curve looks ugly imo especially right next to 01:24:114 (3).
01:24:114 (3,4,5) - Have these be slightly curved:
I would redo these and abuse hexgrid.
01:28:820 (1) - Not very good because the tail points and curves UP where 01:29:702 (2) is further down.
01:30:585 (4,5,6,1) - Unpretty
01:31:761 (1,2,3) - Compact compact compact:
01:37:055 (5) - Uneven distance before and after; keep constant.
01:49:996 (2) - Curves up but 01:50:585 (3) is down.
01:52:349 (2,3) - Not perfect symmetry.
01:52:938 (3,4,1) - Looks not good cause it could be hexgrid but its not.
01:53:820 (1,2,3,4) - Same
01:54:996 (4,1) - Tail is too close and head is too far.
01:56:467 (1,3) - Not good blanket nor symmetry.
02:00:291 (3,4) - Not good blanket.
02:01:467 (1,2) - Pointless. Not good looking.
02:04:408 (2,3) - Don't overlap. Too difficult to read for this level.
02:06:467 (1,2) - Doesn't quite mesh. Better as this:
02:09:114 (2,3) - I rotated this sideways for you. . It doesn't look pretty horizontal, and it doesn't look pretty to me sideways either.
02:09:996 (3,1,2) - Not hexgrid so it looks unpolished.
02:11:467 (3,4) - Don't stack.
02:11:761 (4,1) - Same
02:12:644 (1,2) - Doesn't look too good because no "intersection". . 02:13:232 (2) "receives from" too low.
02:13:232 (2,3) - Not good blanket.
02:13:232 (2,4) - Don't stack.
02:22:349 (1) - Smooth the edge or make it blatant and obvious

ALSO, if you make it blatant, put the edge on the slider TICK, because if it TICKS when it bends, it feels better.

There are loads of stuff more, but I'll let you sort these issues first before introducing harder ones.
BE PREPARED TO REMAP. A LOT.

P.S. if you have time, watch these videos. They are really good: https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=P ... GGoLIrQtOx

placeholder as a reminder for myself

P.S. @ JeZag, put pictures in boxes or use links like puush / imgur, this way it doesn't clutter the thread with pictures.

11/7 edit - soon i promise zzz sorry for being so late :v

Hiya~

I suck at mapping/modding, but i offered to m4m so heres some things i noticed and unless the following post looks like the ramblings of a madman, i hope it can be useful :3



Rush difficulty

when i played this difficulty for the first time (before opening the editor) it felt really smooth, so i didnt think i'd find anything wrong with it

00:02:644 (2,3) - Seems kind of awkward and weird, since the rest of that section has nothing like that in it.

00:02:938 (4) - and 00:04:114 (3) - both are mapped to the 'static' sounding sound, but nowhere else in the beginning of the song are any notes mapped to that sound. In fact right here 00:06:320 (3) - and here 00:08:673 (3) - that same sound begins to play on a slider end, which sounds odd to me.

I noticed that 00:48:232 (1) - and 00:52:938 (1) - both have relatively small spacing to the next note despite being half beat (i think) gaps, just seems a little off, since all the other half beat gaps in that section of music have a largely spaced jump coming from them. (though i also noticed that both the notes mentioned before, are slider ends, and the others are not, but yeah just something i noticed.)


00:57:202 (4,5,6,1) - Are all rather largely spaced, though my spidey senses sense no change in song intensity.



Insane

When i played this map for the first time (without looking in the editor) it was also really smooth, but i noticed the slider mentioned below as i played

01:05:585 (4) - Kinda weird to play, i think its cos of the really small gap between the slider end and 01:05:879 (5) - but im not 100% sure D:

01:14:996 (1) - same thing is happening here, but since the following note, 01:15:291 (2) - is a slider its less noticeable because of how lenient sliders are with hit timing.

01:18:820 (1) - there's a somewhat noticeable sound on the blue tick which this slider goes over which seems a bit strange as it isn't mapped, there are other sliders soon after it which do the same thing, but for this slider 01:18:820 (1) - , the music is still in the process of slowing down, so skipping that beat feels awkward in my opinion.

02:02:153 (5,6,1) - and 02:11:565 (5,6,1) - These streams seem 100% fine but for some reason they feel weird to me, they probably don't need changing, just subjective observation i made.


Hard

When i first played it i found it kinda awkward to play, but i think that's just my bad low AR reading skills.

00:42:938 (1) - may be better off as a short slider, since there's a sound on the blue tick after, which is pretty loud, but nothing is mapped on it so when you actually play it it feels weird and somewhat difficult to hit the following circle ( 00:43:232 (2) - ) accurately.

01:54:996 (2) - there's a beat on the slider end that sounds wrong to be on a slider end



I feel like all the stuff i mentioned isn't very important, but that's just my opinion, i hope this can be somewhat useful to you
Sorry i don't think i'll be of any use modding easy and normal since i suck with slow/easy maps

I'll complete my side of the m4m soon... orz
AND respond to this mod. This week is brutal for some reason.

[ Lilu ] wrote:

Hiya~

I suck at mapping/modding, but i offered to m4m so heres some things i noticed and unless the following post looks like the ramblings of a madman, i hope it can be useful :3



Rush difficulty

when i played this difficulty for the first time (before opening the editor) it felt really smooth, so i didnt think i'd find anything wrong with it

00:02:644 (2,3) - Seems kind of awkward and weird, since the rest of that section has nothing like that in it. I remapped a bit

00:02:938 (4) - and 00:04:114 (3) - both are mapped to the 'static' sounding sound, but nowhere else in the beginning of the song are any notes mapped to that sound. In fact right here 00:06:320 (3) - and here 00:08:673 (3) - that same sound begins to play on a slider end, which sounds odd to me. I think this is fine, because the static lasts a whole 1/2, so that even though my off beat 1/4 doesnt start at the beginning of static, it still has the body in 1/2 of the static.

I noticed that 00:48:232 (1) - and 00:52:938 (1) - both have relatively small spacing to the next note despite being half beat (i think) gaps, just seems a little off, since all the other half beat gaps in that section of music have a largely spaced jump coming from them. (though i also noticed that both the notes mentioned before, are slider ends, and the others are not, but yeah just something i noticed.)
Did a fix to the spacing.

00:57:202 (4,5,6,1) - Are all rather largely spaced, though my spidey senses sense no change in song intensity.
did a fix



Insane

When i played this map for the first time (without looking in the editor) it was also really smooth, but i noticed the slider mentioned below as i played

01:05:585 (4) - Kinda weird to play, i think its cos of the really small gap between the slider end and 01:05:879 (5) - but im not 100% sure D:
alright decreased DS

01:14:996 (1) - same thing is happening here, but since the following note, 01:15:291 (2) - is a slider its less noticeable because of how lenient sliders are with hit timing.
alright same

i just dont like overlap in my map cause i want it to be clean and concise on purpose, and i dont think overlap fits the bill ><

01:18:820 (1) - there's a somewhat noticeable sound on the blue tick which this slider goes over which seems a bit strange as it isn't mapped, there are other sliders soon after it which do the same thing, but for this slider 01:18:820 (1) - , the music is still in the process of slowing down, so skipping that beat feels awkward in my opinion.

i recognize the synth there, but I think the transition from the previous pattern into this section as well as the "finish" from the previous section merits the use of this "long" slider.

02:02:153 (5,6,1) - and 02:11:565 (5,6,1) - These streams seem 100% fine but for some reason they feel weird to me, they probably don't need changing, just subjective observation i made.

This was the best way I could nudge in the 1/3 stream while having it be more intense than just sliders, which I used in the earlier half ((


Hard

When i first played it i found it kinda awkward to play, but i think that's just my bad low AR reading skills.

00:42:938 (1) - may be better off as a short slider, since there's a sound on the blue tick after, which is pretty loud, but nothing is mapped on it so when you actually play it it feels weird and somewhat difficult to hit the following circle ( 00:43:232 (2) - ) accurately.
There is a sound, but it's not as loud as the others. Thus, these 3 hitcircles, I think, accurately portray the main skeleton of the drums here.

01:54:996 (2) - there's a beat on the slider end that sounds wrong to be on a slider end alriiight done.



I feel like all the stuff i mentioned isn't very important, but that's just my opinion, i hope this can be somewhat useful to you
Sorry i don't think i'll be of any use modding easy and normal since i suck with slow/easy maps

Thanks a lot for your mod!

Oh, didn't know the other guy who mapped this set got banned. GL on getting this ranked.

Fairly unfortunate. Thanks for the stars!

Heya, M4M from my queue. I see that the map is already in a good contition for the rank so most of the things what I say here are mainly my suggestions!





I'd better not go for 204 bpm Extra as I even didn't find anything in Insane. Good luck with the set as it's quite good tbh!
My map: https://osu.ppy.sh/s/533181

Xayler wrote:

Heya, M4M from my queue. I see that the map is already in a good contition for the rank so most of the things what I say here are mainly my suggestions!

Easy
00:10:585 (1,1) - Improve the blanket a bit. hm looks fine to me, judging from its approach circle.
01:07:938 (4) - I'd highly recommend to start this slider at a white tick instead since the white tick has higher emphasis and it's kinda hard for beginners to have 3 sliders like this to click. due to the rhythm being established, i think this will be fine.
01:14:114 (1) - Same as above, but end it at white tick instead. i leik ur suggestion better, changed
01:28:232 (1) - I'd highly recommend to avoid 1/2 sliders if they aren't repeat sliders because beginners just can't play these sadly when notes are so close to each other. alright
01:28:820 (2,3) - And I'd better remove the circle and start the slider from white tick instead. Let the slider be as long as it currently is. due to emphasis, i'd rather not
01:33:526 (2,3) - ^ changed the notes before according to the other comment, but not this particular rhythm

Normal
I'd nerf this difficulty a bit because the gap between Easy and Normal is very high tbh. Just don't use too much 1/4 in this case. the more and more i think about this, the less i am inclined to nerf this difficulty, else the gap between this and hard is just too much.
Aimod says that 01:21:026 (3) - this object is too far from the previous object. should be fine
00:09:702 (3) - Make this as a repeat slider, otherwise it feels really off. i feel like its off with the repeat when comparing it to the music. certainly ending on a white tick might feel good, but it doesnt correlate to the music.
00:10:585 (1) - Shouldn't the spinner end at 00:11:761 - instead according to the ranking criteria? the ranking criteria regarding this particular point is kinda hand-waivy. ive found examples of maps ranked recently (within the year or two) with normals like this. it seems to be a problem when you have high (or low in my case?) bpm
00:23:820 (4) - This note feels really weird to click, I'd change here something to make this as a slidertail instead. i changed something.
02:05:732 (5) - This feels very weird, I'd better place it 02:05:879 - here instead. its a reoccurring emphasis (or lack of it) throughout the mapset.

Hard
01:07:496 (2) - This hitsound at the slidertail is very weird, I'd move it into the next sliderhead instead. alright
01:48:232 (1) - Just like you started with the 01:47:055 (1) - start of this circle, I'd place it further from 01:47:938 (3) - . i'd prefer not to because even though there is an emphasis, its one continuous melody with the rest whereas 01:51:761 (1) literally "doesnt belong"
01:52:938 (1) - ^
01:56:908 - I'd add circle to here and 01:58:085 - here also as it's that intense place and later you do it in the normal part. its not in the normal part (later cause its different). its used in the insane (the 2nd time not the first) cause its no longer mapping drums but the melody. here, i would not use it cause the percussion in the song dont support it
02:05:879 - Same from normal, this seems a bit weird to me. im firm in my stance ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)
02:24:555 (2,1) - Move them closer to eachother as it's 1/4 gap and it feels very weird to have the same gap as it's like 1/2. this was done cause i still want a jump even if smaller between these two, sort of to separate two fairly distinct parts of the song.

Insane
00:10:585 - I'd add a circle here and start the spinner in 1/8 timescale from 00:10:658 - here. cause im mapping melody here, no hitcircle there cause no melody there.
02:24:702 (1) - I'd move this away from 02:24:555 (2) - this circle as this sudden spacing change isn't that healthy. u right changed
02:25:879 (1) - Make this slider a bit more appealing to the eye please. its already A E S T H E T I C >:^(((((((

I'd better not go for 204 bpm Extra as I even didn't find anything in Insane. Good luck with the set as it's quite good tbh!
My map: https://osu.ppy.sh/s/533181

thanks a lot for your mod!

Hello, M4M fro my queue
Good Luck!

Lavender wrote:

Hello, M4M fro my queue

Red means unrankable
Blue means suggestions, recommended to fix
Black means comments, feel free to ignore
[General]

1. Found unused .wav files:
   - soft-hitfinish3.wav whoops removed

[Easy]

1. Nice.

[Normal]

1. 00:24:114 (5,6) - 1.15x spacing? [/color]
2. 01:18:820 (1,2) - idk whether it is unrankable but i suggest you using ds here [/color]
3. 00:10:585 (1,1) -

   Guideline wrote:

   Try to avoid using hitobjects directly after spinners (especially on Easy/Normal difficulties). Spinners are sometimes the hardest element for players, and having a hitcircle or slider half a beat (or even a beat) after a spinner will commonly result in frustration and a broken combo. Hitobjects directly after spinners are fair game for Hard/Insane difficulties, but try to give a nice pause for Easy/Normal difficulties.

   gap between spinner end and incoming notes should be bigger than 1/1 in Normal (common)
   argh i concede, changed.

[Hard]

1. 00:43:085 - missing a beat here not included on purpose, i feel like its too minor
2. 02:23:526 (1,2,1,2,1,2) - seem a bit intense for hard difficulty :x i hope not

Nice diff.
[Insane]

1. 00:25:144 (2,3,1,2,3,4) - those sliders are begin with blue line, that's not comfortable to play. You may want this rhythm:
   hmmm im adamant about changing this rhythm cause its on purpose for the emphasis, even if uncomfortable.
2. 00:43:232 (2) - NC if i NC here, i screw up the combo color scheme ((
3. 02:05:732 (2) - an 1/8 reversed slider would be better here [/color]

[Rush]

1. Don't have much to say, it's fairly good.

Good Luck!

oh nooooo you modded the advanced orz orz orz
thanks for the mod!

sb says mapped by owo ?
if that's not you then remove owo from tags too


[easy]
00:05:291 (5,1,2,3) - this pattern really isnt beginner friendly, stack is clearly visible from f5
00:22:349 (1,2) - this kind of flow is more suitable for hard/insane imo
01:06:173 (2,3,4) - 01:11:761 (3,4,1) - etc. doesn't make sense why you'd introduce 1/2 rhythms this far into the song. note density is not consistent with the beginning (esp these 2 points i linked)
01:28:232 (1,2,3,4,5) - this part sounds exactly the same to me but why did u use different rhythms? consistency is important. same with 01:32:938 (1,2,3,4,5) -
01:58:526 (3) - delete . it's the same rhythm as 01:57:349 -

[normal]
00:05:291 (5) - reading hazard
00:05:291 (5,1,2,3) - flow into (3) is kinda sharp
00:27:644 (2,3,4,5,1) - weird flow, try making it more circular
00:36:467 (1,2,3,4) - try to make a cleaner shape i guess lol
01:32:349 (4) - move this down and maybe curve it more would help the flow
01:58:820 (1) - not following anything . u skipped the emphasized note at 01:59:408 -
02:05:879 - leaving this empty just messes with the polarity tbh

[Hard]
I'd avoid meddling with combos in anything but insanes cuz it just kills your combo consistency and screws up the drain
like sometimes u have really short combos and others u have long ones ya

00:35:291 (1) - might wanna just stack this or avoid the overlap completely, flow into (2) isnt great btw
01:29:702 (1,2,3,1,2,3,4,5) - dont really understand the 1/4 spam here, again it breaks note density
02:17:644 (1,2,3) - bad flow

[Insane]
00:25:144 (2,3,1,2,3,4,5) - these offbeat sliders really don't represent the song well, try
00:27:055 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - same thing about consistency, this part has the exact same rhythm as ^
00:43:526 (4,1) - switch nc imo
00:46:908 (4) - NC, u did it in Rush
01:32:202 (3) - the snare is on the downbeat, either map to it or remove the hitsound
01:41:173 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1) - honestly i barely hear these in the music.. this pattern is pretty hard to read/play too
01:46:467 (1,2,3) - make into 1/1 slider, (2) atm sounds way too forced
01:49:408 (1,1,1) - note density consistency...
02:02:153 (5,6,1) - 02:11:565 (5,6,1) - try not to use circles cuz most people dont know this is 1/6

[Rush]
00:05:879 (1,2,3,4,5) - you were following the constant 1/4 beat and all of a sudden you switch to offbeat sliders, then go back to following the constant 1/4.... kinda inconsistent
00:08:673 (3) - again don't put sliders on the upbeat like this, the emphasized note here should be the downbeat 00:08:820 - not the blue tick
00:17:644 (1) - 1/2 slider for consistency
00:27:055 (1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2,3) - this linear pattern is really awkward cuz u dont have any jumps
00:32:202 (3,4,5,6) - asdf
00:43:085 (2) - maybe reduce this jump cuz the notes that should be emphasized are (3,4,5) but since they're all spaced the same you lose the jump emphasis effect
00:43:820 (1,2) - spacing
01:02:791 (2) - try to have something clickable on the snare
01:05:144 (3) - try to map the snare
01:07:055 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - don't use snares to hitsound emphasis. there is no snare here except for 01:07:644 - and 01:08:820 - which you didn't map. use whistles/finishes/normal samplesets/whatever else that isnt overpowering

rest of the map is fine just the same stuff again so i dont wanna bomb u with the same thing over and over again even tho i already did lol :s

glhf!

hi im modder c:

skip normal and easy

[Hard]
some parts of the map i feel would look more aesthetically pleasing if the object spacings were consistent (that sounds dumb) so here's what i mean xD

00:31:761 (1,2,1,2) - spaced consistently and then suddenly this 00:34:114 (1,2) - gets really tight

01:11:761 (1,3,1) - when suddenly 01:12:938 (1,3) - gets super tight

i hope that makes sense anyway inconsistencies like that occur all throughout the map so im not going to post every single one, just scan for them and consider this

02:04:114 (3,4,1,2,3,4,5) - awkward circle flow

[Insane]
00:15:144 (4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1) - if you intended for the flow gaps to be jumps to the right on every beat in this section, then thats cool but if not, reconsider the flow because 00:15:144 (4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - flow is lacking different directions until here and it gets monotonous

00:25:144 (2) - start 00:25:144 - with a circle and follow 00:25:291 - with a slider, the current rhythm choice ignores the emphasis on 00:25:291 - and starts awkwardly on an off beat
now that i look at those 2 combos, its a little rhythmically challenged, there are a lot of stressed elements that are getting completely ignored by spamming sliders
consider this , this allows you to capture the slide effect on the less emphasized parts of the song and still have room to fit flow change and distance for emphasizing stuff like 00:25:879 - which deserves its own clicking function

00:29:408 (1,2,3,4,5,1,2,3,4,5,6) - over use of right direction jumps, add some flow breaks and make it less clockwise flow (a lot of this diff is over use of 1 direction flow the more i look at it)

really everything about this diff is nice, just that one sections rhythm choice and how lacking in comparison there are of snappy jumps going left (or counterclockwise flow at all for that matter), i love the theme you have going in here though of the shapes made by the whole combo, they're pretty cool but you're sacrificing a lot of play-ability enjoyment in how it's mapped currently, there are definitely better alternatives that can keep your aesthetic (ill let you explore that since i dont want to invade your map tbh lol its nice).

[Rush]
00:32:349 - the reverse in melodic tune occurs here, not 00:32:202 - , the slider should start on the on beat and not the off beat

02:23:673 (2,3,2,3,2,1) - should not be jumps. according to how you hitsounded it and how the music is, the emphasis is exclusively on 02:23:526 (1,2,1,2,1,2) - , mapping 02:23:673 (2,3) - with the same distance as 02:23:526 (1,2) - is a bit too much, and mapping 02:23:820 (3,1) - with less distance even though it is a musically more emphatic note is far too little. i suggest some ctrl gs in this section since the notes are placed well but can flow better and capture the music better if they are oriented differently.

ok well super short mod since a lot is repetetive and tbh i loved the aesthetic in literally all of them even if i didnt really like the flow in a couple of them, gl with set c:

[General:]

• I don't think League of Legends is the artist, that's the source.
  The sword pulsing to the right really doesn't make a whole lot of sense. Why not have it pulse outward?

[Easy:]

• 00:05:291 (5,2) - Don't overlap this. Beginners will mess this up.
  00:38:232 (4,1) - Blanket could be improved.
  01:01:467 (2) - Too complex for beginners. I won't point this out again, but please avoid 1/2 all throughout the map.
  ^01:07:055 (3,4) - This is too much. Even for 102, this isn't "easy". Beginners wont know how to play this.
  
  I'll stop here.

[Normal:]

• 00:04:114 (3,5) - Move these out because this overlap is hard to read.
  00:09:702 (3) - Just a circle here.
  00:31:761 - Don't put SV changes in easier difficulties. That's an advanced technique.
  02:01:614 (2,4) - Players will go for (4) before the see (3). Make the flow more obvious.

[Hard:]

• This one's fun!
  01:15:144 (4,1,2) - I feel this could be confusing. Wait for other opinions on this though, as I'm not sure if this is a big deal or not.
  01:33:967 (4,1) - This jump is unnecessary.
  02:04:114 (3,4) - ^

[Afteword:]

• I like the pretty use of sliders! Good luck.

Gaia wrote:

sb says mapped by owo ?
if that's not you then remove owo from tags too
to say it concisely, owo "is the mapper". I picked up this project cause he ded


[easy]
00:05:291 (5,1,2,3) - this pattern really isnt beginner friendly, stack is clearly visible from f5 fixed
00:22:349 (1,2) - this kind of flow is more suitable for hard/insane imo i'll reconsider
01:06:173 (2,3,4) - 01:11:761 (3,4,1) - etc. doesn't make sense why you'd introduce 1/2 rhythms this far into the song. note density is not consistent with the beginning (esp these 2 points i linked) i know its not entirely consistent with the beginning, but in some ways, i intended it to get a tad bit harder, slowly by first introducing 1/2 repeats at 00:51:761 (5) and then toning it up later. Furthermore, later in the map there are still calm parts where the density is comparable to the calm beginning.
01:28:232 (1,2,3,4,5) - this part sounds exactly the same to me but why did u use different rhythms? consistency is important. same with 01:32:938 (1,2,3,4,5) - you're following the high synth but i was following the low synth.
01:58:526 (3) - delete . it's the same rhythm as 01:57:349 - same rhythm, but different functions. I treat this one as a "pick-up" note to the next section, which I think is justified cause this one note is louder than the other one in addition to sounding a bit more emphasized imo.

[normal]
00:05:291 (5) - reading hazard fixed
00:05:291 (5,1,2,3) - flow into (3) is kinda sharp fixing the other fixed this
00:27:644 (2,3,4,5,1) - weird flow, try making it more circular alright
00:36:467 (1,2,3,4) - try to make a cleaner shape i guess lol fiiiine
01:32:349 (4) - move this down and maybe curve it more would help the flow did something
01:58:820 (1) - not following anything . u skipped the emphasized note at 01:59:408 - this is almost a throwback to 01:02:349 (1), which I think sounds the same (at least the notes im following are)
02:05:879 - leaving this empty just messes with the polarity tbh polarity might be fuk'd, but i dont think reading is an issue because 02:06:467 (1) starts on a major white tick. polarity is a tool to make readability easier but here its a nonfactor.

[Hard]
I'd avoid meddling with combos in anything but insanes cuz it just kills your combo consistency and screws up the drain
like sometimes u have really short combos and others u have long ones ya the motivation was really to keep distinct colors and complements between sections (pretty sure you saw the red/yellow and blue/green stuff, but I made sure that each transition was also necessarily green to yellow cause any other looks ugly imo)

00:35:291 (1) - might wanna just stack this or avoid the overlap completely, flow into (2) isnt great btw fixed the flow a tad bit, but the overlap should be fine.
01:29:702 (1,2,3,1,2,3,4,5) - dont really understand the 1/4 spam here, again it breaks note density hmmm, the note density later is pretty comparable to this. Also, i think the "clicking" load isnt terrible.
02:17:644 (1,2,3) - bad flow

[Insane]
00:25:144 (2,3,1,2,3,4,5) - these offbeat sliders really don't represent the song well, try
even though it sounds and plays weird, I wanted to make this section different due to the unique emphasis in the melody.
00:27:055 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - same thing about consistency, this part has the exact same rhythm as ^
if i ever decide to change one, i'll definitely change the other. but for now, this gon stay.
00:43:526 (4,1) - switch nc imo hm i'll consider but i wanna group this triangle ><
00:46:908 (4) - NC, u did it in Rush o oops changed
01:32:202 (3) - the snare is on the downbeat, either map to it or remove the hitsound i dont wanna remap so i'll probably change hitsound. however, i've gotten so used to it being like this that removing the hitsound makes something feel missing... orz
01:41:173 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1) - honestly i barely hear these in the music.. this pattern is pretty hard to read/play too i dont think its hard to hear. also, this is split into "two" patterns: 01:41:173 (1,2,3,4) and 01:41:761 (1,2,3,4,1), both of which I think should be fairly manageable.
01:46:467 (1,2,3) - make into 1/1 slider, (2) atm sounds way too forced hmm realistically you're listening with only one part of your headset on, or its not picking up the right things. I'm aware that the R/L audio is fairly different, but this rhythm definitely exists in one of the two.
01:49:408 (1,1,1) - note density consistency... screw dat xd i think this represents this portion of the music well and honestly that should come in front of density consistency.
02:02:153 (5,6,1) - 02:11:565 (5,6,1) - try not to use circles cuz most people dont know this is 1/6 i dont think many people can read the rhythm right on the first try, but i went so far as to make this a triple tap so it will be easy to hit (and not lose combo on) even if misread. triples are easy to tap (hopefully). i did reduce the distance tho so it should be easier to hit.

[Rush]
00:05:879 (1,2,3,4,5) - you were following the constant 1/4 beat and all of a sudden you switch to offbeat sliders, then go back to following the constant 1/4.... kinda inconsistent with the introduction of a new melody, i think its apt to throw things around a bit. its like "hey, here i am!!!"
00:08:673 (3) - again don't put sliders on the upbeat like this, the emphasized note here should be the downbeat 00:08:820 - not the blue tick same as before. new harmony kicks in, "here i am!!!"
00:17:644 (1) - 1/2 slider for consistency o oops didnt even realize ive never done a 3/4 slider before. changed.
00:27:055 (1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2,3) - this linear pattern is really awkward cuz u dont have any jumps i know the buildup is awk and the big beats dont seem big, but i think the buildup gets worth.
00:32:202 (3,4,5,6) - asdf hrrrnngg i think emphasizes it better evn tho is offbeat
00:43:085 (2) - maybe reduce this jump cuz the notes that should be emphasized are (3,4,5) but since they're all spaced the same you lose the jump emphasis effect good idea
00:43:820 (1,2) - spacing
01:02:791 (2) - try to have something clickable on the snare aight
01:05:144 (3) - try to map the snare mapping the snare loses the emphasis i wanted to curry with the slider i'll see what i can do
01:07:055 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - don't use snares to hitsound emphasis. there is no snare here except for 01:07:644 - and 01:08:820 - which you didn't map. use whistles/finishes/normal samplesets/whatever else that isnt overpowering aight

rest of the map is fine just the same stuff again so i dont wanna bomb u with the same thing over and over again even tho i already did lol :s

glhf!

thanks a lot for the mod! was really insightful even if you might feel otherwise...