sorry this took so long but thank you for waiting ><;;
General:
Is it possible so that the lyrics don't overlap against each other? Makes it hard to read. For these sections at least
00:27:840 -
00:51:363 -
01:44:749 - maybe
General:
Is it possible so that the lyrics don't overlap against each other? Makes it hard to read. For these sections at least
00:27:840 -
00:51:363 -
01:44:749 - maybe
Insane
00:05:749 (4) - Not too fond of this undermap since there are clickable beats that dont get clicked, looking at previous measures' rhythm would be more consistent. If you wanted to follow vocals then 00:02:476 (3) - would also be a repeat slider and here too 00:09:840 (1) - so I'd advise against the repeats really, same thing happens 00:12:294 (4) -
00:06:567 (1) - slider isn't perfectly centered angled, not sure if this is what you wanted to go for
00:13:113 (1) - Since this is the ending measure of the phrase it'd probably be best to make this stronger? undermapping the strongest measure seems backwards. A rhythm like this sounds pretty good (if you dont want to do all the 1/4 streams):
(ex) http://puu.sh/uOZ2c/4026bbdd68.jpg
00:28:931 - How come not hitting these? It sounds better when theyre hit tbh like how you have it in this measure 00:31:931 (3,4,5,6) - except without the repeats
01:17:749 (4,5) - maybe split these up into more 1/2 sliders. the first 1/2 would make more sense with the music and the other would just be for consistency but you could also do circles I guess. just the first downbeat better as 1/2. I know you try to follow longer vocal but that really strong red tick is hard to miss
01:21:021 (1) - same thing
01:21:840 (1) - These make more sense as 1/1 since there's no 1/2 growl to make the 1/1s stand out, so this is okay even if it misses the red
I like how this one is mapped
00:06:567 (1) - slider isn't perfectly centered angled, not sure if this is what you wanted to go for
00:13:113 (1) - Since this is the ending measure of the phrase it'd probably be best to make this stronger? undermapping the strongest measure seems backwards. A rhythm like this sounds pretty good (if you dont want to do all the 1/4 streams):
(ex) http://puu.sh/uOZ2c/4026bbdd68.jpg
00:28:931 - How come not hitting these? It sounds better when theyre hit tbh like how you have it in this measure 00:31:931 (3,4,5,6) - except without the repeats
01:17:749 (4,5) - maybe split these up into more 1/2 sliders. the first 1/2 would make more sense with the music and the other would just be for consistency but you could also do circles I guess. just the first downbeat better as 1/2. I know you try to follow longer vocal but that really strong red tick is hard to miss
01:21:021 (1) - same thing
01:21:840 (1) - These make more sense as 1/1 since there's no 1/2 growl to make the 1/1s stand out, so this is okay even if it misses the red
I like how this one is mapped
DavidEd
00:05:340 (3,4,5) - Wouldve been cool to see a design something like this http://puu.sh/uP03V/40479ccca1.jpg
00:22:113 (4) - Might be better to use a NC on this since it follows something new in the song. And then you can remove NC from 00:22:931 (3) -
00:25:385 (1) - Maybe also remove NC
00:52:385 (1) - NC
00:53:408 (5) - usually on similar combos I think it's favorable to have all the sliders shapes be similar to one way or another so maybe this could be another angular or linear slider instead of curved, similar to how you treat all your other sliders such as 00:54:635 (3,4,5) - and 00:46:044 (2,3,5) -
01:03:840 (1) - awkward repeat slider, more powerful music needs more clickable objects
01:07:112 (1) - same thing
01:07:794 (3,4) - overlap hinders motion which is strong in this section, I'd advise a different location but probably best to fix the repeat slider first before dictating this
01:35:340 (2) - Kind of an odd shape slider, since you don't really use this odd ones, they stick out like a sore thumb. Not really needing to change but it is noticeable when you come across this, strange.
01:41:203 (7) - Could be stronger if placed elsewhere.
01:43:112 (1,2) - I really don't like how this is the same as 01:41:476 (1,2) -
01:52:521 (5) - maybe curve instead
01:52:931 (1,2) - This is also too similar to what I mentioned before.. it becomes really repetitive :c
your other sliders also resemble the previous chorus section with design but the (1,2) sticks out to me more. It's not bad to have it resemble maybe that closely but it'd be more creative to try different 1/1 slider designs to capture the music
00:22:113 (4) - Might be better to use a NC on this since it follows something new in the song. And then you can remove NC from 00:22:931 (3) -
00:25:385 (1) - Maybe also remove NC
00:52:385 (1) - NC
00:53:408 (5) - usually on similar combos I think it's favorable to have all the sliders shapes be similar to one way or another so maybe this could be another angular or linear slider instead of curved, similar to how you treat all your other sliders such as 00:54:635 (3,4,5) - and 00:46:044 (2,3,5) -
01:03:840 (1) - awkward repeat slider, more powerful music needs more clickable objects
01:07:112 (1) - same thing
01:07:794 (3,4) - overlap hinders motion which is strong in this section, I'd advise a different location but probably best to fix the repeat slider first before dictating this
01:35:340 (2) - Kind of an odd shape slider, since you don't really use this odd ones, they stick out like a sore thumb. Not really needing to change but it is noticeable when you come across this, strange.
01:41:203 (7) - Could be stronger if placed elsewhere.
01:43:112 (1,2) - I really don't like how this is the same as 01:41:476 (1,2) -
01:52:521 (5) - maybe curve instead
01:52:931 (1,2) - This is also too similar to what I mentioned before.. it becomes really repetitive :c
your other sliders also resemble the previous chorus section with design but the (1,2) sticks out to me more. It's not bad to have it resemble maybe that closely but it'd be more creative to try different 1/1 slider designs to capture the music
Extra
00:09:704 (5) - this could be spaced out more
00:13:113 (1,2,3,4) - Try not to stick these... the 1/2 claps are so strong is begs to have higher spacing
00:15:567 (1,2,3) - I like how these help follow the vocals but then 00:17:204 (1,2,3) - doesn't. I think it still matches the guitar but theyre not treated exactly the same since they don't have the same support. Besides, the transition from 00:16:931 (3,1) - isn't very strong and as a personal bias, I don't really like how there's so many objects cluttered around a single space.
00:32:340 (1) - It's not needed to NC these since they dont add any real impact, theyre collectively the same rolls.
00:38:885 (1) - same ^
00:48:090 (4,5,6) - This could be like a triangle 120 degree motion thingy. or maybe use the 3rd slider to be a linear slider in the center of the first two
00:58:522 (2,3,4,5,6) - blanket??? ;_; could space (3,4,5,6,) away from the blanket so the Stacking doesn't mess with the visual.
01:09:294 (3) - Don't really like how this is in the middle of your next design but dont think it can be really helped much if you wanted to keep this as a slider. circles can make it visually more attractive to the next measure who knows
01:11:204 (4) - remove NC
01:11:476 (1) - optional add NC
01:21:021 (1) - remove NC
01:24:294 (3) - optional add NC
01:32:612 (5,1) - ugh this looks so weird together...
01:36:158 (1) - remove NC
01:42:703 (1) - I mean, honestly they don't even look stylish or anything lol it really just serves no purpose
01:44:340 (1) - at least this could be fitting but the relationship the objects have make the NC not needed here.
01:44:749 (1,2) - I think since the music picks up here it'd be best not to undermap so heavily with the 1/1s but it's kept consistent throughout here so I mean, you probably wouldn't change all of them but yeah, more instruments = more objects usually.
01:51:294 (1) - It tones down here so the 1/1s become more fitting for this section.
01:54:567 (1) - Possibly offscreen
01:55:794 (1) - zz
01:58:658 (1) - I guess this is kind of creative but there aren't any lasting vocals or instruments that make this slider accurate to the song I feel. As im sure youre aware it ends on the downbeat (or the white tick before it) which you have that kink in the slider for but it feels really weak...
00:13:113 (1,2,3,4) - Try not to stick these... the 1/2 claps are so strong is begs to have higher spacing
00:15:567 (1,2,3) - I like how these help follow the vocals but then 00:17:204 (1,2,3) - doesn't. I think it still matches the guitar but theyre not treated exactly the same since they don't have the same support. Besides, the transition from 00:16:931 (3,1) - isn't very strong and as a personal bias, I don't really like how there's so many objects cluttered around a single space.
00:32:340 (1) - It's not needed to NC these since they dont add any real impact, theyre collectively the same rolls.
00:38:885 (1) - same ^
00:48:090 (4,5,6) - This could be like a triangle 120 degree motion thingy. or maybe use the 3rd slider to be a linear slider in the center of the first two
00:58:522 (2,3,4,5,6) - blanket??? ;_; could space (3,4,5,6,) away from the blanket so the Stacking doesn't mess with the visual.
01:09:294 (3) - Don't really like how this is in the middle of your next design but dont think it can be really helped much if you wanted to keep this as a slider. circles can make it visually more attractive to the next measure who knows
01:11:204 (4) - remove NC
01:11:476 (1) - optional add NC
01:21:021 (1) - remove NC
01:24:294 (3) - optional add NC
01:32:612 (5,1) - ugh this looks so weird together...
01:36:158 (1) - remove NC
01:42:703 (1) - I mean, honestly they don't even look stylish or anything lol it really just serves no purpose
01:44:340 (1) - at least this could be fitting but the relationship the objects have make the NC not needed here.
01:44:749 (1,2) - I think since the music picks up here it'd be best not to undermap so heavily with the 1/1s but it's kept consistent throughout here so I mean, you probably wouldn't change all of them but yeah, more instruments = more objects usually.
01:51:294 (1) - It tones down here so the 1/1s become more fitting for this section.
01:54:567 (1) - Possibly offscreen
01:55:794 (1) - zz
01:58:658 (1) - I guess this is kind of creative but there aren't any lasting vocals or instruments that make this slider accurate to the song I feel. As im sure youre aware it ends on the downbeat (or the white tick before it) which you have that kink in the slider for but it feels really weak...
Expert
00:13:113 (1,2,3,1,2,3) - ooh i really like these
00:21:022 (7) - maybe NC to show separation of DS
00:25:385 (1,2) - spacing is tooooo close D:
00:28:113 (2,3) - and here too D:
00:29:067 (7,8) - possibly these as well. it's because it's kiai time and it'd be stronger but the relationships feel weaker than the lyrical parts.
00:29:749 (2,3) - same thing... at this point I think it's a stylistic gimmicky thing so I can't point them all out but I think it's not a strong gimmick to apply here
00:32:340 (1) - I won't point out these anymore either too but the NC's aren't needed for any of these triple drum rolls.
00:33:839 (5) - NC for DS change
00:40:385 (5) - This should also have a DS change to keep consistent with your other streams. Not really needed since its the last stream of the measure but you could try it idk. whatever looks better to you, im only looking at consistency for this xP
00:40:931 (13) - possibly NC
00:50:341 (7) - blegh slider. sticks out waay too much for a vocal that doesn't sound much different than the rest
01:02:476 (1,2) - might be stronger to use non repeating kicks for these but it might be too immediate so 1/4 repeatings are okay but feels more powerful without the repeats >>
01:23:339 (5,1,2) - eh linear flow here is so awkward. (5) would have to be repositioned some where else maybe 59;236
01:34:249 (6) - ew this is really unsettling lol. at least not make it a 1:1 overlap but still just making something else anywhere would be better >>;;
01:35:340 (2) - spacing doesn't capture the intensity and the overlaps are also a bit strange here. doesn't get the opportunity to blanket either so I just think an alternative design altogether would be better.
01:36:567 (1,2) - one of these should be equal with the other :<
01:41:476 (1,2) - same...
01:44:340 (7) - NC
01:45:703 (6) - kinda undermapped here, music picks up, don't need 1/1 slider
01:47:340 (6) - same
01:49:930 (5) - NC
00:21:022 (7) - maybe NC to show separation of DS
00:25:385 (1,2) - spacing is tooooo close D:
00:28:113 (2,3) - and here too D:
00:29:067 (7,8) - possibly these as well. it's because it's kiai time and it'd be stronger but the relationships feel weaker than the lyrical parts.
00:29:749 (2,3) - same thing... at this point I think it's a stylistic gimmicky thing so I can't point them all out but I think it's not a strong gimmick to apply here
00:32:340 (1) - I won't point out these anymore either too but the NC's aren't needed for any of these triple drum rolls.
00:33:839 (5) - NC for DS change
00:40:385 (5) - This should also have a DS change to keep consistent with your other streams. Not really needed since its the last stream of the measure but you could try it idk. whatever looks better to you, im only looking at consistency for this xP
00:40:931 (13) - possibly NC
00:50:341 (7) - blegh slider. sticks out waay too much for a vocal that doesn't sound much different than the rest
01:02:476 (1,2) - might be stronger to use non repeating kicks for these but it might be too immediate so 1/4 repeatings are okay but feels more powerful without the repeats >>
01:23:339 (5,1,2) - eh linear flow here is so awkward. (5) would have to be repositioned some where else maybe 59;236
01:34:249 (6) - ew this is really unsettling lol. at least not make it a 1:1 overlap but still just making something else anywhere would be better >>;;
01:35:340 (2) - spacing doesn't capture the intensity and the overlaps are also a bit strange here. doesn't get the opportunity to blanket either so I just think an alternative design altogether would be better.
01:36:567 (1,2) - one of these should be equal with the other :<
01:41:476 (1,2) - same...
01:44:340 (7) - NC
01:45:703 (6) - kinda undermapped here, music picks up, don't need 1/1 slider
01:47:340 (6) - same
01:49:930 (5) - NC
Wretched
00:00:022 (1,2) - so hard to start the map off.....
00:01:385 (6,7,1) - spacing is overdone here... literally only two instruments being played right as the song is starting so its like bad overdone not good overdone x-x
00:04:794 (5,1) - flow is not very well received here. copy pasting the (4) slider to 334;334 could be an option (it has an ugly overlap tho) but just as an idea of how to continue for better flow
00:06:976 (3,5) - so yeah, it'd have this problem of overlap. maybe having (5) slider as a linear slider between the two angled sliders could create better structure.
00:09:567 (4) - should also be two circles to be rhythmically paired with 00:08:749 (4,5) - for the vocals since they get introduced you could do back and forth overlaps if you decide to use circles
00:17:476 (3,4,5,6) - there's really awkward flow here and the spacing changes too much... the trapezoid shape isn't very shapely either
00:25:658 (2,3,4,5) - the spacing couldve been better if the (2) was in the center of the objects but since it's not, it throws off the spacing really.
00:28:522 (4,5) - I get the drum clap but does it have to be this spaced? The song is not super strong for these kiai moments
00:31:522 (2,1) - this feels better spaced for the drum claps, it kinda looks more natural really
00:32:340 (1) - same NC things as before
00:43:385 (3) - NC
00:48:090 (3) - slider-end clap rip
00:49:726 (3) -
00:54:635 (3) -
01:04:249 (4,5) - k i c k s l i d e r s
01:24:294 (3) - NC
01:37:385 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - really interesting stream design here... :thinking: although, I don't think it's intuitive to the song all that much, it has 3 moments of intensity shifting in a short period of time and the song doesn't reflect that. the drums only rolls twice. the middle part of the stream should be something else but i dunno
01:45:703 (6) - noooo repeat slider ;_; the beats should be clickable since more instruments being used
01:47:340 (6) -
02:00:976 (1) - too overspaced even if its the ending.
I like the other diffs more than this one tbh.. This seems really forced for difficulty that a lot of the structure becomes inconsistent. Spacing feels weak at some points and then stronger on others without much consistency to each other. I'm not exactly sure how to judge this one but yeah x(
00:01:385 (6,7,1) - spacing is overdone here... literally only two instruments being played right as the song is starting so its like bad overdone not good overdone x-x
00:04:794 (5,1) - flow is not very well received here. copy pasting the (4) slider to 334;334 could be an option (it has an ugly overlap tho) but just as an idea of how to continue for better flow
00:06:976 (3,5) - so yeah, it'd have this problem of overlap. maybe having (5) slider as a linear slider between the two angled sliders could create better structure.
00:09:567 (4) - should also be two circles to be rhythmically paired with 00:08:749 (4,5) - for the vocals since they get introduced you could do back and forth overlaps if you decide to use circles
00:17:476 (3,4,5,6) - there's really awkward flow here and the spacing changes too much... the trapezoid shape isn't very shapely either
00:25:658 (2,3,4,5) - the spacing couldve been better if the (2) was in the center of the objects but since it's not, it throws off the spacing really.
00:28:522 (4,5) - I get the drum clap but does it have to be this spaced? The song is not super strong for these kiai moments
00:31:522 (2,1) - this feels better spaced for the drum claps, it kinda looks more natural really
00:32:340 (1) - same NC things as before
00:43:385 (3) - NC
00:48:090 (3) - slider-end clap rip
00:49:726 (3) -
00:54:635 (3) -
01:04:249 (4,5) - k i c k s l i d e r s
01:24:294 (3) - NC
01:37:385 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - really interesting stream design here... :thinking: although, I don't think it's intuitive to the song all that much, it has 3 moments of intensity shifting in a short period of time and the song doesn't reflect that. the drums only rolls twice. the middle part of the stream should be something else but i dunno
01:45:703 (6) - noooo repeat slider ;_; the beats should be clickable since more instruments being used
01:47:340 (6) -
02:00:976 (1) - too overspaced even if its the ending.
I like the other diffs more than this one tbh.. This seems really forced for difficulty that a lot of the structure becomes inconsistent. Spacing feels weak at some points and then stronger on others without much consistency to each other. I'm not exactly sure how to judge this one but yeah x(