This beatmap was submitted using in-game submission on Thursday, July 28, 2022 at 18:58:00

Artist: Sayuri
Title: Raise de Aou
Tags: ミカヅキの航海 Mikazuki no Koukai pop japanese ritsu-tanaika FrostxE Sore wa Chiisana Hikari no Youna それは小さな光のような 僕だけがいない街 Boku dake ga Inai Machi
BPM: 146
Filesize: 8836kb
Play Time: 04:34
Difficulties Available:

1. Hard (2.89 stars, 568 notes)
2. Insane (4.42 stars, 1061 notes)
3. RT's Normal (2.02 stars, 353 notes)

Download: Sayuri - Raise de Aou
Information: Scores/Beatmap Listing
---------------
Normal by ritsu-tanaika
BG
Twin

Rest In Peace, Sayuri.

Looking forward with this

Akitoshi wrote:

Looking forward with this

waiting for pkhg's hard

Updated version

http://puu.sh/qBRuM/7cba582e7a.osu

cool map and song

ritsu-tanaika wrote:

Updated version

http://puu.sh/qBRuM/7cba582e7a.osu

o7

Deppyforce wrote:

cool map and song

<3

album name それは小さな光のような can be added into tags
and isn't OD7 too low for a 4.5 star map with only 146BPM

revived and finished!

time to revive and ranked

Zero__wind wrote:

time to revive and ranked

get ur acc back asap frost ToT

Revived

waifu2x the bg then resize to 1080p? the RC now allows up to 1920x1200 background resolution

[Insane]
00:20:696 (3,1,4) - these notes deserve to standout from the rest a bit I believe, they have such a powerful sound attached to it, like giving it bigger spacing or some other differentiation

01:05:696 (2,3,4) - hmm I think making this as one stream will be cooler

01:33:436 (3) - stack?

01:48:847 (10,1) - move NC to here would be better imo

02:04:874 (6,7) - a very sudden shift in spacing after a big jump into a small one, I would suggest spacing out 7 away more.

02:11:860 (4,5,6,1,2,3,1,2,3) - the patterns here are 1-2-3 pattern so wouldn't it be better to also NC 02:11:860 (4) - so now all will look like 3 separate patterns. It is also on a downbeat with a strong sound.

02:46:175 (2,3) - the 3/4 gap and sliderend makes it really awkward in my opinion. I would suggest stuff like this

03:14:943 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11) - why change in spacing? if you would reduce the spacing because of vocal I think doing here would be better at 03:15:148 (3) -

[Hard]
00:20:490 (2,3) - I would suggest ctrl+G this rhythm. a slider ends on such a powerful sound is a bit weird. You also did what I suggest at 00:23:367 (1,3) -

00:51:312 (5) - I suggest changing this slider into 2 circles to highlight the build up before the Kiai more (and make it more intense)

01:27:066 (2) - ctrl+H the slider will make the angle into (3) sharper

01:39:806 (3) - blanket can be improved

wow the hard diff is really well made not much I can help

[Normal]
00:57:477 (3,4) - you have been following the vocal while suddenly shift to instruments?
well you seem to be doing this consistently so you can ignore this

04:27:477 (5) - why is this one a 1/2 slider with reverse? a 1/1 slider would fit better. 04:28:299 (1) - is fine though

04:31:792 - I would recommend you continue mapping until 04:33:230 - then use the spinner to finish the map

Nice song
Good luck!

hi, m4m from your queue

insane:

1. 00:09:189 (3,4) - this kind of transition between objects (stack) barely used anywhere else in the diff, perhaps change it to your usual ds for sake of consistency
2. 00:20:080 (9,1) - swap nc? 9 has far more relation to next combo taher then previous, its the same as 00:20:696 (3) -
3. 00:20:696 (3) - having this note unemphasized is quite underwhelming, my suggestion is to 00:20:696 (3,4) - ctrl+g this and adjust perfect triangle 00:20:696 (3,4,5) - here. 00:23:984 (4) - 00:27:271 - 00:28:299 (1,4,1) - same
4. 00:24:600 (7) - imo this thing is pretty confusing, having reverse arrow on 00:24:908 - this tick kinda makes sense, but would make more sense to have click on 00:24:806 - its sounds more like human error
5. 00:25:833 (2) - on the tail of this thing is completely different sound, my ssuggestion is to change this slider to 2 circles and put nc on second one
6. 00:33:230 (1,2,3,4) - thats quite odd, you follow vocal mostly, even ignoring everything else, but there you completely abandon it (00:39:806 (3,4,5,6) - and there you follow the same lines D:)
7. 00:46:381 - having downbeat unemphasized feels unnatural
8. 00:52:134 (8) - i feel like this thing should be nced cause its completely new sound
9. 00:59:532 (1) - suddenly. perhaps adjust to be blanket with 01:00:148 (2) -
10. 01:05:799 - i can hear note here
11. 01:12:066 (1,5) - 01:15:970 (8,1) - 03:40:627 (17,1) - swap ncs?
12. 01:29:018 - uh, i understand that you wouldn't want to add 1/8 slider here, but not representing this thing feels unnatural
13. 01:31:997 (3,4) - not sure about this one, but i can here vocal note between these
14. 01:35:901 (1) - what does this note follow?
15. 02:03:230 (2,3,4) - i can hear clearly how triple should go to 02:02:819 - , not where at is atm
16. 02:34:977 (1) - thats odd, guitar solo is a very important part of any song and you completely abandon it
17. 02:46:175 (2,3) - you should probably try making (2) without reverse and make (3) reverse instead, starting from where (2) ended (like this)
18. 03:15:970 (11) - you probably not a fan of such things, but i'd nc this
19. 03:41:552 (4,5,6,7,8,9) - such thing appears for the first time and its almost 4 minutes in the song, perhaps make it not too sudden (i mean stream after extended slider might be quite sudden in this case because such pattern wasn't established before)
20. 04:11:655 (2) - you should break jumps chain here, theres no sound supporting this note, musically this section is clearly divided
21. 04:17:511 - theres note
22. 04:22:340 (5,1,2,3,4) - these are all similar musically, it should be represented correctly imo by making whole pattern with them
    
    Generally i think all triples could use far more consistency through them, quite often is seen like drum is followed with them but after that exact same sounds are missed for some reason, sometimes they just appear randomly

hard:

1. 00:52:545 - how about note here? stacked on next slider's head
2. 01:35:285 (4) - circles instead would work good to emphasize drum
3. 01:35:696 (1) - hm, there's a pause, having this place empty would emphasize that
4. 01:41:860 (4,1) - 02:54:600 (1,2) - 03:31:381 (2,3) - 03:58:093 (5,1) - make nice blanket? (perhaps check all of them)
5. 01:45:559 (1,2,3) - if (1) and (3) were further from each other (space just your usual ds) it would look neater
6. 02:48:847 (2,3,4,1) - perhaps adjust spacing between those, they look too close with stacks enabled (general advice)
7. 03:00:354 (3) - 03:52:956 (3) - this thing probably touches hp bar
8. 03:06:415 - perhaps don't skip drums here, could make double under slider end or some sort of that stuff
9. 03:14:326 - you cound start spinner from there and follow 1/2 drums before with some sliders and circles
10. 04:08:573 (1,2) - suddenly you use stack as a transition between objects, thats odd because previously you follow consistent spacing
11. 04:10:217 - there is the start of different section with different drumming pattern and its a downbeat. i think it would be better represented if there was a circle with nc on it

Hope I helped, good luck

Hey, m4m from your queue!

[General]

1. You should use custom combo colours. It's a good way to give your map some more personality.

[RT's Normal]

1. 00:14:737 (3) - Missing clap? You should place one here in order to stay consistent with your hitsound pattern.
2. 00:23:367 (1,3) - Not a fan of this heavy overlap. This is the only time an overlap of this calibre is introduced in the map, so it's a bit inconsistent.
3. 00:38:984 (5,1) - Blanket here could be improved a tad, the end of (1) diverges away from (5). The stack over 00:41:038 (2) - is slightly off as well.
4. 01:02:819 (1,2) - This blanket seems to be a bit off as well.
5. 02:00:764 (4,1) - Really not a fan of this, the end of (4) gets a bit too close to (1) for it to look nice imo.
6. 02:21:723 (1,2) - You should remove the finish over (2), because the only time a cymbal appears in this part of the song is at (1), so it's a bit unfitting.
7. 02:57:066 (2,3) - You could form a blanket here by slightly rotating (3) anti-clockwise, which will look nicer imo.
8. 04:16:381 (3) - This circle overlaps my HP bar, which is poor presentation and it may pose a challenge for new players to read. I would recommend moving it down a bit.

[Hard]

1. 00:26:038 (3,4,1) - The circular flow on this section could be improved a tad. Perhaps you could try something like this instead? The cursor from (4) natrually flows into (1), and a blanket is formed over (3)
2. 01:38:162 (4,1,3) - Two things: firstly, the stack between (3) and (4) is off slightly, and there's a blanketing error over (3) and (1) which is quite noticeable. I would fix both of these things for a nicer aesthetic.
3. 01:51:929 (4,1) - Whilst playing, I felt that this jump was a bit to big in comparison to the rest of the map, especially considering that this section of the song isn't that intense. I would tone it down a bit.
4. 02:24:189 (6,7,1) - Make the spacing within these blankets consistent. Something along the lines of this would work better imo, as it sorts out the spacing issue and fixes the square.
5. 02:28:915 (2,3,4) - This triangle also appears to be off slightly. I'd move (4) a bit to the left.

[Insane]

1. 00:55:422 (4,2) - Stack between these two notes is slightly off. Probably not noticeable in gameplay, but it's easy to do and it'll make the overall presentation nicer.
2. 01:17:614 (1,4,5) - This can be adjusted so that (5) blankets (4) as well, like this.
3. 01:31:792 (2,3,4,5) - If you rotate this a bit clockwise, then the rhombus shape could be improved.
4. 02:24:600 (4,2,3) - Maybe you could stack these? Having a partial overlap is a bit unfitting imo.
5. 02:45:970 (1) - I somewhat expected a finish + clap on this note as well for consistency, but since the music calms down a bit here I can see why you did this.
6. 02:55:422 (1,3,4,5) - With stacking enabled, this blanket appears to be off. You should move the stack down a bit so that the first note is blanketed, as that's the one the player is going to mainly look at.
7. 03:06:107 (4,1,2,3) - Same kind of problem as the above, this blanket appears off.
8. 04:22:340 (5,1) - Perhaps you could blanket this as well? It would look nicer imo.

Nice map, I found minor issues in terms of stacks/blankets/structure but other than that, the map is very good. Good luck~

m4m
cool song

[General]
why is boku dake inai machi in tags?

[Normal]
00:01:997 (3,4) - blanket is off!

00:09:395 (4) - try to move this slider down a bit to form a perfect triangle for aesthetics

00:23:984 (2) - try this rhythm instead http://puu.sh/y7BC3/dd6f157c05.jpg, because 1/1 beats are more dominant than the red tick that the slider is landing on, it would be more fitting rhythm wise if you make the beat clickable instead

00:29:121 (5) - how about extending this to 3/2 slider instead to make it land on the snare

00:39:806 (1,2) - blanket is off!

01:04:463 (3,4) - try to ctrl+g rhythm instead, that way the reverse slider will follow vocals nicely and the circle will be mapped on the stronger drum

01:28:710 - unnecessary but maybe you can add a note here to map the strong snare, you only need 2 beats recovery time in normal difficulty anyway

01:35:285 (4,1) - i think you should focus on the snares and break the usual rhythm pattern a little bit, in order to highlight the slight rhythm pause in the song by mapping it with a slightly different rhythm usage

02:48:025 - it would be more logical to map starting from this measure, as its the start of the new verse

03:12:682 (7) - maybe move this note more to the left so it lines up with the curve from before; thus it makes a better flow? somewhere around x44 y364 will do the trick

03:38:573 (6) - change to 2 circles on head and tail instead? so the downbeat is clickable and the rhythm between 03:37:340 - 03:38:573 - will be the same as the last measure for consistency because it is the same thing in the song

03:52:134 (1,2,3) - the rhythm here should be somewhat less dense than 03:53:778 (4,5,6) - , because of its weaker drums. maybe just change the 1/2 sliders on 03:52:134 (1,2) - to just clickable circles on 1/1 beats instead

04:01:997 (1,2) - blanket?

04:14:326 (6) - change this to 1/2 slider + circle? because it clearly has different stronger drums than 04:15:148 (1) - so it should be emphasized more rhythm wise!

04:31:175 (6) - same as my suggestion on 03:38:573 (6) -

[Hard]
00:44:223 (4) - there is no sound on this 1/4 tick, if you want to map vocals i suggest changing 00:43:915 (3) - to an extended 3/4 slider instead so the slider tail lands on vocal, as the sound on the tick isnt strong enough to be clickable in my opinion

00:53:573 (2,3) - 01:06:107 (1,2) - fix blankets maybe

02:11:655 (8,9,1) - doesnt really matter, but move this down a bit? the stacking triple is almost touching 02:10:627 (5) - already so it kind of failed to give and impression of clicking on a perfect square shaped pattern while playing

02:29:943 (1) - try to make a jump on this slider by moving it somewhere else? it will be a good idea to emphasizing the start of this measure with that strong cymbals crash

02:52:854 (4) - very minor but maybe move it to x365 y89 instead to form a straight line to improve the aesthetics for a bit?

03:41:244 (3,4) - maybe second slider should be a different shape (like an red anchored one maybe) to emphasize the cymbal

04:01:895 (7) - same as 02:52:854 (4) -

04:09:395 (3,4) - fix blanket?

[Insane]
00:43:915 (3) - not sure if this counts as invisible reverse arrow with default skin because its stacked right under the head in such a short time after, but if this counts then its unrankable

00:52:134 (8,9,10,11,12) - i dont think 7 ->8 should be a jump, try to make small spacing to make it feels different than the drums buildup that you made jumps on right before this part, maybe stack all 5 notes over 00:50:901 (1) - again

01:27:374 - theres another drum sound here though, make another reverse arrow?

01:35:901 (1,2,1,2) - personally i dont think it fits to make these 2 combo have this similar linear flow since the vocals are different, so maybe they should feel different while playing too? maybe stacking the first combo will feel nicer

02:05:080 (7) - stacking is off by a massive 1 pixel!!

02:50:490 (5,8) - same as my concern before about the invisble-looking reverse slider. this one might actually get covered in hit300 file after the first slider!!

03:32:408 (1) - same as 02:50:490 (5,8) -

03:59:943 (3) - another stacking that is off by a massive 1 pixel!

04:30:559 (4) - how about rotating this slider more clockwise so that it will be more further away from 04:29:532 (5,4) ;so it looks a little cleaner?

good luck!

m4m

you finally decided to rank this

General
disable widescreen support for all diffs

RT's Normal
00:03:230 (4,1,2,3) - consider having more whistles on these beats for the bassdrum in the background
00:10:833 (2) - whistle at end?
00:14:737 (3,4) - nazi spacing
00:20:080 (1) - remove whistle from its end, there's no drum in the music
00:25:011 (3) - ^
00:31:586 (3) - missing whistle on head
00:33:230 (1) - whistle at end and use clap on head of 00:33:847 (2) - instead to fit the music better
00:34:874 (4) - ^ whistle at end
00:38:984 (5,2) - stack
00:45:148 (4) - why no hitsound on such strong beats? at least have a clap on head imo
00:46:381 (1) - better change this into two 1/1 sliders like 00:48:025 (3,4) - , which will follow the music better and more consistently
00:51:312 (3) - change into two 1/2 sliders to also catch the heavy drumbeat at 00:51:929 - ?
01:02:819 (1,2) - this blanket can be better
01:47:203 (4) - recommended to shorten this to 1/1 slider to split all 01:46:381 (2,3,4,5) - these up to make it easier, and also to catch vocal. remember to change the clap at end to whistle if you do so
02:08:367 (6) - add clap for snaredrum roll
02:21:518 (6) - ^
02:48:025 - restarting to map from this point should be more fitting to the music imo, can copy the rhythm of 02:49:669 (1,2) - to 02:48:025 -
02:58:710 (4,1,2) - nazi spacing
03:48:641 (6) - add whistle for bassdrum

Hard
00:06:312 (3) - why drum whistle on head instead of soft whistle?
00:27:477 (3) - remove whistle? there's no drum in the music
01:03:641 (3,4) - maybe change into two 1/2 sliders as well so the heavy beat at 01:04:052 - can be clickable?
01:19:052 (6,7) - probably need clap
02:11:244 (7) - I'm not sure what's this slider following to, maybe you can rearrange the rhythm here to specifically follow drums or vocals
03:52:956 (3) - this is slider is too high above and doesn't look nice with the hp bar, maybe you can move it down by moving 03:51:107 (3,4,5,6,7,8,1,2) - lower

Insane
00:35:696 (3,4,5,6) - don't really like the flow here, maybe try to rework this pattern to have a jump or something smoother
00:38:573 (6,7) - I think CTRL+G here would make 00:38:573 (6,7,8) - really interesting
03:09:395 (1) - I have some problem with the pattern from here. 03:09:395 (1,2,3,1,2,3) - are totally fine as they are, but 03:10:422 (3) - shouldn't be a small spacing like this, it's a strong snaredrum like 03:09:395 (1,1) - and you should have a jump here and exchange NC with 03:11:243 (1) - . same for 03:12:270 (3) - . this is what I think the whole pattern is supposed to be grouped by
03:31:792 (4,5,6,1) - this spacing and flow is not so fitting imo, it'd be great if you could have a jump at 03:31:997 (5) - with the clap just like 03:30:354 (3,2) -
04:33:230 (3) - kinda similar to what I mentioned for the pattern 03:09:395 (1) - . I think you should have a jump at 04:33:230 (3) - and have the NC here to fit the music better
not much, I've played this map for long

call me back when it's ready :3

Thanks all! I will get to your maps before checking mine.

hi, from your queue!

[RT's Normal]

1. Sorry, but seems like some objects are too far or too near from the previous object. Could you remove all NC's on map and check AiMod in order to check this out?
2. 00:05:285 (3) - Maybe you could use the same shape of 00:01:997 (3) - and blanket it
3. 00:41:449 (3) - You could use this and change that shape. I'm not going to mention every possible blanket that could be blanket, so check everything out and fix them if you want to
4. 00:46:381 (1) - Tail 1px down, then fix 00:48:025 (3) - tail
5. 01:02:819 (1) - Maybe?
6. 01:15:970 (1) - Shouldn't be hitsounded as 01:12:682 (1) - ?
7. 02:00:764 (4,1) - There's no "sinergy" between these shapes, maybe you could work on that
8. 02:34:874 (1) - NC?

[Hard]

1. 00:40:422 (2) - Seems like stack is a little bit off
2. 04:01:997 (1) - This shape seems a little awkward to me while playing, even more passing by hit error meter. Maybe you could move 04:00:970 (3,4,5) - a little bit up and work on this slider to flow a little more natural

[Insane]

1. I'm not sure about saying that, but shouldn't 00:29:943 (1) - be NC'd (or not) like 00:19:258 (2)?
2. Didn't 01:39:600 (1,2,3) - gained too much spacing comparing with 01:38:984 (1,2,3)? Doesn't feel natural do such movement right after a way smaller one, while 02:29:943 (1,2,3,1,2,3) - plays a lot better imo
3. 02:00:353 (4,1,2,3) - Shouldn't be consistent as 00:51:312 (4,5,6) - on NC's?
4. 02:18:847 (1) - Why is that NC'd? Missclick maybe? I don't think this is necessary here
5. 02:46:175 (2) - This big white tick seems way too important to be a sliderend. Maybe you could use a 1/4 slider and a circle to give something clickable on this note
6. 03:15:970 (11) - NC? Maybe it could be a little more spaced too
7. 03:37:340 (6) - I think that it should be NC'd like 03:35:696 (1)

good luck!

This modding thread has been migrated to the new "modding discussions" system. Please make sure to re-post any existing (and unresolved) efforts to the new system as required.