Skylish wrote:

[Fan's Oni]

> 0,100 can show Emilia's whole head, consider shifting the BG down 20 digits more. change

! 00:00:494 - Again, HS:S is strongly discouraged in any circumstances unless a soft sample really fits the music. While, the introduction consists of common piano melodies (which you are following to) and vocals, HS:N with a lower vol. is good enough. ok...also xfrac's advice, change to such as otther diff's pattern

> 00:36:207 - change it to k for a better colour-change trend. feel d better

> 01:15:374 - same cymbal crash with 01:14:541 - , but missing a Finisher hm...i thought here lots of times, K is a bad feeling 01:14:874 - change to k k d D

> 01:20:041 - consider adding some diminuendo SVs for the weakening dynamic of guitar chords, like the settings in Oni. 100% is too loud. oops, i missed it 01:19:874 - delete D, and add Oni's audio

Skylish wrote:

Re-checklish

[General]

! All diff.es except stu's Oni: 01:07:541 - / 01:07:874 - K K did not show a great instrast within those bass drum kick and drum bass kick with cymbal crash. D K would work better. changed all D K

! Oni's': Consider unifying the SV changes in the introduction part. Will ask stu and fan. edit: unify to 0.8x

[Kantan]

> 00:00:494 - redundant green timing point, you can remove it directly since SV=1.00 here. removed it.

[Futsuu]

> 00:00:494 - not recommended to use any SV changes until Muzukashii okay, remove greenline here.

> 00:31:207 (39,40) - ctrl+G (k d) seems matching the pitch flow better. yeah, seems nice.

> 00:44:207 - k for consistent drum kicks, same as 00:38:874 - / 00:41:874 - changed.

> 01:06:707 (123,124) - how about d k here to show a variation? 2 repeated K k d are enough I guess, at 01:03:541 - / 01:04:874 - . K d k at 01:06:207 - can display a nice colour flow with the suggestion at 01:07:541 - okay, nice variation.

> 01:19:374 - where's the d ;w;? Repeated doublets usage is expected. yes, added it.

[Muzukashii]

> 00:44:374 - remove it to clear the mapping channel and create a distinguishment between vocal gaps seems nice, i changed it.

> 01:14:541 - you missed a Finisher? ohh yes, fixed it.

[Oni]

> 01:07:374 (341,342) - k D? refers to the general part Fixed.

> 01:15:041 - Unify the usage of Finisher with Muzukashii and Fixed.



[]

I am in probation tier now (I cannot qualify beatmap). I will re-bubble again, when things are settled, and let frac qualify it later. Call me back when everything is confirmed.

Thank you Skylish

Skylish wrote:

Re-checklish

[stu's Oni]

> 00:54:541 - change it to k for a better flow, common drum kick is expected
Taht's my mistake :O I changed 00:54:707 to k like how I made at 00:49:041

> 00:59:541 - remove this triplet for spacing, the whole section after 00:58:207 - lacks a glimpse of space and rest.
I keep the note at 00:59:707

> 01:07:541 - not sure why those kats are spammed. Perhaps you want to map the high-pitch piano chords at the backgroud layer. If that's the case, somewhat the kat usages should show nice contrasts and consistencies:

< 01:07:707 - a small kat to show the cymbal crash at 01:07:874 - Now It's "K k K k"
< 01:08:207 - kdkdk for consistent places of kat spams Fixed


> 01:14:541 - missing Finisher Fixed

[]

I am in probation tier now (I cannot qualify beatmap). I will re-bubble again, when things are settled, and let frac qualify it later. Call me back when everything is confirmed.

Skylish wrote:

A few things before I bubble:

[Stu's Oni]

> 01:16:874 - I forgot to mention this timing How'bout a Finisher as well? It shares the same cymbal crash with 01:14:541 - / 01:15:374 - . A similar Finisher note is expected.
In that case , I think 01:17:374 and 01:17:541 should be K together , but that also weird too
the K 01:14:541 here due to the drum sound at 01:14:207 (382,383,384) , so I keep 01:16:874 here k

These should be all, call me back later when things are settled.

Skylish wrote:

[Fan's Oni]

> 00:00:494 - why is here still HS:S? Are you compromised with HS:N, otherwise please explain the rationale behind of strong determination in using soft hitsamples. ehh...my shit english, i was thought that is mean about the piano pattern, and idk when why how these 2 audio become HS:S :thinking:

Skylish wrote:

A few things before I bubble:

[Muzukashii]

> 00:00:494 - Fix SV=0.8x if you are for consistency. i thought 0.9x would be nice in muzu. Anyway, i changed for consistency.

[Oni]

> 01:07:374 - not sure if you want to keep it as d or k, both work fine from my point of view. change to k, feels better i think.

[]

These should be all, call me back later when things are settled.

xfraczynho wrote:

Talking with Skylish about spread between F-M I'd suggest something

K-F-M is pretty good imo both of them increases on a 2x~ objects amount, but I think Muzu could have a little less notes to have a good K-F-M-O:

[Muzukashii]
Suggest to:
00:51:041 (159) - delete according vocals
00:56:374 (188) - ^
01:09:707 (252) - kat and 01:09:874 (253) - delete, would follow piano and doesn't break the spread with fut
01:11:041 (258,259) - 01:12:374 (264,265) - similar
Fixed them all
that's what i suggest, wouldn't break any gap and makes something different here :')

xfraczynho wrote:

Yes, the title is actually Incomplete START according to http://krtgirls.wixsite.com/initiating-station/staff. Every metadata comes from here.
Let me know when you update it

SPOILER

Kurai wrote:

xfraczynho wrote:

Yes, the title is actually Incomplete START according to http://krtgirls.wixsite.com/initiating-station/staff. Every metadata comes from here.
Let me know when you update it

Hey, I don't see anywhere written on that page that the Romanisation of the title should be "Incomplete START". It's only written "未完成START" and no Romanisation is provided. I couldn't find any official Romanisation anywhere else. Shouldn't the title be Romanise to "Mikansei START" instead?

SPOILER

Tbh i based on
that's actually more accurate as incomplete than unfinished, as you can see on

(Incomplete it's actually the nearest word).
That's basically why I allowed that more than Unfinished START, also this doesn't seem like it's the same song according to lyrics
I think katacheh could be more accurate, let's wait for his reply, that's all what i can say atm

Kurai wrote:

xfraczynho wrote:

Yes, the title is actually Incomplete START according to http://krtgirls.wixsite.com/initiating-station/staff. Every metadata comes from here.
Let me know when you update it

Hey, I don't see anywhere written on that page that the Romanisation of the title should be "Incomplete START". It's only written "未完成START" and no Romanisation is provided. I couldn't find any official Romanisation anywhere else. Shouldn't the title be Romanise to "Mikansei START" instead?

SPOILER