actually, you couldn't (unless it's related somehow). backgrounds should represent the song as nicely as possible, why would i have a song like this fitted to a bg like this? certain parameters must be followed, unless you're in a circumstance where there is nothing you can directly trace back to the song that can be reliably used or at least incorporated.
-[ Snowflake ]- wrote:Wtf? It's a background, not a hitcircle. You could literally use an anime girl for the bg and it'd still be rankable. Background images have nothing to do with song emphasis.
your background is 1193x670, contrary to the highest quality allowed (1366x768). stretched out onto a 1920x1080 screen, and coupled with the watermark, it looks bad. the "fine detail" of this piece is lost in the resolution.
-[ Snowflake ]- wrote:That aside, how dare you say the quality of the background is bad? This is some high quality shit. No pixels, round edges, strong detail in the setting (i.e. mountains, trees, clouds, etc.), a very good depiction of The Underground, good shading, a lot of different colours used to keep fine detail, and a lot of god damn hard work and dedication. There is absolutely nothing wrong with the quality of the background. It is beautiful, not fuzzy, not blurry, and not pixelated. I am insulted!
i don't know why you would be insulted regardless.