ok here we go
So, first of all, you said that massively inconsistent difficulty throughout the song is being looked into, and not to comment on it. And I'm not saying you shouldn't do this, but I want to make sure that you know the best option here (or at least, what I think is best). So, first of all, you have the option to change the slower easier parts to harder, or the harder parts to easier. The first option, I believe, would get the result you want, and be the easiest option, however it will lower the quality of your overall mapping. If you make the hard parts easier, the quality would go up because the difficulty is the same, but. The difficulty will suffer, and it will take quite a long time. Anyways, on to the mod.
00:28:373 (4,5) - The distance between these two represents a change in where the 5 exists right? It's not merely 1 blue tick apart, it's two. But when you get the same rhythm here: 00:30:088 (4,5,6) - You change to antijumps which doesn't represent the rhythm as it did before. Now, neither of these are bad, because they are consistent with themselves, but I would recommend sticking with one or the other, unless the rhythm sounds different enough to justify doing this.
00:41:659 (1,2,3) - This is awesome, I love technical maps, and it really calls for something different than just a triple conformed to DS. But the problem comes when you start to conform them to DS for a second, and then go back to this pattern. Again, stick with your patterns and don't leave them if the rhythm is the same.
00:50:230 (1,2,3) - DS between the 2 and the 3 is 2.34x, and has one follow point. But then here 00:52:052 (2,3) - they are 2.64 apart and have two follow points. This is quite ugly then, so remain consistent.
00:58:373 (1) - Would recommend curving this more such that the blanket looks better.
01:00:088 (1,1) - Try to avoid small overlaps like this, small overlaps are terrible. But, overlaps can be good. If you want to intentionally overlap something, try bisecting another slider, it looks quite good.
01:05:230 (1,2) - Once again with this blankets. They aren't so great, try to curve the 1 more and blanket the 2 better then.
01:06:945 (3,4,5,6) - Make the distance between this close to 1.21, it will look better and more consistent.
01:34:588 () - This should exist, I mean, just listen, it exists, and you map the exact same note multiple times over.
01:35:230 (1,2) - This works, but you can't just place it anywhere. If you want these to exist, structure needs to exist. 01:34:373 (1,2) - These two would have to have the same jump.
01:44:230 (3) - Why not blanket this?
01:41:445 (3,4,5,1) - I hope you realize these are like, 1/4 jumps at 280 bpm. I mean, if you remain consistent it's ok, but you aren't consistent with the WHOLE map. If it calls for it, it does. If it doesn't, it doesn't. I'm not sure exactly what I would say for this, but I would probably nerf the DS to... 1.41, versus the 1.88 you have now.
01:44:445 (4,5) - If you did decide to blanket the previous blanket suggestion, this jump needs nerfing.
01:55:588 (2) - Make this pattern a equilateral triangle, it fits better considering the time between notes.
02:05:230 (1) - Why is this NC? That doesn't make any sense to do.
02:08:659 (1) - At least you were consistent with it, but it still doesn't make sense considering in the previous section like this you didn't make a NC in these spots.
02:14:659 (5) - try this
http://puu.sh/p8d8P/8884eb13d4.jpg02:20:018 (3) - Unsnapped on start and finish.
02:20:659 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - I don't think this fits the noises here. Either go with your original triplet or repeating.
02:39:516 (3,4,5) - Why is the distance between the 3 and 4 four follow points, but between the 4 and 5 they are three? Be more consistent.
02:42:945 (3,4,5) - Since you copy and pasted it, ^
02:49:159 (1,2,3) - Distance isn't proper. two follow points.
02:58:480 (9) - Unsnapped green line around here.
02:59:230 () - Don't see why the break should start here really.
03:28:373 (3) -
http://puu.sh/p8do1/e8ad7888cf.jpg (sorry puush sucks at selecting areas)
03:33:088 (2,3,4) - Distance between all these should be the same.
03:34:373 (4,1,2) - Why are these so close? Surely the 1 calls for a little bit of a jump.
03:34:802 (2,3) - Distance has 3 follow points, but 03:36:088 (1,2,3,4,5) - these only have two.
03:51:516 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1) - You copy pasted this stream from before so if you made changes to the previous one, make them to this one too.
Skipping fourth chorus...04:24:088 (1,2) - pls. Just make it a proper blanket.
04:37:694 (8,1) - This calls for a stream jump.
04:39:409 (8,1) - ^
04:41:123 (8,1) - ^
04:57:945 (7) - Slightly offscreen, unrankable.
You did pretty good! You are progressing like a million times faster than I did!
<3