Ok. Point taken, removed that stuff.Endaris wrote:
Assuming that I can give you a selected 3* map and you might not even be capable of passing it it's quite stupid of you to call yourself the best <50k player.
Apologies, thread.
Same here.xxjesus1412fanx wrote:
hate to judge but i really dont think you're better than most 50k players, or in fact any of them. you can't understand what it's like play accurately or the humongous challenges of moving a cursor from note to note, and when your top ranks are just easily touchscreen abused maps it becomes a moot point whether or not it's an unviable playstyle for most maps when even the small fraction of maps that are easily abused are enough to easily inflate the rank of someone who can't even grasp what a 300 hit window is because of how weighting works.
Sorry for being so derisive, but statements like the one in your signature just set me off.
And here. Really, apologies.Mahogany wrote:
I see no way to balance touchscreen play with Mouse/Tablet play. The only reason this isn't a massive problem is because there are very few touchscreen players.
Touchscreen play is not comparable in any way, and no touchscreen aim is anywhere near remotely impressive when compared to Mouse/Tablet aim.
And please stop flattering yourself about your PP scores compared to your rank, it's kinda unbearable
Touchscreen is a fundamentally unbalanced playstyle that rewards massively disproportionate PP compared to the effort and skill required to achieve the scores compared to just about any Mouse/Tablet play.
)))))