pishifat wrote:

xzxzxzxz

when you get a new mod, be sure to reply to the post saying what you did and didn't change (and any reasoning for why you decide not to change soemthing). this way, modders can get feedback on what they say and improve their mapping
an example of a mod reply is something like this, which you've probably seen on lots of other map threads

letting mods pile up like this also makes it look like you aren't even applying anything, which is kinda lol

Ok I'm starting to reply now


hard
so with rhythms, you'll want the map to allow clicking on individual sounds. clicking when there's no actual beat is a thing to avoid when constructing rhythm
00:14:000 (4) - some examples of objects being clicked on nothing. there's beats/sounds on 00:13:800 - and 00:14:200 - , but not 00:14:000 - . because of this, arranging rhythm where you click on those places works best, like zzzz. including sliderends where there's very weak/nonexistent sounds is often acceptable since you're not actually clicking on them
It's right. I tried to follow the lyrics of songs and forgotten about melody. I fixed this thing

00:16:600 (2) - this is the same sorta thing. using that logic, you should be able to come up with a more acceptable rhythm
Yeah, In fact the whole line of the song is sung on a single note guitar(Probably ). But the vocals are still strong, so I think that it will help players. Anyway. I fixed this place (Maybe not quite right, but fixed. I think it is better)

00:32:200 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9) - you should know by now what the issue with this could be. clicking on nothing constantly isn't really valid
I fixed it in accordance with previous ideas

00:23:200 (2) - similar to the previous things -- this time think more about which sounds are more important than others. 2 does start on a sound, but the sound on its reverse is much more powerful, meaning something like xzxz would be more fitting
I agree. Fixed

00:34:800 (3,4) - mapping with reverses when there's no actual 1/4 sounds in the song would be considered inappropriate as well. there's times where such things work, but when the song is clearly focusing on 1/2 like this, it won't be
Fixed

hitsounds are also something you might not fully get yet. you're placing finishes correctly and emphasizing some other sounds as well with other hitsounds, but you're still missing out on a lot of opportunities for other hitsound usage.

most of the time, mappers use claps to represent snare drums in the song (just as you represent cymbal crashes with the finish hitsound).
00:34:800 (3,4) - for example, these are used in the way most mappers would, since the song has a snare drum on the sliderheads of both 3 and 4
the same sounds can be heard on 00:28:400 (3) - 00:31:600 (2) - 00:33:200 (6) - and pretty much everywhere else throughout the song. using similar hitsounds to represent similar noises whereever they repeat in the song is like the basics of consistent hitsounds
Great advice. Thank you. But it's difficult for realizing in practice for me now. I will think about it


these concepts affect all difficulties so uh i'd rather not say anything else super specific lol

normal
high sv/spacing can work for a normal difficulty, but when you're not all that good with controlling clean placements yet, it'll be easier to use conventional lower sv (around 1-1.2) and spacing that allows 1/2 gaps to overlap.
with the current high settings, you've got loads of unintuitive placements, like
00:04:600 (4,5,6) - object crowding
00:08:800 (4,5) - 00:12:400 (6,1,2) - ambiguous head vs tail (ideally head of slider will be closer to previous object than tailon lower difficulties)
00:26:000 (1,2,3,4,1,2) - 00:05:800 (6,1,2,3) - and general large spacing makes it harder to visually see what 1/1 spacing is vs 3/2 spacing (which wouldn't be a problem with more object density or smaller spacing)
I reduced spacing and fixed placements

gl!!

Sonnyc wrote:

[Easy]
Rhythm of the intro felt less fitting. 00:00:401 (1) this reverse slider doesn't follow a particular element of the song. To follow the long melody, a single 2/1 slider without a reverse would fit better. Due to how the song is structured, 00:04:000 (2,3) this rhythm is not snapped properly to the drums. In this case, I just suggest to make a long slider starting at 00:03:600. Thanks for the advice, I fixed it
00:32:400 (6,1) - Starting combo from (6) will fit the song better. It's right. Fixed
[Normal]
00:06:700 (1) - Wrong snapped. Yeah, I know it but the vocals and the drums start at 00:06:736 - between blue and white ticks so I do not know what to do. If you think it's wrong then I will fix
00:32:400 (7,1) - Same combo suggestion with easy. Ok, fixed
00:50:400 (6) - NC would do good. Ok, fixed
[Hard]
00:36:200 ~ 00:41:000 - Do you really think the best rhythm for this song is this? Currently it is just spammed with 1/2 while the song provides something more. Listen to the song more carefully, and use a rhythm that could best reflect the song please. For example, 00:36:400 has nearly no beat that doesn't demands a note. 00:36:700 there is a beat here that could be expressed as 1/4, but it is just empty. Yes, I thought about it. I reworked this part. Now it is much better

Not bad, but I've got a feeling that you've just toggled distance snap on, and placed objects according to the distance snapping without a proper understanding of patterning. Besides, the Hard diff worked out nicely among these three diffs.

Hope you can have some more mapping experience yourself by making several beatmaps. Also looking other mapper's beatmap (preferably a ranked beatmap) would help you forming a better idea of mapping.

Good luck.

Hobbes2 wrote:

heyo, m4m from queue. The maps you can choose from are posted in the queue, thanks!

[Easy]

00:16:400 (3,2) - Consdier making these parallel for the sake of aesthetics. I think it would look nice. I do not like parallel. I specifically tried to avoid it here

00:19:600 (1,2) - This blanket is very slightly off, adjust the end of 2 Thank you for your attention. Fixed

00:26:400 (2,3) - This blanket is off, adjust the top of 3 to curve around 2 better ^

00:29:599 (2,3) - I'm assuming this isn't a blanket, but if it is one then you should redo the slider ^

[Normal]

00:05:800 (6) - If you're gonna shape the slider like this, make it symmetrical I tried to fix it, it is much better now
00:09:200 (5) - ^ ^

00:10:400 (2,3) - 2 is not blanketed properly. Adjust it to make it smoother (less curved) Thank you for your attention. Fixed

00:31:600 (5,6) - Blanket could be better. Curve 5 a bit more. Fixed

00:34:200 (1) - Kinda ugly. I'd redo this slider. Fixed

[Hard]

00:15:200 (2,3,4) - Consider making this an equilateral triangle (by using the create polygon circles feature)

00:16:400 (1) - If you do the above, stack this on 00:15:200 (2), and then move everything accordingly. Thank you for a good idea

00:20:400 (3) - Move this up a hair, so it isn't as close to 00:19:600 (1) I reworked this part

00:22:000 (7) - Somewhat unattractive slider. I'd redo it. This is my favorite slider

00:35:600 (4) - NC I follow the Russian vocal here. 00:34:800 (2,3,4) - It is 1 word. So NC at 00:36:200 (1) -
00:36:200 (1) - remove NC For the same reason

00:37:800 (8,1,2) - fix blanket I reworked this part

00:41:900 - Missing a note Nah, i don't think so

As another note, I think you should redo combos in your Hard, and try to see if you can do the NCs during downbeats whenever you can. Right now the combos just kinda seem all over the place.

Good luck!