1. Lunatic (4.1 stars, 431 notes)
2. Normal (1.83 stars, 165 notes)
3. Satellite's Hard (2.98 stars, 292 notes)

Reana wrote:

General

1. It's just my opinion, but consider to add kiai time on satelite's diff or delete kiai time on dailycare's diff to make it same. // i'll consider it x.x

Lunatic

1. 00:32:088 (2,3) - 앞부분에 비해서 디스턴스가 너무 좁은거같은데 좀 넓혀보시는건 어떤가요?
2. 01:10:016 (1) - , 01:56:302 (1) - 거의 모든 부분에서 스택패턴을 쓰셨는데 여기만 반스택인건 살짝 이상하네요. 통일성을 위해서 스택을 쓰심이? // 일단 (2)들은 반스택인 상태로 놓았어요
3. 01:36:373 (2,3) - ^ // 디스턴스를 넓히라는 의미로 알아듣겠습니다
4. 02:28:445 (1,1,2,1) - 만약 키아이 타임을 계속 넣으실거라면, 01:21:588 (1,1,2,1,1) - 이부분과 키아이 타임 배치를 똑같이 해보시는건? // 키아이 관련된건 새틀라이트랑 얘기해보고 전반적으로 수정할게요
5. 02:33:159 (4) - 너무넓음 ㄷㄷ... // 거리벌려놓은건 컨셉이기도 하고 02:22:873 (4) - 도 있고 블랭킷도 맞춘거라.. 우선은 이대로 냅둘게요ㅠㅠ

Other diffs seem fine to me since this is amaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaazing mapset lmao
Rank HYPE

Pink_Whatever wrote:

Hello! This is my mod

General

• Hmm I think you need more tags // soon,

Normal

• 01:04:873 (5) - New combo here? In normal, combos should not exceed 8. // ahh i've never heard such rule ;w;
• 02:11:730 (4) - Not major but maybe make this slider a curve like the previous one. // I fixed it like 02:16:873 (4) -
• 02:37:445 (1) - I think this note is placed too low (touches the accuracy bar), try putting it in a different position or just raise it higher.

For Lunatic, since I can't play that level, I tried modding it by watching. Rhythmically, the map seems good.

Moa wrote:

in game req my honey♥
[general]
01:12:159 - 이부분 부터도 충분히 kiai 가 될수있다고 think 합니다
[normal]
00:39:159 (4) - zom man 펴주면 이쁜 Blanket 이 될거같음 00:39:159 (4,5) - 이렇게 two 개
00:44:945 (5,6) - blanket fix 해주세요
01:12:159 - 솔직히 here 은 click 할수있게 make 했으면 좋겟음 // 하지만 하드에선 지적을 안했는걸..?!
01:26:516 - here은 click 이 need 할거같음
01:13:659 - ^ // 위 두 개는 그다지..
01:31:230 (5) - this slider 은 here 서 finish 하는게 nice 할거같음 그리고 01:31:873 - here 은 circle 을 // 이건 고려해보겠습니다
01:39:588 (3) - 1/1 reverse 하는게 어떨지 // 이해 불가..
01:53:730 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - ctrl+c ctrl+v T nam // 맵 컨셉입니다
02:19:445 (1) - here 서 부터 suddenly drum beat 에 맞춤 정말 이상해요 여긴 01:12:588 (1) - here 랑 비슷한 rhythm use 하는게 좋을듯 // 노노 이건 그다지 어색해보이진 않는데.. 노래가 이럴 분위기 아닌가요..?
02:34:873 (1,2,3) - slider 정리가 need 해보임 // 좀 슬라이더들을 펴봤음
[Satellite's hard]
NICE MAP!
[Lunatic]
00:25:873 (1,2) - 강조되는 부분이라도 00:36:159 (2,3) - 이런점프들은 DS가 좁은데 저것만 너무 넓은듯 처음부터 // 저거 두 개 ds차이 0.1밖에 없는데.. 어쨋튼 좀 줄였어요
00:31:445 (1,2) - 여긴 너무넓음 한 00:33:588 (3,1) - 이정도가 적당해보임
00:57:159 (1) - 이런부분부턴 콤보수가 10이 넘어가는것도 보이는데 그냥 전체적으로 뉴콤 1다운비트 기준으로 하는게 어떤지? // 컨셉인데 일단 한 번 더 뉴콤지적 들어오면 고치겠음..
01:12:159 (1) - 키아이도아닌데 여기부터 너무점프가 넓은거같습니다 아니면 키아이설정 ㄱ // 이건 제가 봐도 좀 심한 점프였네요..
01:33:159 (1) - 여기부턴 00:26:302 (1) - 이파트랑 동일하게 잔잔한? 부분인데 앞과다르게 DS가 상당히넓다고생각됩니다 앞부분을 늘리거나 뒷부분을 좁히시져 (갠적으로 앞부분 좀 점프거리 늘렸음함) // 일단 앞부분 약간 늘렸음

아귀찮음 여기까지^^

1. 00:41:302 (5) - make spacing consistent with 01:07:445 (1) - this — 0.1x.
2. 00:51:159 (5,1) - it's better to make consistent spacing with 01:01:873 (5,1) - this and 01:34:445 (4,1) - this.
3. 01:58:873 - it's a quite strong don't ignore it.
4. 02:31:016 (4,5) - weird anti-jump, song is quite strong here so make 1.6 spacing.
5. According to Modding assistant:
   • Useless green line(s) over red (no SV changes):
   00:00:588 {588} ms
   • Concurent volume value for red-green line(s):
   00:00:588 {588} ms

1. 01:58:873 (3) - suggest to make spacing lower, because this beat is weaker, maybe stack it with 01:57:802 (2) - this one, looks better imo.
2. But 02:40:016 (7) - here I suggest increase spacing a bit, because beat is stronger.

Namki wrote:

General
Where are tags? // Soon!..

Lunatic

1. 01:58:873 (3) - suggest to make spacing lower, because this beat is weaker, maybe stack it with 01:57:802 (2) - this one, looks better imo.
2. But 02:40:016 (7) - here I suggest increase spacing a bit, because beat is stronger. // Uhh, these two were intended for triangle. So i didn't want to fix it even though these ignore beat.. But! i'll consider changing it xd..

Normal looks great for me.
Good luck.

Hi, from my 東方Project Queue

1. 00:58:445 (4,6) - these sliders are slightly seen overlapping when playing,not saying to change the pattern because of such a small thing but maybe you could try to blanket the slider start of (6) or simply rotate (4) away from that slider start
2. 01:02:302 (1) - this slider feels a bit too curved which makes the blanket look weird (mid point at 224 144 and end point at 293 119 looks better)
3. 01:58:873 (6) - NC?
4. 02:23:302 (3,1) - really weird overlap, would be fine if it had the same "level" of overlap as 02:24:159 (4,1) - I guess but it doesn't look too good this way
5. 02:23:302 (3,2) - in case you change the pattern because of the above point you can maybe try to stack this
6. 02:40:016 (5) - NC for the same reason as above

1. 00:25:873 (1,1) - this is not a major problem I think but for me (I play on fullscreen 1080p), most of the approach circle starts off screen, which feels pretty unusual I guess, some other players might find that confusing too
2. 00:32:730 (4,5) - I know it's centered but this doesn't look as good as the rest of the blankets in this diff just because the slider isn't curved enough
3. 00:49:016 (1,2) - this isn't major but the flow here could be better by just rotating the slider
4. 00:49:016 (1) - if you NC'ed here you should also NC on 00:54:159 (6) - for consistency
5. 00:57:159 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - then this whole combo is bigger than all the other in this section, maybe divide it in 2?
6. 01:07:016 (6,1) - you made all stacks up until here perfect stacks, why is this one different?
7. 01:11:945 (2) - this reverse has two claps which makes it different from the rest, maybe you could map it differently? perhaps 1 note 1 slider?
8. 01:18:588 (3,4) - this would flow soooo much better if (4) was curved
9. 01:53:302 (6,1) - same as before, I'm just pointing this out because I like consistency, it's purely subjective
10. 01:58:230 (2) - same for the 2 kicks
11. 01:58:873 - shouldn't this note be mapped?
12. 02:23:945 (7,8,9) - here shouldn't the vocal highlight be from (7) to (8) instead of (8) to (9)? I feel like (8) is the strong note and the jump would feel better there

1. 00:43:445 (2,3) - this doesn't have the best flow imo, (2) is leading to the left, opposite of (3), mostly because (3) is a slider which forces the player to slow down after the jump
2. 00:52:445 (2,3) - here it doesn't feel as bad because it's a note instead of a slider
3. Also the highlight (clap) is on the slider end of 00:52:445 (2) - , I know that the pattern is the same but maybe it would follow the music better if it highlighted the clap instead of making the same pattern
4. 01:58:873 (3) - NC?
5. 02:40:016 (7) - maybe you could highlight this kick better through a jump? also NC :b

- Milhofo - wrote:

Hi, from my 東方Project Queue

[Normal]

1. 00:58:445 (4,6) - these sliders are slightly seen overlapping when playing,not saying to change the pattern because of such a small thing but maybe you could try to blanket the slider start of (6) or simply rotate (4) away from that slider start // rotated (4), and i adjusted some notes
2. 01:02:302 (1) - this slider feels a bit too curved which makes the blanket look weird (mid point at 224 144 and end point at 293 119 looks better) // Blanket was adjusted
3. 01:58:873 (6) - NC?
4. 02:23:302 (3,1) - really weird overlap, would be fine if it had the same "level" of overlap as 02:24:159 (4,1) - I guess but it doesn't look too good this way
5. 02:23:302 (3,2) - in case you change the pattern because of the above point you can maybe try to stack this // these two are rly cool suggestions thanks!
6. 02:40:016 (5) - NC for the same reason as above

Really nice set, loved it, good luck!