1. Easy (1.36 stars, 57 notes)
2. Lost Forever (2.4 stars, 105 notes)
3. Normal (1.9 stars, 75 notes)

deadpon3 wrote:

Hi, m4m!

Lost Forever:
CS is too high, it feels like a really old map. Change it to CS4. Discussed and denied
00:21:747 (4,5,6) - More distance, it looks more like a 1/8. I really dont know what you mean here. It doesnt look like 1/8 to me at all
00:27:351 (5) - Place it somewhere else, looks bad like that. Ok
00:32:296 (4,5) - Another 1/4 looking like a 1/8. ^

Well, not so much to say about. Short song, it needs more diffs.

Because it's a short mod, m4m only one diff.
t/408665

Thanks

kricher wrote:

lost forever
its good just get bigger circles
easy
00:29:659 - this feels empty ?
00:36:912 - ^^^ - thats a slider
00:37:571 - ^^^ ?
01:07:901 (1) - get this timed better I dont even understand this. There is only 1 timing point

WazZzaA123 wrote:

Backgroud - maxresdefault.jpg is 1366x768, which differs from the recommended size of 1024x768.
Tags - Add some tags

[Normal]
00:21:747 (2,3,4) - Maybe try to add a Back and Forth Slider into the slider that you made That doesnt really make sense
00:32:296 (8,9,1) - ^ ^
00:42:846 (4,5,6) - ^ ^

I feel like CS:3 Is more Appropriate I like cs 4 better, which has been shown in previous mods

Other than that it looks really good, maybe add a harder difficulty ? Its called Lost Forever

M4M One diff t/410341

MrSergio wrote:

Here's my part of our M4M deal :3
Raujika <3

Consider that I'll be a bit more subjective here since otherwise I can't point out much xD
So don't take anything personally since it's just how I see mapping :3

General

• Default combo colors ;w;
  
  Behold the power of vivid colors :Q___

  
  

  [Colours]
  Combo1 : 199,137,46
  Combo2 : 255,128,64
  Combo3 : 255,128,128
  Combo4 : 214,175,22
  Combo5 : 147,218,14
  Combo6 : 177,101,101

Lost Forever

• First thing I notice is the AR, which imo is a bit low for the general spacing of the map. The ideal AR would be around 7 (maybe 6.5 or 7.5 depending on how you want it). Also, keep the CS. I don't really see any point in increasing it here (regarding the previous mods)
  
  00:16:472 (6) - Random whistle appears /w\
  00:19:110 (6) - same ^
  
  00:20:428 (2,3) - There is a little spacing inconsistency here but it's not really a problem (1-->2, 2-->3 are the same on the timeline yet not the same on the playfield, spacing-wise., but as I said it's not a problem). What I wanted to do here tho was to improve the flow between 2 and 3. I find it a bit forced and stiff. so here's an alternative pattern, see if you like it: here (I copied 1 and mirrored it vertically, then stacked it where 2 was)
  
  00:21:747 (4) - What about a whistle on this? It sounds really nice imo >~<
  same goes for all the other similar patters: 00:32:296 (4) - 00:42:846 (4) - 00:53:395 (4) -
  
  00:27:351 (1) - Maybe mirror this horizontally, since the jump is kinda forced (if you want I can provide geometric evidence and angular problems :^)
  
  00:28:670 (3) - this slider body goes out of the grid :/ You can slightly improve the blanket here
  
  00:31:307 (3) - Keep the current coordinates for the object, but do a Ctrl + H, Ctrl + J and a Ctrl + G. I suggest this because you always put a jump and the slider after such jump always has the curve in the opposite direction which feels less smooth imo
  
  00:36:582 (3,1) - Blanket can be improved :3
  
  00:41:527 (2,3) - Again, as I said above, you put a jump and the slider after the jump has the curved the opposite way xD
  Like this it flows better imo
  
  00:42:846 (4,5,1) - you increased spacing here. The other similar patterns had less spacing (references: 00:21:747 (4,5,1) - and 00:32:296 (4,5,1) - )
  I personally prefer the low spacing for that pattern :3
  
  00:47:791 (4) - maybe a whistle on head?
  
  00:50:428 (3) - imo the clap is a bit too much, since this part looks like a transition between the first half and the second half of the song. Instead try using a whistle here
  
  00:51:088 (1,3) - Hm... now that I look a these I think I pointed out too much these sliders and their curves which seem to be part of your style. I think you'll reject the ones above lol
  
  00:57:351 (2,3) - I'd increase a bit more this jump, since 00:56:362 (1,2) - is way bigger and puts more emphasis on 2, which is actually on a red tick
  
  01:00:978 (3) - the blanket with that huge "S" slider is a bit off. Maybe move this circle to around 376;217
  
  01:03:615 (5) - 2 things I'd like to point out here: first, you skip the NC at 01:02:956 (3) - ; second, I would have really liked to click 01:04:274 - since there's also a clap on it. So in the end, what about removing the repeat and adding a circle? You can also place that NC properly this way
  

Normal

• Since it is a normal, make sure to have all the distances constant. See what AIMod says
  
  00:29:989 (5) - Missing NC?
  
  01:07:901 (1) - I'd just use a circle on the white tick. As it is now it's a bit confusing since you make it start on a weak beat
  
  01:09:549 (3) - I'd remove both hitsounds, as you did for your other diff (compare hitsounds with the other diff and make sure they are consistent)
  

Ok, I'm done here :3
Let me know if you need clarifications with anything =w=/

Maybe Gladius wrote:

From #modreqs, just felt like modding this. No need for M4M

Please remember, my mod(and other mods in general) is mostly suggestions that I think could improve the map. No need to accept everything I say, and nor all my suggestions correct for that matter.

General

1. I couldn’t help but get the feeling (when listened at 25%) that the offset and the BPM for 00:14:164 (1) - to 00:19:439 (1) - here is not quite on. In fact, BPM may not even be 91 for the intro. But that could just be due to the nature of the sound (it’s not a clear sound) used in the intro. Feel free to ignore this xD
   I stole timing from other Lost Imagination maps, so it probably wont be wrong

Normal

• 
  Overall, I noticed that the distance spacing is not very consistent like it should be for a Normal diff. Please fix these errors by looking through the map yourself with Distance Snap on, as well as by using AIMod (Ctrl + Shift + A). Some parts are snapped to 1.2x, while some others are snapped to 1.3x, for instance. Ok, ill go through that
  
  Few cases:

1. 00:17:461 (2) - too large of a gap Ok
   
2. 00:21:747 (2) - filling in the timeline gaps as I’ll mention below should take care of some awkward spacing issues like this.
   
3. 00:41:197 (2,3) - changes from 1.3x to 1.2x Ok
   
4. 00:48:450 (5) - too small of a gap Ok
   
   
   On another note, I’m not an expert myself, but I feel like the Clap hitsound is overused in the map. Usually claps are used in the 2nd and 4th beats of a measure, but I believe you put them on almost every single white tick possible. Please consider changing this. I actually like it. Sorry that I disagree with you, but I like it...
   
   
5. 00:19:439 (1) - End this slider at 00:20:428, and then add a slider at 00:20:758. It would be much better like this because there is a strong clickable sound at 00:20:758 that could be represented, as well as removing the time gap between 00:19:439 (1) and 00:21:747 (3). Im sorry but no. The song slowly progresses into a more filled and cramp area (except the first part). The flow reminds me of going from trying to sleep to a dream of some sorts. Just figurative dance
   
   
6. 00:22:077 (4) - same as above. While fixing this, I suggest you tweak the slider a little bit to make the ‘gorge’ part of the slider more natural. (try a rounder arc, if you know what I mean.) ^
   
   
   There are more instances of such sliders you could shorten, I won’t mention them all here.
   
   
7. 00:21:747 (2,3,4) - From what I know, stacking multiple notes in a Normal diff can be quite risky, as it can be fairly hard to read. Check with others about these kinds of patterns in Normal. Ill check with others
   
8. 00:24:714 (1) - I think you can just change to this for better flow into the next slider. My style in general on this map kind of says 'no' to flow, but that is my style. This song is vey wierd in itself. It has those notes that go from soft to loud and is kind of serreal, so I did that
   
   
9. 00:37:901 (3) - removing the curve point at x: 107, y: 215 should make it look nicer. Ok
   
   
10. 00:52:406 (3) - Try something like this? Flow is a subjective topic as many say, but this looks and flows better imo. ^
    
    New Combos: I’m suggesting these to keep the NC pattern consistent - that is - at each big white tick like you did here 00:32:626 (1). In Easy and Normal diffs, keeping a consistent NC pattern is recommended to do so. Ok
    
    
11. 00:22:077 (4)Ok
    
    
12. 00:27:351 (3)Ok
    
    
13. 00:37:901 (3)Ok
    
    
14. 00:43:175 (6)Ok
    
    
15. 00:48:450 (5)Ok
    
    
16. 00:53:725 (6)Ok
    
    
17. 00:59:000 (3)Ok
    
    
18. 01:08:230 (2) - and probably one here, after the long slider

Ok

Lost Forever

• 
  Overall in this diff, a lot of the jumps and the flow seem quite random to me. I’m not very experienced in modding/mapping those aspects, so I’ll most likely not mention those here.Just the style
  
  
  Some mentions, however:

1. 00:43:835 (2,3) - I don’t hear any significant sound in the music to justify this large jump here. Ok, shortened
   
   
2. 00:56:033 (4) - kinda random? I don’t think I would expect a circle in the middle of the map after the last slider since it points downward. Moved a bit
   
   
3. 01:08:560 (2) - seems too far from the sliderend, and also 01:08:890 (3) - is the most significant sound in the song, so I don’t think a triangle necessarily best represents the music here. Ok
   
   
4. 00:23:395 (4) - blanket off, try making the slider a bit less curved.Ok
   
   
5. 00:24:714 (1,2) - blanket off, may have to fix the position of the circle and tweak the slider a bit to fix this blanket.Ok
   
   
6. 00:28:340 (2,3) - This gap is suddenly very small compared to 00:23:395 (4,5) - but then you’ve used this distance for other spots like 00:34:934 (4,1) - this so I don’t think this should matter too too much.Ok
   
   
7. 00:36:582 (3) - horizontally flip the slider instead? Right now, 00:37:571 (4) - feels like it’s alone on an island by itself in terms of placement relative to the sliderend of the (3). The (3) slider suggests a motion to the left, but the (4) is placed to the right at the moment, which makes for an awkward flow, I guess. Ok, remodeled the whole area
   
   
8. 00:40:538 (1) - blanket a little off here.Ok
   
   
9. 00:53:395 (1,2), 01:03:615 (1) - NC seems unnecessary unless there is a specific reason for these.Im stupid and I dont know why I did that
   
   
10. 01:00:648 (2) - blanket could be better, try making the slider differently by referring to this handy article. More specifically, This. Ok
    
    
11. 01:00:648 (2,3,4) - This spacing and 00:50:099 (2,3,4) - this spacing is quite different, I suggest making the one at 00:50:099 (2,3,4) - spaced smaller, I don’t know if the halfscreen jumps is quite fitting for the overall calm mood of this map.

That makes sense, ill change that


That’s all for now, send me a forum PM if you have any questions regarding my mod.

Good Luck!

Moeri wrote:

Hey! Mod for mod! My map: https://osu.ppy.sh/s/424146

[Lost Forever]
Just my personal opinion, a little bigger CS would make the map look better. As stated before, I dont want to change that

It'd be good to sharp up your map, and fix some overlap and blanket issues[Nazi]:
00:15:483 (3,1) - Ok
00:28:340 (2,3) -
00:34:934 (4,1) -
00:36:252 (2,3) -
00:37:571 (4,1) -
00:40:208 (6,1) - ^ for everythign above here
00:44:164 (3,5) - Not sure why this overlapping here. because I wanted it to
00:50:428 (3,1) - ^
01:08:560 (2) - Move together as the triangle to 01:06:582 (6) - ? I dont really understand, but I dont feel its an issue

00:29:989 - You could insert an uninherited line(green) here to rise the volume since the music is turning up the volume. That is actually a brilliant idea!
00:35:263 (1) - You can CTRL + G here for another flow. Ok
00:45:813 (1) - For "better" flow, you could CTRL + H here and put back to same position again.nah, it was done like this on purpose

[Normal]
Remember to keep same consistent distance between objects in Normal difficulty, at least for above 95% of all objects. Everthing is snapped correctly according to AImod...

00:29:989 - As mentioned above, you can add an uninherited timeline here to raise volume, suggesting to 30%.^

Tripples like these in a normal with such BPM is strongly not recommended, which is highly chance for disqualification being too hard:
00:21:747 (2,3) -
00:32:296 (4,5) -
00:42:846 (4,5) -
00:53:395 (4,5) - I get this alot. If a BN actually says something about it, then I will change it, but I like it here.

Good luck!

Battle wrote:

this bg is great

Marianna wrote:

Are you sure about this CS 4? lol okay, bye Beginners.

Congrats anyway!

Okoratu wrote:

01:03:615 (1) - interesting comboing choice, is that intentional

1. 00:19:439 - Unlike Hard, this is having a volume increase of 25%. Making it consistent cross difficulty would make an organized setting.
2. 00:21:912 (3) - 00:32:461 (5) - 00:43:011 (5) - 00:53:560 (5) - Questionable rhythm for the lowest difficulty. Although the bpm is pretty slow, I highly disagree using such a 1/4 rhythm for the lowest difficulty. If you really persist this rhythms, you may want to add an additional Easy to make something beginner friendly. Unless, this just feels a bit too much.
3. 00:19:439 (1,2) - 00:41:197 (2,3) - 00:50:428 (2,1) - Minor issues that weren't a 1.3x. Considering the usage of 00:39:879 (2,1) etc, I doubt if the setting was intentionally made. Though it might not highly affect during gameplay, making them consistent would build a better structure.

1. 01:03:615 (1) - R..really? This combo feels pretty random imo.
2. 01:11:197 (2,3) - This jump felt pretty large compared to this section.

Monstrata wrote:

An Easier diff is nice, but it should never be a necessity if the map already has a Normal that is below 2.00 stars.

1. 00:37:901 (1) - the curve of the slider could be improved so, that it would by synchronized with the slidertick.
2. 01:02:956 (2,3,1,2,3) - may I ask why the rhythm here is harder than the same part in Normal?
   Note: 00:44:494 (2,3) - somewhat similr happens here. The hardest difficulty uses an 1/1 slider here.
   Note2: 00:36:252 (2) - that circle wasn't here in Normal. Why did you add it in the easier version.
   
   In my eyes, the best solution is to readjust Slider Velocity to 1.2 and fix spacing to avoid overlaps, afterwards, so everything is spaced properly and SV/DS balance is not broken. While also reducing the amount of 1/2s to a level, where Normal and Easy do not conflict in terms of rhythm.

1. First to all overlaping objects isn't cool, I strongly suggest you to use 1,5 spacing, the cleaner the better, this will not make the diff harder, but will looks better and readability will be better as well.
2. 00:21:747 - you can add a circle here, since the music is strong and I think it deseve to be mapped, as you mapped some less important beats in this diff already, I don't see the reason to ignore the important ones that are going with the main melody in the song.
3. 00:37:901 (1) - weird slider shapes are fine, but I guess you tryed to make it symmetrical, an advice for me would be make it in the center of the grid and when you got the perfect symmetric shape then you can rotate to adjust it as you wish
4. 01:06:912 (1,2) - rhythm is a bit wrong here, if you listen to the melody careful you will notice the main one goes in 01:06:912 - 01:07:241 - 01:07:571 -, so basically my suggestion is to add something in 01:07:571 - and remove 01:07:901 (2) - , try (you used a similar rhythm in normal diff):
   

1. I'm doing this, because I notice that some parts are more dense in easy diff than normal diff.
2. 00:27:351 (1,2) - in easy you decide to use a 1/2 pattern with two sliders, this is fine, but the fact that you added a long slider in normal 00:27:351 (1) - make the difficulty spread weird, since you mapped both diffs, some consistency would be cool.
3. 00:29:989 (1,2,3) - easy vs 00:29:989 (1,2,3) - normal, kinda similar rhythms, but the one at easy seems more complicate, I'll suggest to go with this for easy diff
   
4. 00:35:263 (1,2,3) - easy vs 00:35:263 (1,2) - just remove the extra beat in easy or add it on normal.
5. 00:40:538 (1,2,3) - easy 00:40:538 (1,2,3) - normal, any reason for have a 1/2 slider on easy 00:41:197 (2) - but a single circle on normal diff?
6. 00:55:044 (3,4) - 1/2 slider and circle in easy diff, but 1/1 slider in normal
7. 00:59:659 (2,3,4,1) - multiple 1/2s in easy while normal diff is using long sliders with 1/1 gaps
8. 01:02:956 (2,3,1,2,3) - easy 01:02:956 (2,3,4,1) - normal, as you can see the rhythm is alot more dense at easy diff
9. 01:09:549 (1,2,3) - 1/2 pattern in easy, but only a long repeat slider in normal diff, why?
10. this doesn't mean easy need to always have an easier rhythm than normal, but when this happen that often it can become an issue, which I think is the case in this beatmap

1. 00:44:494 (2,3) - in easy you have a 1/2 slider and a circle, which sounds nice, but why you only have a 1/1 slider in your hardest diff?

Bakari wrote:

There is a great deal of difference between making something for the sake of quality and making something just to get a map ranked.

When you disagree with something go ahead and say so, I reply as soon as I have the time to do so.

I do not question the playability of Lost Imagination, I question whether the jumpy placement matches with the actual song you are mapping.

Beginners would eventually notice that rhythm conflicts between diffs, if they would progress from difficulty to difficulty. But it's a matter of common sense to keep things consistent and logical throughout the whole set.

I do not disqualify something unless I'm sure that at least one more person beliefs that the set is not going the right way, for that reason I came up after Sonnyc's post the first time and discussed the matter with Natsu for the second time.

Whatever QATs say is not final, I'm a mapper just like you, Natsu or anybody else in the thread. The only difference is that I care about the way things work here and I want to see a high-quality map, rather than something that is just rankable and you seem to be trying to rush the process

Bakari wrote:

Monstrata wrote:

An Easier diff is nice, but it should never be a necessity if the map already has a Normal that is below 2.00 stars.

Can we get over with those star-rating based judgement and have a llok at the actual difficulty and the way it plays?

Monstrata wrote:

Oh uhh, you're misinterpreting me... It has nothing to do with this particular Normal or the star rating lol. If the lowest difficulty of a map is below 2.00 stars, then it doesn't require a second (and easier) diff also below 2.00 stars.

The recent emphasis on difficulty-renaming is rather unsettling.

1. The claps you are using in the intro part do not make much sense with the monotonous rhythm. I wouldn't introduce them untill 00:15:483
2. The BG is already used in another version of the song. Add a touch of personality and search for a different one?

1. I would really prefer lower Approach Rate. Something around 3 or 3,5.
2. 00:14:164 (1,2,3,4) - there is no reason to use lower spacing values here. Please, keep it consistent throughout the difficulty.
3. 01:08:230 (2) - this would sound way better, if it were two circlres. Each circle would stand for the individual sound and provide more clear feedback to the players.
   
   That's way better than what I saw the last time. Great job!

1. 00:19:439 (1,2,3,1) - the sudden density changes from 2/1 to 1/4 feel too choppy. Try to use more 1/1s or even 1/2s, so when the 1/4 triplet shows up, players are ready to hit it properly and it does not feel sudden.
   Note: this will also fix the density issues mentioned in Natsu's post.
   
   There are a few more density issues, and all those could be resolved. So, we'd have a nice difficulty ascension from difficulty to difficulty, going consistently and making a nice spread.

1. 00:24:714 (1) - this beat has a spacing emphasis and a jump of x3.0 DS, but 00:27:351 (1) - a similar beat here - doesn't. Then things go even lower and you use x1.6 or something around that 00:29:659 (4,1) - 00:34:934 (4,1) - another similar downbeat uses no jumps and low spacing - and the spacing inconsistencies go on in the smae manner quite often. I do not get any logic behind those and I can not see how it can be enjoyable to the player. Care to explain yout distance usage?
2. 00:34:604 - could use a circle here. It will make the nice and strong beat clickable to the player, giving them better feedback during the gameplay. As for the slider, you can finish it at 00:34:274.
   Note: basically, any strong beat should be clickable. So, players get to actually hit something, when a strong sound is played.
   
   The spacing usage seems to be having little if any correlation with the music, which has a great impact on playability in my eyes. I would recommend you to go through the map again and make spacing more or less even, while consistently emphasising the beats, you find important.

Bakari wrote:

Monstrata wrote:

Oh uhh, you're misinterpreting me... It has nothing to do with this particular Normal or the star rating lol. If the lowest difficulty of a map is below 2.00 stars, then it doesn't require a second (and easier) diff also below 2.00 stars.

The recent emphasis on difficulty-renaming is rather unsettling.

The lowest difficulty has to be beginner-friendly, nothing else should matter.

Edit 8 hours later:

[General]

1. The claps you are using in the intro part do not make much sense with the monotonous rhythm. I wouldn't introduce them untill 00:15:483
2. The BG is already used in another version of the song. Add a touch of personality and search for a different one?

[Easy]

1. I would really prefer lower Approach Rate. Something around 3 or 3,5.
2. 00:14:164 (1,2,3,4) - there is no reason to use lower spacing values here. Please, keep it consistent throughout the difficulty.
3. 01:08:230 (2) - this would sound way better, if it were two circlres. Each circle would stand for the individual sound and provide more clear feedback to the players.
   
   That's way better than what I saw the last time. Great job!

[Normal]

1. 00:19:439 (1,2,3,1) - the sudden density changes from 2/1 to 1/4 feel too choppy. Try to use more 1/1s or even 1/2s, so when the 1/4 triplet shows up, players are ready to hit it properly and it does not feel sudden.
   Note: this will also fix the density issues mentioned in Natsu's post.
   
   There are a few more density issues, and all those could be resolved. So, we'd have a nice difficulty ascension from difficulty to difficulty, going consistently and making a nice spread.

[Lost Imagination]

1. 00:24:714 (1) - this beat has a spacing emphasis and a jump of x3.0 DS, but 00:27:351 (1) - a similar beat here - doesn't. Then things go even lower and you use x1.6 or something around that 00:29:659 (4,1) - 00:34:934 (4,1) - another similar downbeat uses no jumps and low spacing - and the spacing inconsistencies go on in the smae manner quite often. I do not get any logic behind those and I can not see how it can be enjoyable to the player. Care to explain yout distance usage?
2. 00:34:604 - could use a circle here. It will make the nice and strong beat clickable to the player, giving them better feedback during the gameplay. As for the slider, you can finish it at 00:34:274.
   Note: basically, any strong beat should be clickable. So, players get to actually hit something, when a strong sound is played.
   
   The spacing usage seems to be having little if any correlation with the music, which has a great impact on playability in my eyes. I would recommend you to go through the map again and make spacing more or less even, while consistently emphasising the beats, you find important.

Hope this gives a better idea of my concernes and helps you to make a proper reply to address the disqualification.

1. Nothing has been replied to from this part of the mod. It seems you have ignored these suggestions without providing a reason. Can you show some degree of disagreement, so I can get your ideas behind these claps and the background?

1. Could as well use Overall DIff and HP Drain 2,5.

1. 00:28:340 (2,3) - you seem to like the pattern a lot. What is the reason for x1.0 soacing here? It seems to be much lower than your average spacing values.
   Note: 00:34:934 (5,1,2,3,4,1) - here we have a normally spaced pattern and then two patterns with lower spacing, although they sound very similar. Why? You were the one who said that spacing is all intentional, so I don't think it will be too hard to explain that.
2. 00:40:538 (1) - this could be split into an 1/2 slider and a circle for the sake of rhythm consistency through the set.

Bakari wrote:

A few more things flashed in my mind after going through the set.

[General]

1. Nothing has been replied to from this part of the mod. It seems you have ignored these suggestions without providing a reason. Can you show some degree of disagreement, so I can get your ideas behind these claps and the background?

I apologize for not answering at all. I have been trying to contact you ingame for like a week so I can explain (I much prefer that over the forums) but I couldnt grab you. I DID change the hitsounds at the beginning as suggested.

I will NOT change the BG though. I have grown attached to it an wish to not change it. IDK if im not original. Also, finding a new bg that I like is hard and I really am not satisfied with anything else. I looked for 10 minutes and really took this into consideration, but no.

[Easy]

1. Could as well use Overall DIff and HP Drain 2,5.

k

[Lost Forever]

1. 00:28:340 (2,3) - you seem to like the pattern a lot. What is the reason for x1.0 soacing here? It seems to be much lower than your average spacing values. Art. It is just art I guess. Juxiposition. My artistics views. Yes.
   Note: 00:34:934 (5,1,2,3,4,1) - here we have a normally spaced pattern and then two patterns with lower spacing, although they sound very similar. Why? You were the one who said that spacing is all intentional, so I don't think it will be too hard to explain that. Juxoposition XD. I still fixed and increased alot of that
2. 00:40:538 (1) - this could be split into an 1/2 slider and a circle for the sake of rhythm consistency through the set. ok

Reply to this, and we'll try get you a bubble back! ok!

1. 00:51:088 (1) - seems something went wrong here, the tail supposed to be snapped at 00:51:747 -
2. 00:53:725 (1,1) - mmm nop, is fine to use combos to express something different, to make a pattern readable etc, but this one doesn't make much sense, since is the only part where you make with, there are other similar parts and you didn't the same, just remove the NC at 00:54:384 (1) - or make similar parts the same, otherwise is random and you didn't used anything similar at your other diffs
   

1. 00:21:747 - you can add a circle here, since the music is strong and I think it deseve to be mapped, as you mapped some less important beats in this diff already, I don't see the reason to ignore the important ones that are going with the main melody in the song. this wasn't applied in my previous mod and I don't have a reply of why :l
2. 00:55:044 (2,3) - this also need a reply, or just make the rhythm consistent with normal diff

Natsu wrote:

Lost Forever

1. 00:51:088 (1) - seems something went wrong here, the tail supposed to be snapped at 00:51:747 -
2. 00:53:725 (1,1) - mmm nop, is fine to use combos to express something different, to make a pattern readable etc, but this one doesn't make much sense, since is the only part where you make with, there are other similar parts and you didn't the same, just remove the NC at 00:54:384 (1) - or make similar parts the same, otherwise is random and you didn't used anything similar at your other diffs

Easy

1. 00:21:747 - you can add a circle here, since the music is strong and I think it deseve to be mapped, as you mapped some less important beats in this diff already, I don't see the reason to ignore the important ones that are going with the main melody in the song. this wasn't applied in my previous mod and I don't have a reply of why :l
2. 00:55:044 (2,3) - this also need a reply, or just make the rhythm consistent with normal diff

call me back

1. 01:01:637 (1,2,3,4) - spacing here is wrong, be careful when fixing

Natsu wrote:

no kudo ofc and send me a forum pm when you fix this, I'll rebub

Last edited by Bakari on about 8 hours ago, edited 1 time in total.

and I'll qualify