In that case 4-5 = 4.00-5.00
stop trying to turn my life into a meme
stop trying to turn my life into a meme
forum
Your biggest pet peeves
posted
Total Posts
94
Khelly, 5* is literally 5.00000000000000000000*
No one uses 5* to refer to 5-6*. For example no one says 'I can fc 5* maps', referring to everything below 6*
And those are some good low AR maps.
No one uses 5* to refer to 5-6*. For example no one says 'I can fc 5* maps', referring to everything below 6*
And those are some good low AR maps.
If I say I am playing 5* (Read as 5 star) maps, what kinds of maps do you imagine? Do you think I'm referring to 5.00* and maybe +- 0.1? Really? Because when anyone says that I imagine they're playing anything like 5.2 5.4 5.8 whatever.B1rd wrote:
Khelly, 5* is literally 5.00000000000000000000*
No one uses 5* to refer to 5-6*. For example no one says 'I can fc 5* maps', referring to everything below 6*
And those are some good low AR maps.
IMHO
4-5* means starting at 4.0 and ending at 5.0
5* means exactly 5*. Most people don't mean this. Most people mean around.
Around 5* means 4.5-5.5*
I don't know why I felt I needed to add my worthless opinion to this thread.
4-5* means starting at 4.0 and ending at 5.0
5* means exactly 5*. Most people don't mean this. Most people mean around.
Around 5* means 4.5-5.5*
I don't know why I felt I needed to add my worthless opinion to this thread.
When i say im playing 5* i mean up to 5,5 and 6* 5,5++
But that cant be applied here
But that cant be applied here
So basically everyone means different things but assumes everyone means exactly what they say.HK_ wrote:
When i say im playing 5* i mean up to 5,5 and 6* 5,5++
But that cant be applied here
When I say I'm playing 5* I am playing 5.00 to 5.99
Why don't you say you're playing 5-6* maps instead of saying you're playing 5* mapsHK_ wrote:
When i say im playing 5* i mean up to 5,5 and 6* 5,5++
If everyone was as specific as 5.50 to 6.00 we wouldn't have this problemMahogany wrote:
Why don't you say you're playing 5-6* maps instead of saying you're playing 5* mapsHK_ wrote:
When i say im playing 5* i mean up to 5,5 and 6* 5,5++
Because i can pass 5.5* map and say i passed a 6* map obviouslyMahogany wrote:
Why don't you say you're playing 5-6* maps instead of saying you're playing 5* mapsHK_ wrote:
When i say im playing 5* i mean up to 5,5 and 6* 5,5++
I would assume they're playing something around 5*, like 4.8 to 5.4*. You tend to round numbers to a whole, like you do with time. But circumstantial implications doesn't change the definition.Khelly wrote:
]If I say I am playing 5* (Read as 5 star) maps, what kinds of maps do you imagine? Do you think I'm referring to 5.00* and maybe +- 0.1? Really? Because when anyone says that I imagine they're playing anything like 5.2 5.4 5.8 whatever.
DOES THIS MEAN I CAN SAY I HAVE 7* FCS NOWHK_ wrote:
Because i can pass 5.5* map and say i passed a 6* map obviously
Just keep using decimals. Everyone using decimals is your dream anyway right?
Of course it doesKhelly wrote:
DOES THIS MEAN I CAN SAY I HAVE 7* FCS NOWHK_ wrote:
Because i can pass 5.5* map and say i passed a 6* map obviously
doesnt actually mean you did that but if you get caught you will have an excuse
Then why not say that then?HK_ wrote:
Because i can pass 5.5* map and say i passed a 6* map obviously
I like to categorize my star ratings based from the leading integer (or floor operation) of a star rating value.
I also don't want to get cocky either, just because I passed Highscore [Extra] 6.01* and tell everyone that I passed a 7* map.
I also don't want to get cocky either, just because I passed Highscore [Extra] 6.01* and tell everyone that I passed a 7* map.
Because its wrong?Mahogany wrote:
Then why not say that then?HK_ wrote:
Because i can pass 5.5* map and say i passed a 6* map obviously
Thread perfectly derailed
OT: when my cursor hits the note but click just late enough to miss
OT: when my cursor hits the note but click just late enough to miss
Then don't lie?HK_ wrote:
Because its wrong?Mahogany wrote:
Then why not say that then?
No.Mahogany wrote:
Then don't lie?
Topic Starter
I personally view the difficulty above .5 the next star.
Above 2.5 = 3
Above 3.5 = 4
Above 4.5 = 5.
Regardless of what it actually is i notice a bigger difference in overall difficulty between say 3star and 3.5 star rather than 3.5 to 4.
But that's just me. I know once you reach 4 - 5 maps some seem like they deserve a 6 star rating while some seem like they deserve a 3 star rating.
Above 2.5 = 3
Above 3.5 = 4
Above 4.5 = 5.
Regardless of what it actually is i notice a bigger difference in overall difficulty between say 3star and 3.5 star rather than 3.5 to 4.
But that's just me. I know once you reach 4 - 5 maps some seem like they deserve a 6 star rating while some seem like they deserve a 3 star rating.
Topic Starter
New pet peeve.
When you're playing a map that is above your current skill rank ( 4.5 star for me) and you come so close to clearing it but then get fkt from a sudden spike in difficulty, timing and pattern in the end T.T
When you're playing a map that is above your current skill rank ( 4.5 star for me) and you come so close to clearing it but then get fkt from a sudden spike in difficulty, timing and pattern in the end T.T
- when the map doesn't even go to the main beat in the song
- short sliders that go fast
- when rrtyui trolls and misses the last note
- short sliders that go fast
- when rrtyui trolls and misses the last note
oh there's one more thing. High-bpm hold sliders. The ones that go bzzzzzzzzz.
Oatmeal wrote:
- when rrtyui doesnt troll and misses the last note anyway
When people randomly blame mappers instead of admitting that they are bad at the game
Topic Starter
Retard alert. Clearly doesn't see that i was talking about a known TROLL mapping technique and not about the mappers themselves.Ezonie wrote:
When people randomly blame mappers instead of admitting that they are bad at the game
-When you point out what you don't like about maps or osu gameplay then a forum man child attempts to troll.
-When said scrub misses the fact that you said you suck at the game openly in the forums a few days ago after announcing your return to Osu!
I don't think those words are directed to youMvsk wrote:
Retard alert. Clearly doesn't see that i was talking about a known TROLL mapping technique and not about the mappers themselves.Ezonie wrote:
When people randomly blame mappers instead of admitting that they are bad at the game
-When you point out what you don't like about maps or osu gameplay then a forum man child attempts to troll.
-When said scrub misses the fact that you said you suck at the game openly in the forums a few days ago after announcing your return to Osu!
Jiroski_old
the only thing i've read before making that post is the title of the thread
ASSUME makes an ASS out of U and ME so don't just randomly assume
ASSUME makes an ASS out of U and ME so don't just randomly assume
ZenithPhantasm
Topic Starter
Ezonie wrote:
the only thing i've read before making that post is the title of the thread
ASSUME makes an ASS out of U and ME so don't just randomly assume
-Beatmap creators who randomly hide notes behind sliders. V
> When people randomly blame mappers instead of admitting that they are bad at the game
Not only have i never heard of anyone blaming the beat mappers for their own lack of skill on a particular map but you also used the same off word "randomly". Guess it was just coincidence, sorry for the accusations. I come from a forum where everyone is so toxic so usually expect these things.
Anyway so you're saying that people actually complain about the beat mappers for their own folly? Is this with beat maps that are generally ranked low in quality by the community or with favorable maps?
Well not everyone actually read any post before making a post themselves
Anyways basically some people who can't play a certain mapping style ( like skystar or hanzer or val0108 ) will start calling the maps cancer and blaming the mappers when it's just these people themselves who are bad at the game.
Join a multiplayer lobby, pick one of those maps and you'll understand what i mean.
I doubt you'll find one in the forums as these people are aware that they are bad and don't want to publicize it.
Anyways basically some people who can't play a certain mapping style ( like skystar or hanzer or val0108 ) will start calling the maps cancer and blaming the mappers when it's just these people themselves who are bad at the game.
Join a multiplayer lobby, pick one of those maps and you'll understand what i mean.
I doubt you'll find one in the forums as these people are aware that they are bad and don't want to publicize it.
When people in multi picks image material, everything will freeze, fourth dimensions when it's a 5* lobby with players that have 5 digit rank
Don't forget big black. Once the host change the map into big black, everyone join and the room got full all of a suddenN0thingSpecial wrote:
When people in multi picks image material, everything will freeze, fourth dimensions when it's a 5* lobby with players that have 5 digit rank
The big black doesn't work bruh, people now jump in any lobby with "no title" or "Monster"'s hardest difficulty cough*salsa*coughDeathAdderz wrote:
Don't forget big black. Once the host change the map into big black, everyone join and the room got full all of a suddenN0thingSpecial wrote:
When people in multi picks image material, everything will freeze, fourth dimensions when it's a 5* lobby with players that have 5 digit rank
I used to put on airman or the big black into lobbies to see all the worthless 6 digits come in and then kick them all. It was fun.
so evulKhelly wrote:
I used to put on airman or the big black into lobbies to see all the worthless 6 digits come in and then kick them all. It was fun.