forum

orangentle / Yu_Asahina - HAELEQUIN (Extended ver.)

posted
Total Posts
71
show more
Topic Starter
[ -Scarlet- ]

Avishay wrote:

Hi.

RIP my hands after playing this with no warmup.

[the faith of truth]
  1. First of all, why is the diff name lowcased? I'd understand if the author was lowcased completely but egh, CAPITAL LETTERS WORK 'CUZ HAELEQUIN, but just 'The faith of truth' or 'The Faith of Truth' could look really nice too. The reason why I didn't want to capitalize the letters is because of one of the version of Haelequin named "HAELEQUIN the faith of truth". But I'll keep it for now, still got some nicr difficulty naming since Priti have suggested few more cool difficulty names for me
  2. I realise that the background does not have many colors, but I still think that 2 colors is a poor choice for such song, even if you don't want to add any, I still highly recommend to add some to be exclusive for the 1/3 and 1/6. I think the bg is nice enough, and there's not much colours to use to fit this bg. I think the current 2 colours are good enough
  3. 00:09:827 (1) - I honsetly think it will be much nicer for the spinner to end on 00:12:356, and there's the less preferable option of muting the spinner, but anything is better than nothing. Yup, fits really nicely here
  4. 00:16:368 (5,6) - This felt like a relatively big spacing change for no apparent reason, so.. I'd say reduce it a bit. Adjusted a bit
  5. 00:17:066 (5,6,1) - And then this with the really low spacing, feels really odd.. Spaced them a little bit
  6. 00:17:414 (1,2) - As I feel that the rhythm here doesn't do any justice for the song you could try either of these: http://puu.sh/na08c/35fad733aa.jpg or http://puu.sh/na08J/7e563e92a9.jpg, this way there's a bit more purpose to the note on the blue tick. I'll keep my current rhythm since I find it more fitting. Your first suggestion seems find, but the missing 1/4 in-between felt really weird despite having beat at almost every 1/4 of the song. The 2nd suggestion seems really weak on emphasizing the blue tick on 00:17:676 - though
  7. 00:24:914 (5,6) - Current spacing is a bit too big imo, try placing 5 at x268 y172 or change some placements. Adjusted a bit here
  8. 00:29:275 (1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2,3) - I really really hate the movement shifts here, it starts clockwise, then moves drastically to the left and then counter-clockwise, and repeat, feels kinda meh to play. Reworked the pattern here, hopefully is better now @
  9. 00:32:066 (1,2,3) - Feels odd for me as well, http://puu.sh/na0ol/bb44fd1cc2.jpg I feel like this rhythm would work better, mainly because you are not following the triplets before 00:33:112 (1) - 00:33:810 (1) - etc. This way there's no note on the blue tick which you ignored most of the time and it goes nicely. 3/4 sliders feels really odd to play at this part, but I've reworked the pattern on this section here
  10. 00:36:077 (1) - All of those notes are pretty significant, I think using a slider for them is the wrong choice.. Kinda, changed to 1/4 circles
  11. 00:52:996 (1,2,3,4) - I got 2 things to say about this: 1. The stack of (1) and (2) is wrong, mainly because the only time you stacked circles like this is at triples or 1/2 rhythms, this one caught me by surprise and I'd space it or... 2. http://puu.sh/na0zN/8446c54379.jpg Use this rhythm, goes nicer with the held keys. Change to my own rhythm here
  12. 00:54:043 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - I feel like those could be 1/4 sliders with low hitsounded sliderends, would be really cool. No need for that here I guess, wanna keep it simple here
  13. 00:55:089 (1,2,3,4,1) - Continuing with the pattern, as the first 3 sliders have no meaning at all, I'd just use 1/2 circles then a triplet or a 1/4 for the last slider that goes with the ringing, you could do a stream into a 1/4 slider as well, just to emphasize the instrument in the last part. Changed the last 1/4 slider into circles instead
  14. 00:56:659 (5,6) - Sorry but this rhythm is wrong, only the sliderhad is supported by the music. http://puu.sh/na0Oh/27783a95c9.jpg Fixed rhythm~
  15. 01:05:554 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - This rhythm is even better for that ^
  16. 01:08:693 (3) - This is actually 1/8 into 1/6 like this - http://puu.sh/na0TU/6a27d0c480.jpg If you're going to have one slider then please use 1/8. Yea, you're right about the beat here. Fixed!
  17. 01:43:054 (3) - This is just 1/4, if you want 1/6 then 01:42:879 (2) - is supposed to be a reversed 1/6. Alright
  18. 02:05:903 (1,2,3,1) - All of this is sooooooooo awkward, it looks like 1/4 even though this is 1/3 and then there's that 1/6 gap? 1/3 like the next pattern is the best option here. Guess this is the best solution if I want to keep this pattern
  19. 02:08:868 (1) - Splitting it into 2 sliders would be much nicer Alright~
  20. 02:08:868 (1) - No 1/6s here, feels inappropriate, actually, I checked the timing on this pattern and it goes like this: http://puu.sh/na1gT/e86bde968f.jpg I changed to my own rhythm here
  21. 02:11:135 (1,2,3) - Bigger spacing here feels appropriate, try moving (2) to x256 y188 Did something similar
  22. 02:26:833 (1) - I don't really understand this slider, this is the same rhythm like a moment ago and suddenly you switch to 1/1 and you never did it again or before then. I'm following the obvious 1/1 beat here
  23. 02:34:682 (2,3) - How about some movement instead of a stack? Those notes are not similar and it will create some nice effect with the weakness of (3) just like 02:35:554 (2) - I think the current pattern is fine as it is
  24. 02:49:507 (5,1) - I feel like this needs a much bigger spacing with the strength of the slider. Don't think there's a need of increase the spacing bigger than it is
  25. 03:06:949 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - Those ringing sounds land on 1/12 ticks, the current 1/4s are not really doing anything and meh you could feel that you are not playing the song, consider making regular 1/2 rhythm. Maybe, but I'll keep my current rhythm for now since it plays rather nicely here for me
  26. 03:34:682 (2) - How about adding a reverse so it won't end on a 1/8 tick? 1/4 spacing is plenty. Maybe, but the current one really gives the player lots of time to prepare for the upcoming 1/4 stream
  27. 03:48:984 (1,2,3) - Those sliders are really overkill, 1/6 spacing while the notes are not really significant, second slider is just 1/2, I'd suggest making just 1/6 streams or one slider for each like at 04:08:519 (1,2,3,4,5) - (Talking about the pattern itself, as it recurs) I think the current 1/6 slider plays perfectly fine from various testplays I've seen
  28. 03:57:879 (1) - How about stopping kiai here? Then it resumes at 03:59:973 (1) - nicely. I'll keep this for now, feel that there's no need to remove kiai at this that
  29. 04:31:368 (4) - 3/4 like you always do would be nicer. Nah, there's obvious change in the pacing at this part, so following the obvious 1/1 beat would fit nicely
  30. 04:53:170 (1,2,3,4,5,1,2,3,4,5,1,2,3,4) - I can't point is precisely, but I had an awkward time playing this, the overall pattern looks cool but I couldn't find it really fun to play. Maybe the 1.2x SV might be a little brutal, but it should be fine... I guess?
Good luck!
Thanks for the mod! :D
ffstar
[puilet]
00:03:810 (5) - start from here to 00:05:205 (5) - i not sure how to explain this, you see there are 2 different rhythm in this part, slightly increasing tone (00:02:066 (1,2,3,4) - ) then following decreasing tone (00:02:414 (1,2,3,4) - ). The thing i want to say is as the previous part you map increasing tone with lower spacing then decreasing tone with higher spacing which is very nice, so i just want to suggest that why don't you swap the increasing tone with the repeat slider and decreasing tone with stream?
02:08:926 (1) - should start at 02:08:868 -
03:06:949 - wrong rhythm? should be 1/3, map it like this http://puu.sh/naiiY/76c564cb1f.jpg
03:18:461 (3) - hidden repeat sign
03:32:414 (3) - NC?
03:33:112 (3) - NC?
03:37:996 (1) - this repeat slider is actually hold longer than the following one, but this slider hidden in the notes there make it very confusing, actually you made this slider higher velocity before if i no mistaken and i found it better for reading
04:43:228 (1,2,3) - better you make both sliders repeat 5 times

bye
Topic Starter
[ -Scarlet- ]

ffstar0716 wrote:

[puilet]
00:03:810 (5) - start from here to 00:05:205 (5) - i not sure how to explain this, you see there are 2 different rhythm in this part, slightly increasing tone (00:02:066 (1,2,3,4) - ) then following decreasing tone (00:02:414 (1,2,3,4) - ). The thing i want to say is as the previous part you map increasing tone with lower spacing then decreasing tone with higher spacing which is very nice, so i just want to suggest that why don't you swap the increasing tone with the repeat slider and decreasing tone with stream? I reason why I didn't do this is because it's quite boring to play like 5 notes of streams, then hold on the 1/4 repeat slider and so on when the music is clearly streamy all the way. So I alternate a bit between full stream and few 1/4 repeat slider to make it less boring since, mapping full deathstream in the beginning is rather boring to play too
02:08:926 (1) - should start at 02:08:868 - Might feel a little off starting the note at 02:08:926 (1) - , but that's actually where the beat starts
03:06:949 - wrong rhythm? should be 1/3, map it like this http://puu.sh/naiiY/76c564cb1f.jpg The whole rhythm here is rather complicated, in beginning it's 1/3, later 1/6, then 1/4, then... ??? So I'll keep the rhythm here a simple 1/4 rhythm for now, might just fk it and map 1/2 slider or something if it's necessary
03:18:461 (3) - hidden repeat sign I think it's enough time for to read the hidden repeat sign?
03:32:414 (3) - NC? Alright
03:33:112 (3) - NC? ^
03:37:996 (1) - this repeat slider is actually hold longer than the following one, but this slider hidden in the notes there make it very confusing, actually you made this slider higher velocity before if i no mistaken and i found it better for reading Alright, increased the SV
04:43:228 (1,2,3) - better you make both sliders repeat 5 times Opps, bad mistake here. Fixed!

bye
Bye! Thanks for the mod Moey~ :D
Black Emptiness
the faith of truth:
* 00:31:629 (4,1) - Aesthetically speaking, this connection between these two notes is not nice. Try to use the same distance snap or move the stream (starts from 00:31:717 (1) - ) down.
* 01:13:578 (3) - This note is really hard to read. I recommend to place it where slider 01:13:926 (1) - starts.
* 01:45:845 (8,9,1,2) - It would be nice to see the same stream shape as here: 01:46:629 (4,5,6,7,8) - .
* 02:05:903 (1) - New combo is unnecessary here.
* 02:08:926 (1) - Same here.
* 02:26:484 (3,1) - You can blanket 02:26:484 (3) - a bit better.
* 02:28:228 (1,2,3,4) - Is this "not stacking" on purpose? If not, you should fix it.
* 02:43:577 (1,2,3,4) - Try Ctrl+J. It will look better.
* 04:15:321 (1) - The slider is occupied by a circle-shaped stream and it's quite bad to read. As I mentioned before, maybe placing it somewhere else would help.
* 04:41:396 (4,1,2) - Make a round pattern / cleaner pattern (not sharp) like you did before with the "8 pattern".


This is my first mod and first post. I didn't find anything else.

He's right ^
Good luck, Scarlet.
Bara-
Heyo

[General]
• Files unused:
{albumartsmall.jpg} {folder.jpg}
Strange thing, this seems to happen for most of the maps I check nowadays, is it maybe something which happened on my PC (as I recently added some "images" to music to send it to my iPhone

[tfot]
00:01:193 (2) - Please s[ace them, a stack felt rather awkward, as the music sounds like 1/4 (or is it 1/6?)
00:24:740 (4) - To keep consistency, NC this as well (to Nc every beat)
00:25:089 (6) - ^^
00:25:786 (1,1) - This jump is rather awkward, due to high spacing, and having the same DS as the next 1/4 objects. People might think (1) starts at the blue tick, and therefore miss
01:43:926 (1,2,3,4) - Rotate it pleast, so it flow better into the next set of objects, like you do with the next 8 notes!
01:46:368 (1) - Why is there an NC?
02:04:507 (4,7) - NC both for more emphasis on the beat
02:08:926 (1) - Shouldn't it start 1/6 earlier?
02:55:786 (1) - OMG SUCH A NICE SLIDER
03:33:635 (2) - Please Ctrl G to make it a bit more easier to hit
03:33:984 (2) - ^^
03:34:333 (2) - ^^
04:39:653 (8,1) - Why is this at a lower DS compared to the rest?
04:54:740 (5,1) - ^^
04:58:926 (1) - Since the music is quite silent in the break, why not stack it under 04:58:519 (1) - to give it more emphasis

I love this map
I hope your GD will be like this :P
Call me when it's fixed for bubble
Topic Starter
[ -Scarlet- ]

Black Emptiness wrote:

the faith of truth:
* 00:31:629 (4,1) - Aesthetically speaking, this connection between these two notes is not nice. Try to use the same distance snap or move the stream (starts from 00:31:717 (1) - ) down. I think it fits nicely here, emphasizing on the change in beat at 00:31:717 (1) - where it gets less intense, that's why the spacing in lower starting from here
* 01:13:578 (3) - This note is really hard to read. I recommend to place it where slider 01:13:926 (1) - starts. It's pretty fine here. No issues from various testplays I've seen
* 01:45:845 (8,9,1,2) - It would be nice to see the same stream shape as here: 01:46:629 (4,5,6,7,8) - . I tried using curvy pattern before for that pattern, it doesn't seem it fits the pattern with the upcoming curvy stream
* 02:05:903 (1) - New combo is unnecessary here. That NC is to clearly tell that there's a change in rhythm starting from this point.
* 02:08:926 (1) - Same here. Similar, NC use to identify that this slider is different from the others
* 02:26:484 (3,1) - You can blanket 02:26:484 (3) - a bit better. Looks perfect to me
* 02:28:228 (1,2,3,4) - Is this "not stacking" on purpose? If not, you should fix it. This is intentional
* 02:43:577 (1,2,3,4) - Try Ctrl+J. It will look better. I'll stick to my current pattern, looks nice as it is
* 04:15:321 (1) - The slider is occupied by a circle-shaped stream and it's quite bad to read. As I mentioned before, maybe placing it somewhere else would help. Is not really that difficult to read due to the high AR
* 04:41:396 (4,1,2) - Make a round pattern / cleaner pattern (not sharp) like you did before with the "8 pattern". The reason why I didn't stick with the "8" stream pattern here because there's obvious change in the song intensity here

This is my first mod and first post. I didn't find anything else.

He's right ^
Good luck, Scarlet.
Thanks for the mod! Sorry for being stubborn though :? Will get to yours soon!

Bara- wrote:

Heyo

[General]
• Files unused:
{albumartsmall.jpg} {folder.jpg}
Strange thing, this seems to happen for most of the maps I check nowadays, is it maybe something which happened on my PC (as I recently added some "images" to music to send it to my iPhone
Pretty sure these files aren't in my folder
[tfot]
00:01:193 (2) - Please s[ace them, a stack felt rather awkward, as the music sounds like 1/4 (or is it 1/6?) Kinda, changed direction here
00:24:740 (4) - To keep consistency, NC this as well (to Nc every beat) Hmm, alright
00:25:089 (6) - ^^ Don't think there's a need for NC for this though
00:25:786 (1,1) - This jump is rather awkward, due to high spacing, and having the same DS as the next 1/4 objects. People might think (1) starts at the blue tick, and therefore miss Most testplays I've seen so far doesn't have a problem playing this part. Hmm, I'll reduce 00:25:786 (1) - by 1/8 beat then
01:43:926 (1,2,3,4) - Rotate it pleast, so it flow better into the next set of objects, like you do with the next 8 notes! Alright~
01:46:368 (1) - Why is there an NC? The piano at this part is rather different than the one before, also a small change in stream spacing at this point too
02:04:507 (4,7) - NC both for more emphasis on the beat Alright~
02:08:926 (1) - Shouldn't it start 1/6 earlier? Actually the beat clearly starts at 02:08:926 - that's why I map it there. But then feels a little off starting 1/6 later than the red tick. Will follow yours then
02:55:786 (1) - OMG SUCH A NICE SLIDER Thanks~ 8-)
03:33:635 (2) - Please Ctrl G to make it a bit more easier to hit Yup, it is
03:33:984 (2) - ^^ ^
03:34:333 (2) - ^^ ^
04:39:653 (8,1) - Why is this at a lower DS compared to the rest? Adjusted the whole streams here
04:54:740 (5,1) - ^^ Adjusted whole 1/4 slider jumps here
04:58:926 (1) - Since the music is quite silent in the break, why not stack it under 04:58:519 (1) - to give it more emphasis Nah, feel really awkward to remain on the same spot for the last name. Making it further also complements well with the finish too!

I love this map
I hope your GD will be like this :P
Call me when it's fixed for bubble
Thanks for the mod Bara- :D
I remapped the entire last section since it is rather awkward to play. See if it is okay @@
Bara-
i believe in you
Topic Starter
[ -Scarlet- ]
Thanks Bara- <3
Kyrzer
Nothing i can really do here, all i can do is shoot a kudosu star <3

Nice map btw :3
ffstar
holy shiet it is bubbled OwO so mow
where 2nd bubble..................
SYAHME
I like your mapping style, go approved.
BeatofIke
Minor things fixed. Good luck!
This is bubble #2~
Topic Starter
[ -Scarlet- ]

arronlim13 wrote:

Nothing i can really do here, all i can do is shoot a kudosu star <3

Nice map btw :3
Sorry for the late reply. Thanks for the star! :D

ffstar0716 wrote:

holy shiet it is bubbled OwO so mow
where 2nd bubble..................
OwO

SYAHME wrote:

I like your mapping style, go approved.
Thanks~ Working on it!

BeatofIke wrote:

Minor things fixed. Good luck!
This is bubble #2~
Thanks for the bubble~ :)
Bara-
Wow nice
ffstar
this is happening
Rumia-
gogo yapzor
pishifat
snapping stuff:
01:08:693 (3) - snapping in entirely 1/6 or separating between 1/8 and 1/6 is more acceptable. the part before the red tick is sort of ambiguous about snapping and the part afterwards is clearly 1/6, so like using 1/8 for 1/6 doesnt really work
01:17:763 (3) - same as 01:17:589 (2) - (so 1/6). mapping the same thing in the song with differnet rhythm is umwhat
01:26:048 (3,4,5) - 3 is 1/6 then 4 and 5 are 1/4
01:31:194 (3,4,5) - 1/6
01:43:054 (3) - 1/4
some piano stuff in the kiais aren't exactly right, but i think those were discussed on rlc's map with the result of "just do whatever sounds ok snapping is dumb there"

not snapping stuff:
01:29:275 (1,2,3) - and 01:29:973 (1,2,1) - song is repeating the same rhythm for so rhythm should reflect that
02:05:554 (1) - transitions into the 1/3 section better if tail of this is snapped in 1/3 as well
02:08:228 (3) - sv change isnt being applied because green line is in the wrong place
03:10:002 - missing something on the main instrument (which you prioritize everywhere after here)
03:26:833 (2,3,4,5,6,7) - 03:28:228 (2,3,4,5) - can't tell what you're trying to follow with rhythm here. 03:27:095 (4) - makes me think you want to follow the main instrument, but you ignore the same sounds on 03:26:920 - 03:27:443 - . be clearer about what you're following in the music here
03:28:926 (1) - holy strongest sound of the phrase and it's on a sliderend could you like do something about it
03:34:682 (2) - are u missing a repeat on this lol
03:59:275 (1) - song is really making these blue ticks stand out. rhythm should show that
04:43:228 (1,2) - a lot more intuitive to click between each white tick rather than on some 1/6 tick

if you can do something about these i'll rebub
Topic Starter
[ -Scarlet- ]

pishifat wrote:

snapping stuff:
01:08:693 (3) - snapping in entirely 1/6 or separating between 1/8 and 1/6 is more acceptable. the part before the red tick is sort of ambiguous about snapping and the part afterwards is clearly 1/6, so like using 1/8 for 1/6 doesnt really work
Yea, changing to 1/6 should solve the problem
01:17:763 (3) - same as 01:17:589 (2) - (so 1/6). mapping the same thing in the song with differnet rhythm is umwhat
Changed this small section to 1/6
01:26:048 (3,4,5) - 3 is 1/6 then 4 and 5 are 1/4
Alright
01:31:194 (3,4,5) - 1/6
ALright
01:43:054 (3) - 1/4
Don't think so, clearly sounds like a 1/6 to me
some piano stuff in the kiais aren't exactly right, but i think those were discussed on rlc's map with the result of "just do whatever sounds ok snapping is dumb there"
Well, hopefully is fine for mine xd
not snapping stuff:
01:29:275 (1,2,3) - and 01:29:973 (1,2,1) - song is repeating the same rhythm for so rhythm should reflect that
Didn't really notice that lel, fixed!
02:05:554 (1) - transitions into the 1/3 section better if tail of this is snapped in 1/3 as well
Alright
02:08:228 (3) - sv change isnt being applied because green line is in the wrong place
LOL, never noticed this. Fixed!
03:10:002 - missing something on the main instrument (which you prioritize everywhere after here)
Followed the rhythm from other similar parts
03:26:833 (2,3,4,5,6,7) - 03:28:228 (2,3,4,5) - can't tell what you're trying to follow with rhythm here. 03:27:095 (4) - makes me think you want to follow the main instrument, but you ignore the same sounds on 03:26:920 - 03:27:443 - . be clearer about what you're following in the music here
Hopefully is fine now xd
03:28:926 (1) - holy strongest sound of the phrase and it's on a sliderend could you like do something about it
Alright
03:34:682 (2) - are u missing a repeat on this lol
Never really noticed this lel, fixed!
03:59:275 (1) - song is really making these blue ticks stand out. rhythm should show that
Yup, followed your rhythm
04:43:228 (1,2) - a lot more intuitive to click between each white tick rather than on some 1/6 tick
Alright
if you can do something about these i'll rebub
Thanks for your mod and time! :D
Err, do I need to ask the previous BNs to rebubble too?
Bara-
Since he popped yes
When he rebubbles ask me for a recheck
Sadly enough you can't ask BeatofIke anymore since he's no longer a BN
pishifat

[ -Scarlet- ] wrote:

01:43:054 (3) - 1/4
Don't think so, clearly sounds like a 1/6 to me
object 2 is clearly 1/6, but 3 is clearly 1/4 :( they're the same instrument so comparing should make it obvious

and u ended up changing 01:17:938 (4) - for some pattern thing but it's still 1/4, not 1/6 :(

:(
Topic Starter
[ -Scarlet- ]

pishifat wrote:

[ -Scarlet- ] wrote:

01:43:054 (3) - 1/4
Don't think so, clearly sounds like a 1/6 to me
object 2 is clearly 1/6, but 3 is clearly 1/4 :( they're the same instrument so comparing should make it obvious

and u ended up changing 01:17:938 (4) - for some pattern thing but it's still 1/4, not 1/6 :(

:(
LOL, at first I tried listening to these two parts at 25%, the 1/6 seems really obvious here. But when I play it at 75%, 1/4 beat becomes more apparent. Oh god. Anyway, changed these parts to 1/4 :D
pishifat
9223372036854775807
Seijiro
wow, am I late for the party or...
Anyway, recheck from #modreqs.

Looks like the snaps provided by pishi work well and I see no other problems



7085774586302733229
Bara-
Placeholder
I'll look at it tomorrow, I was quite busy irl recently
Topic Starter
[ -Scarlet- ]

pishifat wrote:

9223372036854775807

MrSergio wrote:

wow, am I late for the party or...
Anyway, recheck from #modreqs.

Looks like the snaps provided by pishi work well and I see no other problems

7085774586302733229
Thanks a lot guys~

Bara- wrote:

Placeholder
I'll look at it tomorrow, I was quite busy irl recently
Alright, take your time~
Rumia-
happening man
Bara-

Rumia- wrote:

happening man
It happened :)
Tornado
\ :D /
Akasha-
Ctrl + Shift + I is real lolol
Congratulations
Luel Roseline
Finally yes!
Enon
(´・ω・)凸
Underforest
nice song
Signum
Congratulations
Topic Starter
[ -Scarlet- ]
Thanks everyone~ :D
Luel Roseline
Finally...Completely ranked!
Bara-
Hooray!
Topic Starter
[ -Scarlet- ]
Thought it would take a week (7 days) to rank.
Looks like is 11 days instead LOL
Enon
(´・ω・)凸 GREATZ (´・ω・)凸
Rtyzen
gratz~ :)
Please sign in to reply.

New reply