Lasse wrote:

m4m reply

truth thing

1. why are there two background files in the folder? http://i.imgur.com/exWAvrp.jpg Forgot to remove one of bg when I changed
2. I tried to testplay but my stamina is too bad today so I fail later
   first the things I noticed while playing (before I failed, lol):
3. 00:26:135 (1,1,1,1) - nc spam and spacing makes this look like 1/3 to, just remove the nc spam to make it better to read, so it will be more like 00:38:693 (1,2,3,4) - Yea, kinda forgot to remove the NC spam here @@
4. 00:29:449 (2,3) - again a bit weird to read, I think stacks would do the job just Nah, this one is perfectly fine
   
   now editor stuff;
5. the stream spacing in the pre 14s Intro part feels a bit random to me, as the sound doesn't change that much, yet you change spacing every few notes? putting chanes on something like 00:19:507 (1) - is fine for me though as they sound differently and all For me there's a very difference in the tone every 4 1/4 beat in the stream. That's why I change the DS every few notes
6. 00:23:692 (1,1,1) - bigger spacing for each combo would actually be really nice with the piano here though
7. 00:25:089 (6,1) - real stack or moving 6 somewhere else seems nicer It was stacked before, not sure why is it off this time
8. 00:36:077 (1) - how about moving down to stack on 00:36:600 (1) - ? having a complete stop here would go great with the break in the music, just like you did on 00:57:182 (7,1) - . In fact you do it here again 01:19:507 (6,1) - . So doing it also on the first time would be great Yea, great idea. But then I want to keep the blanketing here 00:36:600 (1,2,3,4) and also keep the jump at 00:35:903 (5,1) larger that's why I place it there. Might consider stacking it though
9. 00:40:438 (1,4) - can you move 1 bit right? this overlap doesnt really look nice imo http://i.imgur.com/7mR4knq.jpg The overlap is perfectly fine here for me
10. 00:44:188 (4,5) - space the same as the two times before? like you did 00:42:792 (5,6) - Alright~
11. 01:08:606 (2,3) - trnasition into the held slider felt weird to me, maybe you can, sth like http://i.imgur.com/yONMxgw.jpg seems to read and play nicer here Is not really weird for me. Feel like stacking here is easier to play since both notes are on the same spot
12. 01:24:304 pretty audible 1/4, maybe maker 3 a kickslider? Didn't really hear any 1/4 though @@
13. 01:26:048 (3) - snapping feels weird to me, is there even anything on the blue tick? using 1/6 here to seems more fitting, as the sounds on 01:26:019 - 01:26:077 - are very audible, sth like this rhythm http://i.imgur.com/I41NU53.jpg feels better to me Maybe, but I feel that the 01:26:048 (3) note is a good way to transit into the 1/6 sliders. Might consider changing this if it is an big issue
14. 01:36:252 - nc on the blue ticks instead would look much nicer here http://i.imgur.com/Al9PfEX.jpg Not sure about the NCs here though, seems pretty fine
15. 01:39:740 (1,2,3,4,5) - since the first sound are differen from 4+ you could try starting with a 1/6 repeat to make a better transition Yea I guess, nerfed the 1/6 stream. A bit different but somewhat similarhttp://i.imgur.com/jfi95fd.jpg maybe even ncspam the 1/6 to make it clearer, stuff like 01:45:496 (4,5,6,7,8,9) - or 01:49:856 (4,5,6,7) - looks (nearly) the same but is 1/4
    also those 1/6 stacks are brutal on a sub 6* map, but that should not be your problem since they fit, just make the transitions to the measier and have them easier to read
16. 02:17:763 (1,2,3,4,5) - same problem here, nc and really low spacing makes it look like 1/6, easiest fix owuld be changing the 1/6 (nearly) stack mentioned before somehow From tons of low DS stream before the players won't really get confused by this kind stream
17. 02:27:705 (1) - coul actually use a hearable sliderslide here to fit the music, same for 02:37:473 (1,3) - and some others Nah, I don't really like using sliderslide hitsound that much, won't use it here
18. 02:55:786 (1) - might look nice if you changed the first nodes a bit to blanket the right part of it, this should give you an idea what I mean: http://i.imgur.com/Hvr0hsO.jpg Hmm, alright then xd
19. 03:20:554 (1,2,3,4) - would look niver if curved smoother/symmetrically http://i.imgur.com/Mmwy53d.jpg Looks similar, but shouldn't be an issue here I guess
20. 03:28:752 (6) - bigger spacing + now 2x repeat makes the chance very high to let go too early and sliderbreak here Not really though, most of the testplays I've seen so far don't really have issues with this part
21. 03:29:275 (1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2,1) - nc on the blue ticks instead? would look better imo The NC I'm currently usually is pretty good enough
22. 03:34:856 (1) - the fact that you use 1/3 and 1/6 snapping before combined with low spacing makes this looks more like a 1/6 stream also :v Don't think the player would actually get confused here from what I've seen in various testplays
23. for the kiai it feels like the curcing of some of those rounded stream like 04:14:624 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - could be a bit smoother Adjust a little here @@, should be fine now LOL
24. 04:47:938 (3,4) - lol is this giant jump really needed? the 1/2 dont even seem that strong, 04:47:066 (5,1) - is already a bit huge for my taste, but better since those are sliders Is quite symmetrical here and yea, because it's slider that's why it isn't really that hard to catch from (3) to (4)
25. 04:58:286 (1,1,1,1,1) - here you actually nc spammed the 1/6 stream like I suggested for the first one, so do it on the first one mentioned too? also this is really going to frustrate players, lol ending the map with a spaced quint that plays like 258 1/4 stream seems really unexpetced :v THe NC spam is there to make sure that the player know the upcoming stream is somewhat different from the kind of stream they have played so far. Should be fine I guess @@

interesting map, good luck!

Neoskylove wrote:

M4M.

00:17:240 (6) - http://puu.sh/mp3BM/f36ab54fb0.jpg I think I'll stick to my current one xd
00:26:484 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9) - http://puu.sh/mp3Du/3b4fcf2cb9.jpgHow about this? Nah, don't really like this @@
00:29:798 (1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2,3) - Reading is very difficult. Make distance same. Make slight changes here
00:37:996 (1,2,2) - shy this is overlap? Nope, doesn't really affect the gameplay anyway
00:40:438 (1,2,3) - you are overlapping with 00:40:962 (4) - . avoid overlap. http://puu.sh/mp3J5/690548f428.jpg Similar to ^
00:48:810 (1,2,3) - ^ ^
02:16:717 (1) - tail can stack with 02:15:496 (2) - Nah, not really necessary here
02:16:193 (2) - you can make blanket. http://puu.sh/mp3RH/3e2f73a660.jpg I think it's already well blanketed
02:32:589 (3) - stack 02:31:368 (4) - head Alright~
04:58:286 (1,1,1,1,1) - delete NC The NC is there for players to be able to know that this stream is different kind of stream they have played throughout the map

Rumia- wrote:

some irc

2016-01-09 16:31 [ -Scarlet- ]: ACTION is listening to [https://osu.ppy.sh/b/866727 orangentle / Yu_Asahina - HAELEQUIN (Extended ver.)]
2016-01-09 16:31 [ -Scarlet- ]: putus straight download error?
2016-01-09 16:31 [ -Scarlet- ]: oh wait osu supporter
2016-01-09 16:32 Rumia-: ok
2016-01-09 16:32 Rumia-: my data dl like
2016-01-09 16:32 Rumia-: 5xfaster
2016-01-09 16:32 Rumia-: LOL
2016-01-09 16:32 Rumia-: fuk wifi nub
2016-01-09 16:32 [ -Scarlet- ]: rip data LOL
2016-01-09 16:32 [ -Scarlet- ]: 1GB/month?
2016-01-09 16:32 Rumia-: 1.5
2016-01-09 16:32 Rumia-: LOL
2016-01-09 16:32 Rumia-: finished dl liao
2016-01-09 16:38 Rumia-: nice
2016-01-09 16:38 [ -Scarlet- ]: wah
2016-01-09 16:38 [ -Scarlet- ]: A
2016-01-09 16:38 Rumia-: i think some intro a bit harder than later part
2016-01-09 16:38 [ -Scarlet- ]: One of the few player get A LOL
2016-01-09 16:38 Rumia-: LOL
2016-01-09 16:38 Rumia-: i win liao
2016-01-09 16:38 Rumia-: until middle part my hand feel tired 
2016-01-09 16:38 Rumia-: cuz early part so heavy stream
2016-01-09 16:38 [ -Scarlet- ]: fk YouTube stream making me lag here
2016-01-09 16:38 Rumia-: then later part relax a bit
2016-01-09 16:38 [ -Scarlet- ]: oo
2016-01-09 16:39 Rumia-: wait ah i play 1 more time
2016-01-09 16:39 Rumia-: lol
2016-01-09 16:39 Rumia-: quite fun
2016-01-09 16:39 [ -Scarlet- ]: Kiai part also quite heavy stream right
2016-01-09 16:39 Rumia-: ya but still got a little rest
2016-01-09 16:39 Rumia-: with those slider reverse
2016-01-09 16:40 [ -Scarlet- ]: I think also because stream damn long in beginning liao later gotten used to it
2016-01-09 16:40 Rumia-: holy shit magic acc i distracted
2016-01-09 16:40 Rumia-: LOLOL
2016-01-09 16:40 [ -Scarlet- ]: LOL
2016-01-09 16:40 [ -Scarlet- ]: remove the gui plz
2016-01-09 16:44 [ -Scarlet- ]: cursor lagging is real
2016-01-09 16:45 Rumia-: YA
2016-01-09 16:45 Rumia-: cursor suddenly lag in middle
2016-01-09 16:45 Rumia-: LOLOL
2016-01-09 16:45 Rumia-: idk wt todo jusst play hope pass only
2016-01-09 16:45 Rumia-: HAAHAH
2016-01-09 16:45 [ -Scarlet- ]: yea
2016-01-09 16:46 Rumia-: uikeks
2016-01-09 16:46 Rumia-: almost 1k combo
2016-01-09 16:46 Rumia-: is this real
2016-01-09 16:46 Rumia-: and B
2016-01-09 16:46 Rumia-: LOL
2016-01-09 16:46 [ -Scarlet- ]: whr accuracy
2016-01-09 16:46 Rumia-: blame cursor la
2016-01-09 16:46 Rumia-: lag
2016-01-09 16:46 Rumia-: LOL
2016-01-09 16:46 [ -Scarlet- ]: nvm still higher score LOL
2016-01-09 16:46 [ -Scarlet- ]: buang pc curi better one
2016-01-09 16:46 Rumia-: hmm
2016-01-09 16:46 Rumia-: i notice 1 thing
2016-01-09 16:47 Rumia-: 04:58:054 (1) - this slider
2016-01-09 16:47 Rumia-: is totally breaking combo
2016-01-09 16:47 Rumia-: maybe should move near the stream better imo
2016-01-09 16:47 [ -Scarlet- ]: yea
2016-01-09 16:48 [ -Scarlet- ]: I think I'll just reduce to 3/8 slider ba
2016-01-09 16:48 [ -Scarlet- ]: same for others
2016-01-09 16:48 Rumia-: the last part only that slider i think
2016-01-09 16:48 Rumia-: spoil
2016-01-09 16:48 Rumia-: from both play i notice i break there
2016-01-09 16:48 [ -Scarlet- ]: oo
2016-01-09 16:48 [ -Scarlet- ]: okay~
2016-01-09 16:49 Rumia-: 04:52:996 - gap here also feel a bit weird
2016-01-09 16:50 Rumia-: 03:37:996 (1,1,2,3,4) -  oh this slider inconsistent no wonder
2016-01-09 16:51 Rumia-: http://puu.sh/mp53L.jpg maybe try doing it with only 3 slider ?
2016-01-09 16:51 Rumia-: http://puu.sh/mp53L.jpg
2016-01-09 16:51 Rumia-: eh post twice dy LOL
2016-01-09 16:51 [ -Scarlet- ]: Hard to read ke?
2016-01-09 16:51 Rumia-: ya
2016-01-09 16:51 Rumia-: i expect all of them same length
2016-01-09 16:51 Rumia-: even tho u nc there still the stream cover the slider head
2016-01-09 16:51 Rumia-: dun see nc also LOL
2016-01-09 16:52 [ -Scarlet- ]: cuz I thought this 03:37:996 (1) different nc can tell the rest of the slider is different
2016-01-09 16:52 [ -Scarlet- ]: orz
2016-01-09 16:52 [ -Scarlet- ]: wtf, that hl whole thing
2016-01-09 16:53 Rumia-: lol
2016-01-09 16:53 Rumia-: yea i know u want do that also
2016-01-09 16:53 Rumia-: but i think 3 slider also sounds better 
2016-01-09 16:53 Rumia-: and plays better too
2016-01-09 16:53 Rumia-: maybe need to adjust a bit those 3 slider pattern
2016-01-09 16:54 Rumia-: the next pattern dont affect also
2016-01-09 16:54 [ -Scarlet- ]: hmm, kk
2016-01-09 16:54 Rumia-: http://puu.sh/mp5c1.jpg probably sth like this would work
2016-01-09 16:54 [ -Scarlet- ]: yea sounds better
2016-01-09 16:54 Rumia-: or ur own idea 
2016-01-09 16:55 [ -Scarlet- ]: dat gap LOL
2016-01-09 16:55 Rumia-: well its easier since u hold longer
2016-01-09 16:55 Rumia-: LOL
2016-01-09 16:55 Rumia-: 03:42:531 (1,2) - eh this maybe extend distance a bit more
2016-01-09 16:55 Rumia-: the overlap a bit clunky
2016-01-09 16:56 [ -Scarlet- ]: oo
2016-01-09 16:56 [ -Scarlet- ]: 1.5 sv then LOL
2016-01-09 16:56 Rumia-: no dun change sv lor
2016-01-09 16:56 Rumia-: just use ctrl shift s
2016-01-09 16:57 Rumia-: selection center
2016-01-09 16:57 Rumia-: just tick x axis
2016-01-09 16:58 [ -Scarlet- ]: holy shit
2016-01-09 16:58 [ -Scarlet- ]: Never knew got this black magic
2016-01-09 16:58 [ -Scarlet- ]: LOL
2016-01-09 16:58 Rumia-: LOL
2016-01-09 16:58 Rumia-: am i genius
2016-01-09 16:58 Rumia-: LOLOL
2016-01-09 17:04 Rumia-: 04:31:368 (4) - eh i think this better if u do 1/2 reverse
2016-01-09 17:04 Rumia-: http://puu.sh/mp5uQ.jpg
2016-01-09 17:04 Rumia-: sounds better imo
2016-01-09 17:05 Rumia-: http://puu.sh/mp5xt.jpgmaybe sth like this
2016-01-09 17:06 [ -Scarlet- ]: oh, you no untick the stacking thingy?
2016-01-09 17:06 [ -Scarlet- ]: yea actually sounds better
2016-01-09 17:07 Rumia-: gridsnap ?
2016-01-09 17:07 Rumia-: i usually untick it when shaping sth
2016-01-09 17:07 [ -Scarlet- ]: http://osu.ppy.sh/ss/4299182
2016-01-09 17:08 [ -Scarlet- ]: oo
2016-01-09 17:08 Rumia-: cuz it will bother distance
2016-01-09 17:08 [ -Scarlet- ]: for me damn messing without stacking LOL
2016-01-09 17:08 Rumia-: LOL
2016-01-09 17:08 Rumia-: 01:36:077 (4) - duwan change this to 1/4 slider ?
2016-01-09 17:10 [ -Scarlet- ]: for me same beat like 01:35:554 (1,2,3) so no use making it different
2016-01-09 17:11 Rumia-: kk
2016-01-09 17:11 Rumia-: btw got 1/3 part i feel sth weird
2016-01-09 17:11 Rumia-: 02:06:077 (4,3,3,3,3,3) -  compare to 02:09:740 (1,1,1,1,1) - 
2016-01-09 17:12 Rumia-: i think they are basically same rhythm
2016-01-09 17:12 Rumia-: u are also forcing 1/6 jump here which i dont think rankable
2016-01-09 17:12 [ -Scarlet- ]: aI think I changed that part 99 times already LOL
2016-01-09 17:12 Rumia-: LOLOL
2016-01-09 17:13 Rumia-: i guess other part ok dy
2016-01-09 17:13 [ -Scarlet- ]: where 1/6 jump
2016-01-09 17:13 [ -Scarlet- ]: the one before?
2016-01-09 17:13 Rumia-: 02:06:484 (3,1) - 
2016-01-09 17:13 Rumia-: 02:06:833 (3,1) - 
2016-01-09 17:14 [ -Scarlet- ]: god
2016-01-09 17:14 [ -Scarlet- ]: tuhan
2016-01-09 17:14 Rumia-: oh saya tuhan
2016-01-09 17:14 [ -Scarlet- ]: that one see first ba, if possible I duwan touch this part at all LOL
2016-01-09 17:14 [ -Scarlet- ]: cuz looks nice to me
2016-01-09 17:14 Rumia-: ya look mmg nice
2016-01-09 17:14 Rumia-: the actual matter is playbility
2016-01-09 17:15 [ -Scarlet- ]: but playing it
2016-01-09 17:15 [ -Scarlet- ]: LOL
2016-01-09 17:15 [ -Scarlet- ]: gg
2016-01-09 17:15 [ -Scarlet- ]: all 100s there
2016-01-09 17:15 Rumia-: if u need idea i simply say remove 02:06:252 (1,1,1,1) -  and extend all 3 slider 
2016-01-09 17:15 Rumia-: but maybe u need to re pattern a bit but im sure u can do it
2016-01-09 17:15 Rumia-: lolz
2016-01-09 17:16 [ -Scarlet- ]: that's worse come to worse lo
2016-01-09 17:16 [ -Scarlet- ]: yea
2016-01-09 17:16 Rumia-: yea cuz 1/3 part should be one of the relax part during the solo anyway
2016-01-09 17:16 Rumia-: ok i done modding
2016-01-09 17:17 [ -Scarlet- ]: kk, thanks hamzap

HeatKai wrote:

Good luck, good luck!

MrSergio wrote:

Mod requested in forum PM :3

[General]

• Both your combo colors are really "extreme". While the white itself fits nice, the dark red (which is almost black) is a pain to play with, since it blends with the dim's color :/ Maybe make the black combo color less darker... Changed it to light brown xd
  
  Just because everyone complains about this, the dimensions of your BG aren't the suggested ones (either 1024x768 or 1366x768 or any other 4:3/16:9 resolution)
  Here : link. I simply added more white pixels at the right of the image so the character is more centered too (1024x768) Thanks for editing the picture! One of the main reason why I was reluctant to use this image because of its resolution, and I'm no expert in editing images @@

[the faith of truth]

• 00:09:740 (5) - NC? x) You use one each 1/1 here in any case, so... Hmm... I guess it would be appropriate to NC here then
  
  00:17:676 (2,3,4) - Just personal preference to improve the pattern here and following better the music: since there is kinda a stop in the rhythm of the song using a rather small spacing helps the player also focus on that particular rhythm your pattern is aiming for, so, what about moving (4) to around 136;212? Pretty great idea Fixed!
  
  00:23:694 (1,1) - Unrankable: you must switch combo color when placing a New Combo otherwise the meaning of New Combos is vain. Please revert these 2 to white or add a third color which isn't near in values to the black one Not sure why I have this NC issue in the first place. I guess is because I was trying to move this map from another mapset where the combo color was different
  
  00:24:740 (4) - NC? You used one each 1/1 for this section I don't think NC is really needed for this particular part
  
  00:29:449 (2,3) - I feel I must enforce what RikiH_, TequilaWolf, Lasse and Meoskylove pointed out here: it's really hard to read, and the reason is the spacing: 1 --> 2 is huge while 2 --> 3 is tiny. In such situation either stack the notes of the shorter jump (2, 3) or move them farther away since they really look like 1/4 I guess this part is really an issue here. Spaced (2) and (3) a little more
  
  00:35:903 (5) - Convert this into a 1/4 slider kick as you did for 00:33:810 (1,1,1) - for consistency reasons Yea sure
  
  00:37:647 (5) - Missing NC? You used again one NC each 1/1 Actually I'm not particularly sure about NC-ing this. Main reason was because 00:36:077 (1) part has the same DS and the others like 00:37:996 (1,2,3,4) have a DS on their own. But I'll just NC this part for now
  
  00:47:153 (1,1) - Again, do not use the same combo color twice in a row, it's unrankable. You even did the correct thing for 00:58:316 (1,1) - ... Alright, fixed!
  
  01:18:112 (1,2) - This spacing kinda goes in conflict with 01:16:717 (3,4,5) - . The main reason is because they are fairly near in time. They wouldn't be a problem if they were apart, but in this case you mix things up and players might be confused by this: you used to stack a 1/4 note at the end of the sldier only when there were at least 2 1/4 circles after it (a triplet basically), while you kept using a jump in case there was only an object after the long slider. See what you can do here, since this concerns more your style Hmm, sounds logical here. Spaced 01:18:112 (1,2) a little more for better readability
  Note: using stacked 1/4 object at the end and at the start of a slider isn't the same thing. I'm referring to a possible reply with "01:18:984 (4,5) - is the same so why not" which is not No worries, I'm not the type who replies like that
  
  01:20:554 (5,1) - Switch NC please, for the usual reason of the 1/1 NC pattern Did things a little different here, keeping it consistent with 00:47:153 (1,2,3)
  
  01:29:973 (1) - Imo you could make this flow better by using a 1/4 slider instead, since you used it on 01:30:147 (2) - which is almost the same note into the music Sounds like it, fixed!
  
  01:31:717 (1,2,3,4,5,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,1,2,3,4,5,6,7) - This is great, omg Thanks~
  
  01:37:996 (5) - Missing NC? (I'm starting to realize that there isn't a solid NC pattern, or rather, logic. While I do see that you used in this case a NC for pointing out the DS change I do not understand while you didn't change DS where the piano really changes rhythm each 1/1) Not sure about this, I didn't NC this part OR make any change in DS because the change in piano rhythm isn't as obvious as 01:38:345 (1,2,3,4) or 01:37:298 (1,2,3,4) . So I'll be keeping this for now
  
  01:39:391 (5) - Same ^ ^
  
  01:41:833 (5,1,2) - Remove the NC from 1, and add one on both 5 and 2 Added on 01:41:833 (5) and removed 01:42:007 (2)
  
  01:44:973 - Again, you keep alternating from 1 NC each 1/1 to one NC each 2/1 or even 3/1. The next streams has also this problem, see if you can fix it
  I usually NC only when there's a change in DS in that particular stream. If the DS is constant, I'll keep it at the same combo
  
  02:01:629 - I really wanted to play this note too while testplaying ;w; Maybe divide 02:01:368 (5) - into 2 1/4 sliders... I don't like the idea of dividing the slider into 2 1/4 sliders since there's no obvious piano at 02:01:542 . Guess I'll add a note at this part
  
  02:03:461 (1,2) - Wait wait wait... why the jump lands on the weak beat here? Imo the jump should fall exactly where the NC starts.
  Same goes for 02:04:159 (1,2) - 02:04:507 (4,5) - 02:04:856 (7,8,1) - I'm not really sure though. I believe that the jump Should start from the 1/4 slider, which is where the NC starts. As for where it lands... I'm still not really confident about this though. I'm keeping this for now since for now since this part plays perfectly fine from what various testplays
  
  02:17:763 (1,2,3,4,5) - Move all these notes "one note farther", like this, since the DS change happens on the NC, not before it Opps, nice catch there
  
  02:18:112 (5) - NC? I never really like the idea of NC-ing parts that is particularly harder to read or change in rhythm like for this one. But still I'll NC this for now
  
  02:21:949 (1) - The jump to 2 is kinda confusing, since there is a huge decrease in spacing from 2 to 3. My suggestion here is to keep 1 staked on 02:21:600 (3) - . It also gives a nicer feeling imo Yea, kinda. Fixed!
  
  02:32:763 (4,5,6) - This straight line is kinda... "weak". What about a classical triangle like this? There is also a nice emphasis on the next slider like this Did something similar
  
  02:34:682 (2,3,1) - Wow, this is really confusing. 02:34:507 (1,2) - Is bigger on the playfield even if it shorter on the timeline than 02:34:682 (2,3) -
  I have a solution for this, but I'll give you the screen since it's kinda long to explain: screen (note that the black 1 is on top of 02:36:600 (3) - which comes a lot later. The whole (1, 2, 3) black pattern got rotated by around -130 degrees) Yea, have seen quite some player get confused at this part and haven't really found a good solution to it. Nice suggestion
  
  02:39:217 (2) - The beast on the tail of this kinda goes to waste, since it's equal at the beat on its head (and as you know sliders have more emphasis on their head) Yea, I should keep things consistent here like what I did later
  
  02:42:531 (5) - NC, where are you, my love? :^) (ok, I'll stop, since I already explained the whole matter before xD) I also explained my idea on NC-ing just now. I'll be keeping this for now till more people bring out this issue xd
  
  02:55:786 (1) - This is sexy, man
  
  03:06:339 - Keep in mind that there is always a beat in such spots on your patterns. If you can do something to use that beat, it's welcome, if not, don't worry too much since it's fine as it is (it just feels a waste of beats imo tho) Yea actually. Swapped position of 03:06:252 (1,2)
  
  03:08:693 (3) - I hear more beats here tho :/ Crappy pattern as example That part seems having similar beat as 03:08:345 (1) , at least for me. But I've converted 03:09:042 (1) into 2 1/4 slider since the loud beat is more obvious here
  
  03:41:484 (5) - NC :^) Mentioned about this before
  
  03:43:490 (4,1) - Kinda hard imo, but I guess it's just me here Yea, it might be difficult but at least it fits the song really well here
  
  04:35:903 (2,3,4,5) - Be careful, since you used this kind of spacing also for your 1/6 bursts which may be confusing Maybe, so far I've seen none of the players have problems with this part yet though. I'll be keeping this for now
  
  04:58:228 (1,1,1,1,1,1) - Judging from the spacing, I'd rather play them as 1/3, not as 1/6 (this is related to the above suggestion, where the spacing is the one that makes the difference between understandable and not understandable) Kinda. Reduced the DS significantly

[Hitsounds]
Unless I say otherwise, these are all personal preferences

• 00:09:740 (5) - soft-hitfinish? Even the custom soft-hitclap may work here I actually didn't want to hitsound this since it has a nice transition to the spinner without the hitsound. But yea soft-hitfinish sounds better
  00:24:565 (3) - I don't think the soft-hitwhistle on the head is useful here, since you didn't use it for 00:23:868 (3,3) - Maybe, but the soft-hitwhistle sounds really nice here for me along with 00:24:740 (4,5,6)
  01:12:007 (7) - soft -hitwhistle? Sounds nice, sure
  01:14:449 (2) - Same ^ ^
  01:16:193 (5) - Same ^ ^
  01:30:845 (1) - Missing soft-hitwhistle on head? Alright
  02:23:606 (3) - soft-hitwhistle? ^
  03:58:577 (1) - soft-hitfinish instead of soft-hitwhistle? Alright, did few different things here too
  03:59:973 (1) - normal-hitfinish? Oh, both of us had the same idea xD One of the few different thing I've made

Volume:

• 00:20:903 - This 30% difference in volume is really a lot. Consider using 70% instead of 80% from 00:20:903 - till 00:26:484 -
  00:39:042 - Return to 70% since the emphasis gets lowered from here on
  01:09:740 - Back to 80% since the music starts giving more bump to thanks to build up (01:09:043 (1,2,3,4,5) - )
  01:31:717 - Revert to 70% or even 65% to let the player hear more the music, and in particular the piano
  01:37:647 - Back to 80%
  02:19:507 - Return to 70% since the song calms down a bit
  02:44:973 - Back to 80%
  03:34:856 - Pump it up to 90% since this part is really intense
  03:39:391 - Maybe even 95% or 100%
  03:40:438 - 90% for all the kiai, since it's the kiai x)
  04:25:089 - Just to make it sure, back to 80%, kiai ended
  04:53:170 - 90%
  05:02:763 - Everything you want below 30%

Last thing I have to say is to be careful about the Combo-ing and above all those 1/6 streams, since you keep using different spacings for your 1/4 streams which may confuse the player (basically, he just thinks of it as another 1/4 stream with variation in spacing. A different combo color or a different spacing may help)

That's all, good luck :3
Really nice map btw, here's a star for you~

P A N wrote:

irc woohoo

SPOILER

18:19 *P A N is listening to [http://osu.ppy.sh/b/866727 orangentle / Yu_Asahina - HAELEQUIN (Extended ver.)]
18:19 P A N: best
18:19 [ -Scarlet- ]: LOL
18:19 [ -Scarlet- ]: Thanks xd
18:23 [ -Scarlet- ]: o, mouse?
18:24 P A N: yea
18:24 P A N: mouse with wifi
18:24 P A N: lol
18:25 P A N: MY GOD
18:25 [ -Scarlet- ]: LOL
18:25 P A N: BEST
18:25 [ -Scarlet- ]: No wonder mouse slips xd
18:25 P A N: ahahahaha
18:25 P A N: I think
18:25 P A N: this map is my 2nd favorite
18:25 P A N: first is furioso melodia
18:26 [ -Scarlet- ]: LOL really? Thanks xD
18:26 [ -Scarlet- ]: trying to get it ranked tho, waiting BN notice me orz
18:26 P A N: yes please
18:26 P A N: XD
18:27 P A N: why people still can mod this i wonder
18:27 P A N: and that's wall of mod
18:29 [ -Scarlet- ]: idk, feel like for now only can improve map from watching testplay
18:29 [ -Scarlet- ]: since I cant play this myself LOL
18:29 P A N: XD
18:29 P A N: 02:19:507 (1,2,1,2,1,2,3,1,2,3,4,1,2) - 
18:29 P A N: how about add whistle to all of tail
18:30 P A N: I tried to add and I think it's fit
18:31 P A N: ah maybe not for 02:22:298 (3,4,1,2) - 
18:31 [ -Scarlet- ]: actually sounds very nice
18:31 P A N: but 02:19:507 (1,2,1,2,1,2) - is great
18:31 P A N: yea
18:32 P A N: 02:29:100 (5) - 02:30:670 (1) - finish? XD
18:33 [ -Scarlet- ]: kk, sounds great along with 02:27:705 (1)
18:33 P A N: 02:18:112 (1) - also
18:34 [ -Scarlet- ]: ^this I tried before, doesn't really fit the music for me @
18:35 P A N: i see
18:36 P A N: since this 00:12:531 - 
18:36 P A N: have you tried add whistle on every red tick
18:38 [ -Scarlet- ]: Nope
18:38 [ -Scarlet- ]: sounds quite nice actually xd Added
18:38 P A N: yea ahaha
18:39 P A N: maybe 00:01:368 - too
18:39 P A N: about whistle
18:40 [ -Scarlet- ]: yea, added there too >
18:41 P A N: imo 01:06:949 (3,1,1) - are strong enough to add finish?
18:43 [ -Scarlet- ]: Yup, sounds nice
18:43 [ -Scarlet- ]: should throw throwing finish at every loud beat here LOL, actually sounds really nice
18:44 P A N: ahahaha
18:47 P A N: 01:43:926 - till 02:02:763 - 
18:47 P A N: whistle every red tick?
18:47 P A N: you added on some redtick tho
18:48 [ -Scarlet- ]: I wanted to, but sounds like whistle spamming, so made it a little different
18:48 [ -Scarlet- ]: LOL
18:50 P A N: awwww pattern so gud
18:51 P A N: hope i can map like this :/
18:51 [ -Scarlet- ]: LOL thanks for the hitsound help xD Helped a lot
18:52 [ -Scarlet- ]: actually spent like 1 hr thinking how the to hitsound this kind of map LOL
18:52 P A N: lol
18:52 [ -Scarlet- ]: since I'm horrible at hitsound z
18:53 [ -Scarlet- ]: anyway, thanks a lot xd
18:53 P A N: yea no problem
18:53 P A N: i love this map
18:53 P A N: sp yea
18:53 P A N: so*
18:53 P A N: let me take kds :3
18:53 [ -Scarlet- ]: want post chatlog?

taku wrote:

i love this mappppppppp ;w;

great job! ;> ;>

AtHeoN wrote:

cool map, here some star :3

Come[Back]Home wrote:

the faith of truth

00:17:240 (6,1) - I know its an Extra, but stacking the tail of (1) under (6) is kinda hard to read at first. I think this shouldn't be a problem here, at least for me
00:28:577 (4,5) - Wouldnt this look and play cooler if (5) was curvy aswell? Like this Yea kinda~
00:38:693 (1,2,3,4) - Just a minor thing aswell, i would move (4) too 121/293 for a perfect straight line. Looks better Adjusted to 120/292 instead xd
00:52:996 (1) - Shouldnt this slider end here 00:53:257 - ? I think it fits more with the music, you could place a circle here aswell 00:53:345 - and add a clap on it. Not really, the current rhythms fits the music perfectly for me especially the beat on 00:53:257 -
02:08:345 (1,2) - This is really uncomfortable to play, because of the high ds which causes a somehow bad flow. Maybe you should reduce the ds a bit Changed the pattern on 02:08:345 (1) slider instead
02:33:112 (6) - i think moving this one too 260/250 would create a cool jump pattern to play imo. Alright
02:39:217 (2) - It would fit more if it had the same ds as 02:39:566 (1,2) - Okay
02:40:961 (1,2) - ^ ^
02:54:740 (1) - NC is not necessary here since you havent dont that before I NC there due to the 2 circles jumps, but I might remove it if it's necessary
03:33:810 (1,2,1,2,1,2) - Woah, dont you think that this is a bit too hard to read? Many will combobreak there since its so unexpected. Try something else. Reworked pattern here, hopefully is better now @@
03:56:484 (3,2) - The overlap somehow ruins the good looking pattern imo Is pretty okay as it is
04:50:903 (1,1) - Are you sure about this? This may cause a dq since you can barely see the second slider. Yup, this should be perfectly fine
04:51:688 (1,1) - ^ ^


Sorry if this mod doesnt help, im not an Extra modder haha
Cool map though, good luck!

kkk wrote:

really fun to play, pray for approve! \o/

SolarFox wrote:

Saja nak beri star sbab map ni rly nice leh ;D

1. First of all, why is the diff name lowcased? I'd understand if the author was lowcased completely but egh, CAPITAL LETTERS WORK 'CUZ HAELEQUIN, but just 'The faith of truth' or 'The Faith of Truth' could look really nice too.
2. I realise that the background does not have many colors, but I still think that 2 colors is a poor choice for such song, even if you don't want to add any, I still highly recommend to add some to be exclusive for the 1/3 and 1/6.
3. 00:09:827 (1) - I honsetly think it will be much nicer for the spinner to end on 00:12:356, and there's the less preferable option of muting the spinner, but anything is better than nothing.
4. 00:16:368 (5,6) - This felt like a relatively big spacing change for no apparent reason, so.. I'd say reduce it a bit.
5. 00:17:066 (5,6,1) - And then this with the really low spacing, feels really odd..
6. 00:17:414 (1,2) - As I feel that the rhythm here doesn't do any justice for the song you could try either of these: http://puu.sh/na08c/35fad733aa.jpg or http://puu.sh/na08J/7e563e92a9.jpg, this way there's a bit more purpose to the note on the blue tick.
7. 00:24:914 (5,6) - Current spacing is a bit too big imo, try placing 5 at x268 y172 or change some placements.
8. 00:29:275 (1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2,3) - I really really hate the movement shifts here, it starts clockwise, then moves drastically to the left and then counter-clockwise, and repeat, feels kinda meh to play.
9. 00:32:066 (1,2,3) - Feels odd for me as well, http://puu.sh/na0ol/bb44fd1cc2.jpg I feel like this rhythm would work better, mainly because you are not following the triplets before 00:33:112 (1) - 00:33:810 (1) - etc. This way there's no note on the blue tick which you ignored most of the time and it goes nicely.
10. 00:36:077 (1) - All of those notes are pretty significant, I think using a slider for them is the wrong choice..
11. 00:52:996 (1,2,3,4) - I got 2 things to say about this: 1. The stack of (1) and (2) is wrong, mainly because the only time you stacked circles like this is at triples or 1/2 rhythms, this one caught me by surprise and I'd space it or... 2. http://puu.sh/na0zN/8446c54379.jpg Use this rhythm, goes nicer with the held keys.
12. 00:54:043 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - I feel like those could be 1/4 sliders with low hitsounded sliderends, would be really cool.
13. 00:55:089 (1,2,3,4,1) - Continuing with the pattern, as the first 3 sliders have no meaning at all, I'd just use 1/2 circles then a triplet or a 1/4 for the last slider that goes with the ringing, you could do a stream into a 1/4 slider as well, just to emphasize the instrument in the last part.
14. 00:56:659 (5,6) - Sorry but this rhythm is wrong, only the sliderhad is supported by the music. http://puu.sh/na0Oh/27783a95c9.jpg
15. 01:05:554 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - This rhythm is even better for that ^
16. 01:08:693 (3) - This is actually 1/8 into 1/6 like this - http://puu.sh/na0TU/6a27d0c480.jpg If you're going to have one slider then please use 1/8.
17. 01:43:054 (3) - This is just 1/4, if you want 1/6 then 01:42:879 (2) - is supposed to be a reversed 1/6.
18. 02:05:903 (1,2,3,1) - All of this is sooooooooo awkward, it looks like 1/4 even though this is 1/3 and then there's that 1/6 gap? 1/3 like the next pattern is the best option here.
19. 02:08:868 (1) - Splitting it into 2 sliders would be much nicer.
20. 02:08:868 (1) - No 1/6s here, feels inappropriate, actually, I checked the timing on this pattern and it goes like this: http://puu.sh/na1gT/e86bde968f.jpg
21. 02:11:135 (1,2,3) - Bigger spacing here feels appropriate, try moving (2) to x256 y188
22. 02:26:833 (1) - I don't really understand this slider, this is the same rhythm like a moment ago and suddenly you switch to 1/1 and you never did it again or before then.
23. 02:34:682 (2,3) - How about some movement instead of a stack? Those notes are not similar and it will create some nice effect with the weakness of (3) just like 02:35:554 (2) -
24. 02:49:507 (5,1) - I feel like this needs a much bigger spacing with the strength of the slider.
25. 03:06:949 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - Those ringing sounds land on 1/12 ticks, the current 1/4s are not really doing anything and meh you could feel that you are not playing the song, consider making regular 1/2 rhythm.
26. 03:34:682 (2) - How about adding a reverse so it won't end on a 1/8 tick? 1/4 spacing is plenty.
27. 03:48:984 (1,2,3) - Those sliders are really overkill, 1/6 spacing while the notes are not really significant, second slider is just 1/2, I'd suggest making just 1/6 streams or one slider for each like at 04:08:519 (1,2,3,4,5) - (Talking about the pattern itself, as it recurs)
28. 03:57:879 (1) - How about stopping kiai here? Then it resumes at 03:59:973 (1) - nicely.
29. 04:31:368 (4) - 3/4 like you always do would be nicer.
30. 04:53:170 (1,2,3,4,5,1,2,3,4,5,1,2,3,4) - I can't point is precisely, but I had an awkward time playing this, the overall pattern looks cool but I couldn't find it really fun to play.

Avishay wrote:

Hi.

RIP my hands after playing this with no warmup.

[the faith of truth]

1. First of all, why is the diff name lowcased? I'd understand if the author was lowcased completely but egh, CAPITAL LETTERS WORK 'CUZ HAELEQUIN, but just 'The faith of truth' or 'The Faith of Truth' could look really nice too. The reason why I didn't want to capitalize the letters is because of one of the version of Haelequin named "HAELEQUIN the faith of truth". But I'll keep it for now, still got some nicr difficulty naming since Priti have suggested few more cool difficulty names for me
2. I realise that the background does not have many colors, but I still think that 2 colors is a poor choice for such song, even if you don't want to add any, I still highly recommend to add some to be exclusive for the 1/3 and 1/6. I think the bg is nice enough, and there's not much colours to use to fit this bg. I think the current 2 colours are good enough
3. 00:09:827 (1) - I honsetly think it will be much nicer for the spinner to end on 00:12:356, and there's the less preferable option of muting the spinner, but anything is better than nothing. Yup, fits really nicely here
4. 00:16:368 (5,6) - This felt like a relatively big spacing change for no apparent reason, so.. I'd say reduce it a bit. Adjusted a bit
5. 00:17:066 (5,6,1) - And then this with the really low spacing, feels really odd.. Spaced them a little bit
6. 00:17:414 (1,2) - As I feel that the rhythm here doesn't do any justice for the song you could try either of these: http://puu.sh/na08c/35fad733aa.jpg or http://puu.sh/na08J/7e563e92a9.jpg, this way there's a bit more purpose to the note on the blue tick. I'll keep my current rhythm since I find it more fitting. Your first suggestion seems find, but the missing 1/4 in-between felt really weird despite having beat at almost every 1/4 of the song. The 2nd suggestion seems really weak on emphasizing the blue tick on 00:17:676 - though
7. 00:24:914 (5,6) - Current spacing is a bit too big imo, try placing 5 at x268 y172 or change some placements. Adjusted a bit here
8. 00:29:275 (1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2,3) - I really really hate the movement shifts here, it starts clockwise, then moves drastically to the left and then counter-clockwise, and repeat, feels kinda meh to play. Reworked the pattern here, hopefully is better now @
9. 00:32:066 (1,2,3) - Feels odd for me as well, http://puu.sh/na0ol/bb44fd1cc2.jpg I feel like this rhythm would work better, mainly because you are not following the triplets before 00:33:112 (1) - 00:33:810 (1) - etc. This way there's no note on the blue tick which you ignored most of the time and it goes nicely. 3/4 sliders feels really odd to play at this part, but I've reworked the pattern on this section here
10. 00:36:077 (1) - All of those notes are pretty significant, I think using a slider for them is the wrong choice.. Kinda, changed to 1/4 circles
11. 00:52:996 (1,2,3,4) - I got 2 things to say about this: 1. The stack of (1) and (2) is wrong, mainly because the only time you stacked circles like this is at triples or 1/2 rhythms, this one caught me by surprise and I'd space it or... 2. http://puu.sh/na0zN/8446c54379.jpg Use this rhythm, goes nicer with the held keys. Change to my own rhythm here
12. 00:54:043 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - I feel like those could be 1/4 sliders with low hitsounded sliderends, would be really cool. No need for that here I guess, wanna keep it simple here
13. 00:55:089 (1,2,3,4,1) - Continuing with the pattern, as the first 3 sliders have no meaning at all, I'd just use 1/2 circles then a triplet or a 1/4 for the last slider that goes with the ringing, you could do a stream into a 1/4 slider as well, just to emphasize the instrument in the last part. Changed the last 1/4 slider into circles instead
14. 00:56:659 (5,6) - Sorry but this rhythm is wrong, only the sliderhad is supported by the music. http://puu.sh/na0Oh/27783a95c9.jpg Fixed rhythm~
15. 01:05:554 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - This rhythm is even better for that ^
16. 01:08:693 (3) - This is actually 1/8 into 1/6 like this - http://puu.sh/na0TU/6a27d0c480.jpg If you're going to have one slider then please use 1/8. Yea, you're right about the beat here. Fixed!
17. 01:43:054 (3) - This is just 1/4, if you want 1/6 then 01:42:879 (2) - is supposed to be a reversed 1/6. Alright
18. 02:05:903 (1,2,3,1) - All of this is sooooooooo awkward, it looks like 1/4 even though this is 1/3 and then there's that 1/6 gap? 1/3 like the next pattern is the best option here. Guess this is the best solution if I want to keep this pattern
19. 02:08:868 (1) - Splitting it into 2 sliders would be much nicer Alright~
20. 02:08:868 (1) - No 1/6s here, feels inappropriate, actually, I checked the timing on this pattern and it goes like this: http://puu.sh/na1gT/e86bde968f.jpg I changed to my own rhythm here
21. 02:11:135 (1,2,3) - Bigger spacing here feels appropriate, try moving (2) to x256 y188 Did something similar
22. 02:26:833 (1) - I don't really understand this slider, this is the same rhythm like a moment ago and suddenly you switch to 1/1 and you never did it again or before then. I'm following the obvious 1/1 beat here
23. 02:34:682 (2,3) - How about some movement instead of a stack? Those notes are not similar and it will create some nice effect with the weakness of (3) just like 02:35:554 (2) - I think the current pattern is fine as it is
24. 02:49:507 (5,1) - I feel like this needs a much bigger spacing with the strength of the slider. Don't think there's a need of increase the spacing bigger than it is
25. 03:06:949 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - Those ringing sounds land on 1/12 ticks, the current 1/4s are not really doing anything and meh you could feel that you are not playing the song, consider making regular 1/2 rhythm. Maybe, but I'll keep my current rhythm for now since it plays rather nicely here for me
26. 03:34:682 (2) - How about adding a reverse so it won't end on a 1/8 tick? 1/4 spacing is plenty. Maybe, but the current one really gives the player lots of time to prepare for the upcoming 1/4 stream
27. 03:48:984 (1,2,3) - Those sliders are really overkill, 1/6 spacing while the notes are not really significant, second slider is just 1/2, I'd suggest making just 1/6 streams or one slider for each like at 04:08:519 (1,2,3,4,5) - (Talking about the pattern itself, as it recurs) I think the current 1/6 slider plays perfectly fine from various testplays I've seen
28. 03:57:879 (1) - How about stopping kiai here? Then it resumes at 03:59:973 (1) - nicely. I'll keep this for now, feel that there's no need to remove kiai at this that
29. 04:31:368 (4) - 3/4 like you always do would be nicer. Nah, there's obvious change in the pacing at this part, so following the obvious 1/1 beat would fit nicely
30. 04:53:170 (1,2,3,4,5,1,2,3,4,5,1,2,3,4) - I can't point is precisely, but I had an awkward time playing this, the overall pattern looks cool but I couldn't find it really fun to play. Maybe the 1.2x SV might be a little brutal, but it should be fine... I guess?

Good luck!

ffstar0716 wrote:

[puilet]
00:03:810 (5) - start from here to 00:05:205 (5) - i not sure how to explain this, you see there are 2 different rhythm in this part, slightly increasing tone (00:02:066 (1,2,3,4) - ) then following decreasing tone (00:02:414 (1,2,3,4) - ). The thing i want to say is as the previous part you map increasing tone with lower spacing then decreasing tone with higher spacing which is very nice, so i just want to suggest that why don't you swap the increasing tone with the repeat slider and decreasing tone with stream? I reason why I didn't do this is because it's quite boring to play like 5 notes of streams, then hold on the 1/4 repeat slider and so on when the music is clearly streamy all the way. So I alternate a bit between full stream and few 1/4 repeat slider to make it less boring since, mapping full deathstream in the beginning is rather boring to play too
02:08:926 (1) - should start at 02:08:868 - Might feel a little off starting the note at 02:08:926 (1) - , but that's actually where the beat starts
03:06:949 - wrong rhythm? should be 1/3, map it like this http://puu.sh/naiiY/76c564cb1f.jpg The whole rhythm here is rather complicated, in beginning it's 1/3, later 1/6, then 1/4, then... ??? So I'll keep the rhythm here a simple 1/4 rhythm for now, might just fk it and map 1/2 slider or something if it's necessary
03:18:461 (3) - hidden repeat sign I think it's enough time for to read the hidden repeat sign?
03:32:414 (3) - NC? Alright
03:33:112 (3) - NC? ^
03:37:996 (1) - this repeat slider is actually hold longer than the following one, but this slider hidden in the notes there make it very confusing, actually you made this slider higher velocity before if i no mistaken and i found it better for reading Alright, increased the SV
04:43:228 (1,2,3) - better you make both sliders repeat 5 times Opps, bad mistake here. Fixed!

bye

Black Emptiness wrote:

the faith of truth:
* 00:31:629 (4,1) - Aesthetically speaking, this connection between these two notes is not nice. Try to use the same distance snap or move the stream (starts from 00:31:717 (1) - ) down. I think it fits nicely here, emphasizing on the change in beat at 00:31:717 (1) - where it gets less intense, that's why the spacing in lower starting from here
* 01:13:578 (3) - This note is really hard to read. I recommend to place it where slider 01:13:926 (1) - starts. It's pretty fine here. No issues from various testplays I've seen
* 01:45:845 (8,9,1,2) - It would be nice to see the same stream shape as here: 01:46:629 (4,5,6,7,8) - . I tried using curvy pattern before for that pattern, it doesn't seem it fits the pattern with the upcoming curvy stream
* 02:05:903 (1) - New combo is unnecessary here. That NC is to clearly tell that there's a change in rhythm starting from this point.
* 02:08:926 (1) - Same here. Similar, NC use to identify that this slider is different from the others
* 02:26:484 (3,1) - You can blanket 02:26:484 (3) - a bit better. Looks perfect to me
* 02:28:228 (1,2,3,4) - Is this "not stacking" on purpose? If not, you should fix it. This is intentional
* 02:43:577 (1,2,3,4) - Try Ctrl+J. It will look better. I'll stick to my current pattern, looks nice as it is
* 04:15:321 (1) - The slider is occupied by a circle-shaped stream and it's quite bad to read. As I mentioned before, maybe placing it somewhere else would help. Is not really that difficult to read due to the high AR
* 04:41:396 (4,1,2) - Make a round pattern / cleaner pattern (not sharp) like you did before with the "8 pattern". The reason why I didn't stick with the "8" stream pattern here because there's obvious change in the song intensity here

This is my first mod and first post. I didn't find anything else.

He's right ^
Good luck, Scarlet.

Bara- wrote:

Heyo

[General]
• Files unused:
{albumartsmall.jpg} {folder.jpg}
Strange thing, this seems to happen for most of the maps I check nowadays, is it maybe something which happened on my PC (as I recently added some "images" to music to send it to my iPhone
Pretty sure these files aren't in my folder
[tfot]
00:01:193 (2) - Please s[ace them, a stack felt rather awkward, as the music sounds like 1/4 (or is it 1/6?) Kinda, changed direction here
00:24:740 (4) - To keep consistency, NC this as well (to Nc every beat) Hmm, alright
00:25:089 (6) - ^^ Don't think there's a need for NC for this though
00:25:786 (1,1) - This jump is rather awkward, due to high spacing, and having the same DS as the next 1/4 objects. People might think (1) starts at the blue tick, and therefore miss Most testplays I've seen so far doesn't have a problem playing this part. Hmm, I'll reduce 00:25:786 (1) - by 1/8 beat then
01:43:926 (1,2,3,4) - Rotate it pleast, so it flow better into the next set of objects, like you do with the next 8 notes! Alright~
01:46:368 (1) - Why is there an NC? The piano at this part is rather different than the one before, also a small change in stream spacing at this point too
02:04:507 (4,7) - NC both for more emphasis on the beat Alright~
02:08:926 (1) - Shouldn't it start 1/6 earlier? Actually the beat clearly starts at 02:08:926 - that's why I map it there. But then feels a little off starting 1/6 later than the red tick. Will follow yours then
02:55:786 (1) - OMG SUCH A NICE SLIDER Thanks~
03:33:635 (2) - Please Ctrl G to make it a bit more easier to hit Yup, it is
03:33:984 (2) - ^^ ^
03:34:333 (2) - ^^ ^
04:39:653 (8,1) - Why is this at a lower DS compared to the rest? Adjusted the whole streams here
04:54:740 (5,1) - ^^ Adjusted whole 1/4 slider jumps here
04:58:926 (1) - Since the music is quite silent in the break, why not stack it under 04:58:519 (1) - to give it more emphasis Nah, feel really awkward to remain on the same spot for the last name. Making it further also complements well with the finish too!

I love this map
I hope your GD will be like this
Call me when it's fixed for bubble

arronlim13 wrote:

Nothing i can really do here, all i can do is shoot a kudosu star <3

Nice map btw :3

ffstar0716 wrote:

holy shiet it is bubbled OwO so mow
where 2nd bubble..................

SYAHME wrote:

I like your mapping style, go approved.

BeatofIke wrote:

Minor things fixed. Good luck!
This is bubble #2~

pishifat wrote:

snapping stuff:
01:08:693 (3) - snapping in entirely 1/6 or separating between 1/8 and 1/6 is more acceptable. the part before the red tick is sort of ambiguous about snapping and the part afterwards is clearly 1/6, so like using 1/8 for 1/6 doesnt really work
Yea, changing to 1/6 should solve the problem
01:17:763 (3) - same as 01:17:589 (2) - (so 1/6). mapping the same thing in the song with differnet rhythm is umwhat
Changed this small section to 1/6
01:26:048 (3,4,5) - 3 is 1/6 then 4 and 5 are 1/4
Alright
01:31:194 (3,4,5) - 1/6
ALright
01:43:054 (3) - 1/4
Don't think so, clearly sounds like a 1/6 to me
some piano stuff in the kiais aren't exactly right, but i think those were discussed on rlc's map with the result of "just do whatever sounds ok snapping is dumb there"
Well, hopefully is fine for mine xd
not snapping stuff:
01:29:275 (1,2,3) - and 01:29:973 (1,2,1) - song is repeating the same rhythm for so rhythm should reflect that
Didn't really notice that lel, fixed!
02:05:554 (1) - transitions into the 1/3 section better if tail of this is snapped in 1/3 as well
Alright
02:08:228 (3) - sv change isnt being applied because green line is in the wrong place
LOL, never noticed this. Fixed!
03:10:002 - missing something on the main instrument (which you prioritize everywhere after here)
Followed the rhythm from other similar parts
03:26:833 (2,3,4,5,6,7) - 03:28:228 (2,3,4,5) - can't tell what you're trying to follow with rhythm here. 03:27:095 (4) - makes me think you want to follow the main instrument, but you ignore the same sounds on 03:26:920 - 03:27:443 - . be clearer about what you're following in the music here
Hopefully is fine now xd
03:28:926 (1) - holy strongest sound of the phrase and it's on a sliderend could you like do something about it
Alright
03:34:682 (2) - are u missing a repeat on this lol
Never really noticed this lel, fixed!
03:59:275 (1) - song is really making these blue ticks stand out. rhythm should show that
Yup, followed your rhythm
04:43:228 (1,2) - a lot more intuitive to click between each white tick rather than on some 1/6 tick
Alright
if you can do something about these i'll rebub

[ -Scarlet- ] wrote:

01:43:054 (3) - 1/4
Don't think so, clearly sounds like a 1/6 to me

pishifat wrote:

[ -Scarlet- ] wrote:

01:43:054 (3) - 1/4
Don't think so, clearly sounds like a 1/6 to me

object 2 is clearly 1/6, but 3 is clearly 1/4 they're the same instrument so comparing should make it obvious

and u ended up changing 01:17:938 (4) - for some pattern thing but it's still 1/4, not 1/6

pishifat wrote:

9223372036854775807

MrSergio wrote:

wow, am I late for the party or...
Anyway, recheck from #modreqs.

Looks like the snaps provided by pishi work well and I see no other problems

7085774586302733229

Bara- wrote:

Placeholder
I'll look at it tomorrow, I was quite busy irl recently

Rumia- wrote:

happening man