1. Nightmare (4,89 stars, 1275 notes)

Lasse wrote:

m4m reply

00:14:566 (2,3) - 00:14:566 (2,3) - the angle those make looks really bad, move 3 down to blanket or 00:14:566 (2,3,4) - make this thing symmetric make symmtrical slider
00:27:052 I think there should be a not here, even if you want to stay with the vocals. I puts a nice emphasis on the beat in the bg, which should not be left out well

00:28:439 (3,4) - why is this stacked? The pitch of the vocals is going so high here, it warrants much more spacing, not the same as the way weaker vocals on 00:27:745 (1,2) - suggestion: good idea

SPOILER

see 00:31:560 (4,5,6) - , there the sudden stack actually fits with the vocals!

00:29:826 strong vocal, should probably be clickable ok
00:32:601 such a strong noise, how about mapping a 1.5/1 slider on it => until 00:33:121 ? well, I listened to your advice, but I do not think it is a good idea

00:37:456 (3) - you are putting not enough emphasis on the strong vocals on 00:37:803 imo, also completely ignoring strong beat by skipping 00:38:150
maybe sth like this?

SPOILER

done

00:38:843 (1,2,3,4) - feels off, slider ending on 00:40:231 etc reworked
00:38:843 (1) - s1/1 slider here, goes better with vocals + instrument
sugegsting one of those:

SPOILER

00:41:618 (1,2,3) - would be fine if those were higher spaced than 00:42:658 (4,5,6) - to go with the change of pitch in the vocals, suggesting a 2xds triangle + 1.5x ds triangle or something (3 and 6 are stacked) it's fine, i guess

SPOILER

your consistent ds is fine here, but it doesn't really emphasize what it should
00:43:699 pls don't ignore this k

01:01:040 (1,2,3,4) - same thing, 3-4 pitch is much higher than 1-2 I do not understand what you mean, patterns are arranged symmetrically and looks good

01:03:468 pls don't ignore this but there is no sound
01:05:895 ^ 1/1 slider maybe? yep

01:06:589 (1) - finish or sth here not necessary
01:17:687 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - 1/1 sliders louder drum/normal head and a more quiet soft tail would make for the same buildup without making it feel so empty and without ignoring so much in the music i think it's ok

01:23:236 (1) - idk but nc spam might actually make this look better sure
01:26:011 (9) - put a sldier until the blue tick before the spinner here (01:27:658), it goes so well with those vocals
or completely remove the spinner and do it like this. Helps to build some suspense before the "drop" (is that even a drop?) add circles under vocal

SPOILER

01:32:080 (3,4) - do those thung really need to be perfectly ontop of each other? bad to read imo, this goes for all the times this happen so I won't mention more of it. just space the two sliderheads little bit maybe? I do not agree. I spent a few testplays, and it's very easy to read. I do not see this as a problem


01:32:947 (1,2,3,4,5) - this image should explain it better tahn writing a paragraph about it fixed

SPOILER

01:35:375 (5,1,2) - bad angle for this imo, rotate 01:35:895 (2,3,4) - for much more fluid motion fixed

SPOILER

01:54:450 (4) - looks bad, make the red anchor more symmetric and it will look better, example suggestion: no,it's fine

SPOILER

01:54:797 (5,1,2) - those wide angles make for bad flow here yea

02:03:988 (5,6) - I said I won't mention this perfect-stack pattern anymore, but it's really bad for this one, it looks like one weird slider here, not like two, epsecially with ar9 when you see them both at the same time. You donÄt even have parts of them overlapping to make it clearer

02:15:606 (8) - the 1/8 actually only starts on 02:15:693 probably, but if i put 1/8 on 02:15:693 its will do not readable for game
02:21:156 (8) - ^
i mean hitting 5x1/4 feels better for many players, but it stil doen't go with the music :/
02:26:705 (8) - ^
02:32:254 (8) - ^

02:21:849 (2) - this one of the strongest "wubs" but perfectly straight... I wait for more opinions about it
02:22:543 (4) - ^
02:23:236 (5) - ^

02:27:919 (7,8,1) - looks bad I do not think so, although

02:33:294 (6) - damn you ignore all the 1/4 here, at least make it a repeating 1/4 slider instead, will still go with the thing you mapped it to but not leave out all the 1/4 remapped
02:34:682 (1) - ^
02:33:988 (1) - 1/4 is much quieter here, so it feel fine to ignore it in this case

02:35:722 (2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9) - how about this, it doesn't ignore the 1/4 but still plays (nearly) the same as yours: no no no, I really like the fact that is now displayed

SPOILER

02:37:109 (2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9) - ^
02:40:924 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9) - ^
02:42:312 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9) - ^
this pattern happens again later in the song, I won't mention it again since it will just be the same suggestion

02:46:387 you are pretty much ignoring this, put a circle here and make 02:46:129 (12) - a 1/2 slider

02:46:820 (2,3,4,5) - have you tried making all of those repeat 1/4 sliders instead? Seems to go better iwth the music for me those ticks rather weak sound, but looks interesting
02:48:208 (2,3,4,5) - ^

02:50:635 (1,4) - you are ignoring so much here, and this happens more than once in your map, how about making them 1/4 sliders? remapped

02:57:572 (1) - this part is much calmer than before, yet you still use the same sv and mostly 1.5x spacing. I'd suggest toning this down a bit since it doesn't really go well with the music 1x sv might be fine sure, done

03:19:768 (1) - basically a repeat of the intro, so what I said there goes for here too it's fine

04:23:583 - long slow slider owuld be so much better here idk, I listen to other opinions

04:38:410 dont ignore this sure
04:43:699 (3) - very strong wub but no wub slider? I think this slider perfectly reflects the essence
05:02:080 (8) - see 1/8 way above
05:07:630 (8) - ^
05:13:179 (8) - ^

05:17:341 (8) - bad slider for this ok

05:22:283 (1) - same as mentioned way earlier
05:23:583 (2) - ^
05:27:745 (2) - ^

05:34:682 (2,3,4,5) - the "try repeat slider" instead thing again

05:25:664 (9) - wub and no wub slider? nah
05:36:589 (7) - ^

05:37:109 (1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2,3,1) - idk about this, it's so clumped together and always blocking about half of it it's fine, i guess

05:38:843 (1) - you know already

good luck with the map

1. 01:33:468 (5,6) - I think it would look better if they overlapped instead of being stacked. Maybe move 01:33:468 (5) around (x:119 y:226) and change the direction a little bit.
2. 01:44:566 (5)- Same, move it around (x:221 y:225)? There is the same pattern ^ many times so it's up to you if you want to change it.
3. 02:05:375 - Missing a circle?
4. 02:18:121 (7) - This is on a blue tick and it doesn't have a good flow. I think it's better to fill the gap between 02:17:947 and 02:18:728 with a round stream ending on 02:18:728 (1)
5. 02:34:508 - Adding a circle is better IMO.

xDarxen wrote:

Alright, here's the mod

[General]
Maybe increase the AR and OD a little bit? Like, around AR 9.3 and OD 8? Just a preference tho. okay, changed OD to 8

[Fear]

1. 01:33:468 (5,6) - I think it would look better if they overlapped instead of being stacked. Maybe move 01:33:468 (5) around (x:119 y:226) and change the direction a little bit. I really do not understand why no one likes these stacks. They are ideal for playing and easy for read. I'm not going to change them, except that if it unrankable
2. 01:44:566 (5)- Same, move it around (x:221 y:225)? There is the same pattern ^ many times so it's up to you if you want to change it.
3. 02:05:375 - Missing a circle? no, it's alright. sound begins on blue tick
4. 02:18:121 (7) - This is on a blue tick and it doesn't have a good flow. I think it's better to fill the gap between 02:17:947 and 02:18:728 with a round stream ending on 02:18:728 (1) yea
5. 02:34:508 - Adding a circle is better IMO. but there is no sound

That's all. Amazing job, good luck making it ranked!

Xinely wrote:

from m4m

• 
  Insane

1. Raise OD to 8 or 8,5.. this is insane diff afterall selecting OD I tried to rely on other Receptor marathons, so I think that would be enough OD8
2. 00:09:364 (4,5,6) - somehow same spacings play a bit too easy and boring for me. i think just increase the shape a bit like https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/3898913 changed, probably
3. 00:32:254 (6) - i would say move to 336,360 for give a movement to emphasize the vocal, it's high tone afterall so i think stack just play a bit weird you are right
4. 00:33:988 (2) - just for design i would say to curve the slider a bit down, just somehow see straight slider here suddenly a bit weird hm, i think it's looks fine
5. 00:38:150 - really not map piano here? altho you look following vocal here but piano is loud and important to map changed before
6. 00:46:473 - until 01:04:508 - somehow i cant understand about all your clap hitsounds here in the background music just appears faint popping sound. Maybe they really do not need, I will listen to other opinions
7. 00:50:635 (2) - hmm i kinda dislike your tail position here since it's near with previous slider's tail. look not really well for me. i would say move the tail position to 188,48 and if you agree with that, move 00:51:329 (3) - to 92,92 k
8. 01:06:589 (1) - drum finish on head would be great sure
9. 01:23:583 (2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9) - NC all of them because increasing the spacings changed before
10. 01:30:780 - add circle, the music is loud and important for dnb style sure
11. 01:32:254 (4) - in tail sampleset soft please, the music has no music and hitnormal sounds annoying I do not know anything about hitsounds so I'm just going to listen to you xD
12. 01:32:601 (5) - same as above
13. 01:36:242 (5) - 0,98x spacing after tail is so.. somehow not really well to play, after you did a jump to catch this slider. i would say move this slider like http://puu.sh/l5j0A/dec5eddb13.jpg wel
14. 01:38:236 - the music is loud here so imo this time should be mapped. i would suggest a slider from here until 01:38:410 - in fact, I just want to highlight claps here
15. 01:39:017 - same as above but for this time i will suggest add circle instead it's overmapp, i think
16. 01:41:098 - a sound tick for this time and blue tick is same so if you map that blue tick, i would say map the red tick as well , 01:40:924 (5) - end the slider at red tick and add circle in blue tick? okay
17. 01:43:265 - just curious why you ignore to map drum here when it sounds so strong idk xD
18. 01:49:942 (2) - hmm finish somehow sounds so loud and not really well to hear for me. i would say remove it since the music itself only a drum
19. 01:55:838 (6) - this low spacing definitely plays bad for me, ugh, according your flow.. i cant suggest a better place here. let u to decide by yourself changed before
20. 01:57:225 (4) - same as 01:32:254 (4) -
21. 02:28:179 (8) - cant read it because almost all body covered by previous slider changed, probably
22. 02:30:780 (7) - 184,268 to keep your stream flow pls k
23. 02:33:641 (4,1) - weird spacing gap, better make jump or normal spacing or stack them make a normal spacing
24. 02:44:652 (8) - 340,320 to make better flow on stream nice
25. 03:18:554 - map pls. tick sound so loud well
26. 04:13:612 - 04:14:393 - are same with 01:38:236 - and 01:39:017 - same

good luck ~

edit : oh i started mod this from yesterday so im sorry if i already say what you had changed before

The Fetish wrote:

M4M Reply.

00:03:468 (3) - This blanket looks ugly to me, move it back a tiny bit so its not overlapping with the Approach Circle.
00:07:630 (5) - Same with this one
00:08:323 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - The equal spacing here doesn't fit the changes in the music too well for me. Try moving the 5 down a bit to give some emphasis on that low note. changed before
00:34:682 (3) - Blanket isnt 100% perfect.
00:55:491 (1) - Again here.
01:05:895 (6) - This blanket issue all over the map, so Ill just label them as "Blanket issues" to save me explaining it every time. But this is the same as my first two points.
01:32:080 (3,4) - In general, I found all these sliders boring and weird to play. It stops any flow and movement you have. Consider trying something else. Ill give an example. https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/3902847 This adds a bit more movement to keep things interesting. Ctrl+g Might work well enough as well. I wrote about this in previous mods
01:34:942 (3,4) - I hear a note on the red tick here, make it a triple or something similar. but i can't do this, there is no sound
01:39:884 (1) - Blanket issue. Too Close. nope, lol
01:42:658 (1) - Blanket. Too close again.
01:50:982 (1) - Blanket Too close.
01:55:664 (5) - Something like https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/3902852 Might work better. Creates a nice curve movement. good idea
01:57:138 (3,4) - Same as before, I hear something on this red tick.
02:13:179 (1) - From this point on, I found a lot of these streams to be pointlessly ugly. Consider smoothing most of them out. 02:26:358 (4,5,6,7,8) - This one as an example of a bad one.
02:44:219 (3,4,5,6,7,8,9,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12) - The pitch gets higher on each of these 3 streams. Consider increasing the spacing for each to match that. remapped
02:54:797 (1) - I almost broke here because the slow SV surprised me, consider upping the SV a bit. k
02:58:092 (3,4,5,6,7) - Parts like this I didnt enjoy, I think you should up the spacing after the first slider to the next, Ill post an example. https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/3902887 And another example. https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/3902890 not think that there needs be jumps, the music is really calm
03:05:895 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10) - Try something similar to https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/3902892 for this part. Looks a little cleaner changed, probably
03:07:456 (2,2) - These are so close you may as well stack them. it is a trifle
03:14:566 (3,4,5,6) - This section is way too clustered. Space everything out to create some flow. fixed
03:46:127 (3) - Pull this down a tiny little bit to make the blanket look better.
03:55:838 (1) - ^
04:09:710 (1,2,3,4) - Try something like this instead. Much more interesting to play. https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/3902903 Just switch 2 and 3 around. Then Ctrl+g 4. well
04:15:953 (3) - Fix Blanket.
04:19:421 (1) - ^
04:30:867 (2) - Move this a bit so it isnt touching the previous slider. Do the same for any other sections that are the same. oups
04:32:167 (2,1) - Again, needs something on the red tick.
04:45:086 (6) - Blanket is a little off.
04:47:514 (7) - Consider making this a slider, and reshaping the streams to fit. Theres definitely a note on that blue tick. hm idk, maybe later
05:37:109 (1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2,3,4,1,2,3) - This was pretty difficult to read for the difficulty of this map. You may want to consider remapping this part.
05:41:271 (1) - Same as before, SV may cause a miss. Consider increasing it.

I didnt really notice any issues with hitsounding. And theres several issues that I didnt point out but are the exact same as ones I did, I just didnt need to point out every single one. Instead I just gave you a general idea. Also its really late at night so sorry if I missed anything.

Anyways, GL.

Loony Key wrote:

М4М queue

SPOILER

1. 01:08:670 (1,1,1,1,1,1,1) - может завернуть в другую сторону, начиная отсюда 01:10:751 (1,1,1,1) - во первых вылезает за пределы сетки, а во вторых начиная отсюда 01:12:138 (1,1) - не пропорциональное уменьшение DS, смотрится не очень красиво сдвинул чуть влево
2. Кстати если хочешь, то можешь продолжить ставить ноту на "пау" или "бау" до сюда 01:15:606, и как раз в этом моменте DS будет примерно 0.1 или меньше, а потом спинер не
3. 01:23:236 (1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1) - музыка вроде в одном темпе, почему DS так изменяется резко, не понятно Не совсем. Да, характер хлопков не меняется, то само фоновое напряжение увеличивается, из-за чего увеличение ДС вполне нормально
4. 01:55:664 (5,6) - кажется лучше такие моменты чуть раздвинуть, Ds 0.15 что ли, или 0.2 сделать там все заремапано
5. 02:00:346 (2) - аналогично, четок не удобно, и лучше чтоб чуть выдвинута ноту было все очень удобно, сам проверял
6. 03:40:578 (5) - за пределами сетки, далеко за пределами, опустить придется ИЛИ 03:40:578 (5) - заменяем на ноты 03:40:578 и 03:40:924 и ставим на вжикивание слайдер 03:41:098-03:41:878 сдвинул немного вниз. И вообще выход за пределы сетки допустим, если ноты не касаются ХПбара и прочих вещей
   
   Чтоб 7 слайдер на картинке обязательно примерно так же соприкасался с 1 слайдером, по моему будет прикольно
7. 03:58:612 (1,2,3,4,5,1,2,3,4,5,6) - тут вроде как темп начинает меняться (увеличиваться), предлагаю чуток увеличить DS Сделал немного по своему
8. 04:08:843 (3,4) - может такие моменты сделать типо такого? nope
   
   ИЛИ
   
9. Если продолжать мапать не будешь, то советую обрезать песню здесь 05:54:277, дабы уменьшить вес карты [/color]

DahplA wrote:

M4M

Fear

1. I thought the minimum Audio Lead-In was set at 2000? okay
2. Personally, I would raise the AR slightly for easier readability, considering how many streams this has. well, 9.1 is fine i guess
3. 01:40:231 (2) - Stack is slightly off done
4. 01:42:658 (1) - The blanket here seems too sharp. Double check this fxd
5. 01:47:514 (4) - Personally, I feel the positioning of 4 is really awkward as its hidden with 2. I suggest reworking this pattern here. well
6. 02:05:462 (3) - Starting a stream on the blue tick might be too punishing for players who aren't expecting it. I suggest extending out 02:05:202 (2) - to a 1/2, similar to this pattern 01:42:658 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - . This map does seem to be more complex focused, so only take this as a suggestion. It begins with the sound of a blue tick, but I'm afraid it's really uncomfortable. Add circle here
7. 02:40:490 (8,9,10) - What happened to the flow here. It creates a really wonky movement here if the stream sharply turns that angle, not to mention the outwards facing slider at the end. I recommend just having it the stream curve in a linear fashion rather than this. lol, idk why I did it so badly
8. 03:08:150 - This creates an inconsistency by leaving this note out, as you've mapped this note in the past combos prior to this. I suggest adding a circle here (even though it sounds like it's meant to be a double). Either than, or to actually map doubles instead of triples for these sounds. so, I purposely miss the sound here because I want to highlight the end of the 1/2 song (of this interval). Personally, I think it sounds great
9. 00:04:855 (5,6) - Personally I think this movement is awkward and can be substituted for something much better. http://puu.sh/l6DFl/c8f91c4e38.PNG good idea

Who are you? I've never heard of your maps but this is something else. Everything seems to be well executed from my eyes. I love this map. GL with getting it ranked. I'm FCL. Actually, I wanted to write here a big wall of text about how I did this map and a lot another of interesting things, but change my mind

Euny wrote:

m4m! came from my queue♥

• Fear

1. 01:23:236 (1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1) - this is really no need to. nc spam is not necessary. since you used 1 combo for previous time line(01:17:687 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - ) if its ds intentional, also dont need to cause ds increase with regularly. i guess that nc here is fine,because spacing becomes more over time
2. 02:54:797 (1) - looks ez to break combo. hard to find way to tail. hm, i don't think so. I will listen to more opinions
3. 03:16:994 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9) - you can improve this star flow try to using 'ctrl shift D' will help you. i am lazy for use it here xD
4. 03:36:763 (2,3) - replace (3) for better blanket like 03:59:306 (3,4,5) - them ok
5. 04:09:710 (1,2) - what happend with there. just, ctrl G for (1) and avoid overlap with (2) will be better. screen shot will help you rly bad patterns, thanks)
   
   SPOILER

   
6. 04:38:063 (3) - isnt hard to read? just stack with next object's head probably, stacked
7. 05:32:687 (1) - this slider must start at 05:32:774 here. cause new part start at there. just add note for 05:32:687- here and move slider.
   fxd
8. 05:41:271 (1) - lost way slider again too

interesting. thanks for mod my map and gl with this

1. 00:32:601 (1) - The hitsounds don't really fit the song. The sound is a rather high pitch, yet you use a low pitched drum-hitclap. Consider using soft-hitwhistle, or a custom sample
2. 01:17:687 (1) - Probably me, but this is quite inaudible
3. 01:35:028 (4) - Shouldn't a normal-hitclap fit better for the head?
4. 02:42:658 (2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9) - Whistles on the odd numbers instead of the even numbers sounds much better, and follows the music better! (Applies to the part starting at 05:22:196 (1) - as well!)
5. 02:46:820 (2,3,4,5) - ^^ (Slidertail here )
6. 02:48:208 (2,3,4,5) - Wouldn't drum Finishes feel better for the heads?
7. 02:52:369 (2,3,4,5) - See 2 above
8. 04:47:514 (7) - The gap here feels awkward, why not make this a 1/4 slider?
9. 05:38:756 (3,1) - This jump O.o So large