xi - ANiMA

posted
Total Posts
104
show more
ZZHBOY
seems fine for me, bubbled~!
jonathanlfj
ZZH叫我来的

[Mofeng's LV.4]
用CS3.5 - 3.7会有更好的难度分配
01:02:970 (1) - 转盘可以从01:02:643开始
01:30:436 (1,3,1,3) - 这些可以换成1/2折返,反正打起来是一样的

[LV.6]
00:30:109 (5) - 间距
00:54:141 (2) - 之后相似的节奏都没有再用过1/3,这里还是用1/2吧

[Dynamix's LV.8]
AR有点虚高,用8.3就行
01:03:951 (4) - 其实这里再加个repeat也没有问题
01:08:201 (1,2) - 实在是不太美观,可以把01:08:201 (1) 挪到 01:07:220 (3,4) - 这里然后再摆之后的
01:41:062 (2) - 间距再远一些跟之后的1/3能有对比

[Spring's LV.10]
00:34:523 (3) - 用1/6
01:07:547 (5,6) - 离得有点太近了
01:41:226 (2,3,4,5) - 这里离01:40:899 (1) 再远一些
01:43:842 (3,4) - 超级难读,最好不要stack

[LV.11]
01:00:517 (1) - NC去掉
01:24:795 - 这里感觉缺一个音,可以放圈到01:24:877 (4) 头上
01:37:629 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - 这里非常容易断,建议你用两个1/8的折返滑条代替
01:42:861 (1,2,3,4) - 间距再小一点
Hakurei Yoru
臭奶呆
Topic Starter
liaoxingyao

Hakurei Yoru wrote:

臭奶呆
你在大声什么啦
Topic Starter
liaoxingyao

jonathanlfj wrote:

ZZH叫我来的 @ZZHGIRL

[Mofeng's LV.4]
用CS3.5 - 3.7会有更好的难度分配
01:02:970 (1) - 转盘可以从01:02:643开始 这个保留
01:30:436 (1,3,1,3) - 这些可以换成1/2折返,反正打起来是一样的 这样得重摆好多东西啊..

[LV.6]
00:30:109 (5) - 间距
00:54:141 (2) - 之后相似的节奏都没有再用过1/3,这里还是用1/2吧

[Dynamix's LV.8]
AR有点虚高,用8.3就行
01:03:951 (4) - 其实这里再加个repeat也没有问题 总感觉会被挑..先保留好了
01:08:201 (1,2) - 实在是不太美观,可以把01:08:201 (1) 挪到 01:07:220 (3,4) - 这里然后再摆之后的
01:41:062 (2) - 间距再远一些跟之后的1/3能有对比

[Spring's LV.10]
00:34:523 (3) - 用1/6
01:07:547 (5,6) - 离得有点太近了
01:41:226 (2,3,4,5) - 这里离01:40:899 (1) 再远一些
01:43:842 (3,4) - 超级难读,最好不要stack

[LV.11]
01:00:517 (1) - NC去掉
01:24:795 - 这里感觉缺一个音,可以放圈到01:24:877 (4) 头上
01:37:629 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - 这里非常容易断,建议你用两个1/8的折返滑条代替
01:42:861 (1,2,3,4) - 间距再小一点 这个还好我觉得
no reply=fixed
谢谢lfj大大
jonathanlfj
Pata-Mon
Ayachi-
WTF
[Crz]Makii
性药怒飞std
Topic Starter
liaoxingyao

jonathanlfj wrote:


感谢lfj大大
yf_bmp
nbnb 恭喜性药
those
[11]
01:03:787 (7) - risky http://puu.sh/oErp2.png
01:42:861 (1,2,3,4) - first time in the entire map using this 1/6 pattern, probably not a good idea. This could work http://puu.sh/oErSm.png
Topic Starter
liaoxingyao

yf_bmp wrote:

nbnb 恭喜性药
nbnb
谢谢爱抚
hehe

those wrote:

[11]
01:42:861 (1,2,3,4) - first time in the entire map using this 1/6 pattern, probably not a good idea. This could work http://puu.sh/oErSm.png
in my opinion, perfectly readable and fine, its a pretty common technique. i agree with the other point though, otherwise great map, congrats!
J_8579
Nice diff names.
Kuo Kyoka
WTF
Topic Starter
liaoxingyao

Kuo Kyoka wrote:

WTF
WTF
[ A v a l o n ]
WTF i'm surprised :o
Karen

those wrote:

[11]
01:03:787 (7) - risky http://puu.sh/oErp2.png
this is the only one weird thing in this diff in my opinion :?

Spring diff
01:50:054 - it should be clickable right?
some spacing issues 00:15:558 (4,1,2) - 00:17:029 (9,1,2) - 00:26:676 (2,3,4) -
00:45:313 (3,4) - is there any deeper reason for not emphasizing the downbeat 00:45:313 (3) -
00:50:545 (3,4) - ^
01:47:111 (8,9) - ^
00:52:915 - pretty empty
01:18:992 (3,4) - confusing spacing, it's almost the same with 01:18:665 (1,2) -

小学生图好啊,教教我
Fycho

those wrote:

[11]
01:03:787 (7) - risky http://puu.sh/oErp2.png

Karen wrote:

Spring diff
some spacing issues 00:15:558 (4,1,2) - 00:17:029 (9,1,2) - 00:26:676 (2,3,4) -
01:18:992 (3,4) - confusing spacing, it's almost the same with 01:18:665 (1,2) -
These concerns mentioned on the thread seem valid to me, please figure them out!
show more
Please sign in to reply.

New reply