Irreversible wrote:
Zexion wrote:
@Irre: why is Drezi null-town? Just because he voted Jess early game for that silly read? I hardly find that enough content to assume that. MB (magic bomb) being null-scum for the excess of questions I suppose?
He got my towncred for pointing out good quotes, also seems to pay attention.
You never answered about MB tho, I would like to ask you again.
fartownik wrote:
Frostings wrote:
The read is real. There is no new player that joins his first/second game, gets placed in scumfaction and plays "nonsensical scum" on day 1. I was at L-4 as the game just started, and so I gave my honest reads to let you all know that I am actually paying attention to this game, not just making trash posts for no reason. I don't know why you keep bringing up Irre and the last game either, when this is a new game and different things happen. Not sure if you think I'm scum acting naive, but, believe it or not, I'm one of the people actually making analysis here, unlike half the others.
Your posts are filled with hypocrisy: "More scumpoints to you, you're digging a grave" because I make a "weak" read on one person? Take a look at yourself and what you're doing to me right now. You make a scumread on me (off of what?) and now you're trying to backup your arguments with absolutely no evidence
They don't need to pretend to play nonsensical scum to be nonsensical. They simply have no idea what they're doing thus they can do anything. I don't like your read at all. The fact that you make analysis doesn't make you Town. There's most likely scum in the lurking, but that's not the rule. Also really? Mafia is all about assumptions, much less evidence. You can't really have 'evidence' on anyone in this game if you really want to go there, you can only assume to a certain point and base your actions on those assumptions. So far I assume you're a good candidate for being scum, that's all. I've made my points in previous posts, they may be trivial to you, but they're more or less scumtells to me.
Just to add to the meaning of this: While I agree with most of the post, I would have to disagree with the evidence part: there are some mechanics that could allow such evidence to exist, but for the most part, it is a game of assumptions and conversation.
Also the Frostings thing felt really forced, like if you were trying to desperately prove him as scum... Also what's the point on being so aggresive, like:
fartownik wrote:
Frostings wrote:
We make assumptions based on evidence. You're just admitting that your accusations are empty
You're seriously starting to annoy the fuck out of me. I'm not even gonna answer this.
This really felt unnecesary and could have been answered in a better way... I know he you had a lot of reasons you already posted to lynch him but the way you did it didn't felt right.
Tess wrote:
That's the thing I don't like about how things have been going so far. Nothing stands out in particular. Except for one thing, but it's fairly subtle. It'd take me too long to explain, considering the way things are going right now. So, I'm waiting for you guys to fuck up.
Please don't be a secretive player. That would make me scumread you for the entirety of the game. If you don't have the intention to explain a certain thing, then don't mention you have that thing. (you get the idea, right?)
- Magic Bomb - wrote:
I want to know if Sniverre's vote on Frostings was just a random vote or a legit vote, because it was done at a grey area, around when RVS ended, and if it is a legit vote, why did you vote him so early on?
Seems to me Sniverre was on RVS yet. Do you suspect them as scum with only two posts?
-----------------------------
3 AM here. Stopping for now.
Also on a game-unrelated thing: is there anyway to know how to address each player (he, she) that could really help me make my posts lol.
